Jeffrey Spies

5.2K posts

Jeffrey Spies banner
Jeffrey Spies

Jeffrey Spies

@JeffSpies

Bridging tech, data, & policy to accelerate science via #open. PhD Quant Psych (Behav Stats). Lately negotiating for libraries. Built/founded/CTO'd @OSFramework

Katılım Ekim 2010
1.3K Takip Edilen1.7K Takipçiler
Jeffrey Spies retweetledi
Purdue Libraries and School of Information Studies
We are thrilled to announce that The Big Ten Academic Alliance (BTAA) has signed a groundbreaking two-year Open Publishing Agreement with Springer Nature—marking the publisher’s first unlimited, uncapped open access agreement in the Americas! Learn more: hubs.la/Q03pQr_p0
Purdue Libraries and School of Information Studies tweet media
English
0
2
0
143
John B. Holbein
John B. Holbein@JohnHolbein1·
Whoa. This looks like an amazing project. Scholars at UMichigan have recently collected a massive dataset of over 1.1M podcast transcripts that is largely comprehensive of all English language podcasts. Using this data, they conduct an investigation into the content, structure, and responsiveness of the podcast ecosystem. Check it out!
John B. Holbein tweet mediaJohn B. Holbein tweet mediaJohn B. Holbein tweet mediaJohn B. Holbein tweet media
English
14
125
746
99.8K
Jeffrey Spies retweetledi
Susan Swartz
Susan Swartz@beadmomsw·
Aaron Swartz would/should be 38 years old today.
English
184
1.3K
6.6K
467.2K
Jeffrey Spies retweetledi
Achim Zeileis @zeileis@fosstodon.org
Very sad news: Our friend and colleague Fritz Leisch passed away this week. Among his many #rstats contributions: - Original R Core Team member - Co-founder of CRAN - Sweave author for reproducible documents R Core Team announcement: stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-an…
English
6
27
111
20.8K
Dan Goodman
Dan Goodman@neuralreckoning·
@PracheeAC I think we need to convene a committee to decide if you're right or not Prachee. We'll get back to you next year when all the relevant stake holders have had ample time to contribute to deciding the terms of reference for the committee.
English
2
0
11
1.6K
Prachee Avasthi
Prachee Avasthi@PracheeAC·
I respectfully disagree with the article. I cannot think of a worse thing for the open science movement to become a consensus seeking juggernaut. It’s already a very insular space with the usual suspects and same ideas floating around for decades — it can be very difficult to get movement on the smallest things because, IMO, there is no surer guarantee to incrementalism or stasis than doing only things for which all people agree. And now for the optimism. Some of the best things to happen in open science are when Someone. Somewhere. Does. Something. And thankfully, there are so very many somethings precisely because we don’t need consensus to try something new. The people in this movement are a gorgeous panoply. Individual fires of a thousand colors. Abundant motivation to something good for the future of science. Many of their experiments have shaped our thinking and iteration on what might come next. By explicitly trying to unearth new ideas and people, we can see that that the movement is so much bigger than it seems. Many are acting rather than waiting for consensus and reports and convenings. That’s not to say that coordination, interoperability, standards etc. aren’t important or required for big change as well so kudos to all of these organizations and infrastructure we depend on that also try to move mountains. But progress thankfully does not hinge on one solution to rule them all or distribution of efforts in coordinated ways. TL;DR, in the open science movement, the opportunity to execute on new, unproven, non-consensus ideas and subsequent movement of the Overton window are a massive feature, not a bug. And IMO, further consolidation isn’t worth the downsides.
English
6
2
53
29.6K
Mushtaq Bilal, PhD
Mushtaq Bilal, PhD@MushtaqBilalPhD·
@scite has this great AI-powered chat bot that answers your questions with citations to published scholarship. It also shows you the exact places in articles where the required infomation. As you can see in the screenshot, it shows the exact line where the author define illegality.
Mushtaq Bilal, PhD tweet media
English
2
3
6
1.5K
Dr Raul Pacheco-Vega
Dr Raul Pacheco-Vega@raulpacheco·
I am looking for good citations on definitions of "illegal", "informal", "illicit" and "immoral". Self-nominations welcome.
English
2
2
2
4.9K
Andrew Montalenti
Andrew Montalenti@amontalenti·
Is there an open source tool or WordPress plugin that checks outbound links on your old blog posts, makes sure they are not 404s or unresponsive, and offers way to replace with Internet Archive links instead, if available? Ideally something F/OSS and truly non-commercial?
English
3
0
1
985
Jeffrey Spies
Jeffrey Spies@JeffSpies·
@JasonWilliamsNY Hmm, not bad. This could become a thing. With that said, I'd go for your dish if for no other reason than the meat on the AI dish is almost certainly people.
English
1
0
1
26
Jeffrey Spies retweetledi
Prachee Avasthi
Prachee Avasthi@PracheeAC·
Good at thinking through high leverage research projects that you’re happy to iterate on or sunset if they don’t pan out so you can test new approaches/insights? You might be the ideal Discovery Project Scientist @ArcadiaScience! Our next round of review begins in about a month so this is the time to apply! jobs.lever.co/arcadiascience…
English
2
44
65
37.4K
Rafa Sanjuan
Rafa Sanjuan@Rafa_Sanjuan_·
Happy to share our preprint on the zoonotic potential of >100 animal viruses! We used pseudotypes to study viral entry into human cells and its molecular determinants. biorxiv.org/content/10.110…
English
3
58
156
21.1K
Jeffrey Spies retweetledi
Susan Swartz
Susan Swartz@beadmomsw·
11 years. RIP my darling boy.
Susan Swartz tweet media
English
118
391
2.8K
176.2K