anti 🙂

Every form of hatred is pathetic, but some can at least be rationalized. None is more pathetic or bizarre than hatred toward Islam. 99% of those who are fiercely hateful toward us know virtually nothing about Islam or Muslims. The remaining 1% those who actually know something about it and still hate us are individuals steeped in misunderstanding. And these people, who often consider themselves the most intelligent among the group, are routinely refuted by any Muslim who can actually read.

6. The Gospels Are Straightforward, Harmonizable Historical Biographies with No Contradictions Popular readings treat the four Gospels as perfectly complementary eyewitness reports. In practice, they differ in details (e.g., order of events, resurrection accounts, genealogy in Matthew vs. Luke, timing of the temple cleansing). They are ancient bioi (Greco-Roman lives) with theological emphasis, not modern verbatim histories. Apparent discrepancies (e.g., who visited the tomb first, what was said at the ascension) require harmonization efforts that some scholars see as strained rather than obvious. 7. The New Testament Canon Was Clearly Fixed Early and Universally Accepted Many assume the 27 books were obvious and agreed upon from the beginning. The process took centuries; early Christians debated books like Hebrews, Revelation, James, 2 Peter, and others. Some included works later excluded (e.g., Shepherd of Hermas). Full consensus emerged gradually (4th century lists like Athanasius’). NT authors themselves didn’t explicitly list a “New Testament” canon — they quoted the Old Testament as Scripture and saw their own writings as authoritative in context. 8. Everything in the NT Applies Directly and Literally to Christians Today in the Same Way Christians sometimes treat the NT as a flat rulebook or timeless manual. In context, much addresses specific 1st-century situations (e.g., food sacrificed to idols, head coverings, slavery regulations, expectations of imminent return of Christ). Passages like the Jerusalem Council’s decrees or Paul’s instructions on marriage reflect cultural negotiation. Literal application without considering genre, audience, or covenant shift (old Law vs. new covenant) leads to inconsistencies (e.g., tithing as mandatory NT command — it’s not explicitly required the same way; or “do not judge” taken in isolation). 9. The Text of the New Testament We Have Today Is Essentially Identical to the Originals with No Significant Changes A common defense is that variants don’t affect doctrine. However, there are hundreds of thousands of textual variants across manuscripts (more than words in the NT in some counts), mostly minor (spelling, word order), but some meaningful (e.g., the longer ending of Mark, the woman caught in adultery in John, 1 John 5:7-8 Trinitarian formula). Most are unintentional scribal errors, but they show the text evolved in transmission before standardization. 10. Jesus and the Apostles Intended to Start “Christianity” as a New Religion Separate from Judaism The early movement saw itself as fulfillment within Israel (Jesus as Messiah for the Jews first). Paul’s Gentile mission and later developments created a distinct identity. The NT reflects a transition, not a fully formed “Christianity” from day one. Assumptions of a clean break ignore the Jewish roots and diversity in the earliest communities.

