Julião Jr.

15.9K posts

Julião Jr.

Julião Jr.

@JuliaoJr

Músico - Produtor Musical - Homem de esquerda, interessado em política e mais um tanto de coisa, Economista formado pela @UFJF.

Katılım Mayıs 2009
3.6K Takip Edilen5K Takipçiler
Julião Jr.
Julião Jr.@JuliaoJr·
@TUITFLA A questão é o volume das taxas. A organização é necessária. Se um empresário for produzir aqui, ele tem impostos, como qq país com a complexidade do Brasil tem. Mas, os Estados jogam inclusive o frete e o imposto é cobrado em cima do total. É uma questão de razoabilidade.
Português
0
0
0
7
Flavão
Flavão@TUITFLA·
@JuliaoJr Eu não sou a favor do governo metendo a mão no bolso do cidadão desse jeito. Compra um produto e da praticamente o valor dele pro governo Aí o governo gasta nosso dinheiro com tudo, menos com o povo.
Português
1
0
0
6
Julião Jr.
Julião Jr.@JuliaoJr·
A assustadora eficiência da auto-exploração. Como todos os outros ciclos, acredito que isso não se sustentará. O capitalismo necessitaria de estar ofertando mais oportunidades que justificassem isso como algo temporário. E é o contrário o que vemos: As crises se aprofundam.
Sandroka13@sandraselmasr

Sociólogo da USP trabalhou por seis meses como ciclista de app e descobriu dados alarmantes. Um sistema onde o trabalhador não é mais explorado pelo patrão, ele se explora sozinho. bbc.com/portuguese/art…

Português
0
1
3
156
Julião Jr.
Julião Jr.@JuliaoJr·
@mariatdystopia Boa pergunta. Já considerei as vicissitudes, que acho mais agudas que os sinais, pois se sente na carne, como mais possíveis de trazer um ponto de mudança. Hj nada disso me parece suficiente, ou capaz de. Acredito que quando o centro que nos subordina cair, nossa chance virá.
Português
1
0
1
23
mari
mari@mariatdystopia·
What other clear signs so many neocolonized people in the global South need to fully weak up from [elite & common] Westerners’ imperialist, capitalist, colonial, structural labyrinth we’re stuck for +5 centuries, always adapting, never really changing, starting by themselves??
English
1
0
4
33
mari
mari@mariatdystopia·
The western imperialist mentality, provincial yet universalist, self-exculpatory ideology of “Others” as “inferior,” never ready for self-determination—*Still* colonizing the globe economically, culturally, politically etc since 1492–same year Spain expels Muslims from Andalusia.
fawn 💌@fawnn404

the deepest issue is that western society still struggles to imagine palestinians as sufficient unto themselves. intellectually, morally, politically.

