James Sotiropoulos

76 posts

James Sotiropoulos

James Sotiropoulos

@James_Sot

Junior Doctor | PhD Candiate at NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney

Katılım Temmuz 2022
135 Takip Edilen59 Takipçiler
James Sotiropoulos
James Sotiropoulos@James_Sot·
Excited to share our new publication in @JClinEpi on using individual participant data for risk of bias assessments. IPD informed assessments might reduce uncertainty and help increase confidence in the evidence base
NHMRC CTC@TrialsCentre

Two new @JClinEpi papers from @TrialsCentre offer practical methods to improve trial transparency & systematic reviews. IPD-informed bias checks & registry reporting reforms could reshape evidence synthesis. Read them here👉bit.ly/414rg5S & bit.ly/4mL0fwP

English
0
1
6
869
James Sotiropoulos retweetledi
Anna Lene Seidler (she/her)
Anna Lene Seidler (she/her)@LeneSeidler·
🌟🌟 Massive Congratulations to @KylieEHunter from @TrialsCentre for winning the Thomas Chalmers Award at the Global Evidence Summit 2024! 🌟 🌟 Her winning presentation was on the IPDIntegrityTool, which is available here➡️ lnkd.in/gRG7gsc9
Anna Lene Seidler (she/her) tweet media
English
6
3
28
793
James Sotiropoulos retweetledi
Vishal Kapadia
Vishal Kapadia@KapadiaNeo·
The majority of voters will continue to resuscitate preterm infants with 30% to 40% O2. Paper does challenge the current recommendations given difference in mortality in High-vs-low but also discusses low certainty of this finding and complexity of this important question. Where to now? Looking forward to some clarity in coming few years from HiLo, Torpido30,60, OptiSTART, DOXIE trials. Goal: Better outcomes for our newborns. #neotwitter
Vishal Kapadia@KapadiaNeo

After reading @JAMAPediatrics paper, I will start resuscitation of preterm babies <32 weeks with following oxygen concentration. @AAPneonatal #neotwitter @Research4Babies @NICU_Musings @ccroehr @drbretty @natetexsun @BrianKingNeo @James_Sot @LeneSeidler jamanetwork.com/journals/jamap…

English
1
3
8
948
James Sotiropoulos retweetledi
JAMA Pediatrics
JAMA Pediatrics@JAMAPediatrics·
High initial oxygen (90-100%) for resuscitation of preterm infants less than 32 weeks may be associated with reduced deaths, finds study from the NETMOTION Collaboration. ja.ma/3XDzbGy
JAMA Pediatrics tweet media
English
0
7
10
1.7K
Abdul Razak
Abdul Razak@DrAbdulRazak_MD·
@EBNEO @JAMAPediatrics @James_Sot @grpolglase @Atul_Monash 4. Biased studies (lots of reds/yellows) 5. Highly heterogeneous in terms of titration IMO, this is a very important paper alerting us to be careful with what we are doing but I would look forward for TORPIDO, HILO to get some more insights
Abdul Razak tweet media
English
1
0
3
112
James Sotiropoulos retweetledi
NHMRC CTC
NHMRC CTC@TrialsCentre·
📢 New Research 🔬 Do higher oxygen concentrations help prevent death in very premature babies? New research from the NETMOTION study led by @James_Sot, @LeneSeidler and @KylieEHunter from the @syd_health @TrialsCentre, published in @JAMAPediatrics hopes to help answer this question. Read more about the research here 👉 rb.gy/l3f2x8 Read the full paper here👉 rb.gy/wjppqy #LeadershipForGood #ClinicalResearch #PrematureBabies
NHMRC CTC tweet media
English
0
4
6
440
James Sotiropoulos
James Sotiropoulos@James_Sot·
@Dr_KSGautham What we did find from looking into titration is that after 4 minutes the delivered FiO2 was relatively similar across the three groups. There are some nice figures in eAppendix 8 that explore this 👇
James Sotiropoulos tweet mediaJames Sotiropoulos tweet media
English
3
0
2
67
James Sotiropoulos
James Sotiropoulos@James_Sot·
@Dr_KSGautham Certainly. The slow vs fast titration definition was somewhat arbitrary, but we drew a line based on how fast the study protocols allowed FiO2 to be adjusted each minute. This didn't work, as the studies titrated too heterogeneously. So we couldn't run this planned analysis.
English
1
0
1
98
Gonzalo Solís García
Gonzalo Solís García@gonsolisg·
@James_Sot Congrats on a much needed study! Would you be able to provide the full text? I was trying to read it but our library won't access it until is on a print issue. Thanks and congratulations again
English
1
0
0
93
James Sotiropoulos
James Sotiropoulos@James_Sot·
@BrianKingNeo 3.) Yes, as you found we looked at a few different sets of priors in the supplement 😄 We also compared to frequentists models and got similar results See in 1.) re: how nodes were grouped Let me know if anything else needs clarification
English
0
0
1
22
Brian King
Brian King@BrianKingNeo·
@James_Sot Found #3 in your appendix! I see as a SA you split into 4 categories (21%, 30%, 50-65% and >90%). Still wonder if 30-65% vs >90% would yield anything interesting. Maybe it's simply "some oxygen", even the smallest amount?
English
1
0
0
64
James Sotiropoulos
James Sotiropoulos@James_Sot·
@BrianKingNeo 2.) I think this is a question of statistical power. Interaction effects for network meta analysis are still a relatively new area. They need quite large sample sizes to reach significance. Without speculating too much, I think we will see more about this in future updates.
English
1
0
1
18