Jodster N

4.5K posts

Jodster N

Jodster N

@JodsterN

Politically incorrect, unvaccinated, conspiracy-theorist asshole. I repost relevant shit but you won’t like my truths. 😬👍

Canuckistan Katılım Aralık 2015
696 Takip Edilen273 Takipçiler
Jodster N retweetledi
Ryan Gerritsen🇨🇦🇳🇱
In a more dangerous and divided world… Carney is psyoping Canadians. Here are 15 separate speeches of him using those words.
English
510
2.3K
6K
152.8K
Jodster N retweetledi
Dr. Dawn Michael
Dr. Dawn Michael@DawnsMission·
BOOM. This is exactly why Big Pharma and the NCI buried it. They’re about to lose billions. Ivermectin & Mebendazole are curing cancer — something chemotherapy could never do. Nearly 200 patients. Multiple cancer types. 84% positive outcomes.
English
170
5.1K
11.8K
251.6K
Jodster N retweetledi
The Eagle flies free
The Eagle flies free@Fa21519230·
🚨🚨 Después de años de investigación, el Dr. William Makis comparte el protocolo censurado de dosificación de IVERMECTINA para la lucha contra el cáncer... Según el Dr. Makis, para la mayoría de los cánceres, incluidos el de mama, colon, pulmón, páncreas, riñón, gástrico y las leucemias, se recomienda una dosis inicial de 1 mg por kg de peso corporal por día... Para una persona de 60 kg, esto equivale a 60 mg diarios: - Cinco pastillas de 12 mg - O 6ml de líquido (aprox. una cucharadita + 1ml) La evidencia de eficacia es convincente y depende de la dosis: - El Dr. Shankara Chetty observó cómo el PSA de un paciente con cáncer de próstata disminuía de 89 a 11 con una dosis de 45 mg/día. - Un caso de la Dra. Tess Lawry mostró una caída del CA125 (marcador de cáncer de ovario) de 288 a 22 con solo 0,2 mg/kg. - Un estudio a largo plazo de Castro en niños con leucemia no mostró efectos secundarios después de 6 meses con 1 mg/kg. En el caso de cánceres agresivos (páncreas, cerebro), la barrera hematoencefálica puede requerir una dosis mayor. El Dr. Makis cita: - Colega del Dr. Landrito con cáncer de vesícula terminal: el cáncer desapareció después de 14 meses con 2 mg/kg/día. - La dosis más alta documentada es de 2,5 mg/kg (Dr. Chetty), con solo efectos secundarios visuales transitorios que se resolvieron. La oncología convencional no ofrece esto. ¿Por qué? La ivermectina es genérica, no tiene patente y no es rentable. Por consiguiente, no hay ensayos clínicos financiados... "Usar ivermectina para el cáncer es, sinceramente, muy sencillo. Es un fármaco sumamente seguro"... Su recomendación más importante para quienes tienen dificultades es comenzar con 1 mg/kg/día. Se puede tomar durante muchos meses, incluso más de un año, con un excelente perfil de seguridad basado en evidencia anecdótica a largo plazo, nada que perder...
Español
45
2K
4.3K
170.4K
Jodster N
Jodster N@JodsterN·
@RealRickRule The easiest way to shut down this style of liberal is to simply ask, “Who pays for it?”
English
1
0
0
28
Jodster N
Jodster N@JodsterN·
@CNviolations Mbongdingo Wright on his maiden flight. Inadvertently invents Congo's first massage chair.
English
1
0
12
304
Dr. Clown, PhD
Dr. Clown, PhD@DrClownPhD·
Always remember how lucky you are NOT to have been born in India… 🙏
English
1.5K
1.7K
18.9K
1.6M
Jodster N retweetledi
Ryan Gerritsen🇨🇦🇳🇱
The only surviving signatory of the 1982 Constitution Act, Brian Peckford knew exactly what was happening to our rights & freedoms during this time. They were being trampled on. Never forget.
English
42
900
2.6K
23.4K
Mindy MF Robinson 🦄
Mindy MF Robinson 🦄@iheartmindy·
@unlimited_ls You're supposed to always say you "feared for your life" like you heard them say they were getting weapon and coming back etc.
English
7
0
53
1.4K
Unlimited L's
Unlimited L's@unlimited_ls·
🚨JUST IN: The Michigan man charged with manslaughter for fatally shooting one of the “teens” he caught breaking into his garage has been bound over for trial This is INSANE... his property had been broken into twice before this incident, and police IGNORED HIM AND TOLD HIM TO GET BETTER SECURITY Now Judge Kelly Kostin said Dayton Knapton, 24, put himself in the situation despite prior break-ins at his property She said his self-defense argument “becomes more difficult” after reviewing security video Knapton is charged with manslaughter, assault with intent to murder, and weapons offenses after a shooting that killed a 17-year-old and injured another Police say he saw several people entering his garage on camera, went outside, and opened fire as they were leaving The garage had been broken into at least twice before, and Knapton had been told after the second break-in to “beef up” his security
English
7.5K
4.7K
31.2K
3.2M
Jodster N
Jodster N@JodsterN·
@randyhillier The only option is to sue the government itself, or those in it. How does one prosecute the entity that broke the rules it's supposed to be enforcing?
English
1
0
1
69
Randy Hillier
Randy Hillier@randyhillier·
The Hartman decision ought to be mandatory study and fully understood before excercising the Right to Vote in Canada. The government may impose any duty, obligation or reccomendation upon the populace including social murder (knowing there will be deaths) and the Courts will protect the government and not provide compensation to the victims. Be wary
The Canadian Independent@canindependent

