Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Jam Basketball Intelligence
693 posts
Jam Basketball Intelligence
@JBItweets
College Basketball’s #1 scouting & analytics service. Proud partner to championship programs across the country. Join the #JamFam! 🍇🏀
Chicago, IL Katılım Nisan 2015
252 Takip Edilen1.4K Takipçiler
Jam Basketball Intelligence retweetledi
Welcome to The Deep Drop, a new podcast with Brian Geisinger that takes a deeper dive into basketball.
In the first episode, @bgeis_bird sits down with @PackMensBball Asst. GM @PatrickJStacy for an in-depth look at the analytical side of the game.
🔗: 247sports.com/college/north-…
English
Jam Basketball Intelligence retweetledi
Welcome to the Pack, Andrew Slater, Patrick Stacy, and Reed Vial.
gopack.com/news/2025/4/7/…
English
@Support can you please answer my DM? Been unable to access an account for over a week with no help from email or DM support. Thanks
English
#JamFam occupying the top two spots!
College Basketball Report@CBKReport
Top-25 College Basketball teams in conference play, via Torvik: 1. Houston 2. Michigan State 3. Auburn 4. Duke 5. Purdue 6. Florida 7. Louisville 8. Iowa State 9. Alabama 10. Missouri 11. Kansas 12. Illinois 13. Saint Mary's 14. Wisconsin 15. Arizona 16. Texas Tech 17. Maryland 18. Tennessee 19. Mississippi State 20. Ole Miss 21. BYU 22. Kentucky 23. St. John's 24. Clemson 25. McNeese State (😳)
English
A pair of first year #JamFam clients occupying the top two spots in YoY total win improvements in college hoops!!!!
📈🏆🕺🏻🍇🏀
College Basketball Report@CBKReport
College Basketball's most improved teams this past season 💪
English
Proud scouting/analytics partner to the best defense in the country! @UHCougarMBK
Out Prepare. Outperform. #JamFam
CBB Analytics@CBBAnalytics
A look at which teams are 'defensive disruptors'... with 1 significant outlier 👀
English
#JamFam highlights through the first half of the college hoops season:
🏀#1 ranked TEAM & DEFENSE via KenPom @UHCougarMBK
🏀#1 OFFENSE in terms of eFG% @IndStBasketball
🏀Five teams leading their conference (65-35 overall in-conference record)
🏀11/16 teams w/top 100 defenses (eFG%)
🏀Five teams who have ascended 40+ spots in KenPom rankings @McNeeseMBB @IndStBasketball @gbphoenixmbb @SIU_Basketball @ValpoBasketball
🏀+24 average KenPom ranking change since the start of the season
English
#JamFam highlights through the first month of the college hoops season:
🏀#1 ranked team & defense via KenPom @UHCougarMBK
🏀#1 offense in terms of eFG% @IndStBasketball
🏀Five of top 20 team defensive eFG%
🏀Four teams who have ascended 50+ spots in KenPom rankings @McNeeseMBB @IndStBasketball @gbphoenixmbb @SIU_Basketball
🏀53-7 (88%) when favored
English
@JBBauer612 As the author of the tweet, I assure you that it was nothing deeper than a list of players who met those criteria.
Apologies if the title & Kon Knueppel not meeting the aforementioned criteria irked you.
English
@JBItweets Not true at all. The heading was “ultra-efficient scorers”. You were making an argument that having a fg% of 50% was ultra-efficient. That list, if based on eFG%, would have looked different.
English
ULTRA-EFFICIENT SCORERS: 🪣✅
There were six players in the country who averaged 10+ PPG on > 50% FG% & > 40% 3P% in circuit play.
@morezjohnsonJr
@35Derrion
@SisleyTrent
@DamariusOwens1
@jaydenreid_
@NgongbaPatrick
United States 🇺🇸 English
@JBBauer612 The tweet was a filter of players who met all those criteria (per the data source used).
There’s no analysis.
It’s a list of players.
English
@JBItweets Besides the data being wrong, the analysis doesn’t make sense. FG% isn’t relevant. Kon K doesn’t meet your criteria, but he shot a crazy eFG% of ~62%.
English
@JBBauer612 theseasonticket.com/roster_players…
Go ahead and let us know what he shot then.
English
@JBBauer612 Would be interested in hearing what you think is incorrect.
United States 🇺🇸 English
@JBItweets You’ve got some bad data in there, my guy. Gotta be careful with your sources.
English
Jam Basketball Intelligence retweetledi
Bufkin - 14.0/4.5/2.9 - 48%/36%/85%
Smith, Jr. - 12.5/1.6/1.7 - 38%/34%/74%
Mocked in similar spots.
One produced at a higher level while consensus on the other is a higher ceiling.
Which of these 19 y/o guards would you select?
Profiles from @JBItweets annual draft report.
English