Joe Seymour

1.2K posts

Joe Seymour banner
Joe Seymour

Joe Seymour

@JoeSmash86

Chartered Town Planner working at @mplanningcouk. Originally from Cardiff. Supporter of @cardiffcityfc @cardiff_blues @FAWales @WelshRugbyUnion 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿

Cheltenham Katılım Nisan 2012
214 Takip Edilen118 Takipçiler
Joe Seymour
Joe Seymour@JoeSmash86·
@78Spirit Robin Friday did it properly! ✌🏻
Joe Seymour tweet media
Cheltenham, England 🇬🇧 English
0
0
4
462
Tom Harwood
Tom Harwood@tomhfh·
I think a huge part of the reason why no government has been able to enact difficult pro-growth reforms is that the average voter still believes we remain a rich country. You hear this in politicians’ rhetoric “the sixth richest country in the world”. We’re the sixth largest economy but now far from the richest. Per capita we’re tanking down the rankings. One of the reasons why Poland or China have been able to have growth miracles in recent years is they think like a developing country. They know they were poor and they have to build to get rich. We think we are rich and that we don’t have to build anything anymore, or that when we do, it has to be the most expensive possible version of what we build. Bat tunnels. Fish Discos. Kittiwake hotels. We think we’re rich so we can afford to chase some wealth creators away, afford to mandate public biodiversity net gain on every development in the country, and afford to ratchet up state pension spending five times faster than the rate of growth in the economy. We’re suffering from acute ‘rich country delusion’. It’s only once we realise we’re far poorer than we should be that we can start to fix this nonsense.
Polymarket@Polymarket

JUST IN: New analysis reveals Brits thought the UK ranked 7th against US states in income per person — it actually ranked 51st.

English
135
444
4.5K
615.2K
Looking for Growth
Looking for Growth@lfg_uk·
Bring back nuclear, bring back industries, bring back jobs.
English
3
10
108
2.6K
Joe Seymour
Joe Seymour@JoeSmash86·
@Paul_SLG If the planning system is like Spurs, then God help us all!
English
0
0
0
19
Paul Smith
Paul Smith@Paul_SLG·
FWIW, I think there is both room, and a need, for both of those elements. But, right now, I think the focus needs to be on "removing grit from the system" and making the planning system we have - however imperfect - work to its maximum potential. You can think of the planning system like Spurs. It might need an overhaul, but there's also an urgent need to ensure it is doing better in the short-term too.
English
1
0
2
121
Paul Smith
Paul Smith@Paul_SLG·
This is a really interesting read. It highlights a distinction between promoting "ideologically pure" pro-development reforms, and the more boring, but arguably more impactful, types of reforms that those involved with the planning system day to day would like to see.
Jack Airey@aireyj

YIMBYs reshaped the housing debate. But if we’re honest they've done more to influence elite thinking than increase housing delivery. To make a difference they need a broader approach - focusing more on demand, viability, real schemes and cost of living. propviews.co.uk/blog/the-yimby…

