JoshDisciple

@VakomSunrunner @Rk_isOKAY @SoveyX That looks like an Electric Forklift. They are almost silent and you can't hear them until they are right next to you. Dude absolutely should have been paying attention to his surroundings though. Especially given the fact he was walking across the primary forklift lane.

@Rk_isOKAY @SoveyX Also don't Forklifts all make noise when driving to alert people it's there? Like the idiot had to have been purposefully ignoring it to reach that point.

It was my first day as a forklift driver. Cut me some slack.

@BoazBu @Rk_isOKAY @SoveyX I suppose it could depend on where you are, but per OSHA regulations, every statement in @Rk_isOKAY 's post is technically accurate. The question is whether or not the warehouse actually follows those regulations correctly or not. (A lot of warehouses make up their own rules)

@Rk_isOKAY @SoveyX I worked in a warehouse. Everything you've just said is bullshit.

@shebringsjoy I love a lot of Skillet music, but wasnt particularly moved by their version of this song. I am glad they made it though, because with the style/genre here it allows the message of this song to be heard by an audience that might never have ever listened the orgininal version.

Sorry guys. I like it.

@MorrisonSeth The most important take away is that the message in the song will now reach a wider audience that it might not have reached before because it is now in the style that that wider audience listens to and appreciates. Wether or not i personally like this version isn't important.

My 3 year old just asked to listen to “Daddy, John, Korey and Jen O Come, O Come Emmanuel” and shouting “OUR GOD IS WITH US” with everything she has. We don’t usually listen to blasphemous versions of this song, but just this once…

@BMcGrewvy @johnehrett Completely fair to have that opinion. But I think the important thing to take away from this is that the true message of this song will now reach an audience that it might not have reached previously because it is now played in the style they would appreciate.

@johnehrett John seems like a great guy. Even if metal were my thing, I think there's a medium/message clash in this case. It's a haunting and plaintive tune. Metal is the wrong vehicle.

When I was in college, I went to see Skillet perform with Papa Roach on the “Monsters of Annihilation” tour. To this day, one of the most chaotic concerts I’ve ever been to. John Cooper got up on stage in a room full of vaguely high/drunk metalheads. Declared that all their music had a point, that life was worth living, and told that audience that their only hope lay in the name of Jesus. I’ve never seen anything like it before or since.

Absolutely insane to me the amount of people that target hideouts constantly online when he is one of the very few Devs on the team that actually gives a damn. Dude has literally been watching a twitch stream at home at 3am and sees someone cheating on Apex and logs to ban them.

@G4YL0rdFocker @KhronosXF @Vizrai_ @RSPN_Hideouts Having your job title in your bio doesn’t magically turn your profile into a “work account.” It just means you’re transparent about where you work. Tons of people list their job, employer, or role on their personal accounts.

@KhronosXF @Vizrai_ @RSPN_Hideouts Not a personal account. Has his job title in his bio 💀

I don’t understand, doesn’t this COD use a more egregious amount of AI in the form of artwork? Why is that not spoken about but it was a main factor for Arc Raiders? How can anyone trust this outlet if there is no standard for the content reviewed?

@deezynut @ClotFreeFrog @shelley_curious @ImBreckWorsham That’s not really how it works in finance. Trends aren’t defined by every point moving lower. They’re defined over the full cycle. Inflation never falls in a straight line. It always flattens, bumps, and drifts. A pause doesn’t invalidate the trend, because the path isn’t linear

@JoshDisciple @ClotFreeFrog @shelley_curious @ImBreckWorsham The issue isn’t that inflation ticked up once, it’s that it stopped falling. A downtrend is only a downtrend as long as the slope is negative. Once it flattens or turns up, it’s no longer a cooling phase. That’s the point I’m making.

MAGA is dead. Assassinated by Trump and his Israeli interests. It was a psyop. And we fell for it. No time to grieve. We need to regroup. Where do we go from here?

