James Lay

@Ladysarah20056 @OgarRex51523 @JAMBHQ U dey answer the mumu, just check again on Monday same thing happened to me but I have seen mine

@OgarRex51523 @JAMBHQ If Ña you, will you be polite 😒

UTME CHANGE OF INSTITUTION PROCESS ACTIVATED Candidates wishing to change their institution or programme of choice may now proceed to do so visiting any of the Board’s approved CBT. Applicants are advised to visit any accredited CBT centre to effect the changes.

@CrownprinceCom2 Nothing concern me with who dey contest, all I know is tinubu go win, that man is evil, he appointed new INEC chairman so tell me how is that possible? There is not free and fair elections in this country, you can imagine his son says even God can't stop his father from winning

Just in: Former President Goodluck Jonathan to Contest 2027 Election Under the NDP.

@FabianB58246501 I wrote on Thursday first set and later on my exam was rescheduled to Tuesday, ever since then im still getting the same response when I was trying to check my result before the results the response is "under scrutiny"

JAMB HOLDS POLICY MEETING MAY 11TH ... MINISTER TO UNVEIL KEY POLICY DIRECTION The Joint Admissions and Matriculation Board (JAMB)has concluded arrangements to hold the 2026 Policy Meeting on Admissions scheduled for 11th May, 2026, at the Body of Benchers, Auditorium, located at Plot 688, Institute and Research District, FCC Phase III, Jabi, Abuja. The 2026 Policy Meeting promises to be exciting as key policy direction will be unveiled by the Honourable Minister of Education, Dr. Maruf Olatunji Alausa. The Board's annual policy meeting on admissions is a crucial annual gathering where stakeholders decide minimum tolerable UTME marks, admission guidelines, and policies for tertiary institutions. Furthermore, the meeting is expected to, in particular, formally sets the tone for the 2026/2027 admission exercise while impressing it on attendees the need to adhere strictly to stipulated guidelines. Attendees at the 2026 meeting would include critical stakeholders such as Vice-Chancellors, Rectors, Provosts, Registrars and their admission officers. Others are regulatory bodies ranging from the National Universities Commission(NUC), National Commission for Colleges of Education(NCCE), to the National Board for Technical Education(NBTE), among others. Goodwill messages will also be taken from NELFUND, NYSC, and other critical stakeholders. Also slated to hold is the 6th Edition of the National Tertiary Admissions Performance-Merit Awards (NATAP-M), which has ensure strict adherence to admission guidelines and also contributed greatly to the development of tertiary education in the country. Fabian Benjamin, Ph.D., OrgExpert JAMB PCA

@DanielJere61013 @FabianB58246501 No I haven't they have not posted anything concerning it and I haven't seen mine

@JamesLay611140 @FabianB58246501 They have

FAKE RESULT IN CIRCULATION AS HIGHEST UTME SCORE A purported result slip currently being circulated, claiming that a candidate scored 396 in the 2026 UTME, is entirely fake. It is surprising that such a fabrication is being shared by otherwise well-informed Nigerians. Firstly, the Board has clearly stated that UTME results are view-only. The circulated document appears on a fabricated result template, which on its own is sufficient indication that it is not authentic. Secondly, the Board’s registration numbers are system-generated and do not follow the pattern “20269” as seen on the fake slip. There are several other inconsistencies that, even at a glance, expose the result as fraudulent. The public is strongly advised to disregard this fake result and rely only on official channels for accurate information. All results at the moment are view only Fabian Benjamin, Ph.D.,

@Dgolddigger001 @NigeriaStories It real

@NigeriaStories Dont trust these blogs... this news can't be real else Show us proof

JUST IN: JAMB has dismissed viral 394 UTME result of Cross River candidate as fake

@NigeriaStories They haven't release 21st results yet😡

@Ashybabylee @FabianB58246501 @JAMBHQ It UTMERESULT not JAMBRESULT

@FabianB58246501 @JAMBHQ Please can you explain why my son has been seeing "You are currently not eligible for this service" each time he sent JAMBRESULT to 55019 or 66019? Same thing happened during MOCKRESULT. Till now that I am typing this, my son has not been able to check his result.

