JEFFINTEXAS

This is what happened a.co/d/0eRC5NWr

BAR GRIEVANCE AGAINST GINGER ANN SHOCKLEY WEATHERSPOON, MAY 16, 2026 youtu.be/qizILg-2sdA?si… via @YouTube On May 16, 2026, I had my bar grievance against GINGER ANN SHOCKLEY WEATHERSPOON, Texas Bar Card Number 24051583, notarized and sent to the Office of the Chief Disciplinary Counsel (OCDC), State Bar of Texas, PO Box 12487, Austin, TX 78711-2487. I am asking the OCDC to investigate what I believe is objectively verifiable misconduct provable from the documentary record alone. My grievance presents five interconnected violations of the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct, each grounded in the documentary record. These five violations are as follows: 1) TDRPC 3.0(a)(a) - Candor toward the tribunal. Ginger offered same-day contradictory sworn positions. 2) TDRPC 8.04(a)(3) - Conduct involving dishonesty or misrepresentation. 3) TDRPC 3.01 - Filing a claim for an improper purpose, which I assert she admitted on a certified transcript. 4) TDRPC 3.02 - Unreasonably increasing costs and burdens of litigation. 5) TDRPC 4.04(a) - Using means with no substantial purpose other than to burden a third party. This video introduces my grievance against Ginger Ann Shockley Weatherspoon. Though I will not be able to make and publish additional videos for a few days due to work obligations and travel, I plan to delve into the grievance in greater detail of my complaint as time permits.

FRAUDULENT STATEMENTS IN COURT youtu.be/5pB_qiRxQXM?si… via @YouTube

The boomers didn’t just break families — they made it normal not to form them at all. Helen Andrews put it sharply on Tipping Point OAN: Boomers saw any constraint on individual choice as evil, especially lifelong commitments like marriage and family. What felt liberating at 25 started looking hollow at 45 and lonely at 65. Now millennials are inheriting the wreckage — not a crisis of broken families, but a crisis of absent ones. People are reaching their 30s gripped by the quiet terror that they might never build what previous generations took for granted. We’re watching a slow-motion demographic and emotional collapse where the very institutions that gave life meaning (stable families, long-term commitments) have been hollowed out. Freedom without guardrails eventually becomes its own kind of cage — one where you have endless options but no deep roots. Do you think the biggest family crisis today is divorce (like in the 70s/80s) or the growing number of people who never form families at all? What’s one cultural shift that could actually help reverse this?

Legally enforceable marriage contracts are available for Arkansas, Arizona, and Colorado. More states coming soon. etsy.com/shop/MarriageC…

A new study finds that fathers play a unique and powerful role in shaping their children’s long-term physical health. Here's how. psychologytoday.com/us/blog/prepar…

Statistics show women’s happiness has declined as feminist influence has increased.

Source: Body Perceptions and Psychological Well-Being: A Review of the Impact of Social Media and Physical Measurements on Self-Esteem and Mental Health with a Focus on Body Image Satisfaction and Its Relationship with Cultural and Gender Factors mdpi.com/2227-9032/12/1…

@buckeyebettie Feminism is anti-male, anti-child, anti-society - and most of all, anti-woman.

Feminism has not benefited men, women and children. Let me count 50 ways feminism has harmed society: 1. Decline in male college enrollment 2. Parental alienation in family courts 3. High male suicide rates 4. Loss of male-only mentorship spaces 5. Sentencing disparities for men 6. Stigmatization of traditional masculinity 7. Workplace hazards remaining male-dominated 8. Lack of domestic abuse resources for men 9. Due process concerns in HR/Legal settings 10.The "two-income trap" making single-income homes impossible 11. The "Double Burden" (work and home labor) for women 12.Devaluation of stay-at-home motherhood 13.Rising female burnout and stress 14.Declining female happiness metrics 15.Delayed marriage and fertility struggles 16.Breakdown of the nuclear family 17.Rise in fatherless households 18.Increased child poverty in single-parent homes 19.Hookup culture replacing stable relationships 20. Hyper-competition in the workplace 21.Erasure of female-only safe spaces 22.Over-sexualization in the name of "empowerment" 23. Loss of traditional social protections for women 24. Economic pressure on mothers to return to work early 25. Decline in male role models in schools 26. Lower birth rates and demographic decline 27.Increased childhood anxiety and depression 28. Heavy reliance on institutional daycare over parental care 29.Loss of clear rites of passage for boys 30. Weakening of community social fabric 31.Increased polarization between the sexes 32.Disruption of the "provider" identity for men 33. Legal risks associated with modern marriage 34. Conflicting social expectations for "modern" men 35. Academic underperformance of boys 36. Loss of traditional manners and chivalry (male/female) 37.Commodification of the home and family life 38. Social isolation for older men 39.Pressure on women to "have it all" simultaneously 40. Decline in male-dominated trade participation 41.Rise in "Deaths of Despair" (addiction/overdose) 42. Gender-based tribalism in politics 43. Erosion of the complementary partnership model 44. Over-litigation of social interactions 45. Parental stress impacting child development 46. Loss of distinct cultural roles for men and women 47.Housing market inflation based on two-income norms 48. Increased loneliness across all age groups 49. Fragility of modern relationship contracts 50. Loss of long-term intergenerational stability

