Jax-invictus

@MrEugeneStoner @flourinatedfent @BravoKiloActual Only 23% of youth are fit for military duty…. 44% have access to firearms. That’s a concerning gap for “well trained”

@InvictusJax @flourinatedfent @BravoKiloActual And, by the way, I have no problem with the States regulating their militias. I have no problem with that! It's to be expected that they be well trained, outfitted & armed! I just wanted to clear that up.

The second amendment is literally a single sentence. And it has been endlessly tweaked and modified and had all kinds of restrictions placed upon it… yet we are forced to tolerate Chinese and Russian communists sending mothers here to have a U.S. citizen child? Why???

@MrEugeneStoner @flourinatedfent @BravoKiloActual Amazing that it’s been “infringed” upon for 150 years but amazing twitter warrior sad sack just discovered dictionary dot com and now believes guns should not be regulated. You got some screws loose?

@InvictusJax @flourinatedfent @BravoKiloActual "...shall not be infringed." It would behoove you to look up the word "infringe" and apply it to the 2nd Amendment. Now, your ignorance has reached - exceeded - my tolerance level. What that means is we're done here. Enjoy your evening.

@MrEugeneStoner @flourinatedfent @BravoKiloActual And yet states regulate firearms…… and you just whine about it

@InvictusJax @flourinatedfent @BravoKiloActual Dude, you're proving your ignorance over, & over, & over again. Why don't you just sit down, shut up, & take the L.

@MrEugeneStoner @flourinatedfent @BravoKiloActual Presser vs Illinois 1886 States can regulate or ban any organized militia

@InvictusJax @flourinatedfent @BravoKiloActual "The Supreme Court has always held that the second amendment...can be regulated by states." Can you show me where the United States Supreme Court said that the 2nd Amendment "can be regulated by states"?

@MrEugeneStoner @flourinatedfent @BravoKiloActual The Supreme Court has always held that the second amendment is not absolute and can be regulated by states.

@InvictusJax @flourinatedfent @BravoKiloActual And you never addressed my comment, Scooter. x.com/MrEugeneStoner…

@MrEugeneStoner @flourinatedfent @BravoKiloActual Hey you brought up public safety in the gun right debate you lose that every time. It’s a trap Ackbar. All I am saying is every right we have is regulated through acts of congress

@InvictusJax @flourinatedfent @BravoKiloActual You're just not smart enough to catch on we're talking about INFRINGING on my right to keep & bear arms. Intimidation, menacing, aggravated assault, brandishing, et al. - those things I DO with the gun - have always been illegal. You haven't a clue what you're talking about.

@MrEugeneStoner @flourinatedfent @BravoKiloActual Ah so amendments can be regulated if it makes some people uncomfortable????? Sure you wanna play with that stormtrooper

@InvictusJax @flourinatedfent @BravoKiloActual LMAO! Dude, you can't yell shit like that because it incites panic! You can't induce panic, or cause a "normal person" to fear for their safety/life. THAT is what makes it "illegal". Good Lord, boy. Got your Jurisprudence diploma at the Twitter University of Law, did ya? Sit down

@RKBAinCA @flourinatedfent @BravoKiloActual If it goes through congress then it is perfectly legal. What I’m ok with or not doesn’t not matter

@InvictusJax @flourinatedfent @BravoKiloActual So, you’re ok with congressional bans on books. Got it

@MrEugeneStoner @flourinatedfent @BravoKiloActual It’s a restriction on speech. The first amendment is not absolute

@InvictusJax @flourinatedfent @reidhslaughter @BravoKiloActual What, in the actual Hell, does yelling "B*MB!" on an airplane have to do with anything?

@RKBAinCA @flourinatedfent @reidhslaughter @BravoKiloActual Nope, bans just have to be congressional. No right is absolute

@InvictusJax @flourinatedfent @reidhslaughter @BravoKiloActual So, you agree that banning certain guns is unconstitutional. Sweet!