CANDIDATES WITH “NO RESULT YET” STATUS The Board has received numerous inquiries from parents regarding candidates whose results are currently displaying “No Result Yet.” Please be informed that results for underage candidates have not been released. When such candidates attempt to check their results, the system will return the message “No Result Yet.” As stipulated by regulation, only candidates who will be at least 16 years old by 30th September 2026 are eligible to register for and sit the UTME. However, underage candidates may be considered under the exceptional category, provided they demonstrate outstanding ability by scoring 320 and above in the UTME and attaining at least 80% in subsequent screening stages. In line with the agreement reached and endorsed by parents of these underage candidates, only those who score 320 and above will be shortlisted and invited to proceed to the next stages of the screening. Successful candidates at that stage may then be considered for admission under the exceptional candidates provision. For now, results for underage candidates remain unreleased. Fabian Benjamin, Ph.D., OrgExpert. PCA JAMB

@JAMBHQ Mine is show scrutiny

@FabianB58246501 Mine is showing under scrutiny

UTME Results to Be Released Before Midnight The results of the UTME conducted on Friday, 17 April 2026, will be released before midnight today. Follow me for prompt updates as soon as the results are officially released.

@FabianB58246501 This is the message I keep getting try checking my results

RESCUE OF KIDNAPPED PERSONS ERRONEOUSLY ALLEGED TO BE UTME CANDIDATES The nation’s security agencies have once again demonstrated commendable efficiency with the successful rescue of seven of the individuals who were kidnapped while traveling from Makurdi to Otukpo. Initial reports wrongly identified them as candidates en route to sit for the 2026 UTME, a claim that has now been proven false. This development brings immense relief, as the thought of these individuals remaining in the custody of their captors was deeply distressing, we pray for the rescue of the remaining ones. Notably, none of the victims were UTME candidates. Rather, they were individuals who had traveled to Makurdi to participate in the ongoing police recruitment exercise and were returning to Otukpo at the time of the incident. It is regrettable that, in moments like this, there is a tendency to hastily malign government institutions particularly the Joint Admissions and Matriculation Board (JAMB) without proper verification of facts. Such premature conclusions appear, at times, to be driven more by a desire to assign blame than to seek truth. Some individuals even attempted to link the incident to the Board’s examination schedule, despite clear inconsistencies in that narrative. One would expect that, in light of the facts now established, those who propagated these unfounded claims would extend a public apology to JAMB for the unwarranted damage to its reputation. It is important to emphasize that the victims were not examination candidates but participants in a police recruitment exercise who were returning to their base in Otukpo. Regardless of their identity or purpose of travel, however, no Nigerian deserves to be subjected to kidnapping. Such incidents should unite us in concern and compassion, rather than serve as an opportunity to disparage institutions. Even at the onset, there were clear indications that the initial narrative lacked credibility. The structure of UTME examinations makes it highly unlikely for candidates who know one another to be assigned to the same centre or to travel together for the exam. That such a flawed account gained widespread traction highlights the need for greater responsibility in information dissemination. As citizens, we must cultivate the discipline of verifying facts before drawing conclusions or assigning blame. Supporting our institutions in their efforts to deliver on their mandates is far more constructive than undermining them based on unverified claims. The Board remains committed to implementing progressive, development-driven policies that will continue to elevate its operations to global standards. It will not be deterred by unfounded criticism or the efforts of detractors. Finally, it is our collective hope that Nigeria’s security architecture continues to improve, ensuring that no citizen regardless of identity, purpose, or destination falls victim to such criminal acts. Fabian Benjamin, Ph.D., OrgExpert PCA JAMB