These are Pauline ideologies And u assume these false things about ur religion 1. The New Testament Presents a Single, Unified Theology Many of u assume the NT is a seamless book with one consistent message from start to finish. In reality, it contains diverse voices: the Gospels emphasize the Kingdom of God, repentance, ethical living, and Jesus’ teachings aimed largely at Israel. Paul’s letters focus heavily on justification by faith apart from works of the Law, the cross/resurrection as central, and a mission to Gentiles. this creates real shifts — Jesus often stresses doing the Father’s will and keeping commandments (e.g., Matthew 5–7, 19), while Paul downplays Law observance for salvation (Galatians, Romans). James appears to counterbalance Paul on faith vs. works (James 2). The texts show development and occasional tension rather than perfect harmony. 2. Paul Simply Explains or Completes What Jesus Taught (No Real Difference) A widespread view is that Paul faithfully interprets Jesus without contradiction. However, Paul rarely quotes Jesus’ parables or Sermon on the Mount directly and centers his gospel on the meaning of the cross and faith in Christ’s death/resurrection for Gentiles. Jesus’ core proclamation was the imminent Kingdom with calls to radical discipleship and Torah observance interpreted through love/mercy. Paul’s emphasis on grace over Law (for justification) and his independence claim (Galatians 1) led to early conflicts, such as with Peter in Antioch (Galatians 2). Some scholars see Paul as adapting or transforming the message for a new context, not just “explaining” it. 3. The Original Apostles Fully Endorsed and Followed Paul’s Version Without Issue Christians often assume seamless unity between Paul and the Jerusalem apostles (Peter, James, John). The NT itself records public confrontation: Paul opposed Peter “to his face” for hypocrisy on Gentile table fellowship (Galatians 2). The Jerusalem Council (Acts 15) shows debate over whether Gentiles needed circumcision/Law observance. James and the “circumcision group” exerted pressure. While the council leaned toward inclusion, later scenes (Acts 21) reveal ongoing Jewish-Christian concerns about Paul allegedly teaching Jews to abandon Moses. Peter later affirms Paul but calls some of his writings “hard to understand” (2 Peter 3:15-16). Early Jewish-Christian groups (e.g., later Ebionites) reportedly rejected Paul as deviating from Torah-centered faith. 4. All NT Books Were Written by the Named Apostles or Eyewitnesses Traditional attribution assumes Matthew by the apostle Matthew, John by the apostle John, etc. Critical scholarship widely holds that many books are anonymous or pseudonymous: the Gospels are untitled in earliest manuscripts and likely written by later followers of the apostolic communities (Mark and Luke not claimed as eyewitnesses). Some Pauline letters (e.g., certain Pastorals) and others like 2 Peter are debated as later writings in Paul’s or Peter’s name. This doesn’t automatically mean forgery in ancient terms but challenges the idea of direct eyewitness authorship for everything. 5. The New Testament Was Written Very Early, Right After the Events, by Eyewitnesses Many picture the books as immediate records (within a few years). While some letters of Paul are early (50s CE), mainstream dating places the Gospels between ~70–100 CE (Mark possibly earlier, John later), decades after Jesus’ death (~30 CE). This allows time for oral tradition, theological reflection, and community shaping — not pure “instant biography.” Claims of very early dating (pre-70 CE for all) exist but are minority views against the consensus.

When I see a Muslim, I think to myself, he/she will make a great Christian one day, if he can be reached effectively.

@RivenL76245 @UmmahGrid @btbsoco If I was stupid and lack historical knowledge I would but we’re not same U literally have half of these teachings in your books

@Its_97c @UmmahGrid @btbsoco Lmao, physically, No. Maturity debatable. Just say his a pedophile. And I agree that pedophiles should be sentenced to death. What does pedophilia means? An adult that enjoy fucking children. Dont talk about executing pedos when u dont condemn one.

@Tieyourcame1 @btbsoco It’s not like we’re making it up , most of these sayings they hear from us is not hatred it is literally in their own books Majority of them don’t read and those that do skip or leave

@Its_97c @btbsoco They follow Paul and a couple of other unknown weirdos.

A Muslim is not a Muslim if he doesn’t believe Jesus is a prophet , the messiah ,the word of god, had a miracle birth , called people to worship one god and did mighty miracles such as raising the dead , healed the blind etc And could talk about certain aspects of the unseen, including telling people what they ate and stored in their houses.  But we strongly rejects Jesus's divinity, he is a creation , not the creator A subject that’s extremely inconsistent and contradictory in your books because it’s not from god nor is it the real Jesus Every worshiper of Jesus as a god is a follower of Paul not Jesus

@Its_97c @btbsoco Your story is inaccurate

History also doesn’t believe Abraham existed Islam didn't rise because of flawless 7th-century Google Maps entries. It rose because the Qur'an transformed a rugged people that were ashamed of having daughters and resorting to burying them alive , illiterate and morally corrupt by majority into a civilization that lit up the world in science, justice, and faith while your new crew was busy with inquisitions and crusades. Keep demanding "contemporary records" like a broken record; we'll keep living the truth, praying toward the Kaaba, And watching converts come to Islam daily while apostates like you fade into irrelevance

A challenge to Muslims: Can you provide any credible historical evidence that Mecca or the Kaaba existed before the 6th century? Not later traditions. Not religious claims. Actual contemporary historical records.

