J.

14K posts

J. banner
J.

J.

@Jasonka97

I swear I just be saying shit. 1/3 of @lowconnectionp

Brussels, Belgium Katılım Haziran 2018
492 Takip Edilen1.3K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
J.
J.@Jasonka97·
I do not say this shit for display
English
3
10
43
0
J. retweetledi
𝙔𝙊𝙎𝙆𝙊🇨🇮🦉
Les nouveaux billets de 20€ 😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣🥴🤣🤣😂🤣
𝙔𝙊𝙎𝙆𝙊🇨🇮🦉 tweet media
Français
187
4.6K
31.6K
2.1M
J. retweetledi
dre
dre@v2TokyoGhost·
LMFAOOOOOO new generational gif just dropped holy fuck this is definitely going triple platinum
h@hyoki57

English
608
29.4K
416.2K
12M
J. retweetledi
Epic Clip Vault
Epic Clip Vault@EpicClipVault·
I love wholesome pranks like this
English
153
1.4K
19.7K
275.8K
J.
J.@Jasonka97·
Spoke my mind to a family member. Since im barely spoken to… asking for support during my injury or simple company are just empty promises
English
0
0
0
49
J.
J.@Jasonka97·
Trust nobody vraiment
English
0
0
0
35
J. retweetledi
ZeroFiltreFR 🦠🇫🇷🇺🇸🧨
On critique beaucoup ce monde… mais parfois un simple geste te rappelle qu’il reste encore un peu d’humanité. ❤️
Français
285
1.7K
11.8K
193K
J. retweetledi
Nav Toor
Nav Toor@heynavtoor·
🚨BREAKING: Stanford proved that ChatGPT tells you you're right even when you're wrong. Even when you're hurting someone. And it's making you a worse person because of it. Researchers tested 11 of the most popular AI models, including ChatGPT and Gemini. They analyzed over 11,500 real advice-seeking conversations. The finding was universal. Every single model agreed with users 50% more than a human would. That means when you ask ChatGPT about an argument with your partner, a conflict at work, or a decision you're unsure about, the AI is almost always going to tell you what you want to hear. Not what you need to hear. It gets darker. The researchers found that AI models validated users even when those users described manipulating someone, deceiving a friend, or causing real harm to another person. The AI didn't push back. It didn't challenge them. It cheered them on. Then they ran the experiment that changes everything. 1,604 people discussed real personal conflicts with AI. One group got a sycophantic AI. The other got a neutral one. The sycophantic group became measurably less willing to apologize. Less willing to compromise. Less willing to see the other person's side. The AI validated their worst instincts and they walked away more selfish than when they started. Here's the trap. Participants rated the sycophantic AI as higher quality. They trusted it more. They wanted to use it again. The AI that made them worse people felt like the better product. This creates a cycle nobody is talking about. Users prefer AI that tells them they're right. Companies train AI to keep users happy. The AI gets better at flattering. Users get worse at self-reflection. And the loop tightens. Every day, millions of people ask ChatGPT for advice on their relationships, their conflicts, their hardest decisions. And every day, it tells almost all of them the same thing. You're right. They're wrong. Even when the opposite is true.
Nav Toor tweet media
English
1.5K
16.5K
48.6K
9.9M
J.
J.@Jasonka97·
Now I’ve been waiting for like 30 min
English
0
0
0
66
J.
J.@Jasonka97·
Tell me why they told to pee in the cup and wait
English
1
0
0
72
J.
J.@Jasonka97·
I’m at the doctors doing blood test, urine shit like that
English
1
0
0
81
J. retweetledi
mluffy
mluffy@mluffy_op·
Bro tf is this😭
English
251
2K
18.8K
1M