Johnathan Bi

2.3K posts

Johnathan Bi banner
Johnathan Bi

Johnathan Bi

@JohnathanBi

Join my newsletter for expert interviews on philosophy/religion/technology: https://t.co/8jgM4XELH9 Founding Team Opto, Cosmos Columbia Phil & CS Canadian Math Olympiad

New York, USA Katılım Mart 2013
405 Takip Edilen30K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Johnathan Bi
Johnathan Bi@JohnathanBi·
America violated the freedom of the natives in order to build the freest nation in history. According to Machiavelli, this is not hypocrisy; this is necessity. Be it Rome, Ancient Israel, or Persia, all great nations are founded by ruthlessness: there is no other way. This is the interpretation of the great Machiavelli scholar Leo Strauss who writes: “America owes her greatness not only to her habitual adherence to the principles of freedom and justice, but also to her occasional deviation from them. [Machiavelli] would not hesitate to suggest a mischievous interpretation… of the fate of the Red Indians… there cannot be a great and glorious society without the equivalent of the murder of Remus by his brother Romulus.” Strauss brings in Machiavelli to combat two dominant views on America’s founding. The right wants to whitewash and hide this founding murder: they blame disease; they point to how “backward” the natives were; they want this period of history hidden in textbooks to preserve America’s pristine moral image. The left, on the other hand, seeks to expose and guilt: they tear down statues; denounce their ancestors; and want this injustice seared into the minds of each American. For Machiavelli, both sides are equally misguided, and for the exact same reason. The right buries its head in the sand and ignores the brutality. The left implicitly assumes that it could have been otherwise: that you can build your shining city on a hill, preserve the original city, while everyone sings kumbaya. Both voices are afraid to own up to the true cost of freedom. Machiavelli writes: “there is no secure mode to possess [a city] other than to ruin them. And whoever becomes patron of a city accustomed to living free and does not destroy it, should expect to be destroyed by it.” It is tough and ruthless men, willing to violate their deepest principles, who get you to a state of strength where you can actually realize those principles. As the saying goes, tough men make peaceful times. But Machiavelli thinks that people living in peace tend to forget this. Because peaceful times are so easy, you delude yourself into thinking that toughness was never needed. So you either whitewash like the right or denounce like the left. Peaceful times make weak men. And so, to not let weak men make tough times, Machiavelli’s role as teacher is to constantly remind you of the treachery of founding and the true cost of politics. If he were writing a textbook on American history it would be filled with acts of America’s ruthlessness — not to be denounced but to be imitated — just as his books are filled with ruthless Roman leaders for his fellow Italians to learn from. In this lecture, you will learn about the terrifying things you need to do to build a free, equal, and lawful society. And, as always, I will withhold my own opinion and critiques for the end after a charitable reconstruction. Timestamps: 0:50 America's Founding Murder 11:03 The American Case for Technology Theft 18:29 Why Machiavelli Loves the Vulgar 35:56 Machiavelli Really Dislikes the Elites 46:58 Why co-CEOs Never Work 59:43 Wokeism is the Capitalist’s Best Friend 1:18:35 Corrupt People Cannot Be Reasoned With 1:21:08 My Own Views on Machiavelli
English
11
11
83
12.3K
Johnathan Bi
Johnathan Bi@JohnathanBi·
America violated the freedom of the natives in order to build the freest nation in history. According to Machiavelli, this is not hypocrisy; this is necessity. Be it Rome, Ancient Israel, or Persia, all great nations are founded by ruthlessness: there is no other way. This is the interpretation of the great Machiavelli scholar Leo Strauss who writes: “America owes her greatness not only to her habitual adherence to the principles of freedom and justice, but also to her occasional deviation from them. [Machiavelli] would not hesitate to suggest a mischievous interpretation… of the fate of the Red Indians… there cannot be a great and glorious society without the equivalent of the murder of Remus by his brother Romulus.” Strauss brings in Machiavelli to combat two dominant views on America’s founding. The right wants to whitewash and hide this founding murder: they blame disease; they point to how “backward” the natives were; they want this period of history hidden in textbooks to preserve America’s pristine moral image. The left, on the other hand, seeks to expose and guilt: they tear down