Joe Miechowicz

So, I have one idea about abortion that will not be accepted by both the Democratic Party and the Republican Party. My idea is to split the pregnancy of a woman and the baby 50/50. 4.5 months to the woman and her right to have an abortion and 4.5 months to the government, based on when the brain is activated. We all have seen the spark of life at conception when the sperm enters the egg, but doesn't that throughout life ? Doesn't the female egg of a cow have that spark of life at conception when the sperm of a bull enters the egg? So it is only the spark of life, not the spark of human life. The next argument is that when the human fetuses heart starts beating, this is the beginning of human life, but we do heart transplants like the heart is a removable part. So, in my opinion, heart start beating is not the beginning of human life. In my opinion, human life starts when the brain is activated and after 4.5 months of pregnancy. So the first 4.5 months of the pregnancy, it is a fetus and can be aborted by the woman, and after 4.5 months, it becomes a citizen that is protected by the government and can only aborted through a court order. The abortion debate is over, rover. @elonmusk @AmericaPartyX After thought, an emergency abortion can be performed after 4.5 months, and then the emergency issues can be litigated through the courts. If the patient and the doctor have the paperwork supporting the emergency abortion, the possible manslaughter charge can be mitigated at the County Prosecutor's Office, and dropped.

When will people take a pocket knife to dig that out.

📜 Today, we celebrate the 235th anniversary of the adoption of the Constitution of 3 May, the first modern national constitution in Europe and the second in the world. 🕊️ The Constitution of 3 May, 1791, was a symbol of reform, progress, and national renewal.

I think so,...

It's going to be rainy n snowy in Switzerland on Tuesday. If I were there, I would leave tomorrow.

I'm watching FDR on the History Channel and just started dreaming of the possible futuristic robot war. That's what is going on.

I asked the Artificial Intelligence if shotgun shell sized can be produced, and the answer is yes. The idea behind this is that almost everyone has a shotgun in their home, so all they would need is a different kind of shell. It would be available for non-military use after all electronics are incased with Faraday protection.

Or have a shotgun that can do both. The shot gun shell. Why have two shotguns? Then, you would have to figure out how to invent a limited NN-EMP shot gun shell. Then the shot would have to be magazine fled. Red magazines and green magazines. So when you kill all the robots and reach the human enemy, you switch to red magazines. Then go back to green magazines and wait for the next wave of robots.

Prepare for the robot war before it happens, and it won't happen.

NN-EMP weapons. You open up the gun cabinet, grab your shot gun, but you have two types of shot guns, a conventional one for humans, and an NN-EMP shot gun for robots. Non Nuclear-Electromagnetic Pulse shotgun. Electronic devices are made of cases that are like Faraday cages. It's gonna happen, you know it, and I know it.

What are we going to do about robots ? Put a kill switch in the middle of their back, and make their arms unable to reach it. Can't use wifi or Bluetooth, they could block it. Robots are a mistake. In my opinion.

Meer mortals can not stop reincarnation. It just happens.

What if ? Certain automobile manufacturers offered vehicles without all that tracking technology. You can buy the car or truck with SouthStar or without SouthStar and pay less for the car or truck. Then, pay a little more for auto insurance.

Dinesh D’Souza didn’t just “let his daughter marry” anybody. He let her marry Brandon Gill because the dude is the kind of patriot who walks into the lions’ den with receipts** and doesn’t flinch.🔥 In this clip, Gill looks Minnesota Dems in the eye and asks a question so simple it feels illegal in D.C.: Does all this make Minnesota stronger… or weaker? Then he starts rattling off the numbers he says come straight from state data, plus whistleblower claims about a decade of fraud warnings and political protection. And suddenly everyone in the room forgets how to answer in complete sentences. 😬 WATCH. SHARE. If you think taxpayers deserve the truth, comment “STRONGER” or “WEAKER.” 👇

- MARCUS AURELIUS

Worst thing about having big dreams is Fighting the doubts of never making them come true everyday

When Men have no Honor the world falls down pretty quickly

@askaya You are right !!!

What’s the BEST line to end an argument?

A violation of the 4th Amendment. If you pay cash for the car. If you got a loan, then they could legally monitor it.