@deezynut @ClotFreeFrog @shelley_curious @ImBreckWorsham A slight uptick doesn’t “end” a multi-year trend. Trends don’t flip on one monthly print. Inflation always moves up and down inside the broader cycle. A downtrend is measured over a fixed window (1yr, 3yr, 5yr), not by expecting every single data point to be lower than the last

@JoshDisciple @ClotFreeFrog @shelley_curious @ImBreckWorsham A multi-year cooling trend only matters if it’s still cooling. Once the monthly prints show re-acceleration, that multi-year downtrend is over. That’s why markets react to the short-term data… it tells you when the trend is changing. We’ll see next quarter.

@deezynut @ClotFreeFrog @shelley_curious @ImBreckWorsham Policy reacts to short-term data, sure, but policy evaluates success based on multi-year trends. A 3–5 year cooling is the trend the Fed actually cares about. A +0.1% bump doesn’t erase a multi-year downtrend. That’s why the direction is more important.

@JoshDisciple @ClotFreeFrog @shelley_curious @ImBreckWorsham Calling it “short term” and “small scale” doesn’t change the fact that short and medium-term data is exactly what determines policy, rates, wages, and markets. Like it always has. Any slight uptick away from the target is considered bad, not “trending in the right direction”.

@deezynut @ClotFreeFrog @shelley_curious @ImBreckWorsham Yes you're right on the small scale, but the take away is that our current levels are still well under the historical averages. We are overall trending in the right direction. Short term fluctuations over 1 year are not what you focus on when you are financially literate.

@JoshDisciple @ClotFreeFrog @shelley_curious @ImBreckWorsham Long-term averages don’t determine mortgage rates, wage negotiations, or Fed policy. The latest CPI prints do. Century-long averages that override current trends just isn’t how finance works.

@deezynut @ClotFreeFrog @shelley_curious @ImBreckWorsham What the fed targets would be great. But if you want to talk about literally anything in the financial world, it MUST always br done directly in terms of long term averages.... because the year to year fluctuations skew the numbers too much to even be remotely relevant.

@JoshDisciple @ClotFreeFrog @shelley_curious @ImBreckWorsham Averages over 110 years don’t pay today’s bills. The Fed doesn’t target 3%. It targets 2%, and we’re back above target. That’s the entire discussion.

@deezynut @ClotFreeFrog @shelley_curious @ImBreckWorsham The average annual inflation in America between 1914-2025 is 3.29% If we shorten the time to between 1960-2024 the average is 3.8% Either way, 3% is noticeably below the long term average. An increase of .1% in one year after a decrease of over 5% over 2 years is nothing.

@ClotFreeFrog @shelley_curious @ImBreckWorsham The fact you’ve been programmed that 3% is normal says a lot.

@SenAdamSchiff Pretty bad look to post something that is so much of a blatant lie that even your own constituents are calling you out on it. 😅

Let’s be clear: Donald Trump has the power to ensure 40 million people don’t go hungry during the shutdown. But he wishes to inflict the maximum pain on those who can least afford it. He won’t fund food. But he’s happy to build a golden ballroom.

@esjesjesj Can't claim defamation based on screenshots and info publicly available information on your own social media profiles that you yourself posted.

This website is almost certainly criminal defamation and any of the people on it have an easy lawsuit