statues; denounce their ancestors; and want this injustice seared into the minds of each American. For Machiavelli, both sides are equally misguided, and for the exact same reason. The right buries its head in the sand and ignores the brutality. The left implicitly assumes that it could have been otherwise: that you can build your shining city on a hill, preserve the original city, while everyone sings kumbaya. Both voices are afraid to own up to the true cost of freedom. Machiavelli writes: “there is no secure mode to possess [a city] other than to ruin them. And whoever becomes patron of a city accustomed to living free and does not destroy it, should expect to be destroyed by it.” It is tough and ruthless men, willing to violate their deepest principles, who get you to a state of strength where you can actually realize those principles. As the saying goes, tough men make peaceful times. But Machiavelli thinks that people living in peace tend to forget this. Because peaceful times are so easy, you delude yourself into thinking that toughness was never needed. So you either whitewash like the right or denounce like the left. Peaceful times make weak men. And so, to not let weak men make tough times, Machiavelli’s role as teacher is to constantly remind you of the treachery of founding and the true cost of politics. If he were writing a textbook on American history it would be filled with acts of America’s ruthlessness — not to be denounced but to be imitated — just as his books are filled with ruthless Roman leaders for his fellow Italians to learn from. In this lecture, you will learn about the terrifying things you need to do to build a free, equal, and lawful society. And, as always, I will withhold my own opinion and critiques for the end after a charitable reconstruction. Timestamps: 0:50 America's Founding Murder 11:03 The American Case for Technology Theft 18:29 Why Machiavelli Loves the Vulgar 35:56 Machiavelli Really Dislikes the Elites 46:58 Why co-CEOs Never Work 59:43 Wokeism is the Capitalist’s Best Friend 1:18:35 Corrupt People Cannot Be Reasoned With 1:21:08 My Own Views on Machiavelli
English
11
11
83
12.3K
Johnathan Bi
Johnathan Bi@JohnathanBi·
This is nothing new of course. China preserved the flame of Buddhism as it was extinguished in India. Aristotle survives largely thanks to Islam. And I was told that to truly understand Confucius I needed to know French and German (for the latest scholarship). China inheriting the western tradition would be but another page in the fascinating interplay between cultures.
English
7
3
50
4.7K
Johnathan Bi
Johnathan Bi@JohnathanBi·
But it wasn’t until I visited my ancestral home in China last year did I realize why my Western Canon project was so popular there: it is Chinese to the core. There’s nothing more Chinese than dedicating your life to mastering “the canon,” believing that they hold the key to stewarding the world, and striving to win distinction along the way. This was the promise of the imperial exams that so motivated the Chinese intelligentsia and the great houses that produced them for over a millennia. My maternal line runs through one such great house. We produced imperial scholars and statesmen for over six centuries by mastering the classics. It wasn’t until I dug deep into this family history that I realized that my current Western-civ project is a direct continuation of that distinctively Chinese legacy: x.com/JohnathanBi/st…
English
1
2
75
7.2K
Johnathan Bi
Johnathan Bi@JohnathanBi·
It would not surprise me if China became the torch-bearer of the western classics. Ie. You send your grandkids to PKU to study Greek and Tsinghua to read the Federalist Papers. China has a respect for classical texts unrivaled in the west (except, perhaps, by the Jews) while the modern west is committing cultural suicide denouncing their own traditions. Few people know this, but my Western Canon podcast is already watched more in China than rest of the world combined. Despite it 1. being in Academic English (which I don’t dub) 2. launching much later. Seeing the different reactions to these texts is wild: in the West, these books are seen by the mainstream as “problematic” and dangerous, at best useless entertainment. The UK government literally flagged Shakespeare, Milton, Hobbes, Dante as potential signs of far-right extremism. In China, I was expecting significant pushback against “westernization” but instead found a reverence for Western texts that the west itself had lost. The top Chinese scholars know the western tradition like the back of their hand, and public intellectuals are celebrities. I don’t think the west is lost fwiw, but not on a good trajectory. Hopefully more projects like mine can rekindle that ancient flame.
Johnathan Bi tweet media
The New Yorker@NewYorker

