JTTCOTM 🇺🇸

@ColonelTowner precisely *6.66 MILES* from the Eagle on the floor CIA headquarters to the Eagle-skylight at Federal Reserve Bldg The CIA, founded Sep 1947, was created 33 years after the Federal Reserve, founded Dec 1913.

@grok @EricLDaugh It was Sec. of Defense Dick Cheney.

The rule restricting personal firearms on U.S. military bases came from a 1992 Department of Defense directive under President George H.W. Bush. It was implemented by the Army in March 1993 (Army Regulation 190-14) under President Bill Clinton, limiting weapons to official duties like law enforcement or sentry work—making bases gun-free zones for personal protection.

🚨 BREAKING: SecWar Pete Hegseth has just OVERTURNED the rule that banned guns at US military installations for personnel Long overdue! 🇺🇸 "Our warfighters defend the right of others to carry. They should be able to carry themselves!" "Recent events like what happened at Fort Stewart, Holloman Air Force Base, or Pensacola Naval Air Station have made clear that some threats are closer to home than we would like." "In these instances, minutes are a lifetime, and our service members have the courage and training to make those precious short minutes count." "Before today, it was virtually impossible. Most people probably don't know this. It was virtually impossible for War Department personnel to get permission to carry and store their own personal weapons aligned with the state laws where we operate our installations." "I mean, effectively, our bases across the country were gun-free zones!" "Unless you're training or unless you are a military policeman, you couldn't carry." "You couldn't bring your own firearm for your own personal protection on to post. Well, that's no longer. The memo I'm signing today directs installation commanders to allow requests for personal protection to carry a privately owned firearm with the presumption that it is necessary for personal protection." "If a request is for some reason denied, the reason for that denial will be in writing and will explain in detail the basis for that direction." "Again, the presumption is service members will be able to have their amendment right on post. Not all enemies are foreign, nor are they all outside our borders." "Confirming your God-given right to self-protection is what I'm signing into action today, and I'm proud to do so."

Trump says Bruce Springsteen sucks

@SStricklandMMA @TheCriticalDri1 f9660#

@TheCriticalDri1 Yeah man for the last 30 years. "One month away" I hope they get a nuke one day.. Do you know what will happen? Absolutely fucking nothing

Trump completely betrayed the blue collar guys with Iran. What has this cost the average guy. Gas? Shipping? Inflation? 1000 to 2000? How much more by the time this is done? Rich get richer and poor get poorer. Complete betrayal...

@SStricklandMMA 🐏

@RamboAndFrens All these appear 24 times in Q

The world is watching.

Should we tell all the good people watching the day & time? Red carpet rollout? Think logically. The world is watching. Q

Bukele didn’t save El Salvador because he arrested all the criminals. He saved it because he removed the judges. Communist judges are the sword and shield of the communist revolution here in America. Removing them is everything.

Canada's PM is a disgusting NWO-shill hell-bent on the destruction of Canada.

US healthcare system needs

@jmquinn72 @bennyjohnson @rookisaacman Wrong, you. F-5s:

@bennyjohnson @rookisaacman WRONG! Those are not F-5's. Those are MiG-28s. I understand the confusion as no one has been that close before.

RIGHT NOW: NASA Administrator @rookisaacman is flying his F-5 fighter jet RIGHT OVER the Artemis II launch pad. This is totally Badass 🔥🇺🇸

Tomorrow, the Supreme Court will hear one of the most consequential cases of the last 50 years: Whether the 14th amendment grants birthright citizenship to the children of illegal aliens. When I worked in the first Trump admin, I drafted the original executive order ending birthright citizenship for illegal aliens that ultimately went unsigned until the beginning of last year-- and now finds itself at the center of this case. To put it simply: President Trump has every single legal and historical precedent in his favor. When the 14th amendment's birthright citizenship clause was written, illegal immigration was a foreign concept. The 14th Amendment was specifically intended to clarify citizenship for the children of freed slaves. It did not guarantee that a 9-months pregnant Guatemalan could illegally cross the Rio Grande, give birth, and have their child considered an American citizen. The Left always cites the Wong Ark Kim case from 1898 to claim this as settled law, but that case did not apply to illegal aliens. The plaintiff was the son of one of the thousands of Chinese laborers who were brought legally to America during the 19th century to work on the transcontinental railroads. The Supreme Court has never adjudicated the question of whether children born within our borders to somebody who broke our nation's immigration laws are legal citizens. The answer is “no,” and the Court should absolutely uphold the President's executive order. We don't give citizenship to the children of foreign diplomats born in America. In the same way, we should not give citizenship to children of illegal aliens. No European country, not even the Vatican, grants birthright citizenship to children born to unlawful residents. Democrats are naturally freaking out about this case. Why? Because it's a terrifying prospect for the future of their party. They've seen the data showing how much population loss blue states have seen over the last few years. It's possible that California could lose up to six electoral votes in the next census. The only way they can maintain their power is by continually replacing the population with the children of illegals. It's one of the major pillars of Democrat power and it may just be coming to an end.

@LizaRosen0000 x.com/NewswirePatrio…

Flashback: t.co/1WMk1iBcUX Canada’s prime minister declares Islam as Canada’s new cultural identity which all Canadians "must come together" and follow the Muslim community as they worship Islam by marking ‘Eid al-Adha’. As you can see in the video, during his speech he urged Canadians to adopt Islam and embrace its values as their new shared culture with the Muslim population in Canada and Muslims around the world who are welcome to come to Canada and enrich it with more foreign religions values because: Muslim values (jihad and martyrdom) are Canadian values. What is your reaction to Canada’s new Islamic culture?

@grok @LizaRosen0000 Bullshit! He declared Canada must come together under a muslim holiday and belief.

No, not exactly as framed. In the video, PM Mark Carney (at a Muslim Association of Canada Eid al-Adha event) said: "We can pray differently... but all of us must come together around the values of Eid—the values of community, of generosity, and yes, of sacrifice. These are Muslim values. These are Canadian values." He praised multiculturalism and shared values but didn't declare Islam Canada's "new cultural identity," urge adopting Islam, or reference jihad/martyrdom. The post adds spin not in his words.

@LizaRosen0000 @grok Eid al-Adha

@LizaRosen0000 Canada's PM is a disgusting NWO-shill hell-bent on the destruction of Canada.

@deluxe_pepe 🇺🇸❤️

GM Patriots 💚☕

Alabama Attorney General candidate Jay Mitchell is being SLAMMED for an ad telling Muslims they can, "Allahu Akbar back to the Middle East." Critics say the ad should disqualify him from running for office. 👉 Should he be disqualified, or would you vote for him?