De Selby

@theeroamer 1k would be a goddamn steal for a such a priceless artefact.

people on discogs will straight up spend $1000 on a late 80s private press album that sounds like this

@slogdogs let's be honest, though. watching jungle from top pov is like watching two tweakers enthusiastically mowing their lawns while their houses are on fire

@slogdogs You are a beacon of inspiration and entertainment!

Challenger in OCE. 10k Subscribers on Youtube. Twitch Partner. All within the span of 2 weeks. I know I've been doing this thank you stuff a lot these past weeks, but genuinely the support I've received is mindboggling. yorick

@slogdogs Congrats!! (((o(*°▽°*)o)))

TWICTH PARTNER. I've hit so many milestones just within this week, 8k followers on twitch, 9k subs on Youtube AND NOW TWITCH PARTNER. THANK YOU ALL TO EVERYONE WHO HAS SUPPORTED ME AND WATCHED ME. This is just the beginning. The entree to a 7 course meal.

@RavenLynClemens i can see the funny logic of the page, but it's true, the world is full of people that no-one can deny are ultra-attractive, but who are rotten inside. The two have no real connection.

@sleepybisayszzz @michellieart @katriadoodles to be fair, the court ruled in the photographer's favour, the point being that his creative input (setting up his equipment, forming a bond with the monkeys, etc.) was enough to give him legal claim over it. i feel like the AI art thing is even more complex. still stupid though

@michellieart @katriadoodles it is fraud. according to the naruto selfie lawsuit case, only humans can own and create an art to copyright. so he can’t have legal claim over his generative art like NFTs or AI art. if he sells that shit and says it’s his, it isn’t.