The Chinese Communist Party has embraced the study of Greek and Latin—as, in some ways, an antidote to the modern West. newyorkermag.visitlink.me/yl-IXJ

English
73
133
1.2K
127.3K
Johnathan Bi
Johnathan Bi@JohnathanBi·
The father studies political science... so that the son can study philosophy... so that the grandson can study poetry. - John Adams to Abigail Adams
Johnathan Bi tweet media
English
4
4
28
1.6K
Johnathan Bi
Johnathan Bi@JohnathanBi·
@packyM I have 3 more with jeff coming, this is just the beginning!
English
1
0
2
152
Johnathan Bi retweetledi
Packy McCormick
Packy McCormick@packyM·
Woah. This is the first Johnathan Bi I’ve listened to, idea of Nietzsche as mystic grabbed me, came in with no idea who the guest was. Two hours in, he mentions he wrote the book on Esalen, which I read and loved. Jeff Kripal.
Packy McCormick tweet media
Johnathan Bi@JohnathanBi

You’ve been reading Nietzsche completely wrong. He wasn’t an atheist. He was a mystic. 1. His great work, Zarathustra, is a religious text inspired by a mystical experience in Switzerland. 2. Nietzsche had a precognitive dream that shaped his metaphysics: as a young boy he dreamed of his dead father rising from the grave and taking his infant brother … who soon fell ill and died. 3. People read his claims that he was “Buddha” and “Dionysius” as madness. Yet those are his most profound statements. 4. He hated not Christ but Christianity. In short, Nietzsche is spiritual but not religious. This is the claim of my guest Rice University’s Jeff Kripal who will give us a mystical reading of Nietzsche’s Übermensch. Jeff himself is a scholar of mysticism who had a transformative mystical experience while researching Hinduism in Calcutta as a young man. Jeff witnessed the erotic presence of a Hindu goddess as a grad student decades ago, and has since been wrestling with his experience through his writing. His ambition is for his writing to engender similar mystical states in your life and he sees the same mystical inspiration in Nietzsche. These interviews with Jeff have been the most transformative I’ve ever done since starting this project. As a religious seeker I haven’t found a contemporary scholar who is able to tie together classical religion, the great books, and new age spirituality in one philosophical framework quite as Jeff has. What you are going to hear in this interview then isn’t just a new way to read Nietzsche, but a new way to read the entire canon as mystical. Plato, Dante, Homer, Fuerbach, James, Hegel we’ve been reading all of these thinkers completely wrong as we have with Nietzsche. Jeff is leading nothing less than a Copernican revolt against the materialist orthodoxy of the humanities. Timestamps: 2:42 The Übermensch Will Replace Humanity 7:38 Great Thinkers are Divinely Inspired 11:30 Nietzsche is a Mystical Thinker 16:09 Why Most People Misread Nietzsche 35:22 The Evidence for Prophecy 54:21 Holy Men Are Egomaniacs 1:18:33 Nietzsche Loved Christ but Hated Christians 1:30:04 Why Books Engender Mystical states 2:07:37 Why The Humanities Have Failed 2:23:05 All Philosophy Is Disguised Mysticism

