Jon York
17.7K posts

Jon York
@JonY75
Dad. Veteran. Raiders/Padres/Lakers/Aztecs fan. Subsea Engineer. LOST nerd. Contribute to Raider Nation Times.
Katılım Ağustos 2009
1.4K Takip Edilen996 Takipçiler

@Dagr8tone @VinnysCorner1 Nah, it really is a good conversation. And you actually made me look it up. Growing up watching Showtime and the age I was it was Magic Magic Magic haha.
English

@LeandroRaiders @RaidersBeat Never been madder at the team when Darrisaw was still on the board and they took Leatherwood. I know I’m no GM but come on.
English

@RaidersBeat Ferrell and Abram was a mistake, but understandable. But Arnette in 2020 and Letherwood in 2021 was much much worse. There was no reason to support those picks
English

Mike Mayock laments the pick he missed in the 2019 draft…
“I made a huge mistake in my first year.”
#Raiders #RaiderNation
raidersbeat.com/mayock-laments…
English

@Dagr8tone @VinnysCorner1 That’s fair, and no doubt true
Question was about larger Laker legacy, not GOAT tho. Fair or not, I feel Magic was more the face of Showtime, and for Laker legacy gotta throw out The Captain’s Bucks days. Magic had as many MVPs and higher finishes. It’s a discussion for sure tho
English
@JonY75 @VinnysCorner1 Based on his dominance and leading the league in scoring for decades, til Bron recently took it. Kareems total dominance to include College career, he was a monster. Kareem is sometimes mentioned in GOAT convo. Magic is never in that discussion
English

@BrandonMBray @bestofStarTrek Carbon Creek, interesting choice
Was a very nice episode but didn’t cross my mind when trying to think of the best Enterprise episodes - oversight on my part, well done
English

@bestofStarTrek TOS: City of the Edge of Forever
TNG: Measure of a Man
DS9: Duet
VOY: Living Witness
STE: Carbon Creek
... and that was the end of real Star Trek. The buffoonery that followed is not worth watching, rating, or commenting upon.
English

@Dagr8tone @VinnysCorner1 Hmm, Kareem over Magic and Kobe
Somewhat bold take IMHO
Don’t make it a bad take
Really Magic, Mamba and The Captain are all in the conversation.
English
@VinnysCorner1 Disrespectful THE CAPTAIN isn't listed. Based on Lakers Legacy I'd go Magic, Mamba, Shaq then Bron (He only has 1 Chip with Lakers & some would say THE UNIBROW had more to do with that than Bron. Put Kareem, in the mix then i'd go Kareem, Magic, Kobe then Shaq
English

@bestofStarTrek Not at all
But I think we as fans need to relax a bit if they’re a little off base with canon, or if it’s not a perfect mold of what we think Trek is. I want to be entertained by the universe I grew up watching
Just make good shows.
English

@BrutusTB2000 @RiseNDraft I disagree, but I won’t say you’re wrong.
Just sayin’ for someone to call him the least athletically gifted prospect over some decent stretch of time is stupid bait, and I don’t see how anyone could possibly agree with that statement.
English

@RiseNDraft I don’t care if he was, it’s beyond idiocy to say he’s the most athletically limited QB prospect over the 27 years (if that Jets timeframe is right).
English

@BrutusTB2000 @RiseNDraft If he was with the Jets under Parcells, then that would be at latest ‘99.
So the most unathletic QB prospect since ‘99.
Nah dude, I mean Andrew Walter exists among others. I mean think he’ll suck that’s one thing but idiotic statements like this…
English

@jondelarroz This is my favorite Trek movie besides WoK.
Felt like real Trek to me.
English

Who was the starting QB of the first @Raiders game you attended?
Mine was Andrew Walter 💀
#RaiderNation
English

@S_U_Network Won’t look at rings. Won’t look at stats.
Which QB did I fear more when my team played them? It’s close, and no disrespect to the greatness of Peyton, but Montana was just a surgeon. No lead was enough.
English

@DragonSoul @S_U_Network What did he change? If anything he was a throwback with so much control at the LOS (which he was great at).
Not arguing your point, looking for clarification.
English

@S_U_Network Think Manning changed the game at the QB position. Joe is still great, but different times.
English

@BallerToy1327 Indifferent on the song (liked the visuals during the intro tho)
Don’t see a single episode until about 2016
Liked it, then once it found its footing really liked it. Re-watched many times
For context TOS was my fist Trek series, 4pm weekdays in the 80s as a kid.
English

@elvenmaidinn What we needed, one might say, was faith.
Of the heart.
English

Trekkies and longtime fans of 1990s and early-2000s sci-fi, people who suddenly found themselves starved for good science-fiction television.
We went into Discovery with massive hope. After years of waiting for a new Trek series, this felt like the one that could finally deliver. Instead, we all ran into the same wall: deep, bitter disappointment.
It wasn’t just one problem. The show tried to rewrite established Star Trek history by introducing technology that would fundamentally alter the entire future timeline, from The Next Generation all the way through Voyager. On top of that, it radically reinvented the Klingons, turning one of the franchise’s most beloved and iconic races into… whatever that was supposed to be.
Credit where credit is due, though. Jason Isaacs and Michelle Yeoh were phenomenal in Season 1. Their performances crackled with intensity, and the Mirror Universe arc remains the undisputed high point of the entire series. Unfortunately, even that brilliance couldn’t save the show.
I never watched beyond Season 2, I could not force myself.
Fandom Pulse@fandompulse
Star Trek: Discovery initially had 10 million viewers, a magnitude beyond anything Trek gets now. It's clear there's fans who are hungry for Star Trek and will give it a chance initially. What went wrong?
English














