Josh Martin
239 posts

Josh Martin
@JoshMartinLing
writer, user researcher, linguist
Cambridge, MA Katılım Kasım 2020
337 Takip Edilen385 Takipçiler

@joshraclaw I saw the fabled "mask on the nose but off the mouth" on the train the other day. A truly remarkable specimen
English

@psejenks Thanks so much! No, I’m staying in Cambridge; they have a Boston office.
English

@m_faytak @duane_g_watson I remember these flyers being distributed in some Cal undergrad class!! In the LeConte lecture hall all the intro ling classes were in
English

@nbbaier Only 1/3 was declared wrong! The rest was in some middle state where we disagree over what semantics is supposed to be.
English

@ZahraMirrazi I recommend simply not doing this. Hope that helps!
English

@AnyDs Jon Sprouse actually JUST gave a colloquium talk at Harvard where his team tested this (among others) - dunno if there's a paper out or anything but definitely the conclusion was it's a bad test
English

@wavyphd Is something only a novel if it was meant to be? Someone may have done this accidentally already just by writing a series of real journal article abstracts
English

@katiedimartin In my SALT talk Q&A, the first person asked 3 consecutive incoherent questions, the last of which was "by the way, are you crying?" Reader, I was not.
English

@Etyma1010 @complingy This tweet is how I learned that "on accident" isn't the universal default way to say this (mid-20s, west coast English)
English

"Pat, you were muted on accident?" Heard last Friday am at Provost's meeting. Until now, I thought use of 'on' with accident was particular to my 11 yo & her friends. COCA has 137 tokens of 'on accident', 3347 tokens of 'by accident'. Thoughts @complingy ?
English

@YuhanZhang_ My default assumption is that *any* publisher emailing you to offer that is suspicious; never really seen a counterexample
English

@katiedimartin Is the semantics situation a sad coincidence, or do you like semantic topics less and less as you learn more about them?
English

@NinaStrohminger This is a kinda intuitive but also kinda fascinating conclusion because, presumably (??), judgments of personhood *for humans* don't correlate with judgments of their moral character. Villains are still 100% people... right?
English




