Sabitlenmiş Tweet
FOI report for the #lucyletby case
whatdotheyknow.com/request/521287…
Prenatal and neonatal fatalities from 2013 - 2017, Countess of Chester hospital
English
CΣRI
6.8K posts
CΣRI
@Inst_amp_C
Quéri Morrís... https://t.co/w4mG9fc06c
Scotland Katılım Ağustos 2022
159 Takip Edilen252 Takipçiler
@IAMPiqpi @Dudukemerald Gosh, and the day of the submersible Titan's implosion.
English
First time I've seen this kind of pattern 🤔
According to Grok there is no precedent.
GF is Cooking 🕊️✨🙏
English
@IAMPiqpi @Dudukemerald The day they gave evidence about child K in the Lucy Letby trial. A child, who despite being born at 23 weeks gestation, they said MUST have been DELIBERATELY killed by a hardworking young nurse...hilarious. Can you spot the hitch in the stitch-up?
English
@lilyally98 A narcissist's main appeal is the atmosphere created by their lack of concern for others. Sociopathy doesn't trigger your para-empathetic discomfort because they don't feel any of that. Evil can put you at ease.
English
Just because a man is ugly doesn’t mean he’s a good person
Wisdom@Wisdom_HQ
Who would she choose?
English
@GarrickKingston It's supposed to be humane, but they panic and scream as they're being gassed. I stopped eating pork because of that.
English
Was doing some Letby research, and went back to the December 2024 press stunt. Pulled the audio levels to hear the questions properly, and found this gem.
Taylor's face when he finally hits the brick wall is a picture. We all have our moments, but was Sweeney drunk here?
English
@GarrickKingston I put it in a perfectly normal way, and provided it in logic form, too. If you really couldn't understand it, it's your perception that's being scrambled.
Did you feel a kind of brain fog descend as you tried to read it?
English
@Inst_amp_C I'm saying that it imposes a burden on the reader, when they are forced to try to unscramble information that ~any normal person~ should express in a rational way.
In short, put your arguments forward in a readable way, or stop wasting my time.
English
@GarrickKingston A "lone gunman" alibi would clear the hospital of gross negligence, and with an £8.5M lawsuit already lost, that would have started looking like a very tempting prospect, one that would earn them the good grace of the NHS, too.
English
@GarrickKingston Do you want to know my take on the hospital's motives? Breary was the first to point the finger at Letby, but do you know there were 2 Lucys on the ward? Both with blonde, shoulder-length hair. Not identical, but similar enough in age and appearance to be mistaken at a glance.
English
@GarrickKingston You could have used the second instance to say the same thing in correct grammar, or thought up something new to say in the comedically broken syntax. I can't help but feel you're distracting from the Letby discussion because you don't think you'll win an honest debate.
English
@GarrickKingston Are you saying my syntax effected your understanding of my argument? I have a documentary if that helps:
youtube.com/watch?v=c0R4D5…
YouTube
English
@Inst_amp_C work can't for people deliberately Last other time avoiding of in you put order you bothered you while yourself are creating rational be if it telling to things a
, , , .
English
@k1ng5t0ng4rr1ck@GarrickKingston
@Inst_amp_C You've just done it again, making two sequential replies as separate replies to the same post. No-one can follow what you're saying. Why do you expect me to make the effort to connect your posts when you can't be arsed to do it yourself. Say it in sequential order, or piss off.
QME
@Inst_amp_C You've just done it again, making two sequential replies as separate replies to the same post. No-one can follow what you're saying.
Why do you expect me to make the effort to connect your posts when you can't be arsed to do it yourself.
Say it in sequential order, or piss off.
English
@GarrickKingston But if you can explain what a "normal format" is, I will try.
English
@Inst_amp_C Do you understand that the point of conversation is for dialogue to flow in a sequential and rational order?
If I reply to each of your posts in turn, you will reply to each of my replies in turn and etc ad nauseam. Put your argument into a normal format, and I will address it.
English
@GarrickKingston I provided them both in casual and syllogistic form, so you can take your pick depending on whether you are a natural intellectual or an academic. If you're feeling overwhelmed, let's start from the beginning again and you can tell me why you think Lucy Letby is guilty.
English
@Inst_amp_C For the second time: The way you have structured your posts makes it impossible to address them all directly.
English
CΣRI retweetledi
@GarrickKingston All 3 arguments support that larger claim that Lucy Letby is likely innocent of attempted murder. I'm hearing your denying understanding, but I'm not hearing you actually refute the points with evidence, or show how these are invalid/unsound arguments.
English
@Inst_amp_C As observers have no doubt noticed, you have replied with a series of disconnected posts, all interrelated but in no order. There is therefore no feasible way for me to reconnect them for you and address them as if they're one continuous argument.
English
@GarrickKingston Those 3 arguments cover why murder is not a likely explanation, and how the poisoning could have happened without intent to harm. Are there any loose ends you'd like me to explain, or other reasons you think she's a murderer that you'd like to debate?
English
@Inst_amp_C It's not an ad hominem if it's true.
You're all over the place, swerving from one idea to the next, and never making any effort to join your own unsorted ideas together.
I don't know why you expect to be taken seriously. I certainly can't address such vague and woolly notions.
English
@GarrickKingston Hospitals do have safeguards to prevent this kind of thing, but it's not foolproof. Mistakes do happen. That's a physical fact dictated by the second law of thermodynamics.
English
@GarrickKingston P1: identical twins often get mistaken for eachother
P2: the insulin poisoning cases both had identical twins
C: it's possible that there may have been a mix up with the medication due to the twins being identical
English