JayArea

2.4K posts

JayArea banner
JayArea

JayArea

@JayArea4o8

#MMTLP

Katılım Mayıs 2022
224 Takip Edilen85 Takipçiler
JayArea retweetledi
KKep
KKep@kimkep4796·
⚖️ MMAT / MMTLP Case: 24-50792-gs (Chapter 7) Filing Date: 04/03/2026 NLA – Not Legal Advice ⸻ 📂 WHAT WAS FILED •2677 – Trustee response to FINRA (🔥 main filing) •2678 – Supporting declaration (adds transcripts) •2679–2681 – Motion to seal funding docs •2682–2685 – Litigation funding approval + hearing (5/7/26) (Copy of today’s docket shown in the comment section.) ⸻ 🔥 DOC 2677 — QUICK SUMMARY 📄 •Trustee: “FINRA doth protest too much…” •Says FINRA is: •❌ Exaggerating burden (5M emails / $500K+) •❌ Stalling for nearly a year •❌ Refusing to cooperate •Key points: •✅ FINRA has market-wide trading data •✅ FINRA investigated MMTLP •❌ Privilege is not absolute •⚠️ CAT data may be deleted soon 👉 Ask to court: Deny motion to quash + force FINRA to produce ⸻ ⚡ OTHER FILINGS •💰 Funding secured to pursue litigation (2682–2685) •🔒 Terms sealed (2679–2681) •📎 Evidence + transcripts added (2678) ⸻ 🎯 BOTTOM LINE 👉 Trustee is: •Calling out FINRA delays •Saying the data exists •Warning evidence could disappear •Pushing judge to compel production dropbox.com/scl/fi/qr5lzbg… dropbox.com/scl/fi/aweqqay…
KKep tweet mediaKKep tweet mediaKKep tweet mediaKKep tweet media
English
19
154
249
21.7K
JayArea retweetledi
George Palikaras
George Palikaras@palikaras·
There is are not one, not two, but three bitchslaps loading in the next couple of months that will echo to the end of times… gather round, gather round. 😂 #IpittyTheAprilFools
GIF
English
60
244
502
12.1K
JayArea
JayArea@JayArea4o8·
MMTLP
JunkSavvy@JunkSavvy

It wasn't an April Fool's prank. It was the 💣💣💣 no one saw coming... #FOIA 3 years ago today...THEY KNEW!!! #FINRAFraud The FOIA documents reveal extensive communications between senior FINRA officials and their SEC counterparts concerning issues with MMTLP trading. They knew there was a problem for more than a year and FAILED to protect investors. Key findings include: 💥Fourteen months prior to FINRA’s U3 trading halt, three FINRA committees—Market Operations, OTC Corporate Actions Team, and Market Fraud Team—were in active dialogue with SEC representatives re: MMTLP....and they FAILED to protect investors. 💥On December 2, 2022, a conversation took place between FINRA’s OTC Corporate Actions Team and an SEC representative regarding the proposed Meta/NBH spin-out transaction.....and they FAILED to protect investors. 💥On December 5, 2022, just one day before FINRA issued the first of two corporate actions, Sam Draddy noted that the “MMAT/MMTLP matter” had caught the attention of his Fraud Team and others, mentioning discussions with FINRA’s General Counsel and suspicions of fraud involving the two issuers, with “bluesheeting” already underway. They went forward with the corporate action despite RULE 6490.....and they FAILED to protect investors. 💥Draddy, along with Boyle and Gibbons, arranged a Zoom meeting with SEC counterparts to discuss further....and they FAILED to protect investors. 💥On December 11, 2022, at 6:38 p.m. on a Sunday, FINRA CEO Robert W. Cook contacted an SEC official regarding a flood of shareholder complaints about the trading halt, some containing alleged threats (no evidence or law enforcement reporting evidence has been provided), prompting him to send his staff to work remotely while offering to brief his contact.....and they still FAIL to protect investors. 💥Concurrently, Stephanie Dumont, FINRA’s Executive Vice President of Market Regulation and Transparency Services, emailed an SEC contact to schedule an urgent meeting the next morning to discuss the MMTLP situation and the recent halt, copying Racquel Russell on the correspondence.....and still FAIL to protect investors. THEY KNEW. And for the first time, we no longer had to speculate...WE KNEW!!! Following this release and the public outcry, sources claim @SECGov held an emergency meeting to stop FOIA releases. The MMTLP Army did not receive another meaninful FOIA for over a year. WHAT ARE THEY HIDING???#Coincidence WE...ARE...NOT...GOIN...AWAY!!! #Relentless TRCH MMAT MMTLP

