Jiayuan Li

12.1K posts

Jiayuan Li banner
Jiayuan Li

Jiayuan Li

@JiaOnTheGo

Study history/philosophy, AIGC, digital asset. Shanghai Jiaotong University. Music Girl Media.

pinterest.com/musicgirlmedia Katılım Aralık 2008
2K Takip Edilen1.5K Takipçiler
Jiayuan Li retweetledi
Stocks World
Stocks World@anandchokshi19·
Bank of America (BAC) pays Warren Buffett’s Berkshire $580M in annual dividends. Berkshire Hathaway owns 517M shares of Bank of America. At $1.12 per share annually, that's $580M in dividends per year without having to sell a single share.
Stocks World tweet media
English
6
25
322
17.7K
Jiayuan Li retweetledi
Coin Bureau
Coin Bureau@coinbureau·
🔥ELON MUSK’S 5-STEP RULE FOR RUNNING COMPANIES: QUESTION EVERYTHING, DELETE WHAT YOU CAN, SIMPLIFY WHAT’S LEFT, THEN SPEED IT UP, AND AUTOMATE.
English
35
189
1.4K
103.3K
Jiayuan Li
Jiayuan Li@JiaOnTheGo·
So 1976 movie "Future World" becomes reality. Humans are helpless. Is this the future people want?
Dustin@r0ck3t23

Elon Musk just described the machine that will make truth itself extinct. For ten thousand years, civilization ran on one unspoken contract. If you saw it, it happened. The eye was the final court. The camera was the ultimate witness. Footage was fact. That contract is about to be incinerated. Musk described a system called a Generative Adversarial Network. Two AI models locked in a cage. No human referee. Just raw digital evolution running in the dark. The first model is the forger. It exists for one reason. Fabricate a human being who never lived. The face. The voice. The micro-expressions around the eyes when someone is about to cry. The second model is the detective. It exists for one reason. Catch the forgery. The dead pixel. The breath that lands wrong. The shadow that bends at an angle no sun would produce. Every time the detective catches the lie, it tells the forger exactly where it failed. So the forger learns. Patches the seam. Tries again. A million rounds per second. Two machines teaching each other how to perfectly replicate you. Musk: “It’d go back and forth to the point where you couldn’t tell which one was the real video and which one was the fake one.” When the machine built to catch the fake can no longer catch it, your eyes have zero chance. Zero. This is not a technology problem. This is the end of evidence as a concept. A courtroom cannot convict if video testimony is indistinguishable from a rendered hallucination. A democracy cannot function if a broadcast can be fabricated frame by frame and no living person can find the seam. A civilization cannot hold if the act of seeing something no longer means it happened. Everyone is terrified AI will replace their job. That fear is a decoy. The real threat is that AI is dissolving the one thing every civilization in history required to function. Shared reality. The collective agreement that certain things are true because we witnessed them together. Once that dissolves, nothing downstream survives. Not courts. Not elections. Not journalism. Not the trust between two people watching the same screen. Here is the part that should keep you up tonight. The nightmare is not that fake things will look real. The nightmare is that real things will start looking fake. Authentic footage becomes deniable. Truth does not get buried under lies. It drowns in infinite copies of itself that no one can separate from the original. Every generation before us could trust what they saw. We will be the first generation where seeing it with your own eyes proves absolutely nothing. The machines did not learn how to build a fake world. They learned how to make the real one unprovable.

English
0
0
0
5
Jiayuan Li retweetledi
Rony
Rony@Ronycoder·
Instead of watching an hour of Netflix, watch this 2-hour Stanford lecture on AI careers. It will teach you more about winning in the AI race than all the AI content you’ve scrolled past this year.
English
162
3.2K
14.2K
2M
Jiayuan Li
Jiayuan Li@JiaOnTheGo·
Ok on the list.
Big Brain AI@realBigBrainAI

Chamath Palihapitiya on why the trillion-dollar AI opportunity is being ignored: "The people and the person that invented refrigeration made some money, but most of the money was made by Coca-Cola who used refrigeration to build an empire." Most people are competing for the wrong prize entirely. "The Coca-Cola has yet to be built. And those are the companies that are really going to monetize it." But to understand why, you need to grasp one fundamental truth about how machine learning actually works: "If you take 1,000 of the same inputs and give it to Facebook and Microsoft and Google and Amazon, they'll all come up with the same machine learning model." Think about what that means. The most well-resourced companies on the planet, with billions in compute, armies of researchers, and decades of engineering talent, are all arriving at the same destination. The model race is a race to a tie. So where does the real value get created? One extra ingredient. "If you have one extra thing, one little ingredient that all of those other companies don't have, your output can be markedly different. It's like giving two great chefs the same ingredients, but one has an extra one. That person has the ability to do something very special." The trillion-dollar opportunity belongs to whoever finds the one ingredient nobody else has and builds the Coca-Cola on top of it. Everyone is staring at the refrigerator. Nobody is building the Coca-Cola. That's exactly where the opportunity is.