BREAKING: Ontario Court of Appeal Dismisses Lawsuit Over Teen Sean Hartman’s Death Following COVID-19 Vaccination. In a significant decision released today, the Hartman v. Canada (Attorney General) ruling was upheld by the Ontario Court of Appeal, dismissing a lawsuit brought against the federal government over the death of a teenage boy following a COVID-19 vaccination. The court found that the claim had no reasonable prospect of success and agreed with a lower court decision to strike it in its entirety. The case was brought by Daniel Hartman, whose 17-year-old son, Sean Hartman, died in September 2021. Sean, who had been described as previously healthy, was found dead beside his bed 33 days after receiving the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine. Following the vaccination, he had been taken to hospital due to symptoms his father believes were related to the vaccine. Sean’s father, Dan Hartman, says his son chose to get vaccinated so he could continue playing hockey, as vaccination was required for participation in many sports and activities at the time. Hartman’s lawsuit alleged that federal officials, including the Minister of Health, were negligent in approving, promoting, and monitoring the vaccine, and that they acted with reckless indifference or wilful blindness to potential risks. The Court of Appeal acknowledged the devastating nature of Sean Hartman’s death, describing it as a tragic loss for his family and community. However, the judges concluded that the legal claims could not succeed. Central to the ruling was the finding that the federal government does not owe a private duty of care to individual members of the public when making broad public health decisions during a pandemic. Instead, such decisions are made in the interest of the population as a whole, often requiring difficult trade-offs that may carry risks for some individuals. The court also determined that the claim failed to establish the necessary elements for misfeasance in public office. Specifically, there were no material facts showing that government officials acted in bad faith or knowingly engaged in unlawful conduct that would likely cause harm to Sean Hartman. The judges noted that the clinical trial data referenced in the lawsuit supported the conclusion that the vaccine was highly effective, undermining the argument that officials knowingly promoted a harmful or ineffective product. In addition, the court found that the public statements cited in the claim were directed broadly at Canadians and did not create a specific relationship or obligation toward Sean Hartman as an individual. As a result, there was no legal basis to establish the proximity or duty of care required for a negligence claim. Shockingly, the court also claimed that allowing Hartman’s case to proceed could have broader consequences, including discouraging governments from making urgent public health decisions during emergencies due to fear of legal liability. The Court of Appeal further upheld the lower court’s decision to deny leave to amend the claim, finding that the proposed changes would not have addressed the fundamental legal deficiencies. The judges emphasized that lawsuits must be based on clearly pleaded facts, not on the possibility that supporting evidence might emerge later. Ultimately, the court concluded that while the circumstances surrounding Sean Hartman’s death are deeply tragic, the law does not support holding the federal government liable under the claims presented. The appeal was dismissed, bringing the case to a close, with no costs awarded to either side. The Canadian Independent spoke with Dan Hartman by phone this evening. He said he is “seriously considering” taking the case to the Supreme Court and that he and his legal team will evaluate their next steps over the coming week. Hartman noted that the cost of taking the case to the Supreme Court could exceed $20,000. He added that he does not want to ask those who have already donated to his cause to contribute further but said, “What other option do I have?” Dan believes the courts are not willing to find the government liable or hold it accountable, as doing so would amount to an admission of wrongdoing. He also argues that such a finding would make his larger lawsuit against Pfizer significantly easier to pursue. If you want to donate to Dan’s legal fund, you can do so at the link in the comments section.

