JQ Lee

138 posts

JQ Lee

JQ Lee

@JqOnly

https://t.co/GMLWC7qjBo https://t.co/376bq1aNSo ouroboros owner and maintainer ZEP tech lead

Katılım Nisan 2026
125 Takip Edilen249 Takipçiler
JQ Lee
JQ Lee@JqOnly·
@anthonyronning @NousResearch oh interesting! will update a paper logistic more and add more experiment. Decomposing things can be an entrypoint of harness and lifting RLM in runtime. which tool/process are you working on?
English
0
0
0
39
Anthony Ronning
Anthony Ronning@anthonyronning·
@JqOnly @NousResearch Super interesting. I will check this out this week. I’m also working on tools/processes that also kinda wrap the entrypoint and exitpoint of harnesses.
English
0
0
0
86
JQ Lee retweetledi
JQ Lee
JQ Lee@JqOnly·
Submitting RLM-FORGE to the @NousResearch Hermes Hackathon. RLMs were supposed to live inside inference. RLM-FORGE pulls them out into runtime. Hermes gives that runtime bounded calls, tools, skills, provider portability, and memory. Ouroboros gives it recursion, retry, state, and replay. TraceGuard makes sure parent claims cannot commit without fresh child evidence. The weird part is the memory: not as evidence, but as an operational prior for where to recurse next. RLM escaped inference. Hermes gave it memory. Evidence before belief. Repo: github.com/Q00/rlm-forge
English
4
12
86
4.7K
JQ Lee
JQ Lee@JqOnly·
@sidewalkco we are just discussing the Agent OS and LLM context windows and you are bringing up a book to attack my ego that doesn't exist. i think we are done here i am always open when the reply fits the post.
English
1
0
0
12
???gokuhides
???gokuhides@sidewalkco·
@JqOnly i learned both. you need to not be another arrogant rand tech elitist that never reads. go read atlas shrugged and fix your ego. don’t be brainwashed by tech elitism
English
1
0
0
20
JQ Lee
JQ Lee@JqOnly·
@sidewalkco 8 years cool but in new ai era it's a hard reset, time to unlearn
English
1
0
0
15
???gokuhides
???gokuhides@sidewalkco·
@JqOnly i will. and i will dunk on you when it’s done. i’ve worked in audit for 8 years so the critique stands. i’m ex big4
English
1
0
0
24
JQ Lee
JQ Lee@JqOnly·
I'm not being defensive; I'm pointing out that your critique is fundamentally off-targe. in Ouroboros, we use session separation to isolate tasks, meaning there is zero context bloat. You know disposable memory like MCP or subagent? each decoupled session is governed by an independent Evaluate stage that validates results against the Contract before anything moves forward. you’re critiquing a monolith but we’ve built a modular, audited system 👍🐍
English
1
0
0
26
???gokuhides
???gokuhides@sidewalkco·
@JqOnly also why are you being so defensive? you need to take criticism and address actual ideas before defaulting to “AI SLOP LOL”. LLMS are just tools. don’t let it ruin your brain bro
English
1
0
0
37
JQ Lee
JQ Lee@JqOnly·
the separation between the Dev Loop and Audit Loop is exactly why we've moved toward an Agent OS architecture. the Evaluate step functions as that Handoff Boundary you illustrated validating the candidate artifact against deterministic contracts before it ever hits the next cycle. It’s not a closed system when the constraints (Contracts) are defined externally to the agent's reasoning path OS provide the contract and not llm its own as a generator
English
0
0
0
16
???gokuhides
???gokuhides@sidewalkco·
This is actually how you address slop and your architecture doesn’t meet auditing standards. Because you include the auditing loop in the workflow. There should be two different workflows. You don’t have an auditing background so i don’t think you know this. DEV LOOP human intent → spec → implementation → internal QA → candidate artifact ↓ handoff boundary AUDIT LOOP independent audit spec → evidence collection → tests/review → risk assessment → pass/fail/escalate ↓ gate release / revise / reject
English
2
0
0
43
JQ Lee
JQ Lee@JqOnly·
@sidewalkco then let your ai make slop and divergence. I believe the closed loop that makes contract is useful when agent has to pursuing human's goal. and the agent os must be the next direction making contract not context.
English
1
0
0
29
???gokuhides
???gokuhides@sidewalkco·
@JqOnly if you were actually a serious person about this. go into codex and claude and analyze your repo. ask them if your system fails to evolve due to it operating on a closed system. LLMS won’t lie to ya buddy.
English
1
0
0
34
JQ Lee
JQ Lee@JqOnly·
another ChatGPT link with utm_source this paper is about Model Collapse from training on synthetic data, completely unrelated to agent loops, closed/open systems, or harness engineering... You keep name-dropping and linking papers that don’t address the actual system. Read the README or my articles first, then we can have a real conversation.
English
1
0
0
54
???gokuhides
???gokuhides@sidewalkco·
because @JqOnly is obv defensive. here are the research articles that are cited that talk about these issues about operating in a closed system and why his repo isn’t claiming what it says it’s doing. arxiv.org/abs/2305.17493…
English
1
0
0
66
JQ Lee
JQ Lee@JqOnly·
@sidewalkco nah just pointing out you didn’t read the system. Still waiting for real critique, not screenshots and name drops. and welcome your opinion. there isn't an answer on harness engineering. but before that please read ouroboros readme or my articles.
English
0
0
0
18
???gokuhides
???gokuhides@sidewalkco·
@JqOnly i can do it for any. you obv is defensive. do you want me to pull references from alex radford?
English
1
0
0
16
???gokuhides
???gokuhides@sidewalkco·
Why these automations loops are not evolving. @JqOnly You are facing this problem and hermes. 🧵Thread Pt 1
???gokuhides tweet media???gokuhides tweet media???gokuhides tweet media???gokuhides tweet media
English
2
0
1
53
JQ Lee
JQ Lee@JqOnly·
there are 2 axis on Ouroboros 1. philosophy layer: Double Diamond from design thinking interview -> seed -> decomposing tree -> execution -> evaluate -> wonder and reflect 2. OS Layer: from context to contract
JQ Lee tweet media
English
0
0
1
62
JQ Lee retweetledi
JQ Lee
JQ Lee@JqOnly·
This release lands two major milestones of the Agent OS RFC. 1. I/O journal Layer Every LLM call and tool dispatch is now wrapped in a structured, privacy-aware journal. 2. AgentProcess cooperative lifecycle Now we can make an abstraction of user level process. it will be interesting point that ouroboros can execute other harness for specific contract github.com/Q00/ouroboros/…
JQ Lee tweet media
English
4
6
13
581
JQ Lee
JQ Lee@JqOnly·
😂 both Ouroboros and the Hermes agent utilize iteration not to create a closed loop, but to refine context. and regarding the bloat that's exactly why I wrote that it's evolving into an Agent OS. did you read this post? os can make contract not bloating context the OS abstraction handles the resource management so it doesn't suffer the same fate as a raw LLM session also it won the claud plan mode in benchmark.
English
1
0
0
52
???gokuhides
???gokuhides@sidewalkco·
@JqOnly why would you build a closed system that eats its tail. it’s not evolving. it will just run into the same issue that claude / gpt will run into. bloat
English
1
0
0
33