NO FAULT DIVORCE GIVES THE COURTS THE POWER TO PUNISH INNOCENT PEOPLE - ... youtu.be/2ht5Qu9uDnk?si… via @YouTube

NO FAULT DIVORCE GIVES THE COURTS THE POWER TO PUNISH INNOCENT PEOPLE - ... youtu.be/2ht5Qu9uDnk?si… via @YouTube In this final video, Dr. Stephen Baskerville and Bai Mcfarlane discuss how no-fault divorce punishes innocent people - including innocent children as well. This is a great injustice. Bai brings a distinctively Catholic perspective into the discussion about how unilateral "no-fault" divorce violates Catholic doctrine and Canon Law. Dr. Stephen Baskerville is a professor of political science widely known for his criticisms of unilateral no-fault divorce and family court and the flagrant injustices, insanities, and disregard for and violation of multiple constitutional protections unilateral no-fault divorce and family court have created.

TWO COMMON OBJECTIONS AGAINST NO FAULT DIVORCE - Part 8 of 9 youtu.be/Vvg9cV1M8jg?si… via @YouTube

TWO COMMON OBJECTIONS AGAINST NO FAULT DIVORCE - Part 8 of 9 youtu.be/Vvg9cV1M8jg?si… via @YouTube In this eighth video, "A Male Space" brings up two objections to Dr. Stephen Baskerville and Bai Mcfarlane to no-fault divorce. The first objection is why should we keep two people together; why should we keep someone "trapped" in a marriage; why should someone be in a marriage they don't want to be in? The second objection is what about the cases in which someone cannot "prove" actual transgressions in the marriage? Bai brings a distinctively Catholic perspective into the discussion about how unilateral "no-fault" divorce violates Catholic doctrine and Canon Law. Dr. Stephen Baskerville is a professor of political science widely known for his criticisms of unilateral no-fault divorce and family court and the flagrant injustices, insanities, and disregard for and violation of multiple constitutional protections unilateral no-fault divorce and family court have created.

NO FAULT DIVORCE HAS DEBASED OUR ENTIRE JUDICIARY SYSTEM - Part 7 of 9 youtu.be/gxhlGFFBfEg?si… via @YouTube

NO FAULT DIVORCE HAS DEBASED OUR ENTIRE JUDICIARY SYSTEM - Part 7 of 9 youtu.be/gxhlGFFBfEg?si… via @YouTube In this seventh video, Dr. Stephen Baskerville and Bai Mcfarlane discuss how the idea of no-fault divorce has debased the entire American judiciary system. Dr. Baskerville asserts that the sexual revolution and its manifestation in the courts. Bai discusses a constitutional challenge to unilateral no-fault divorce in Dallas County, Texas. Dr. Baskerville mentioned there is a "whole smorgasbord" and "no shortage" of constitutional guaranties and protections that are violated by family court. The reality is that unilateral "no-fault divorce" is NOT judicial in nature, but a mere bureaucratic stamp of approval of what one person wants. This is not justice; this is injustice. Bai brings a distinctively Catholic perspective into the discussion about how unilateral "no-fault" divorce violates Catholic doctrine and Canon Law. Dr. Stephen Baskerville is a professor of political science widely known for his criticisms of unilateral no-fault divorce and family court and the flagrant injustices, insanities, and disregard for and violation of multiple constitutional protections unilateral no-fault divorce and family court have created.

SOLEMNIZED MARITAL VOWS SHOULD NOT BE SUBJECT TO NO FAULT DIVORCE - Part... youtu.be/vDLpi3Lwg34?si… via @YouTube

SOLEMNIZED MARITAL VOWS SHOULD NOT BE SUBJECT TO NO FAULT DIVORCE - Part... youtu.be/vDLpi3Lwg34?si… via @YouTube In this sixth video, Dr. Stephen Baskerville and Bai Mcfarlane discuss how the idea that some state family codes talk about the solemnization being conducted in accordance with the rites of the church. If that is the case, should not the church have authority pertaining to divorce? For example, the Catholic church does NOT believe in the dissolution of marriage, so why should the state be able to intervene in a petition for unilateral "no-fault" divorce, when the church does not acknowledge such in its official doctrine and teachings. Such a practice violates the largely misunderstood "separation of church and state" that attorneys and state actors invoke when it suits their purposes. And absent any criminal actions, why is the church not telling the state that it needs to stay out of the affairs of the church? The state should NOT be permitted to play God. Cesar - and Satan - and Karl Marx - and Vladimir Lenin - and Alfred Kinsey - and Hugh Hefner - and feminists - and attorneys - and "family court" judges - should not dictate church practice and doctrine and should not be able to cancel solemnized marital vows made to and in the presence God Almighty. And the church needs to have the courage and conviction to stand up and tell the state, "Enough is enough." Bai brings a distinctively Catholic perspective into the discussion about how unilateral "no-fault" divorce violates Catholic doctrine and Canon Law. Dr. Stephen Baskerville is a professor of political science widely known for his criticisms of unilateral no-fault divorce and family court and the flagrant injustices, insanities, and disregard for and violation of multiple constitutional protections unilateral no-fault divorce and family court have created.

THE CHURCH SHOULD ENTER THE COURTROOM AND DEFEND THE WRONGED SPOUSE youtu.be/Q7o1Dw-tgcY?si… via @YouTube