John Bell

Together Alliance March. The largest gathering of extremists and racists in British history.

London — A leftist coalition march against the political right features Islamists and fans of the Iranian regime. They are calling opposition to radical Islam and mass migration “racist.”

The March Against the Far Right arrives on Whitehall, with Islamic Republic fanboys leading the way, naturally

The UK Together rally in London today is being sold as a march of love, unity, and hope - against racism and the far-right. But a quick look at who’s backing it reveals a very different story. 🧵

Without Net zero taxes and subsidies the entire industry isn’t viable. energy bosses explain that even if wholesale bills were halved or even zero, Our bills will be 20% higher in 5 years. Brilliant strategy Ed, just brilliant 🤡

“In-group preference is not the same as out-group hostility. You can want to preserve and protect the white British majority in Britain while still treating others with respect. Of course nation-states should put their people first.” @Goodwinmj on the Sceptic. Full episode👇

My first reaction was to groan at such performative nonsense. My second was to think — good practice for the power cuts the pursuit of net zero will inevitably deliver.

The idea that any football supporter who attends matches regularly and listens to the ‘banter’ from the crowd is ‘hurt’ by the visit of a potential future Prime Minister is so laughable it almost seemed like a comedy sketch Mr Ashton needs to grow a backbone !

I’m Emily. A Reform UK Councillor from Portsmouth, new to X. I stepped up because, as a young woman, I’m worried about where our country is heading. Sometimes I don’t feel safe walking home at night and that isn’t right. We can do better. Safer streets, stronger communities. 🩵

I’ve noticed “I act in the British national interest” has been Starmer’s favourite phrase of late. It should of course hardly need saying. It seems to me to come from a place of defensiveness. For in reality Starmer instinctively always thinks first of international law, never mind whether in our national interest or not

"Even if the strait reopened tomorrow, the damage to energy facilities from missile strikes will take years to repair. In the uncertainty over how the war will end, one thing is certain: the economic effects will stretch until the end of the decade" thetimes.com/article/4adc91…

⚠️Australia in big trouble. “If diesel were to run out, food would quickly run out. We have just over a week of dry goods consumption available at our supermarkets and about a week for chilled and frozen foods. Pharmacies will start running out of medicine in about a week” michaelwest.com.au/fuel-security-…

Sounds like the table is being set for the US to withdraw from NATO. Not that this wasn’t obvious before, but it’s now being said pretty explicitly

This is Olympic-standard corruption of Parliament. Say you want to abolish the House of Lords but instead appoint more new peers than your four immediate predecessors combined (62) and also kick out a large group (90) of opposition peers. Starmer has tipped the scales in the Lords in favour of Labour by 152 in just two years. It's outrageous.

Downing Street Wiped the Phone Before Anyone Could Find It Scotland Yard has reopened its investigation into the reported theft of Morgan McSweeney's phone, the device that almost certainly contained the most direct evidence of how Lord Mandelson came to be appointed as Britain's ambassador to Washington. Detectives are examining CCTV footage from the Westminster street where McSweeney claims he was robbed on the evening of October 20 last year. They fear the footage will already have been deleted. It is usually stored for only three months. The investigation, in other words, has been reopened into evidence that may no longer exist. On the evening of October 20, McSweeney called 999 from Pimlico. He gave the wrong address. He did not correct the handler when the wrong address was read back to him. He did not identify himself as the Prime Minister's chief of staff. He did not mention that the device contained sensitive government material. The following day, a police officer called to ask whether McSweeney had tracked the phone using its built-in tracker. He did not respond. At some point between the reported theft and that unanswered call, Downing Street remotely wiped the device. This destroyed the tracker. The phone could no longer be located. The messages it contained could no longer be recovered. Now consider what did not happen. The Metropolitan Police were not informed that the missing device belonged to the Prime Minister's chief of staff. MI5 was not informed. GCHQ was not informed. The Information Commissioner's Office, which must by law be notified within 72 hours of any serious data breach involving personal information, was not informed. It told The Telegraph this week that it had received no notification at any stage. Set this against what was happening inside Downing Street at the same moment. Officials had been holding meetings to discuss what they would do if the Conservatives used parliamentary process to force the disclosure of McSweeney's messages with Lord Mandelson. The phrase used in those meetings, according to reports, was coming for Morgan's messages. Days after those meetings concluded, the phone containing Morgan's messages was reported stolen. Days after that, it was wiped. A prosecutorial mind, presented with this sequence, asks one question above all others. At the point when Downing Street chose to wipe the device, did anyone consider that doing so would destroy the tracker and make recovery impossible? The answer is yes. That is what remote wiping does. It is not a passive consequence. It is the purpose. There are innocent explanations available for most of what surrounds this affair. Wrong addresses happen. Unanswered calls happen. Notification failures happen. But the decision to wipe a missing government device, knowing that doing so would render it untraceable and its contents unrecoverable, at the precise moment when those contents were the subject of active parliamentary and legal scrutiny, is not a clerical error. It is a choice. And choices have authors. Keir Starmer has said he beats himself up over the Mandelson appointment. He has not said who authorised the wipe. He has not explained why the ICO was not notified. He has not said whether anyone in Downing Street attempted to track the device before wiping it. He has not explained why MI5 and GCHQ, the agencies whose job it is to manage exactly this kind of security risk, were kept in the dark. These are not difficult questions. They have simple, factual answers. A government with nothing to hide would have provided them already. The country is still waiting. "Keir Starmer has said he beats himself up over the Mandelson appointment. [...]. He has not explained why MI5 and GCHQ, the agencies whose job it is to manage exactly this kind of security risk, were kept in the dark."

The system is completely rotten

Mark Ashton, Chairman of Ipswich Town FC, has just delivered a masterclass in institutional cowardice. Unreservedly apologising for the “hurt, pain and distress” caused by hosting an elected Member of Parliament, Nigel Farage? Not for some scandal, but for the unpardonable sin of allowing democracy to set foot in a football stadium. This is not compassion. It is the snivelling capitulation of a man who mistakes the shrieking of a Twitter minority for moral authority. One watches such a spectacle with horror: another British institution folding before the mob, reviewing its “policy on engaging with politicians” as though free association were now a hate crime. Pathetic, spineless, and beneath contempt. Britain deserves leaders with spines, not this grovelling.

The British left might be the most retarded in the world. They actually believe a man who screams Allahu Akbar whose wife wears a full niqab is a progressive champion who cares about women’s rights, LGBT and the environment.

They just repeat "China is a green superpower" like a mantra, but don't understand what the words mean. China runs on hydrocarbons, with some token intermittent renewables so useful idiots have something to point at.

The reason we have such terrible politicians is because we have such terrible journalism.