HT
0
17
32
361
JayArea retweetledi
KKep
KKep@kimkep4796·
MMTLP / MMAT / TRCH / NBH ⚖️Kelly v. FINRA (Case No. 2:25-cv-01195-APG-DJA) Filed: 03/30/2026 Response to FINRA’s Objection🏐 (⚠️Not legal advice) ⸻ ⚖️ Core Argument (Simple Version) 1. ❌ “Judge already ruled on immunity” — NOT TRUE FINRA says they’re already immune. Kelly: •Judge never ruled on immunity •Prior dismissal was for: •No private right to sue •Jurisdiction 👉 Immunity was never decided ⸻ 2. 🎯 The REAL issue Before immunity: 👉 “Did FINRA actually have authority to do this?” ⸻ 3. 🔥 What’s being challenged Two specific acts: •Changing corporate action language •Halting trading + removing final trading window 👉 Court has never analyzed if these were authorized ⸻ 4. 🧠 Why FINRA’s argument fails FINRA: “We’re immune” Kelly: •Those cases assumed authority •None asked: 👉 “Was this conduct actually authorized?” ⸻ 5. ⚖️ What Kelly wants 👉 Step 1: Did FINRA have authority? 👉 Step 2: THEN consider immunity ❌ Not the other way around ⸻ 🔥 Bottom Line 👉 FINRA is trying to skip a critical step •They want automatic immunity •Court must first confirm authority ⸻ 🧠 Why this matters If Kelly wins this point: 👉 FINRA must prove authority 👉 If they can’t → immunity weakens or fails ⸻ 💡 One-Liner 👉 “You can’t claim protection unless you prove you were allowed to do it.”@FINRA_Robbed_Me
KKep tweet mediaKKep tweet mediaKKep tweet mediaKKep tweet media
English
9
120
202
4.9K
JayArea retweetledi
KKep
KKep@kimkep4796·
MMAT MMTLP TRCH NBH - Due this Friday, April 3rd, 2026 is the Trustee’s response to FINRA’s March 27, 2025 brief in support of the Motion to Quash a subpoena in the Meta Material’s Bankruptcy case.
English
6
116
224
3.5K
JayArea retweetledi
DrewDiligence
DrewDiligence@KarmaCollects·
$MMTLP I would strongly suggest everyone who has their shares in a brokerage and/or retirement account download and save your statements going back as far as you can. At the very minimum, take screenshots of your holdings and make sure the date is visible.
English
3
42
122
3.8K
JayArea retweetledi
Guess Who
Guess Who@RedHeelzz·
AMAZING! In true @SECGov fashion… They finally figured out they can’t beat us so they CHEAT INSTEAD. Delete the evidence and it never happened, right? Interesting timeframe you all chose. Three years. It’s almost laughable. Nice try. What made you think this was a good plan, @SECPaulSAtkins? A “New SEC”? Nah. You’re as corrupt as ALL of your predecessors! Keep it up. You all can weaponized this system till the cows come home. WE ARE NOT GOING AWAY. #MMTLParmy $MMTLP $MMAT #Relentless sec.gov/newsroom/press…
Guess Who tweet media
English
43
317
575
39K
JayArea retweetledi
George Palikaras
George Palikaras@palikaras·
Check out these docs @annvandersteel There’s something deeply revealing (and disturbing) about a regulator arguing three things at the SAME time: 1) “Producing the data would be too burdensome” 2) “Even if we produced it, it wouldn’t identify anyone” 3) “We need to seal the identity of the person saying all this” So let’s pause. Dear @FINRA: You oversee market integrity. You investigate trading activity. You halt securities. You call this oversight⁉️ To everyone: How can a market be regulated if the regulator cannot, AND will not, identify the participants behind the activity it claims to oversee? That is not a discovery dispute anymore. The system is describing its own limits under oath. What this implies, structurally: 1. Surveillance exists WITHOUT full traceability! 2. Data exists WITHOUT actor-level resolution!! 3. Responsibility is distributed across layers, but accountability is NOT reconstructible from within ANY single layer!!! 4. Critical datasets (CAT, clearing, prime brokerage) are functionally SILOED!!!! Strategic Interpretation in my humble opinion: If a regulator cannot, or will not, identify participants behind market activity, then either: 1. The system is NOT designed to resolve attribution end-to-end, OR 2. The relevant data sits OUTSIDE the regulator’s accessible perimeter and control (which begs the question who has real access and control), OR 3. The integration layer between surveillance and accountability is INTENTIONALLY incomplete All three lead to the same conclusion: FINRA has a structural blind spot, not a one-off limitation. The system looks completely corrupt.
KKep@kimkep4796