English
1
0
3
493
Joe Seymour
Joe Seymour@JoeSmash86·
@BluebirdsPast Why we didn't go for Biancheri on loan in Jan is beyond me. He would've been the perfect focal point that we've been missing since Salech's absence.
English
0
0
0
42
Bluebirds Past
Bluebirds Past@BluebirdsPast·
I do feel that we're missing a presence in the box without Salech. Many a time last night there would be crosses and cutbacks and there's just nobody there to finish. After the red when Rubin was supposed to be our main threat up top, he was picking the ball up off the CBs.
English
6
0
22
3.1K
Joe Seymour
Joe Seymour@JoeSmash86·
@mjccfc As long as it's blue I don't care 💙😂
English
0
0
0
275
Joe Seymour
Joe Seymour@JoeSmash86·
@JohnPretty2o2o @ElaineCox11 @RosieP4 In retrospect John it was a bit of a cheeky/sarcastic comment, but it raises a more salient point about striking the balance between housebuilding and environmental protection, compared to the oversimplification of entirely blaming immigration.
Cheltenham, England 🇬🇧 English
1
0
0
13
John Pretty
John Pretty@JohnPretty2o2o·
Clearly Mr Seymour you think this comment is clever. The problem is - IMVHO - that successive governments have encouraged mass migration to the UK from overseas as quangos have told them it is good for growth. But this keeps demand for housing (and therefore the cost of houses) very high. The answer to the problem is to properly manage human migration levels in this country and ensure that the population is stable.
English
1
0
1
41
Dr Elaine Cox 🍃 💚 🍃🌽🥬🐦‍⬛🐌🇬🇧
While planners and developers are house building, they are responsible for every ton of carbon released into the atmosphere. They are responsible for every species pushed closer to extinction or forced to relocate.    To trade nature's future for housing is not development, and it is a disgrace to the word 'growth.’
Dr Elaine Cox 🍃 💚 🍃🌽🥬🐦‍⬛🐌🇬🇧 tweet media
English
14
53
130
2.8K
Joe Seymour
Joe Seymour@JoeSmash86·
@NoelMooney13 Ask Mr Bale for some 💰 to help transform the Vale site into a world class academy like Clairefontaine
Cheltenham, England 🇬🇧 English
0
0
0
135
Noel Mooney
Noel Mooney@NoelMooney13·
We are developing our new long-term strategic plan for Welsh football. What do you believe we should be thinking about improving / changing over the next 10 years to ensure we reach our full potential ??? Be as direct as you wish. #TogetherStronger 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿⚽️
Noel Mooney tweet media
English
190
21
185
38.4K
Joe Seymour retweetledi
Cardiff Rugby
Cardiff Rugby@Cardiff_Rugby·
Is this one the greatest tries not to have been given? ❌ The lighting strike was cancelled out for Tom Bowen ⚡️ #SixNationsU20
English
15
19
251
74K
Joe Seymour
Joe Seymour@JoeSmash86·
@tomhfh It's the same story up and down the country. Local planning authorities are far too protective of brownfield, employment land that often accommodates few employees, which should be made available for housing.
Cheltenham, England 🇬🇧 English
0
0
0
573
Tom Harwood
Tom Harwood@tomhfh·
Old Oak Common is set to be one of the best connected railway stations in the country. Elizabeth Line. HS2. Heathrow. A superhub. But do you see all those massive ugly flat single storey sheds next to it? Sadiq Khan is blocking thousands new homes, and 'protecting' the sheds.
Tom Harwood tweet media
English
52
32
466
135.2K
Joe Seymour retweetledi
Looking for Growth
Looking for Growth@lfg_uk·
A local council is being forced to spend £4.3 million building a "bat bridge" over a new road. Because, obviously, bats can't fly. Even a so-called "bat expert" admits the plan is bonkers.
English
13
9
141
24.8K
Joe Seymour
Joe Seymour@JoeSmash86·
@AnyaM8_ No, we hate it too. We would like to at least have a chance of obtaining approval for our clients every once in a while!
English
1
0
1
20
Anya Martin
Anya Martin@AnyaM8_·
Looking at this, it is no wonder that the only people who actually like our planning system are planning consultants.
Sam Dumitriu@Sam_Dumitriu

This is eye-opening. I knew the planning system was broken, but it is worse than even I thought. When I heard that planners had recommended Hackney councillors block the extremely popular Shoreditch Works development I asked @Michael_J_Hil to read the planners' report and look through hundreds of documents submitted by the developer. It is really bad. - Developers submitted NINE THOUSAND PAGES of paperwork, planners said it wasn't detailed enough. - Planners said it should be rejected because some flats would lack enough natural light due to shadows cast by other parts of the development. - Planners simultaneously argued there weren't enough homes, didn't provide enough office space, and it was too tall. - Developers had to comply with 42 separate Hackney policies, 75 separate London Plan policies, the Hackney Borough Site Allocations Plan, five other separate sets of standards and policy frameworks, two sets of ‘emerging’ unfinalised policies, plus all relevant national legislation and guidance. - The design review panel criticised the project because every building was of the same architectural style. Planners ignored the surveys showing huge public support for the designs. - New homes must provide outdoor space so residents have access to a green roof, but planners said that might disturb nature. (This is on an exclusively brownfield site) Councillors have an opportunity tonight to overrule the planners. I sincerely hope they do! samdumitriu.com/p/anatomy-of-a…