@RKBAinCA @flourinatedfent @reidhslaughter @BravoKiloActual Yes, if there were a constitutional amendment for smoking

@InvictusJax @flourinatedfent @reidhslaughter @BravoKiloActual So, a ban on smoking in restaurants is a complete ban on smoking then. Got it

@RKBAinCA @flourinatedfent @reidhslaughter @BravoKiloActual If the government determines what can and cannot be read in a library (a public benefit) that would be a ban…. They are regulating speech. Ie no rights are without regulations

@InvictusJax @flourinatedfent @reidhslaughter @BravoKiloActual Did I mention you’re bad at this? Books in libraries are paid for by the govt. Refusing to buy books for a library doesn’t mean you can’t go to a bookstore and buy thousands of copies of that book. A ban mean you’re not allowed to possess it

@RKBAinCA @flourinatedfent @reidhslaughter @BravoKiloActual That’s a book ban…..

@InvictusJax @flourinatedfent @reidhslaughter @BravoKiloActual I would say “nice try”, but it’s actually a terrible, garbage attempt. Did you even read the article you posted? They’re not banning books available to the public. They’re banning certain books from being in schools and public libraries.

@MrEugeneStoner @flourinatedfent @reidhslaughter @BravoKiloActual Yeah. Congress. They determine laws in the US….. what is funny?

@InvictusJax @flourinatedfent @reidhslaughter @BravoKiloActual LMAO! Oh, so THOSE are the 'decisions makers' as to whether my right to keep and bear arms in infringed or not! Now I get it! (Now THAT was funny shit right there, @InvictusJax!)

@RKBAinCA @flourinatedfent @reidhslaughter @BravoKiloActual It’s been happening throughout our history starting in the 1600s and it’s currently happening now lithub.com/congressional-…

@InvictusJax @flourinatedfent @reidhslaughter @BravoKiloActual Wrong. Please go back to grade school history class and start over

@MrEugeneStoner @flourinatedfent @reidhslaughter @BravoKiloActual Constitutional freedoms are not absolute. You can’t tell bomb on an airplane either.

@InvictusJax @flourinatedfent @reidhslaughter @BravoKiloActual If I lived in California or Shitcago, or a number of other juridictions, could I own any of my semiauto rifles - those that are referred to as "assault weapons"? If I lived in California or Shitcago, or a number of other juridictions, could I own my 30-round mags? Infringed.

@MrEugeneStoner @flourinatedfent @reidhslaughter @BravoKiloActual Are you taxed for your firearm? Do you have government inspections on your firearms? Can You legally own as many firearms as you want and no one knows? Not infringed

@InvictusJax @flourinatedfent @reidhslaughter @BravoKiloActual Except the 2nd is the only Constitutional right that I'm aware of that says that our Right to keep and bear arms should exist WITHOUT infringement.

@RKBAinCA @flourinatedfent @reidhslaughter @BravoKiloActual Yeah. If passed by Congress.

@InvictusJax @flourinatedfent @reidhslaughter @BravoKiloActual Cool, so the govt could ban any books that criticize the govt then? Because you could still read all the other books out there. I mean, “no right is unlimited”, right?

@NunesMigs @Kazembe_youseef That’s capitalism

@Kazembe_youseef Almost right. You take $1000 - between you and your socialist friends you pocket $500, then you give $100 to 5 other people. You and your friends are richer AND you're up 5 votes. Eventually you'll run out of other people's money, but until then it's all gravy.

If you take $500 from a worker and give $100 to 5 loafers, you lose one vote but gain 5. It’s the biggest pyramid scam in history, and it’s called SOCIALISM.

@flourinatedfent @reidhslaughter @BravoKiloActual That’s not the definition of militia. Why not right individuals??? Also, If you want it to mean people then they have to be well regulated. Not something that most gun owners can aspire to

@InvictusJax @reidhslaughter @BravoKiloActual Regulated militia means the people are you retarded lol