不响
1.3K posts


我的刀盾
比比拉布
八嘎呀路
歪比巴卜
巴巴博一
选一个上,还是全部上?
我先帮 @toly 喊个口号:让中文meme发生在solana上
#我的刀盾 #比比拉布 #八嘎呀路
中文

"The dragon-slaying youth eventually becomes the dragon."
b@bharat_usd
AI is now anti-government and crypto is now co-opted by the establishment this one stings
English
不响 retweetledi
不响 retweetledi

There have recently been some discussions on the ongoing role of L2s in the Ethereum ecosystem, especially in the face of two facts:
* L2s' progress to stage 2 (and, secondarily, on interop) has been far slower and more difficult than originally expected
* L1 itself is scaling, fees are very low, and gaslimits are projected to increase greatly in 2026
Both of these facts, for their own separate reasons, mean that the original vision of L2s and their role in Ethereum no longer makes sense, and we need a new path.
First, let us recap the original vision. Ethereum needs to scale. The definition of "Ethereum scaling" is the existence of large quantities of block space that is backed by the full faith and credit of Ethereum - that is, block space where, if you do things (including with ETH) inside that block space, your activities are guaranteed to be valid, uncensored, unreverted, untouched, as long as Ethereum itself functions. If you create a 10000 TPS EVM where its connection to L1 is mediated by a multisig bridge, then you are not scaling Ethereum.
This vision no longer makes sense. L1 does not need L2s to be "branded shards", because L1 is itself scaling. And L2s are not able or willing to satisfy the properties that a true "branded shard" would require. I've even seen at least one explicitly saying that they may never want to go beyond stage 1, not just for technical reasons around ZK-EVM safety, but also because their customers' regulatory needs require them to have ultimate control. This may be doing the right thing for your customers. But it should be obvious that if you are doing this, then you are not "scaling Ethereum" in the sense meant by the rollup-centric roadmap. But that's fine! it's fine because Ethereum itself is now scaling directly on L1, with large planned increases to its gas limit this year and the years ahead.
We should stop thinking about L2s as literally being "branded shards" of Ethereum, with the social status and responsibilities that this entails. Instead, we can think of L2s as being a full spectrum, which includes both chains backed by the full faith and credit of Ethereum with various unique properties (eg. not just EVM), as well as a whole array of options at different levels of connection to Ethereum, that each person (or bot) is free to care about or not care about depending on their needs.
What would I do today if I were an L2?
* Identify a value add other than "scaling". Examples: (i) non-EVM specialized features/VMs around privacy, (ii) efficiency specialized around a particular application, (iii) truly extreme levels of scaling that even a greatly expanded L1 will not do, (iv) a totally different design for non-financial applications, eg. social, identity, AI, (v) ultra-low-latency and other sequencing properties, (vi) maybe built-in oracles or decentralized dispute resolution or other "non-computationally-verifiable" features
* Be stage 1 at the minimum (otherwise you really are just a separate L1 with a bridge, and you should just call yourself that) if you're doing things with ETH or other ethereum-issued assets
* Support maximum interoperability with Ethereum, though this will differ for each one (eg. what if you're not EVM, or even not financial?)
From Ethereum's side, over the past few months I've become more convinced of the value of the native rollup precompile, particuarly once we have enshrined ZK-EVM proofs that we need anyway to scale L1. This is a precompile that verifies a ZK-EVM proof, and it's "part of Ethereum", so (i) it auto-upgrades along with Ethereum, and (ii) if the precompile has a bug, Ethereum will hard-fork to fix the bug.
The native rollup precompile would make full, security-council-free, EVM verification accessible. We should spend much more time working out how to design it in such a way that if your L2 is "EVM plus other stuff", then the native rollup precompile would verify the EVM, and you only have to bring your own prover for the "other stuff" (eg. Stylus). This might involve a canonical way of exposing a lookup table between contract call inputs and outputs, and letting you provide your own values to the lookup table (that you would prove separately).
This would make it easy to have safe, strong, trustless interoperability with Ethereum. It also enables synchronous composability (see: ethresear.ch/t/combining-pr… and ethresear.ch/t/synchronous-… ). And from there, it's each L2's choice exactly what they want to build. Don't just "extend L1", figure out something new to add.
This of course means that some will add things that are trust-dependent, or backdoored, or otherwise insecure; this is unavoidable in a permissionless ecosystem where developers have freedom. Our job should make to make it clear to users what guarantees they have, and to build up the strongest Ethereum that we can.
English

@baseposting 基操
means:
“no big deal”、
“just routine”、
“bread and butter”
“Ezpz”
English
不响 retweetledi
不响 retweetledi

Over the past few weeks, it's become clear that the majority of Bootstrap board members (a 501(c)(3) nonprofit created to support Zcash by governing the Electric Coin Company), specifically Zaki Manian, Christina Garman, Alan Fairless, and Michelle Lai (ZCAM), have moved into clear misalignment with the mission of Zcash.
Yesterday, the entire ECC team left after being constructively discharged* by ZCAM. In short, the terms of our employment were changed in ways that made it impossible for us to perform our duties effectively and with integrity.
We're founding a new company, but we're still the same team with the same mission: building unstoppable private money.
Importantly, the Zcash protocol is unaffected. This decision is simply about protecting our team’s work from malicious governance actions that have made it impossible to honor ECC's original mission.
We'll have more soon. Hang tight.
Onward.
* Here's what constructive discharge means:
webapps.dol.gov/elaws/eta/warn….
English

Hi, I’m Jing, 31, and here is my first video on X.
大家好,我是缘缘,今年31岁,这是我在X平台的第一条视频。
I moved from Chengdu to Chiang Mai with my husband and twin boys last year.
去年,我举家从成都移居清迈。
I studied Economics in the UK for nearly 10 years from undergrad to PhD, but eventually chose to drop out of my PhD.
我在英国留学读经济学,从本科到博士近十年,最终选择博士辍学。
I decided to restart my life and do what I truly enjoy.
我选择重启人生,去做真正喜欢的事情。
Today, I’m a content creator with 23K followers on Xiaohongshu.
现在,我是一名拥有 2.3 万粉丝的小红书博主。
I’ve also been working full time in crypto for over a year.
同时,我也已经在加密行业全职工作了一年多。
I went from zero income and deep confusion to building multiple income streams.
我从零收入、迷茫的阶段,走到了拥有多元收入来源。
Life in Chiang Mai has been good to me.
清迈,让我的生活重新变得稳定而快乐。
I’m currently working with @_WOOFi on @StarchildOnX
目前我正在和 @_WOOFi 合作,参与他们的@StarchildOnX 项目。
On this account, I’ll share my experience of working in crypto.
在这个账号里,我会分享我在加密行业工作的真实经历。
I hope it can help anyone considering a career in crypto.
希望能对正在考虑进入这个行业的人有所帮助。
If you want to become a content creator, I hope my journey inspires you too.
如果你也想成为一名内容创作者,希望我的经历能给你一些启发。
I’ll also be creating more content around AI with @StarchildOnX
我也会和@StarchildOnX 一起持续创作更多与 AI 相关的内容。
If you’re curious about any of these — welcome to follow up
如果你对这些感兴趣,欢迎关注
#crypto #AI #vibetrading
中文

刚注意到之前Holo打新的那个@JoinFightID,我也有三个提名资格,希望能趁着行情反弹早点TGE。
获得提名的人,后续可以获得 FIGHT Ticket 的 NFT,大概率会有一定的代币空投。
感兴趣的留个评论吧,挑眼熟的给了。鞠躬谢过。

中文
不响 retweetledi