(Warning: long rant) My liberal friends are completely oblivious about how radicalizing the last week has been for tens of millions of normal Americans. Zero clue. I’m not talking about people who are “online”; I mean regular, everyday Americans. “Normies.” People who scroll through Facebook posts and Instagram reels from the Dutch Bros drive thru line. Political moderates who have water cooler chats about Mahomes touchdowns and Bon Jovi concerts, not Twitter threads or Rachel Maddow monologues. Millions of them. Tens of millions. They’re logging on, they’re engaging, and they’re furious. And I’ll be candid: They blame you guys. They blame the left. Regardless of whether you believe it to be justified, they think you’re the bad guys here. And they are reacting accordingly. I can already hear some of you racing toward the comments to start screeching in moral indignation, so I’m going to be blunt: Shut up and listen to what I’m telling you. Your movement will lose any semblance of relevance if you don’t develop some small measure of self-awareness, and—absent someone force-feeding you bitter medicine—you guys collectively lack the humility to do this on your own. Here are the facts: Fact 1. Tens of millions of Americans started the week seeing a 23-year-old blonde woman—a young woman in whom virtually every parent watching pictured their own daughter—stabbed in the neck by a career criminal. These people then found out the murderer had been released from jail 14 times over. Fact 2. Two days later, tens of millions of Americans watched a video of Charlie Kirk get murdered speaking to college students. Millions of these people knew who Charlie was; millions of them didn’t. Upon seeing the video, however, these normal Americans from across the land and across the political spectrum agreed that he was the victim of a terrible, fundamentally unjustifiable crime, and their hearts broke in sympathy for his family. Good people who had never even heard the name Charlie Kirk before wept. Fact 3. Immediately after seeing the footage of a peaceful young man get shot in the neck, these same people logged onto Facebook and Instagram (remember, we are talking about regular Americans, not perpetually online Twitter or Bluesky users) and saw some of their local nurses, school teachers, college administrators, and retail workers celebrating this horrific crime. Not just defending it, but cheering it. These are all facts. You may not like the implications of these facts, and we can certainly debate the underlying causes thereof, but, indisputably, they are nevertheless factual statements. Here’s what it means for you, the Democrats reading this: These normal, middle-of-the-road, non-political citizens just become politically active. They realized that politics cares about them, even if they don’t particularly care about politics. After watching Iryna Zarutska and Charlie Kirk both bleed out from the neck, they think their lives and the physical safety of their families—the bedrock of human society, the foundation of Maslow’s hierarchy of needs—depend on political activation, whether they desire it or not. These people are now sprinting—not jogging, not walking, but racing—to the right. Because they blame you guys for everything that just happened. When they see footage of Decarlos Brown stabbing a Ukrainian refugee to death, they don’t see just one demon-possessed man. They picture every university administrator, HR bureaucrat, and DEI apparatchik that ever lectured them about systemic racism, the “carceral state,” or the need to release violent crime suspects without bail in the name of social justice. They then think back to conversations they’ve had with their cop friends—their buddy from high school who quit the force after getting tired of being called a racist, their friend at the local YMCA who vents about having to release career criminals because Soros-funded prosecutors aren’t willing to file charges—and they realize everything the left has told them over the last five years has been utter bullshit. And they blame you. Because, even if you count yourself as a moderate Democrat, your party supported the district attorneys, city council members, and mayors that let fictitious concerns about mental health and racial justice supersede very real concerns for their family’s safety. When these Americans see blood erupt from the side of Charlie Kirk’s neck, they don’t see just a martyred political activist. They think of every extreme leftist they’ve ever met who (1) calls anyone to the right of Hillary Clinton a fascist and (2) constantly jokes—“jokes”—about punching Nazis and “bashing the fash.” They realize that there really do exist people who wish to see them dead for their moderately conservative political beliefs, their Christian faith, and even the color of their skin. They ask themselves if the violence visited upon Charlie might one day show up on their own doorstep. And they blame you. Because, even if you’re just a center-of-the-road liberal, you lacked the courage to police your own ranks. You let modern-day Maoist red guards run loose across every facet of society, and what started with social-media struggle sessions has now turned to 30-06 bullet holes. When these Americans log onto social media and see their neighbors justifying, celebrating, glorifying murder, they realize that some who walk among them are soulless ghouls at best, literally demon-possessed at worst. These people—whether they faithfully attend church every Sunday or only attend with relatives once a year, on Christmas Eve—start talking about things like spiritual warfare. They implicitly understand that no normal human casually celebrates the mortal demise of a peaceful person. And they blame you. Because, even if you condemned Charlie Kirk’s murder, they probably haven’t seen you condemn those in your own movement who cheered it on. They view you as complicit in allowing heartless fellow travelers to celebrate death, and it repulses them. For all of these situations, what has your response been? Nothing but bullshit. In response to Iryna Zarutska bleeding out on the floor of a train, you post bullshit statistics about reductions in reported crime, when everyone who’s ever been to a major urban center in the last decade knows that actual crime has skyrocketed, only for victims not to waste their time reporting it to cops that don’t have the manpower to respond and prosecutors that seek to downgrade as many felonies as possible to misdemeanor citations. In response to a 31-year-old man taking a bullet to the neck in front of his family, you post nothing but bullshit whataboutism. > “What about January 6th?” (Honest answer: After you let Liz Cheney spend two years operating a star chamber in the House, combined with countless other failed attempts at “lawfare” against Trump, no one cares anymore.) > “What about Mike Lee making a dumb joke on Twitter about some guy in a mask in Minnesota?” (No one outside of Utah, DC, or Twitter knows who Mike Lee even is.) > “What about Paul Pelosi?” (That’s not comparable to Charlie Kirk getting shot, and we all know it. And, again, Paul who?) > “What about regulations on assault rifles?” (That’s not going to get you very far when one of these killers used a knife and the other one used a common hunting rifle.) In response to teachers, healthcare workers, and thousands of other liberals cheering on Charlie’s murder, it’s nothing but more bullshit and misdirection. > “It’s not THAT many people celebrating!” (Yes, it is. Everyone has seen it on their Facebook and Instagram feeds.) > “I thought you guys didn’t support cancel culture.” (We don’t cancel people over their opinions; we’re more than happy to see people lose their jobs—especially their taxpayer-funded jobs—for actively cheering on murder, though. If you can’t see the difference, that’s your own shortcoming.) All bullshit. Not even smart bullshit, but stale, mid-grade, low-IQ bullshit. Ordinary Americans see right through it, and they don’t like how it smells. You probably don’t like hearing this. But you need to hear it. Because I’m right, and, as you reflect on this, you know I’m right. The ranks of my political movement gained millions of righteously angry new members this week. We have a mandate to ensure these crimes never happen again, and that’s exactly what we are now going to do. If you want to keep a seat at the table as we do so, you’d better clean house and start policing your own.

