Jobran

@mohamed27549486 @alkhames يعني الخبر صحيح شكرا عالمعلومة

@alkhames الفيديو قديم منذ 11فبراير 2024.والموقع الذي نقلت منه الخبر موقع عنصري يكره المهاجرين والمسلمين خاصة ويحرف المعلومات لصالح أهوائه العنصرية واليمين المتطرف ولن تجده ينقل خبر أعتداء على المسلمين أو المهاجرين .

هذا المهاجر بدلا من ان يبحث عن عمل يعيش منه امتهن الاعتداء على النساء في برشلونه… عموما هو الآن يقضي عقوبة في سجن إسباني جميل جدا مع مساجين يكرهون النساء مثله ويعشقون الرجال مثله.

@Preslavets On the contrary, I think the state of theism is quite sad nowadays, with the fall of argument from design after evolution became validated, there are basically no other arguments other than the cosmological and ontological ones to prove God which are very poor and easily refuted.

If atheism used to be intellectual, asking questions about metaphysics and observing a basic culture of debate, then the atheism of the 21st century is simply terrible, any person who considers himself at least somewhat well-read would be ashamed to consider a boor like Dawkins

@Preslavets @AlpArslan_9yyx You're actually cooking!

@AlpArslan_9yyx When salafis try to philosophize, it turns out to be complete bullshit, fucking awesome, the Arabic language is eternal, because God always knew it, so God knew you before your creation, are you also an eternal being or something?

If the quran is the uncreated word of God, as muslims claim, then a logical question arises. The quran is in arabic, as the quran itself repeatedly emphasizes, so does that mean, ontologically, besides God, Islam has a second eternal language, arabic? Is this really monotheism?

@milil_52 تطقع وأنت لسا بين يدي الله؟

مو كذا ياشيخ !

@Ma_La_Dun @ISi3_ كيف كشفته؟؟ 😨 ما شاء الله أنت مرة عبقري تستاهل تصير محقق! 😱

موظف إستقبال ينقذ طفل من خطر سقوط وشيك.

@2Philosophical_ What is meant by internally consistent? And how do you determine if something is metaphysically possible?

An Ontological Argument 1. If the idea of God is internally consistent, then God is metaphysically possible. 2. If God is metaphysically possible, then God exists. 3. The idea of God is internally consistent. So, 4. God exists.

@DrScotMSullivan So you're gonna make a mumbo jumbo cocktail of failed arguments that have annoyed us for decades with no goon evidence to prove God? Yeah, no thanks!

For centuries, philosophers have offered different “ways” to reason toward the existence of God. I have been developing what I think of as a modern philosophical “Five Ways”: 1. The Ontological Argument: God as Necessary Being 2. The Cosmological Argument: God as First Cause 3. The Teleological Argument: God as Supreme Intelligence and Designer 4. The Deontological (Moral) Argument: God as the Foundation of Objective Moral Obligation 5. The Veritological Argument: God as the Ground of Necessary Truth and Rational Intelligibility Each argument begins from a different feature of reality itself: Being. Causality. Order. Morality. Truth. The progression is important. The arguments ascend from existence itself to mind itself. Is the existence of God rationally self-evident? Why is there causality and contingency? Why is the universe rationally ordered? Why do objective moral obligations exist? Why do necessary and immutable truths exist at all? The final argument especially interests me: the argument from necessary truth. Eternal truths seem difficult to explain within a purely material and contingent universe. Necessary truth appears to point beyond matter toward eternal mind. In many ways, this is deeply Augustinian: Truth itself becomes a road to God.

@KR3Wmatic Bro you don't choose to believe

Is believing in God a safe bet even if we can’t prove His existence? In other words, what do we have to lose by believing? What are the consequences of not believing and it turns out He does exist?

@Thorsten1649 Or because they're friends and don't want one person to sit while the other stands! Why always read the worst intention out of a situation?

Die Statistik und Lebenserfahrung ist der Grund warum der Platz frei bleibt👌🏻

@axismakesperfec @wormymcwormersn No

@wormymcwormersn Yes, of course, but what do you think about it? Men are not "deciding" to do this, any more than you decide to look at a speaker's face or decide to look round a room when you enter.

fyi women are highly aware when you look at our breasts

@justalexoki There is no god

thoughts?

@1_Q_X الله خلق الإباحية، الله خلق ثغرة في ميول الإنسان تجعل نفسه تسوّغ له النظر للإباحية، الله صعّب الممارسة الطبيعية بوضع حدود غير منطقية كالمهر والزواج، الله كان يعلم أن هذه الحدود ستصعّب الزواج، كل شيء يحدث بإرادة الله، صنع الإباحية بإرادة الله مشاهدتك لها بإرادة الله. الله مسؤول!

ما اختار لنا الله مقابل ما صنع لنا البشر..

@Michaeldudufudu But she IS involved in this. I don't know her nor do I follow her, but she has a right to talk about something she was involved in. In fact, people would expect her to say something about it. Why does it bother you that she's talking about her experience to her viewers?

How can i make this about me?

@waasim_ Your tweet says two things: I'm too dumb to understand the trinity, and I'm too ignorant to know the significance of qiraat and how they disprove Quranic preservation.

Christian apologists would make the most low IQ arguments that they know proves nothing just to distract their opponents from unraveling the trinity paradox

@ibn_badys طلعت بتعرف تتكلم وجه لَجه يا هيثومة. ما تخليك راجل وتناظر ملحدين بقا

عركة كبيرة في الطريق في أي ثانية حسيت انه هيقوم يضربني؟

@Tomano_1 Respectfully, even if we agree on all of the premises of the Kalam argument we only conclude that there must be a first cause, not that the first cause is God. So it's really not obviously at all.

I'm not saying this to be poetic I'm actually convinced that the existence of God is extremely obvious and an easy to reach philosophical conclusion compared to the rest of discussions in metaphysics

@wydLuthor I cannot believe this is an ongoing topic. Who cares bro?

Jasontheween reveals why valkyrae didn’t want to collab with yonna,saying valkyrae feels she’s to old to do stuffs with yonna because yonna is just 19 and the internet makes her feel like she’s too elderly to work with yonna “I ate how the internet is like oh she’s too old to collab with yonna”

@MoTareKkKk @abwlw45358 @tu_ii90 يا حبيبي افتح كتاب تفسير واقرأ معنى كلمة السفهاء. لا تهاوش فيني هاوش علماءك

@abwlw45358 @ItsJobran @tu_ii90 أين قال القرآن ان كل النساء سفهاء ؟ الاصل في معني الايه ولا تعطوا السفهاء أموالكم هي للرجال اصلا لان الرجال هم الموكلين بالتجارة والعمل اما المراه لماذا يعطوها المال مثلا لتتاجر هي بهم ؟

رضي الله عن شيخ الإسلام

@WeenUpdates they're both ass bro

Jasontheween reveals they almost picked "House Mates" instead of CORE for their new group name😭 "It was Me, Ron, Adapt (voting) for CORE. Lacy, Marlon, and Silky for House Mates"