English
1
0
29
1.5K
Joe Seymour retweetledi
Sam Dumitriu
Sam Dumitriu@Sam_Dumitriu·
This is eye-opening. I knew the planning system was broken, but it is worse than even I thought. When I heard that planners had recommended Hackney councillors block the extremely popular Shoreditch Works development I asked @Michael_J_Hil to read the planners' report and look through hundreds of documents submitted by the developer. It is really bad. - Developers submitted NINE THOUSAND PAGES of paperwork, planners said it wasn't detailed enough. - Planners said it should be rejected because some flats would lack enough natural light due to shadows cast by other parts of the development. - Planners simultaneously argued there weren't enough homes, didn't provide enough office space, and it was too tall. - Developers had to comply with 42 separate Hackney policies, 75 separate London Plan policies, the Hackney Borough Site Allocations Plan, five other separate sets of standards and policy frameworks, two sets of ‘emerging’ unfinalised policies, plus all relevant national legislation and guidance. - The design review panel criticised the project because every building was of the same architectural style. Planners ignored the surveys showing huge public support for the designs. - New homes must provide outdoor space so residents have access to a green roof, but planners said that might disturb nature. (This is on an exclusively brownfield site) Councillors have an opportunity tonight to overrule the planners. I sincerely hope they do! samdumitriu.com/p/anatomy-of-a…
English
61
251
1.3K
344.1K
Joe Seymour
Joe Seymour@JoeSmash86·
@s8mb The problem I often find with Design Review Panels is that the architects on the panel that weren't hired for the project critique the design out of spite, without objectively assessing what is before them.
English
0
0
3
428
Sam Bowman
Sam Bowman@s8mb·
Why have Hackney Council's planning officers recommended that the council reject the Shoreditch Works scheme, which would add 80,500 square meters of new commercial, lab and office space right next to the City? This piece is a good run-down, but the stuff on design in particular caught my eye. Even though the project is popular with normal people and basically looks pretty good, the Design Review Panel (chaired by an architect from Cazenove Architects) rejected it on taste-based grounds, including because the design was *too* cohesive and they wanted something more eclectic. Here is an example of how the tastes of architectural elites are forced on the world through the planning system. This is one reason new buildings look so bad and are so unpopular: they're the architectural equivalent of being forced to listen to Captain Beefheart against your will, every day.
Sam Bowman tweet media
Sam Dumitriu@Sam_Dumitriu

This is eye-opening. I knew the planning system was broken, but it is worse than even I thought. When I heard that planners had recommended Hackney councillors block the extremely popular Shoreditch Works development I asked @Michael_J_Hil to read the planners' report and look through hundreds of documents submitted by the developer. It is really bad. - Developers submitted NINE THOUSAND PAGES of paperwork, planners said it wasn't detailed enough. - Planners said it should be rejected because some flats would lack enough natural light due to shadows cast by other parts of the development. - Planners simultaneously argued there weren't enough homes, didn't provide enough office space, and it was too tall. - Developers had to comply with 42 separate Hackney policies, 75 separate London Plan policies, the Hackney Borough Site Allocations Plan, five other separate sets of standards and policy frameworks, two sets of ‘emerging’ unfinalised policies, plus all relevant national legislation and guidance. - The design review panel criticised the project because every building was of the same architectural style. Planners ignored the surveys showing huge public support for the designs. - New homes must provide outdoor space so residents have access to a green roof, but planners said that might disturb nature. (This is on an exclusively brownfield site) Councillors have an opportunity tonight to overrule the planners. I sincerely hope they do! samdumitriu.com/p/anatomy-of-a…

English
28
77
622
201.2K
Joe Seymour
Joe Seymour@JoeSmash86·
@Paul_SLG This has costs appeal written all over it 💰
English
0
0
0
26
Paul Smith
Paul Smith@Paul_SLG·
What a headline this is.
Paul Smith tweet media
English
21
19
224
19.9K
Bluebirds Past
Bluebirds Past@BluebirdsPast·
🗓️On this day 24 years ago, a very special night at Ninian Park thanks to @graham_kavanagh and @scottyoung1818. If you were there, what were your favourite memories of the day?
English
32
57
363
31.9K
SimpsonsEFL
SimpsonsEFL@EflSimpsons·
•Amorim sacked by Man Utd•
SimpsonsEFL tweet media
English
8
14
193
32.8K