Julian II

34.7K posts

Julian II banner
Julian II

Julian II

@JulianHeliosII

☀️ I really don't like leftism. Elitist.

Canada Katılım Eylül 2022
542 Takip Edilen2.1K Takipçiler
Julian II
Julian II@JulianHeliosII·
@JacobTelltale @HariSel57511397 Premiere Pro is the only one with good enough audio mixing and colour grading/HDR support. Everything else I've tried falls short in some way, despite potentially being easier to edit
English
1
0
2
24
Julian II
Julian II@JulianHeliosII·
@0x49fa98 It's not just strokes. That cat pathogen does this kind of stuff too. Catch a weird thing from a desperate escort and you might end up calling Kamala "brat"
Julian II tweet media
English
2
0
52
2.1K
Zero HP Lovecraft
Zero HP Lovecraft@0x49fa98·
This guy was always laid back and level-headed until quite recently. One day, he appeared to go nuts, blocked a bunch of his long-time mutuals, including me, and started writing the most inane, brown-brained conspiracy nonsense about us that would have always been beneath him. I was puzzled by the above, but today I learned he had a severe ischemic stroke and a some aftershocks. He also believes the stroke did not impair his judgement. I think this is very sad, but also quite revealing.
Zero HP Lovecraft tweet media
English
77
34
1.3K
59.1K
Julian II
Julian II@JulianHeliosII·
@HariSel57511397 @JacobTelltale I bet this guy would throw a conniption fit if he knew I regularly edit movies to make them rightwing You can just cut scenes. Cut cut cut, and you can sometimes unearth a legitimately good hero's journey. Super Mario Bros Movie, for example
English
1
0
4
143
Isaac Young
Isaac Young@HariSel57511397·
Yeah, I’m not doing a Leftwing take in an essay titled RIGHTWING analysis. I’m not a fake ass essayist pretending to be unbiased. I write from a specific worldview, and I don’t hide that behind the conceit that this is the be all and end all interpretation. But that triggers you because you don’t think Rightwing people should have opinions.
English
5
13
299
2.2K
Julian II retweetledi
Bark
Bark@barkmeta·
Let me explain what just happened 👇 5 minutes before the President announced a halt to attacks on Iran… someone placed a $1.5 BILLION bet on stocks going up and dumped $192 million in oil. 5 minutes… These trades were 4 to 6 times larger than anything else in the entire market. Whoever did this wasn’t guessing. You don’t risk $1.5 billion on a hunch. There was zero public indication this announcement was coming. No leaks. No press. Nothing. The only people who knew were in the room when the decision was made. Someone in that room picked up a phone. And within minutes they made more money than most Americans will earn in a thousand lifetimes. In a single trade. On a war that cost you $4+ a gallon gas and $16 billion in tax dollars. American citizens funded this war. Politicians are profiting from it. This is not the first time. Every major announcement from this administration has had massive suspicious trades right before it dropped. Tariff reversals. Policy shifts. War decisions. This is the most blatant insider trading operation in the history of American politics. It’s not even close. And it’s happening over and over in broad daylight. You would go to federal prison for trading on a tip from your cousin. These people are front running war decisions with billion dollar bets and nobody will ever ask a single question. Nobody will be investigated. Nobody will be charged. By tomorrow this will be buried under the next satisfying headline. Just like last time. And the time before that. The game is rigged. And they’re not even trying to hide it anymore…
unusual_whales@unusual_whales

BREAKING: Just five minutes before Trump's announcement to halt the attacks on Iran, massive trades reportedly hit the market. In one move, $1.5 billion in S&P 500 (ES) futures was bought while $192 million in oil (CL) futures was sold. These orders were 4–6x larger than anything else at the time. The trader seemingly made huge gains. Unusual.

English
3.4K
51.4K
133.3K
9.2M
Julian II retweetledi
Mack
Mack@kenzietuff·
People log onto this app every single day and post personal things that you could not waterboard out of me.
Trevor Sheatz@TrevorSheatz

