Jim

You’re acting like “voting decisions I don’t like” means my views on what our tax policy should be or whether Christians should back some highway bill. That’s not the question. The question is whether you can be a faithful Christian and promote policies that mutilate children and rob them of their reproductive capacity. We’re talking about questions like whether it should be acceptable to make pornography available to children. We’re talking about the question of whether you should be able to murder babies in the womb. These are not merely debatable political issues. They are biblical, moral issues, where there should be no question about what Christian clarity requires. And then, even further, we’re talking about Christian leaders taking money from the secular left organizations who promote such policies and using that funding to try to soften these abhorrent political policies to sell them as a legitimate option for Christians. So you can use your obfuscating euphemisms like “ voting decisions” but we need to be very clear about what those “voting decisions“ represent. And it’s pure wickedness. No Christian should have a problem saying that.

Here is the Christian argument for supporting him: Kamala Harris—who is so committed to the murder of babies that she promised she would allow no religious exemptions to employer provided abortions—was the alternative.

Joy Reid's warning about the far-right: "Their plan? 0 income tax, 0 regulation, earn as much as you want, your family inherits it all!"

There is no Christian argument for supporting this man.