⚖️ MMTLP / MMAT / TRCH / NBH Meta Materials Inc. Bankruptcy U.S. Bankruptcy Court – District of Nevada Case No. 24-50792-gs 📄 Key Filings by FINRA (3/27/2026) 👈 •FINRA Supplemental Brief on Undue Burden •Declaration of David S. Norris (Undue Burden) •FINRA General Counsel Declaration •Motion to Seal + Proposed Order (NOTE: The Trustee’s response is due 4/3/2026.) ⸻ 🧠 WHAT THIS IS (Layman’s Terms) ⚠️ Not Legal Advice The trustee wants FINRA documents to investigate potential claims. FINRA says: 👉 “It’s too big, too expensive, and mostly protected—so it should be limited or blocked.” ⸻ 🔍 FINRA’S CORE ARGUMENTS 🟥 Burden •~5M messages / 2.56 TB data •~$450K–$550K+ to review 👉 “This is excessive for a nonparty.” ⸻ 🟥 Privilege •Attorney-client •Work product •Investigative files 👉 “Most of what you want can’t be produced anyway.” ⸻ 🟥 Scope •Trustee narrowed other subpoenas •FINRA still asked for 4 years + communications 👉 “We’re being asked for far more than others.” ⸻ 🟥 Justification •Trading halt tied to settlement/clearance concerns ⸻ 🟥 Sealing •Safety concerns + threats used to justify sealing (See comments to this post for these filings.) ⸻ ⚖️ WHAT THE JUDGE DECIDES 👉 Is this subpoena: •Reasonable and relevant •OR overly burdensome and overbroad Courts balance: •Need for info •Burden/cost •Privilege limits ⸻ 🚨 KEY TAKEAWAYS •This is a scope fight—not a full stop •FINRA’s burden argument will: 👉 Limit scope, not eliminate discovery •Privilege will: 👉 Shape production, not block it entirely ⸻ 🎤 Bottom Line 👉 FINRA will likely have to produce something meaningful—but not everything requested, and not all at once. Also note that the Judge is well aware of the statute of limitations. dropbox.com/scl/fi/9e6a2tw… dropbox.com/scl/fi/a9bjdxt…

English
32
365
542
20.6K
JayArea retweetledi
KKep
KKep@kimkep4796·
Reminder- Upcoming dates in the Meta Materials Bankruptcy Case. FINRA’s filing is due tomorrow. (I expect they will file late. ⏰)
KKep tweet media
English
5
81
155
6.3K
JayArea retweetledi
JunkSavvy
JunkSavvy@JunkSavvy·
Good luck trying to silence The MMTLP Army. 🤣🤣🤣 We know the SEC conspired with regulators, lobbyists, broker-dealers, shorts, et al to defraud investors. The cover-up is ongoing. Ain't FOIA a b*tch?!? #Receipts Your resignations and departures do NOT absolve you of accountability. We expose more and more everyday and we are coming for you. We will not stop until you are exposed, and we are reconciled for the harm your CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY has done to 65k+ investors for over 1200 days. WE ARE RELENTLESS & WE ARE NOT GOING AWAY!!! MMTLP MMAT TRCH
Chris G@808CG1

