政经伪座PGY
20.7K posts
政经伪座PGY
@Jickmang2
生长于北京,成长于南京, 曾混迹于南北两京,国共两都. 工农兵学商,全党骗中央,都干过. 吃喝嫖赌抽,坑蒙拐骗偷,都做过. 臣本布衣,隐居于南洋,苟全性命于乱世,不求闻达于诸侯,本想在推特上笑谈一下江湖,弄个三瓜二枣解馋,却被禁推百日,近日才予恢复......
Katılım Ağustos 2020
2.9K Takip Edilen1.9K Takipçiler
姚诚+李毅 😂😂😂
《美国之音》的长期御用嘉宾，100%潜伏蛆虫，有一个算一个，包括美国之音的全套班底！
谁能给我举几个反面例子？除了妖妖酱……
中文
姚誠 的本名是譚春生（Tan Chunsheng）
基本背景
•出生：1960年4月，安徽省蕪湖市人（現年約66-70歲）。
真實身份疑雲（近年爭議核心）
姚誠長期以「反共義士、前軍官」形象出現，但海外民運圈對其真實身份存在嚴重質疑：
•許多人懷疑他是中共特工或代理人，長期滲透海外民運圈，任務可能是「搞亂民運、恐嚇武統、削弱反共意志」。
•2026年5月，他突然從美國離開，經雲南邊境返回中國，平安入境後大讚中國基建、物價便宜，稱「葉落歸根」、要「肉身測試」是否被捕。此舉引發巨大震動，被指為大外宣或政治庇護失敗後「跳船」。20
•批評者認為其言論（誇中共軍力、勸臺灣和平統一、批評美國等）與中共宣傳高度一致，且過去「反共」經歷有包裝嫌疑（例如出國任務「以個人身份」不被組織承認的說法）。
總結來說，公開身份是前海軍中校、維權人士、流亡異議者；但真實身份在海外爭議很大，許多人認定他是中共長期潛伏的特工/代理人，近年「回流」行為加劇了這一懷疑。
中文
姚诚作为海外民运反共大佬突然返回中共国的引起巨大轰动，海外民运接连出事可见被共匪针对或者渗透的非常严重，希望提醒大家提高警惕，注意分辨，谨防受害。他本人刻意强调自己是中共前海军军官，并自证他作为反共人士可以回国，其中内幕肯定没那么简单，这或许是中共布的局。
中文
2018年6月，时年66岁的上海异议人士任乃俊随旅行团前往美国旅游。在朋友的协助下脱队前往纽约，计划在美寻求政治庇护。
上海当地警方和国保频繁通过电话等方式向他本人及其国内亲属施加压力，并向其承诺“回国既往不咎”。因无法承受各方压力，任乃俊不久便在2018年年内选择乘机返回中国上海。
他回国后并未获得此前承诺的宽待，反而遭到更严密的监控与打压，包括多次被警方登门殴打、强制进行精神病鉴定以及限制人身自由等。
任乃俊追悔莫及。
这是他被公安追打到家以后的惨状。
中文
♨️**Yao Cheng (姚诚) Return to China and Photo with Wolf Warrior Li Yi Completely Expose the Corruption of Overseas Democracy Movement and Serious Loopholes in US Asylum Policy**
The recent case of former CCP Navy Lieutenant Colonel Yao Cheng (谭春生) safely returning to China has shocked and angered many. After entering the United States in 2016 under the guise of "political defection," he was quickly embraced by the overseas Democracy Movement circle and became an active YouTube military commentator, frequently criticizing the CCP's military and its Taiwan strategy. However, around May 22, 2026, he suddenly posted a video confirming that he had returned to mainland China. He first went through Southeast Asia and then safely crossed the border from Yunnan. After returning, he publicly stated that he no longer had expectations for the United States, no longer viewed America as the "beacon of democracy," chose to "return to his roots," and even expressed positive views on certain aspects of China such as infrastructure and prices.
What is even more explosive is that after returning, he also took a photo with the well-known CCP Wolf Warrior Li Yi. This photo has been widely circulated online, showing the two standing close together, smiling. This image completely shatters the narrative of a so-called "defector." A person who claimed to carry sensitive CCP military information and had been active in the US for a full 10 years was able to return to China so easily and openly pose with a CCP Wolf Warrior. This is not simple "homesickness" or "disappointment" — it is a direct slap in the face to the overseas Democracy Movement's long-standing claims of having "review mechanisms" and "anti-CCP purity."
