
吴说获悉,据界面新闻,交通银行董事长任德奇在虹桥国际经济论坛上表示,交行正深度参与上海航贸数字化平台建设,与政府机构、航运及外贸企业协作,整合航贸物流、信息流与资金流,构建航贸金融服务生态。任德奇指出,交行将通过跨界融合满足航贸客户需求,提供安全高效的一站式跨境结算与融资服务,同时利用区块链和人工智能技术提升跨境汇款效率,解决小微企业融资难题;并联合保险、物流、电商平台等共建生态体系。 wublock123.com/index.php?m=co…
星域解链(互关互动)
626 posts

@JJayGentleman
原蚂蚁MKT,链上玩家。 我说的都是错的,信不信随你

吴说获悉,据界面新闻,交通银行董事长任德奇在虹桥国际经济论坛上表示,交行正深度参与上海航贸数字化平台建设,与政府机构、航运及外贸企业协作,整合航贸物流、信息流与资金流,构建航贸金融服务生态。任德奇指出,交行将通过跨界融合满足航贸客户需求,提供安全高效的一站式跨境结算与融资服务,同时利用区块链和人工智能技术提升跨境汇款效率,解决小微企业融资难题;并联合保险、物流、电商平台等共建生态体系。 wublock123.com/index.php?m=co…









很多人低估了 f(x),但原因可能不是币价💰 最近一直在研究 @protocol_fx,很多 DeFi 都在做稳定币、做杠杆,而 f(x) 选择了另一条路。 它把一份 ETH 的风险拆分成两种资产: 一部分承担价格波动、获取杠杆收益 另一部分尽量剥离价格波动,更偏向稳定收益。 本质上,就是将风险与收益重新拆分,再交给不同风险偏好的用户。 从产品设计来看,我认为这套思路很有意思,也算得上 DeFi 领域较有原创性的创新。 不过,设计巧妙,并不意味着用户一定会买单。 我看了一下数据,目前协议 TVL 已超过 7000 万美元,但其中绝大部分资金仍集中在流动性池,真正进入协议核心产品的资金占比并不高。 这意味着,市场认可了它的流动性,却还没有真正认可它的产品。 再看看同样处于稳定币赛道的 Ethena。 它的产品逻辑一句话就能讲清楚——存进去,赚收益。 而 f(x) 则需要用户先理解波动率拆分,再理解不同资产分别承担什么风险,最后才能决定选择哪一种。 相比之下,它的产品门槛确实高了不少。 很多时候,一个协议做不大,并不是因为技术不够,而是认知成本太高。 用户不会因为数学模型更优雅就去使用一个产品,他们真正关心的是:为什么我要用它?它能给我带来什么价值? 所以我觉得,f(x) 真正需要突破的,不一定是协议本身,而是产品表达。 如果未来能够把这套复杂的机制,包装成普通用户一眼就能理解、愿意尝试的产品,它的增长空间或许会比现在大得多。 很多协议输在技术,少数协议输在产品。 而在我看来,f(x) 更像是后者。 这也是为什么,我仍然愿意持续关注它未来的发展。 @protocol_fx @FX100Perp


Most DeFi protocols die in the docs. f(x) Protocol just did something more useful —— it got explained in a room full of real users. After the Chengdu Ethereum meetup, my read on @protocol_fx is simple. The real update was not another metric. It was translation. A complex on-chain system became something miners, HODLers and leverage users could actually understand, question and verify. The details were concrete. fxMINT was presented as having 0 funding cost 89.4% of the time. xPOSITION uses Liquidation Brake to reduce liquidation pressure through rebalancing. Funds stay self-custodied, data stays on-chain, and yield distribution can be checked instead of trusted. That is the user pain f(x) is going after. People holding ETH or WBTC do not always want to sell, but they also do not want to get slowly bled by interest, funding fees or one ugly wick. The product is trying to turn volatility into a cleaner path for leverage and yield. The boundary still matters. Liquidation Brake reduces risk, it does not delete it. Extreme volatility, liquidity, oracle issues and collateral risk still exist. But in DeFi, verifiable is strong. Understandable is the real moat. The thing to watch is simple as f(x) scales, will users remember the APY first, or the moment the product finally made sense?




After enough time in DeFi, you stop asking what pumps next and start asking what still works when the market gets ugly. That’s why @TermMaxFi adding @roycoprotocol senior tranches caught my eye. @CapApp stcUSD and @maplefinance syrupUSDC positions can now be used as collateral to borrow fixed-rate USDC, with an official limit of up to $1M. The setup is pretty clean keep the yield-bearing position, unlock fresh liquidity, and know your borrowing cost through maturity. No waking up to find that a floating rate has gone completely off the rails overnight. The real edge, though, sits inside Royco’s loss waterfall. The junior tranche takes the first hit, giving senior holders a buffer before losses reach them. Some markets also use an observation period to wait out short-term dislocations. TermMax is turning that protection layer into usable credit. That doesn’t make senior bulletproof. If losses burn through the junior buffer, the collateral can still fall and the TermMax loan can still be liquidated. APR, LTV, liquidation thresholds, remaining capacity and market depth are live variables, so the app matters more than the headline. Fixed-rate users have understood this for a while: the market can throw a tantrum, but a locked borrowing cost doesn’t reprice with every candle. It isn’t the loudest strategy in the room, but being able to plan your cash flow is a real edge. The question is whether the USDC you unlock can earn enough to cover the extra protocol, liquidity and liquidation risk. Otherwise, capital efficiency is just leverage wearing a nicer suit. Would you monetize the senior buffer, or leave the position untouched and keep the setup boring?

据 Bitrace 团队监测,在近期 Gate 客户资金遗失案中,被盗资金已确认经由“鑫币担保”运营的第三方洗钱公共群组逃逸。所有交易均被该群组的“报备机器人(Report Bot)”记录,Bitrace Pro 显示,被盗 ETH 已被以约 1800 USDT 的价格卖出。Bitrace 指出,该洗钱群组使用的收款地址关联至“鑫币担保”旗下的加密支付工具 Newpay,监测显示自 Newpay 运营以来,其已累计收取超过 16 亿 USDT 的资金。wublock123.com/news/news-64448