@Paulson1__7 @btbsoco Those so-called Muslims who murder innocent Christians also murder 80 to 90% of us. If you had paid any attention over the past few months, you would know their master hates both of us.

@Its_97c @btbsoco Why unalive Christians then?

@RivenL76245 @UmmahGrid @btbsoco The noob to the hacker Would be executed under our rules Regardless of the time period they would be guilty by their method And the so called god based his way on puberty then physical and mental maturity and with her consent and with the approval of her parent

@UmmahGrid @btbsoco "Better than a pedophile man"

According to the Christian’s counting method for the trinity , there is no such thing as polytheism

Allah the almighty supposedly warns: "If he lies about Us, We grab him by the right hand and immediately cut his life artery (the watin or aorta)." No delays, no slow burn, no "wait a few years for dramatic effect." It's framed as swift divine judgment, like a heavenly kill switch for false prophets. Yet, according to the hadiths (Bukhari 4428, Abu Dawud 4512), a Jewish woman poisons a sheep at Khaybar in ~628 CE. Muhammad pbuh eats some, feels effects, but doesn't drop dead. He keeps leading armies, doing pilgrimages, revealing more Quran, and conquering those that fought him for another four years until 632 CE. Only on his deathbed does he go, " I feel as if my aorta is being cut from that poison " Bro believes the omnipotent God is out here acting like a delayed Uber driver: "Yeah, the punishment's en route... traffic was bad... it'll be there in 1,460 days." If this is the penalty for faking revelations, why the lag? Did Allah need time to marinate the poison? Or was the divine hitman stuck in bureaucracy? "It Feels Like" vs. Actual Divine Execution The Quran promises a literal, violent severing grabbing by the right hand and chopping the artery, resulting in instant or near-instant death (as any real aorta severance would). The hadith? Muhammad pbuh says he feels as if his aorta is being cut from the lingering poison pain. Not "it is cut," not "Allah just executed the threat," but a subjective sensation during a prolonged illness. the deathbed line is either metaphorical or just residual discomfort. So the "proof" relies on equating a dramatic divine threat with a guy's dying words about old food poisoning. That's not fulfillment that's fanfic stretching "feels like" into "exactly as prophesied." If Muhammad pbuh was a false prophet, this verse is Allah publicly announcing the kill method in advance... and then allegedly using it. But why let the guy succeed for decades first? Why reveal the Quran through him at all if you knew he'd fake it and needed this dramatic takedown later? It's like a boss hiring someone he knows is embezzling, letting them run the company for years, then poisoning them slowly while saying, "See? I warned you in the employee handbook." Even better The poison came from a Jewish woman testing if he was a real prophet (if poison harms him = liar; if not = true). He partially "passes" by not dying instantly, but "fails" years later. So Allah the almighty lets the test happen, lets the false prophet keep preaching, then retroactively validates the test via delayed poison. Peak efficiency. Remove logic from your name my guy

Because Quran 69:44-47 says if he lied about his "revelation", his aorta would be severed. And according to Dawud 4512 / Bukhari 4428, he died due to his aorta being severed. So he died the death of a false prophet.

Bro, you really thought you cooked? You saw someone call out missionary vultures preying on the poor and desperate, and your galaxy-brain counter was... asking an AI for the dictionary definition of a Shia survival tactic from 1400 years ago? That's not a flex, that's the intellectual equivalent of a raccoon knocking over a trash can and thinking it won the debate.