The overseas Democracy Movement has played an extremely irresponsible and corrupt role in this matter. They have extremely lax screening, almost non-existent mechanisms, and have even actively packaged and helped people with highly suspicious backgrounds quickly obtain US political asylum. They treat "anti-CCP" as a resource and a business, resulting in opportunists, double agents, and even potential CCP infiltrators easily entering the United States, enjoying protection paid for by American taxpayers, only to turn against America or return to China at critical moments. This directly threatens US national security.
### Yao Cheng's case is only the tip of the iceberg — similar abuses of asylum are numerous
Zhong Jinhua (钟锦化) is a classic example. Between 2014 and 2015, this former CCP judge and lawyer entered the US and obtained political asylum approval in just 43 days — an astonishingly fast process. He claimed to have been persecuted for human rights activities, but there are numerous inexplicable red flags: If he was truly severely persecuted by the CCP, how was his entire family able to leave China safely with valid passports and travel to the US as tourists? As a CCP party member and former judge, he presided over numerous criminal cases, with a reported death sentence rate as high as 30%, and over 150 people reportedly executed under his rulings. Yet such a person was able to quickly pass US asylum review with the help of Democracy Movement figures, relying solely on his one-sided story.
Even more suspicious is that after obtaining asylum, he remained active, participated in various overseas organizations, and was reportedly still holding a Chinese lawyer license as late as 2020 while engaging in bilateral China-US immigration consulting business and helping recruit high-level American talent. These subsequent actions completely fail to prove he was ever persecuted by the CCP and instead show extremely low loyalty to the United States. The multiple contradictions that even an ordinary person can easily see — how thorough was the US immigration background check? Or was it just a mere formality?
Another vivid example is YouTuber Stone (石光磊). According to reliable information, he is the son of a corrupt official in Tianjin. He first fled to Canada, then entered the United States. After joining the Democracy Movement, he pretended to actively support President Trump and used this image to quickly obtain asylum and a green card. Once he secured his status, he immediately cut ties with the Democracy Movement. After 2020, his attitude completely flipped: he began criticizing the US daily, praising the Communist Party, and fiercely attacking President Trump. His content clearly shifted toward CCP-style foreign propaganda, with extremely opportunistic and inconsistent positions. A person with such a suspicious family background was able to easily obtain US asylum protection precisely because of the packaging and strong support from the Democracy Movement, only to turn around and harm American interests.
Additionally, there are cases like Guan Heng (关恒) and other Xinjiang filming incidents. He applied for and received US political asylum after filming videos related to re-education camps in Xinjiang. However, many observers question the true motives and authenticity of such "evidence providers," suspecting they were systematically packaged by the Democracy Movement circle, and that there may even be fabricated elements in their stories, all aimed at quickly passing the US asylum system. These "Xinjiang witnesses" cases also highlight the Democracy Movement’s lax screening and eagerness to expand influence.
### The systemic corruption of the Democracy Movement has seriously endangered US national security
The above cases repeatedly prove that the overseas Democracy Movement has long suffered from severe screening failures and commercialization. In order to expand influence and obtain resources, they often help people with questionable backgrounds apply for US asylum without strict vetting, turning "anti-CCP" into a tradable label. This has directly allowed numerous risky individuals to enter the United States, gain access to Democracy Movement networks and American information, and potentially pass intelligence back to China or turn to anti-American propaganda after securing status.
The United States can no longer afford to be naive. The CCP excels at "mixing truth with lies" in its united front and infiltration tactics. We must remain highly vigilant and cannot open the doors simply based on an "anti-CCP" label.
This chaos is directly related to the lax asylum policies previously dominated by the Democrats. The Pelosi-era approach toward China appeared tough and supportive of "dissidents" on the surface, but in practice the review process was far too lenient and standards too low, allowing large numbers of people with unclear backgrounds to enter. Now that US-China competition has entered a new stage of intense intelligence warfare and infiltration warfare, the old policies are completely outdated and must undergo fundamental reform.