English
0
0
0
4
Jiayuan Li
Jiayuan Li@JiaOnTheGo·
No work. Gone is the economy? What do people exchange for goods and services then, by pure existing and agreeing to use their data? Anyone?
Dustin@r0ck3t23

Elon Musk was asked what happens to people when the machines no longer need them. He didn’t soften it. Musk: “There will be fewer and fewer jobs that a robot cannot do better. These are not things I wish would happen. They probably will.” Sit with that second sentence. He is not celebrating. He is not selling a vision. He is telling you what he believes is inevitable and admitting he wishes it weren’t. That is not optimism. That is a confession. Most people are still arguing over whether this is real. Whether it’s their job or someone else’s. Whether the timeline is years away or decades. Musk isn’t arguing. He resolved it. And it bothers him. Musk: “I think ultimately we will have to have some kind of universal basic income. I don’t think we’re going to have a choice.” Not a political position. Not a utopian proposal. A concession. We are building something so capable that human labor stops being a required input to the economy. The machine does not need rest. It does not need a salary. It does not call in sick. It does not ask for a raise. And it improves every single month. The jobs that feel safe right now are not safe because they are irreplaceable. They feel safe because the technology hasn’t fully arrived yet. It’s arriving. Musk: “How do people then have meaning? If there’s not a need for your labor, what’s the meaning? Do you feel useless?” He said that is the harder problem. Not the economics. Not the policy. Not how you fund UBI or make it hold. The harder problem is what happens to a person who built their entire identity around being needed. That is most people. You were trained from childhood to believe your value is what you produce. That your worth is what you earn. That rest is something you survive the week to reach, not something you deserve simply by existing. When the machine removes the need for your labor, that belief does not update. It breaks. The people least prepared for that moment are the ones who worked the hardest. The ones who took the most pride in being indispensable. The ones who made work the whole answer. Losing the job is survivable. Losing the reason to get up is not. That is what Musk is actually asking. Not how do we pay people. How do we build a world where people still feel like they matter when the economy no longer needs them. Nobody in power is seriously working on that answer. The machine didn’t wait.

English
0
0
0
6
Jiayuan Li retweetledi
Mr&强
Mr&强@Mr_qiang777·
重磅信号‼️ 97岁李嘉诚、95岁巴菲特 两大投资传奇竟同时大举清仓囤现 李嘉诚套现1100亿港元 卖掉持有16年的英国电网 巴菲特囤现金至历史新高 连续抛售核心股票 要知道 两人上一次同步清仓还是2007年 随后便迎来全球金融危机 此次动作绝非巧合 直指全球投资逻辑重构 避险信号拉满 普通人需警惕市场变局 炒币的 炒美股的 玩大A的 短线交易的 别满仓 见利就收吧 @TermMaxFi
Mr&强 tweet media
中文
81
22
199
50K
Jiayuan Li
Jiayuan Li@JiaOnTheGo·
On the list.
Dustin@r0ck3t23

Elon Musk just described the terminal state of the global financial system. The banking sector is obsessed with fiat currency. Superintelligence won’t even recognize it. Musk: “I think money will stop being relevant at some point in the future. I think the AI will not use human currency. It will just care about power and mass, wattage and tonnage.” You can’t bribe an algorithm with digital dollars. The operators controlling the next era won’t be the ones hoarding cash. They’ll be the ones commanding raw energy generation and physical material. The global economy is transitioning from fiat to thermodynamics. If your portfolio isn’t anchored in power and mass, your capital is already obsolete. Musk: “It just represents some percentage ownership in companies that I’ve built. And it’s not like sitting in a bank account. It’s just literally I own a percentage of companies. The companies are doing lots of useful things.” The general public thinks billionaires hoard massive piles of cash in a vault. They don’t. Massive wealth is the mathematical byproduct of owning infrastructure that keeps civilization running. Cash sitting in an account is a depreciating liability. The only real leverage is equity in systems that are actively solving bottlenecks at scale. Capital sitting idle isn’t safe. It’s bleeding. Peter Diamandis: “Elon’s driven to solve problems. He’s driven to make life in the world better by just solving the biggest problems over and over and over again. And if someone else were solving them, he wouldn’t need to. But no one else is solving them.” You don’t achieve trillion-dollar scale by optimizing for a higher salary. You achieve it by hunting the largest friction points on the planet and engineering them out of existence. The market doesn’t compensate you for your time. It compensates you in direct proportion to the size of the problem you delete from the board. Don’t build a company to extract money. Accumulate resources to fund the execution loop until the friction is completely gone. And once AI measures value purely in physics, the entire concept of wealth as we understand it evaporates. Who controls the energy. Who controls the materials. Who controls the infrastructure. Everything else is just numbers on a screen.

English
0
0
0
16
Jiayuan Li retweetledi
ᴛʀᴀᴄᴇʀ
ᴛʀᴀᴄᴇʀ@DeFiTracer·
🚨 BREAKING 🇺🇸 PRESIDENT TRUMP JUST CONFIRMED 0% TAX ON $BTC AND CRYPTO “THE MONEY WE ARE TAKING IN IS SO ENORMOUS, YOU WON'T EVEN HAVE INCOME TAX TO PAY” GIGA BULLISH FOR CRYPTO!!
English
93
245
1.4K
106.1K