José F. Perles Ribes

1.5K posts

José F. Perles Ribes

José F. Perles Ribes

@JosePerles

Licenciado en Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales. Doctor por el Dpto. Análisis Económico Aplicado de la Universidad de Alicante

Calpe Katılım Haziran 2012
245 Takip Edilen116 Takipçiler
José F. Perles Ribes retweetledi
Jon Hartley
Jon Hartley@Jon_Hartley_·
1/Chris Sims is easily one of the most influential macroeconomists (& perhaps most influential empirical macroeconomist) of the last 50 years; he fundamentally changed thinking about monetary policy, metrics,& causality (VARs, time series models). Thread on his greatest hits🧵👇
Jon Hartley tweet mediaJon Hartley tweet media
Jon Hartley@Jon_Hartley_

RIP Chris Sims, a giant in empirical macroeconomics

English
5
164
495
79.3K
José F. Perles Ribes retweetledi
Iñigo San Millán
Iñigo San Millán@doctorinigo·
For decades, peer review has been treated as the gold standard of scientific validation. Yet many scientists know the reality: the system is far from perfect. Peer review is broken and sometimes even corrupted. The process can be slow, inconsistent, and vulnerable to bias. Reviewers are sometimes asked to judge work outside their true expertise. In other cases, they may be evaluating ideas that challenge the very paradigm in which they were trained. And occasionally, reviewers are simply competitors. Ironically, the most prestigious journals can also be the most conservative. Truly new ideas are often met with skepticism, while safer work that fits the current narrative moves more easily through the system. Increasingly, papers are judged less by the originality of the idea and more by the volume of data, the sophistication of statistics, and the beauty of the figures. Science risks becoming data-rich but idea-poor. But there is an important reality to remember: journals do not ultimately decide the impact of scientific work. Impact is decided later, by the community. By the scientists who read it, test it, debate it, and cite it. In the end, citations and ideas determine the legacy of a paper, not the impact factor of the journal that first published it. Science has always advanced by questioning assumptions. Perhaps it is time we also question the system that filters scientific ideas.
Iñigo San Millán tweet media
English
136
1K
2.8K
247K
Víctor Mas
Víctor Mas@Victormasp·
🆕Our paper is finally out in Current Issues in Tourism! Together with Patricia Aranda and María J. Such, we used quantile regression to examine the relationship between population displacement from city-centre neighbourhoods and the presence of Airbnb in Madrid and Barcelona.
Víctor Mas tweet media
English
2
3
11
690
Ana Clara Rucci
Ana Clara Rucci@AnitaRucci·
Gracias @economicas_unlp , realmente estuve muy emocionada junto con mi familia! Felicitaciones a Guido Porto también y al resto de premiados! 🙌
Ciencias Económicas UNLP@economicas_unlp

ENTREGA DE PREMIOS A LA LABOR CIENTÍFICA, TECNOLÓGICA Y ARTÍSTICA 2024✨ La ceremonia se realizó el miércoles 4/12 en la @UNLP ¡Felicitamos a las personas investigadoras premiadas de nuestra Facultad!👏 ▪️Dr. Guido Gustavo Porto ▪️Dra. Ana Clara Rucci 👉econo.unlp.edu.ar/facultad/entre…

Español
1
0
11
350
José F. Perles Ribes
José F. Perles Ribes@JosePerles·
Also with @luismoreno_tw @AnitaRucci, Adrian Más and me Perles Ribes, J. F., Moreno Izquierdo, L. ., Rucci, A., & Más Ferrando, A. (2024). Is the tourism-led growth hypothesis valid after the COVID-19 pandemic? The case of Spain. European Journal of Tourism Research, 38, 3815.
English
0
0
1
293
José F. Perles Ribes retweetledi
REDINTUR
REDINTUR@RED_INTUR·
𝗖𝗮𝗹𝗹 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗽𝗮𝗽𝗲𝗿𝘀 XVI Workshop "Tourism: Economics & Management" Alicante, 6-8 de noviembre de 2024 Fecha límite envío de abstracts: 30 de junio Más información: buff.ly/3ylTyxi #workshop #turismo #economía #gestión #Alicante
REDINTUR tweet media
Español
0
5
5
238