**I strongly call on the US government to immediately promote immigration law and asylum policy reform:**
- Conduct thorough, multi-layered, cross-departmental strict background investigations on all asylum applicants from China, including military and judicial backgrounds, family circumstances, overseas activity records, historical ties to the CCP, financial sources, and real evidence of persecution — never relying solely on personal statements or Democracy Movement recommendations.
- Establish a long-term joint review mechanism among USCIS, FBI, and DHS to regularly re-examine high-risk individuals who have already received asylum (especially those with military, judicial backgrounds, or who were active in the Democracy Movement).
- Asylum policy must strictly prioritize US national security and national interests above all else. Those who genuinely identify with American values, are willing to obey the law and contribute should be welcomed, but any individuals with potential risks must be firmly excluded.
The photo of Yao Cheng (姚诚) with Li Yi after his return, Zhong Jinhua’s (钟锦化) 43-day fast approval, Stone’s (石光磊) complete flip, the Guan Heng (关恒) Xinjiang case, and other incidents have provided more than enough catalysts for reform. It is time to thoroughly clean up the loopholes in the US asylum system and stop letting the corruption of the Democracy Movement become a channel that endangers American security.
Only by establishing a strong, rigorous, and vigilant review system can America truly protect its own interests and effectively help those who are truly deserving and can withstand strict scrutiny.
(Based on publicly available information and online discussions. The incident is still developing. Welcome rational discussion and more evidence.)
#YaoChengReturn #LiYiPhoto #DemocracyMovementCorruption #ZhongJinhua #StoneShiGuanglei #GuanHeng #AsylumReform #USNationalSecurity #ImmigrationReform #AmericaFirst
English
在我前往美国的路上我问过很多中国人为什么要冒着生命危险来美国，他们都发自内心的厌恶和恐惧中共暴政，到美国来就是为了追求自由民主，到了美国之后我发现大多数人并没有站在台前反共，中共暴政给他们带来的恐惧让他们的内心永远都无法奔向自由，我想告诉他们的是：如果真的要追求自由民主，那么共产暴政就是我们永远绕不开的一个绊脚石，否则你来美国就不是追求自由民主，而是在白嫖自由民主的果实，只有你的内心强大起来战胜了中共暴政给你带来的恐惧你才能真正实现你追求自由的目标。
中文
我搞不懂，真想买美股方法多了去了，为啥一定要盯着老虎富途这几家券商？
而且为什么会有人觉得这件事利好币圈？对于政府来说你的钱换成美金和你的钱换成usdt区别很大吗？对于政府来说你用A方法逃税和你用B方法逃税的区别很大吗？
打击券商的关键不是钱不受监管没法抽税流到境外去了吗？
那这样说来币圈在老爷们眼里可比美股坏多了，理论上让这几家券商交出用户境外所得收入的数据再扣税比让币圈的人交税容易几个数量级。
毕竟这么多交易所里，除了想把自己交给国家的欧易以外，其他家想必不太会搭理中国政府。
接下来要么币圈一直熊着，要么牛起来然后被铁锤猛砸，稍微有些期待，毕竟我不是头部KOL，很想知道到时候的“典型”是哪几位天才交易员。
如果大家还想购买美股，可以考虑使用麦通哟@MSX_CN
本王的邀请链接是msx.com/?code=RwIg63
使用上遇到障碍可以私信我
中文
有个事情不知该说不该说
作为一个在海外反共阵营
深度混过的人
姚诚中校的利用价值
远远超过王志安和邓海燕
王志安和邓海燕回到中国根本不会有事
因为党国对他俩不在乎
姚诚中校如果铁了心投共卖友危害甚大
姚诚现在东南亚
显然已被中共铁拳牢牢掌控
从他方方面面表现出来的个性看
他除了屈服配合没有任何第二条路可能
Zhong Jinhua🇺🇸@ZhongJinhua
姚诚中校新视频出来了 他说自己在美国酒驾犯事了 他说自己不想被遣返回中国 甚至南美或非洲 他又说自己想拿美国绿卡很简单很容易 我完全被听晕菜了 可是他都在美国呆十年了呀 难道过去十年他是故意不要美国绿卡吗
中文