MMTLP #FAFO #Veterans #1stAmendment 🔥 THREAD: New Civil Liberties Alliance (NCLA) Takes the SEC’s Gag Rule to the Supreme Court, and YES, it connects to MMTLP. @annvandersteel @TheRobbCarter @cvpayne 🚨BREAKING: NCLA just filed a petition asking the U.S. Supreme Court to review the SEC’s unconstitutional Gag Rule. A rule that forces people to give up their First Amendment rights for life if they settle with the agency. This is a massive moment. Why does this matter? Because the SEC’s Gag Rule is designed to do one thing: 👉 Silence the people who know the truth about SEC actions. Forever. And if you’re in the MMTLP community, this should hit hard. You’ve lived the consequences of a system where the SEC can act in the dark, hide records, and avoid accountability while the public is left with redactions, denials, and silence. MMTLP exposed a simple reality: · When regulators can operate without transparency, investors pay the price. · When regulators can silence people, the truth never reaches the public. · The Gag Rule is the architecture that protects that system. In MMTLP, we’ve seen: • FOIA blackouts • Withheld factual records • A U3 halt with no explanation • 14 months of trading on a placeholder • Zero transparency from the agencies involved Now imagine adding a lifetime gag order on top of that. That’s exactly what the SEC does in settlements: “Sign this agreement, and you can never publicly dispute our allegations even if we were wrong.” That’s not regulation. That’s censorship. NCLA is right: The SEC should not have the power to silence Americans for life. And MMTLP proves why. When the public can’t hear from the people closest to the facts, the narrative belongs entirely to the agency no matter how incomplete or inaccurate. If the Supreme Court strikes down the Gag Rule, it won’t just be a First Amendment victory. It will crack open the wall of secrecy that has shielded the SEC for decades the same secrecy that has fueled the MMTLP transparency crisis. Sunlight is coming. Accountability is coming. And the era of regulators operating without scrutiny needs to end. MMTLP is the case study. The Gag Rule is the mechanism. The Supreme Court is now the venue. The fight for transparency is bigger than one ticker. It’s about restoring the public’s right to speak, to know, and to challenge government power. And that fight just moved to the highest court in the country. More to come! MMTLP remember, FOCUS. The SEC Can Silence You for Life youtu.be/_OhBoqGVdAA?si… via @YouTube

English
6
212
317
9.5K
JayArea retweetledi
KKep
KKep@kimkep4796·
MMTLP / MMAT / TRCH / NBH ⚖️Case: Kelly v. FINRA Case No.: 2:25-cv-01195-APG-DJA Court: U.S. District Court, District of Nevada (Las Vegas) 📑Filing Date: March 25, 2026 ⸻ 🧾 Layman’s Summary (Not legal advice) FINRA just filed an update telling the judge: 👉 “Other courts have already ruled on cases just like this—and they all dismissed them.” Here’s what that means in plain English: •FINRA is pointing to recent decisions in Texas and Connecticut where similar lawsuits were thrown out. •Those courts said: •FINRA has regulatory immunity (they can’t be sued for actions taken as a regulator). •FINRA is not the government, so constitutional claims (like due process violations) don’t apply. •In those cases, judges dismissed the lawsuits with prejudice (meaning they’re done—can’t be refiled). 👉 FINRA is arguing: “Kelly’s case is basically the same as those—so this court should dismiss it too.” They specifically tie it to: •MMTLP trading decisions •FINRA’s role in regulating OTC markets ⸻ ⚖️ Key Takeaway This filing is FINRA strengthening its motion to dismiss by saying: “Multiple courts already agree with us—this case shouldn’t move forward.” ⸻ 🎯 Why It Matters (Your Bigger Picture) •This is part of FINRA’s “immunity shield” strategy •They’re trying to create a pattern of consistent rulings across courts •If accepted, it could: •Shut down Kelly’s claims early •Limit discovery into FINRA’s actions But… 👉 It also shows: •Courts are being flooded with similar MMTLP-related claims 👀 •The issue is far from isolated dropbox.com/scl/fi/zgfoz95…
KKep tweet mediaKKep tweet mediaKKep tweet media
English
6
97
190
9.9K
JayArea retweetledi
JunkSavvy
JunkSavvy@JunkSavvy·
⚠️🚧TORCHLIGHT ENERGY INVESTORS🚧⚠️ Were you an investor in TRCH in 2019-June 2021??? I need your help. Multiple investors have reached out to me regarding a Discord Group that may have been discussing SHORTING TRCH and possibly moving shares OFFSHORE. Additionally, they received UNSOLICITED communications via Stock Twits 👇SEE BELOW👇 encouraging them to SHORT TRCH. If you have any info that may be helpful, PLEASE REACH OUT TO ME ASAP. My DMs are open. Thanks, J. MMTLP MMAT TRCH
Gandalf@GandalfWizz