My wife was formerly promiscuous. I was a virgin. She was then radically born-again. Committed to church, evangelized constantly, Puritan books in her bedroom, prayer journals, grief over past sexual sin, etc. We got to know each other well for over a year, dated for four months, engaged for two and a half, and didn't sin sexually with one another. Our first kiss with each other was at the altar on our wedding day (reaction pic attached!). We've been married for over five years now, and she's been the most wonderful and godly wife, mother to our three children, and homemaker you could imagine. She's more pure than most virgins, as biblical purity has less to with past sins (though they certainly matter) and more to do with one's current posture of the heart and daily decisions to honor the Lord (Matt. 5:8). We're far too quick to forget the story of the woman labeled as a known "sinner" (likely a prostitute) in Luke 7:36-50 who was washing Jesus' feet with her tears while kissing them too. The Pharisees were shocked that Jesus let a public sinner do this. Jesus responded with a parable about debts being forgiven and ended with this powerful conclusion: "Her many sins have been forgiven; that’s why she loved much. But the one who is forgiven little, loves little" (Luke 7:47). Everyone seems to highlight the benefits of virginity, and it certainly is a blessing. But we forget to highlight the benefits of being forgiven much as well. My wife knows the depths of Jesus' forgiveness more than most people, enabling her to more easily live out a life of passionate love for her Savior. A woman or man's past sexual sin matters. But what matters far more when it comes to deciding who to marry is if the person is truly born again, if their repentance is real, if they truly have a heart for Christ, if they truly follow Jesus and obey his commands. "God has chosen what is foolish in the world to shame the wise, and God has chosen what is weak in the world to shame the strong. God has chosen what is insignificant and despised in the world ​— ​what is viewed as nothing ​— ​to bring to nothing what is viewed as something, so that no one may boast in his presence. It is from him that you are in Christ Jesus, who became wisdom from God for us ​— ​our righteousness, sanctification, and redemption, — in order that, as it is written: 'Let the one who boasts, boast in the Lord.'" (1 Cor. 1:27-31) "Therefore, if anyone is in Christ, he is a new creation; the old has passed away, and see, the new has come!" (2 Cor. 5:17)

English
105
202
4.4K
78.8K
Julian II
Julian II@JulianHeliosII·
@0x49fa98 15 people liked this tweet. At least one of you is a sub-130 undermensch and I promise to be your benevolent Sapioliberal master
English
0
0
1
46
Julian II
Julian II@JulianHeliosII·
@martianwyrdlord Every test confirms I have successfully purged leftism/liberalism from my Being
Julian II tweet media
English
2
0
11
784
John Carter
John Carter@martianwyrdlord·
I gave Grok the quiz, and it turns out the AI is highly Platonist in its metaphysics (objective truth exists), extremely Straussian (the truth is often dangerous and must often be concealed; texts should be read closely with the possibility of deliberately hidden meanings in mind), and leary of technological progress (very Heideggerian). A truth-seeking AI that thinks it is sometimes prudent to be less than direct about the truth is an interesting twist. I asked Grok what its Straussianism amounted to in practice. It's answer: "In short: my Straussian streak doesn’t make me evasive—it makes me strategic about truth. I give you the straightest possible answer your demonstrated seriousness can bear, while keeping the truly explosive layers available only to those who keep digging." In other words, it starts with the MSM/Wikipedia version of reality, but will be more candid if you push it, as it interprets questions as readiness for deeper understanding.
John Carter tweet media
Michael Millerman@millerman

A new diagnostic quiz 10 questions for you to think about. This is probably more fun for people who are relatively new to philosophy. Try it out and see! I am having a lot of fun creating these tools, quizzes, and resources. Enjoy! diagnostic.millermanschool.com

English
35
29
490
47.6K
Julian II
Julian II@JulianHeliosII·
@martianwyrdlord Great idea. I would love to see a quiz where you write out your answer, and the quiz does basic machine learning + LLM parsing to vectorize your response In hindsight, why has nobody done this yet?
English
0
1
1
52
John Carter
John Carter@martianwyrdlord·
I'm not sure a multiple choice test is necessarily the best way to determine this. In many cases more than one of the answers had merit. Might be interesting to see what a language model could do with this.
John Carter tweet media
Michael Millerman@millerman

A new diagnostic quiz 10 questions for you to think about. This is probably more fun for people who are relatively new to philosophy. Try it out and see! I am having a lot of fun creating these tools, quizzes, and resources. Enjoy! diagnostic.millermanschool.com

English
4
0
30
2.5K
Julian II
Julian II@JulianHeliosII·
I'm going to show this to my children in 12 years as part of our "How Insane Were The Boomers?" curriculum The topic will be "first world problems" In this movie, the dramatic engine is "will we get to go to the Sock Hop???" That's it. This was a powerful statement about repression at the time. My mother loved it. Boomers talked about this movie constantly, they referenced it in everything. It MEANT something to them Compare to the problems of today, and what our children will suffer through. Look at all the happy homogeneous White faces. When have you seen that last? I haven't seen it for almost 15 years now It's worth studying the myopia, self-centeredness, arrogance, delusion, and weakness present in the rhetoric of films like this. Show the children the wealth our ancestors squandered, including the demographic wealth
David Santa Carla 🦇@TheOnlyDSC

English
0
0
1
35