English
92
674
1.4K
23.8K
Jodster N
Jodster N@JodsterN·
@iheartmindy @ThrillaRilla369 I usually eat super healthy but up here in Canada, the legalized Devil's Lettuce can create an insane amount of munchies.
English
0
0
0
4
Thrilla the Gorilla
Thrilla the Gorilla@ThrillaRilla369·
Your gangster name is the color of your shirt and the last thing you drank. Who are you? 😄
English
2.2K
57
644
104.8K
Jodster N retweetledi
Ryan Gerritsen🇨🇦🇳🇱
This is where these individuals lost me. In May 2021 The Trailer Park Boys became shills for the vax on behalf of the Nova Scotia Government. This entire clip is full of all the talking points including “take the first one available” Never forget.
English
336
443
3.2K
81K
Jodster N
Jodster N@JodsterN·
@elonmusk @KimWever3 UBI creates government dependence and mandatory compliance. I remember something about a jab not that long ago. Don’t suppose we could pay down a debt or two? Maybe lower taxes or some free hospitals? 🤷🏼‍♂️
English
0
0
2
11
Elon Musk
Elon Musk@elonmusk·
Universal HIGH INCOME via checks issued by the Federal government is the best way to deal with unemployment caused by AI. AI/robotics will produce goods & services far in excess of the increase in the money supply, so there will not be inflation.
English
46.7K
22.7K
195.3K
68.8M
Jodster N
Jodster N@JodsterN·
@buckleycarlson The amount of carbon on this earth hasn't changed in billions of years. Greenhouse gases are trapped by plants and zooplankton, which then decay inevitably back into oil. x.com/i/grok/share/d…
English
0
0
1
83
Buckley Carlson
Buckley Carlson@buckleycarlson·
“By calling it fossil, they tell you it's a resource that's running out. If Humanity knew that oil is like tap water for the Earth, the geopolitics of the parasites would go down the drain in a single day.”
Andy@andreas_nigbur

The Oil Lie Oil isn’t rare, it’s also not made from dead dinosaurs. It’s the 2nd most common liquid after water and is the Earth’s lifeblood. The scarcity myth was a Rockefeller lie to dramatically increase the oil price. The system tells you that oil is liquefied dinosaurs (biotic theory) so you believe it's scarce and pay whatever they want. Lie. Oil is abiotic—a liquid mineral generated by the Earth's own engine through high-pressure and high-temperature processes in the mantle. It is the lubricant for tectonic plates. Depleted wells from the 70s have been found to be fuller today than before. Why? Because the Earth's system pumps it from the subsoil. It doesn't run out; it regenerates. By extracting it on a massive scale, we are drying out the Earth's gears. This is why there are more earthquakes and creaking faults: we are stripping the oil from the engine. The fossil theory (coined by the Rockefellers and the Smithsonian in the late 19th century) is the greatest economic hack in history. If oil came from organic matter, it would have a biological signature (nitrogen, phosphorus, etc.) that would degrade. Crude oil is pure polymeric hydrocarbon. The Thomas Gold Thesis This expert (whom the system tried to discredit) proved that methane and oil rise from the depths of the mantle. Hydrocarbons are primordial constituents of the Earth's formation. By calling it fossil, they tell you it's a resource that's running out. If Humanity knew that oil is like tap water for the Earth, the geopolitics of the parasites would go down the drain in a single day.

English
118
678
4.1K
188K