@EnergyCredit1 This you?! "We have been shorting the hell out of Torchlight for years now....We have made $$$ millions in the process....We offset our borrowing costs by shorting elsewhere...Torchlight's days are counted." #Short #Fuked @nbhydrocarbons @johnbrda @Jweschristian

English
16
179
270
11K
JayArea retweetledi
Copy&Paste©️🇺🇸
Copy&Paste©️🇺🇸@wdmorgan2·
The theory here is that FrostBridge, Inc—a new entity controlled by Greg McCabe with the same Midland address as Next Bridge Hydrocarbons (NBH)—could create a practical way to force short sellers (including any naked or synthetic positions from the #MMTLP era) to cover or settle their obligations. This builds on the belief held by many investors that broker-held positions exceed the legitimate ~165 million shares spun off to direct-registered (DRS) holders at Equiniti/AST. Here's how it could work in a step-by-step, straightforward way: Next Bridge transfers valuable assets—such as oil and gas leases, production rights, or development opportunities—into FrostBridge. This keeps the core NBH entity "clean" for genuine shareholders while giving FrostBridge real economic value to work with. FrostBridge then develops, sells, or monetizes those assets to generate cash proceeds or liquidity. This creates tangible money that can be used to resolve disputes. As more legitimate holders DRS their shares with Equiniti, the registered count at the transfer agent approaches the authorized limit. Any remaining broker-held claims (street name positions that may include synthetic or excess shares) stand out as mismatches—brokers can't deliver real NBH shares 1:1 without admitting or covering the shortfall. With FrostBridge holding monetizable assets, NBH could structure a resolution where: - Broker-held or unsettled positions receive a cash payout funded by FrostBridge proceeds (or related sales/dividends). This compensates for the failure to deliver without giving them equity in NBH. - True DRS shareholders retain full ownership in NBH, plus any future upside from remaining assets or new projects. This setup pressures shorts to cover because: - Continuing to hold synthetic positions becomes risky and expensive once mismatches are highlighted (e.g., through audits, shareholder pressure, or legal discovery). - If regulators, courts, or even political figures push for fairness (as some have with letters to the SEC/FINRA), brokers and short holders face liability for failing to deliver entitled shares. Cash settlement via FrostBridge provides an "off-ramp" to close positions without an uncontrolled squeeze. - It avoids diluting real shareholders while addressing the imbalance—shorts either buy back/cover in some market mechanism (if enabled) or accept cash to walk away. In this scenario, the force comes from economic reality and liability: the existence of a separate, value-creating entity like FrostBridge makes it harder to ignore or drag out the old MMTLP issues. Shorts can't just sit indefinitely on phantom positions if NBH carves out assets to fund a fair close-out. Genuine investors benefit by protecting their equity stake while the system finally reconciles the excess claims. Of course, this remains a theory based on the shared McCabe connection and the structure of the new company—no official announcements confirm it yet. But for patient holders, it offers a logical business path toward resolution and potential rewards without endless waiting. Details will become clearer as more filings or updates emerge.
English
1
17
52
2.3K
JayArea retweetledi
McCabeFTW
McCabeFTW@OknowsFootball·
TAKE ACTION #MMTLP! This wasn't the generic response like we usually get. They will EVALUATE! 🙌
McCabeFTW tweet media
English
6
58
118
3.2K
JayArea retweetledi
Ann Vandersteel™️
Ann Vandersteel™️@annvandersteel·
Selling something you don’t own nor can acquire to complete that sale is fraud. The SEC and FINRA are supposed to protect investors from this type of crime. Why is it not a crime in the case of #MMTLP?
GLASS GUY@Giftsonglass

#mmtlp We got them to admit they can't deliver. This is what needs to be broad casted. Isn't this what Madoff did? Admitted his crime?

English
31
340
638
19.5K