@Its_97c @TheWordandI34 @grok what is taqiyya

Description of Allah given in the Quran! Would you worship this God?

“You lost bro 🤣” says the Christian whose Bible has God commanding genocide of entire nations, keeping virgin girls as sex slaves, and endorsing beating your property but suddenly Hadith standards are too high for the master. Our prophet married into alliances and treated women better than your medieval popes treated choir boys. “You can’t defend him by debate” from a guy whose savior got nailed for talking smack

@Deenresponds You lost bro 🤣🤣🤣 just defend your prophet with your Islamic source. Christians are attacking your prophet with the same Islamic source. You can't defend your prophet by debate

New Video Showing how God Logics Nest Friend Ran from discussing christianity and lied to his audience as damage control youtu.be/BfZSWFYHiCI?si…

@Deenresponds @SJ_Marsh1 Getting called a racist by a Christian is like a Southern Baptist yelling “love everyone” while clutching his confederate flag Bible cover

@SJ_Marsh1 it’s literally a meme where i had to make myself into a black guy how you believe this is racist is beyond me. Stop being a a retard

@FUKBIDE @TheWordandI34 Typical retard. How the fuck does being a Muslim have anything to do with being an American? Are you mad because the state managed to separate itself from your filthy, immoral book ruling over its society?

@Its_97c @TheWordandI34 I expect you get the fuck out my country and go back to your Muslim shit hole country

Lady, your entire faith rests on a guy getting publicly tortured to death to pay for your sins? That's not divinity ,that's straight-up divine projection. Yet you're losing it over a 7th-century Arab having a young wife back when girls were routinely married off between 7 and 14 everywhere? Touch grass... or a camel, since you're clearly fixated. Where were the so-called saints and founders of your religion while the entire world including their own followers and themselves was marrying off 7-year-olds and consummating the marriage once they hit puberty? You people just erase history and twist everything to push your agenda. It's genuinely revolting. And somehow these supposedly 'malnourished' Muslims pulled off roughly 80 military expeditions in about 9 years often against forces twice their size with a crazy high success rate. That's basically one major campaign every 40 days. A starved society couldn't sustain that level of operational tempo. Modern military analysis shows nutrition is a core factor in endurance and fighting capability.

Im not judging people for eating camel meat. But those were usually saved for feasts. In the time period, dates, milk, and grains were the main staples and it did help with survival but as far as causing early puberty, it wasn't enough and delayed puberty. Just admit, Muhammad had sex with a child who had the body of a child.

Muhammad is Islam's greatest weakness.

@IjazTheTrini There’s a reason why he’s a Christian 😬

The facts don't care about your fiction.

It’s not wrong. It’s they who are adding their uneducated, rotten brains to it. Nowhere does it say 'prepubescent.' They’re equating menstruation with puberty, when in reality menstruation is a later stage that comes after puberty has already started. It usually takes about 2 to 3 years after the onset of puberty before menstruation begins. Some females go their entire lives without ever menstruating, and for many others it is delayed much longer.

@apostateofallah This tafseer is wrong! 🙂

I’ve noticed that many Muslims on X feel uncomfortable with the fact that Muhammad was a pedophile who raped a 9 year old girl when he was 56, and instead they are making all different types of excuses. Muslims, I want you to know that I SEE you and understand your consternation. So, let me help you out by showing that not only was Muhammad a pedophile false prophet, but he also made halal the marriage, divorce, and remarriage of prepubescent little girls. This isn’t me making things up. This is the Quran and their tafsirs. If you hate the abuse of little girls, you would condemn this and leave Islam.

@apostateofallah @CaptainNoticer Not a prepubescent Because menstruation is a later stage after puberty hits it’s takes about 2 to 3 years for it start after many signs of puberty already have started

@CaptainNoticer What do you call a girl who has yet reached the age of menstruation?