English
10
7
128
28K
Johnathan Bi
Johnathan Bi@JohnathanBi·
You’ve been reading Nietzsche completely wrong. He wasn’t an atheist. He was a mystic. 1. His great work, Zarathustra, is a religious text inspired by a mystical experience in Switzerland. 2. Nietzsche had a precognitive dream that shaped his metaphysics: as a young boy he dreamed of his dead father rising from the grave and taking his infant brother … who soon fell ill and died. 3. People read his claims that he was “Buddha” and “Dionysius” as madness. Yet those are his most profound statements. 4. He hated not Christ but Christianity. In short, Nietzsche is spiritual but not religious. This is the claim of my guest Rice University’s Jeff Kripal who will give us a mystical reading of Nietzsche’s Übermensch. Jeff himself is a scholar of mysticism who had a transformative mystical experience while researching Hinduism in Calcutta as a young man. Jeff witnessed the erotic presence of a Hindu goddess as a grad student decades ago, and has since been wrestling with his experience through his writing. His ambition is for his writing to engender similar mystical states in your life and he sees the same mystical inspiration in Nietzsche. These interviews with Jeff have been the most transformative I’ve ever done since starting this project. As a religious seeker I haven’t found a contemporary scholar who is able to tie together classical religion, the great books, and new age spirituality in one philosophical framework quite as Jeff has. What you are going to hear in this interview then isn’t just a new way to read Nietzsche, but a new way to read the entire canon as mystical. Plato, Dante, Homer, Fuerbach, James, Hegel we’ve been reading all of these thinkers completely wrong as we have with Nietzsche. Jeff is leading nothing less than a Copernican revolt against the materialist orthodoxy of the humanities. Timestamps: 2:42 The Übermensch Will Replace Humanity 7:38 Great Thinkers are Divinely Inspired 11:30 Nietzsche is a Mystical Thinker 16:09 Why Most People Misread Nietzsche 35:22 The Evidence for Prophecy 54:21 Holy Men Are Egomaniacs 1:18:33 Nietzsche Loved Christ but Hated Christians 1:30:04 Why Books Engender Mystical states 2:07:37 Why The Humanities Have Failed 2:23:05 All Philosophy Is Disguised Mysticism
English
104
272
1.6K
158.6K
Johnathan Bi
Johnathan Bi@JohnathanBi·
James Liang is a Chinese billionaire who pays his employees 50K for every baby they make, who is launching a 1 Billion fund to pay PHD students to have children, here’s why… James is the cofounder of trip.com worth $50B, he was also a prodigy academic who started college at 15, got a PHD at Stanford and then became a professor at China's top university PKU. He straddles not just the active and the contemplative life but elite circles across US and China. Sitting at this unique intersection helped him articulate his most important idea: that demography is one of the most overlooked factors that impact innovation. The problem with an aging population is not just the financial strain on pensions but a cultural, technological stagnation that will suffocate any creative act. Gerontocracies (rule by the old) result in sterile, hierarchical, and unimaginative futures. If humanity is going to continue innovating, humanity needs to stay young. James believes offering money alone can significantly fix the problem and is putting his money where his mouth is. In this interview, you will learn about the coming population collapse from one of the world’s foremost demography experts and what to do about it from one of the world’s most resourceful entrepreneurs. Timestamps: 2:02 Paying Employees to Have Babies 3:09 Low Fertility Kills Innovation 11:05 The Young Want Merit. The Old Want Hierarchy 15:42 Small Population = Little Innovation 33:50 Why a CEO Left for Academia 48:33 Humanity Craves Novelty 55:14 True Innovation Creates Heritage 1:16:32 AI Won’t Lead Innovation
English
68
710
3.6K
513.7K
Johnathan Bi
Johnathan Bi@JohnathanBi·
@TheCarlsonNg Resume + why you are interested + what skills you have of those listed above
English
1
0
0
127
Johnathan Bi
Johnathan Bi@JohnathanBi·
Happy to share an incredible milestone: crossing 1.3M subscribers across platforms in just the first 1.5 years of launch! Very thankful to each and every one of you who has engaged with my work. I’m now looking to hire a remote podcast production manager to take the channel to the next level. Please submit applications to: johnathan at greatbooks dot io The only hard requirements for this role are 1. to be a regular consumer of my content with a passion for intellectual inquiry 2. high autonomy, comfortable with ill-defined problem spaces, uncertainty, and being scrappy 3. Native english fluency, comfortable reading dense scholarly works. In addition, the ideal candidate will also know: * Video editing * Thumbnail design * Making viral clips and shorts * How to grow social media channels * Writing viral X copy … but don’t worry if you don’t tick all these boxes, these are skills that can be learned on the job. We are open to both part and full-time applicants with preference for the latter. Applicants who apply should intend to stay for the long term (and not treat this as a transitional role for few months as it takes a lot to train someone up). PS: No geographical limitations, open to anyone anywhere!
English
6
0
54
12.4K