@PepsiAl252865 @dead_protocol @trackingdonald @BasedMikeLee Literally making my point here with both of these replies. Cherry picking individual sentences in a much broader conversation without the needed context. You dont have to agree with his views to acknowledge that he was never anything but respectful in the way he brought them.

@JoshDisciple @dead_protocol @trackingdonald @BasedMikeLee You were saying?

I’ve found another good defamation lawsuit for the estate of Charlie Kirk to bring Charlie was *none* of the things this headline falsely accuses him of being Who else finds this reprehensible?

@PepsiAl252865 @dead_protocol @trackingdonald @BasedMikeLee You clearly never listened to any of Kirk's statements objectively with the included leading context if you believe that. I didn't even follow him, but I knew enough to watch the entire conversation instead of one sentence taken out of context so I had an objective opinion.

@JoshDisciple @dead_protocol @trackingdonald @BasedMikeLee The people who twisting Charlie's words to make them fit a false parallel that doesn't align with the original statement are people like @dead_protocol.

@dead_protocol @trackingdonald @BasedMikeLee It always bothers me when people ignore what someone actually says, and twist the words to make them fit a false parallel that doesn't align with the original statement even slightly, but then argue vehemently that it does. I appreciate you seeing what he said for what it was.

@trackingdonald @BasedMikeLee I'd love to see the quotes. I've watched numerous videos of his, and while I disagreed with a lot of what he had to say, he was nothing but respectful to everyone. He mentioned social issues, and how they were cultural not racial, with proposed solutions.

@Kjustmeok @Kittenwaffin @ElonMuskAOC No. As I have stated in several replies, it needs to be applied equally. But people do need to see comments(especially those that quote statistical facts) for what they truly are instead of always twisting others' words just because they dont necessarily agree with them.

@JoshDisciple @Kittenwaffin @ElonMuskAOC But only for free speech that doesn't fit your narrative, right?

Should X remove the accounts that are cheering the death of Charlie Kirk? What do you think?