English
1
1
11
191
Julião Jr.
Julião Jr.@JuliaoJr·
@mariatdystopia Oi Mari. Tb achei muito possível. Ainda mais se tratando dessas figuras ...
Português
1
0
1
14
mari
mari@mariatdystopia·
@JuliaoJr Vindo dos Bolsonaros, tão “familia tradicional brasileira,” realmente bem possível.
Português
1
0
1
75
Julião Jr.
Julião Jr.@JuliaoJr·
Quando se começa a notar ajustes e mudanças já se torna preocupante. Me parece que o BC conseguiu limitar, conter os danos. Mas, politicamente, vejo a velha a direita querendo se livrar do bolsonarismo para emplacar o seu favorito. Quem seria? Têm um carta (nome) na manga?
Português
0
0
2
22
Julião Jr.
Julião Jr.@JuliaoJr·
todos os poderes e instituições diversas. Bancos são o que há de mais conectado numa economia, que é um sistema de vasos comunicantes. Há um rombo. Qual o tamanho exato? Como será distribuído? Bancos são como juízes de um esporte. Quando atuam bem ninguém nota. +
Português
1
0
2
32
Julião Jr.
Julião Jr.@JuliaoJr·
Por que 4%? Por que não 1% ou 5%? Ou 20%? Essa conta é só para encaixar na narrativa que o Paulo oferece. Tipo as que a CNN ou Globo News criam. Só uma narrativa. Que é um caso de corrupção, me parece óbvio, porque 100% do dinheiro de um banco é dos correntistas. Nosso. +
Português
1
3
7
210
Julião Jr.
Julião Jr.@JuliaoJr·
@zeca_dirceu @reco81 Saúde e força para ele. Zé Dirceu é um gigante e irá superar mais esse desafio. Forte abraço em ambos!
Português
1
0
3
231
Zeca Dirceu
Zeca Dirceu@zeca_dirceu·
Meu pai está com câncer, um linfoma no duodeno. José Dirceu de Oliveira e Silva, o nosso Zé guerreiro do povo brasileiro, não é de se dobrar. Já enfrentou e venceu a ditadura, quatro eleições como deputado, um câncer no rim em 2020, uma cirurgia na cabeça em 2024 e três prisões injustas sem provas. Conversei muito com ele nestes últimos dias. Desde os sintomas até o diagnóstico, ele nunca titubeou: está decidido continuar com a pré-campanha de deputado federal por São Paulo. Fará a quimioterapia e será curado mais uma vez! Peço a oração de todos e todas, peço aos companheiros e companheiras de São Paulo que se dediquem a ajudá-lo ainda mais na pré-campanha, que agora será em grande parte on line. Vale recordar que Lula e Dilma tiveram câncer e foram curados. Nossa família segue com confiança na força do meu pai, mas principalmente na fé em Deus que tem um propósito grande na vida desse homem que já fez muito pelo Brasil e precisa continuar cumprindo a sua missão. Zeca Dirceu.
Zeca Dirceu tweet media
Português
3.3K
1.1K
11.2K
230.6K
Julião Jr.
Julião Jr.@JuliaoJr·
@mariatdystopia Muito interessante tudo isso, a junção do numinoso ao político. Inevitável pensar hoje nos fundamentalistas dentro da Casa Branca querendo juntar o destino manifesto à fé cristã...
Português
0
0
0
2
mari
mari@mariatdystopia·
‘Under the Christian emperors the ancient dream of universality transformed the pagan ambition to civilize the world into the analogous objective to convert literally all its inhabitants to Christianity. The single unifying body of law—the koinos nomos—thus became a single body of beliefs. That these beliefs, as re-described by the Latin Fathers from Augustine to Aquinas, were themselves heavily dependent upon the Stoic notion of law assured a high degree of theoretical continuity between the pagan & the Christian empires, & an equally strong sense that conversion could not be fully or adequately achieved without a corresponding political & cultural transformation. There was one further component of the founding mythology of the Roman Empire which allowed the classical theory of empire to be absorbed relatively easily by its Christian successors. For if the Imperium had drawn the legitimacy for its unlimited political power from a unique moral culture, this was because that culture had been founded in the pietas of which Virgil’s Aeneas, “outstanding in arms and piety’ (‘pietate insignis et armis’) had been the archetype. Pietas denoted loyalty to the family & more generally to the community, together with the strict observation of that community’s religious laws. It also implied the recognition of the singularity, & the truthfulness, of a creed, a creed which, in the Roman case, expressed the complete fusion of the numinous and the political. Rome, said Cicero, had prospered precisely because of ‘our scrupulous attention to religion and our wise grasp of a single truth’. Livy had made Scipio declare: “The empire of the Roman people shall be extended to the furthest ends of the earth” (‘imperium populi Romani propagaverit in ultimos terrarum fines’), a phrase which found a clear echo in St Jerome’s rendering of the Psalm 18:5: “Their sound has been spread throughout the world and the Word had reached to the end of the Earth” (‘In omnem terram excivit sonus eorum et finis orbis terrae verba eorum.’) Under the aegis of the new order, difference itself would vanish into the brotherhood of the God who was also the Son of Man. The Christian emperors had, therefore, not only a duty to uphold & protect Christendom. They had a consequent obligation to extend the empire to those, the non-Christians, who, because of their ignorance, had been denied historical access to the ‘congregation of the faithful’ (congregatio fidelium). The Christian world order whose origins could not be separated from those of the Roman Imperium had always, like the empire itself, been thought of as identical de iure with the world—the orbis terrarum—& thus potentially as a cultural, moral & finally political order with no natural frontiers. Encouraging outsiders to join the wider Christian world posed serious moral difficulties. Conversion was conceived as essentially a cognitive process, an act of instruction which would lead the convert to join the congregation of the faithful of his or her own free will. Forced conversion, although frequently practiced, was, as the great Spanish ‘Apostle to the Indians’, Bartolomé de Las Casas, later protested so violently in [Latin] America, void of true significance. The close association in the Christian mind between belief and certain types of social behavior meant, however, that there were those who were prepared to argue that forced introduction into ‘civility’ was legitimate as the preliminary & necessary condition of voluntary conversion. Indeed, much colonial legislation in Spanish America, and some in Canada, was directed towards this end.’ (Anthony Pagden, 1995)
mari tweet media
mari@mariatdystopia

‘In a wider sense [the medieval empire in the West] had always been a holy empire, for classical Rome itself had since its foundation been endowed with both a divine origin & divine status. Virgil’s Jupiter bestows upon the new city an empire without limits in either space or time. ‘For these [Romans] I set neither bounds nor periods of empire; Imperium without end I give.’ A phrase later echoed by the 14th century jurist Baldus de Ubaldis’ definition of the Christian Empire as the ‘supreme power without limits’. The concept of ‘divinity’ within the pagan world was, of course, very different from the Christian one. But in the various (Christian) narratives which sought to link the Ancient to the modern world, the 2 coincided in a single event. In a culture such as the Christian which gave great eschatological significance to the time and place of birth, the fact that Christ had been born in the reign of Augustus, the architect of the new imperial Rome, identified this as an epochal moment in world history. In Lactantius’ formulation the Augustan principate had been a ‘Golden Age’, the purely human equivalent of the Earthly Paradise. With the Aeneid, which under the Emperor Frederick II was read as a semi-sacred poem (as indeed it was by Dante), & the supposed prediction of the birth of Christ in the Fourth Eclogue, it was possible to conceive the Imperium Romanum not only, as Augustine had done, as God’s reward for supreme but secular virtue,” but also as God’s instrument in the world whose purpose was to prepare the way for its ultimate conversion to Christianity. The Lex regia had been a purely human enactment. For Baldus, however, this human source had acquired divine sanction as a consequence of Christ’s endorsement of imperial authority. (Render unto Caesar that which is Caesar’s.) The Lex regia, it could then be argued, had been an expression of the will of the people passed on God’s behest. If at the time of Christ’s birth rulership of the world was in the hands of the Roman people, then this must have been by divine will. No subsequent claim to ‘divine right’ could quite match the personal endorsement of the Son of God himself. Theocratic emperorship thus became quite unlike theocratic kingship. For Dante, too, the Imperium was the political instrument for the fulfillment of a more enduring human need to create a single community of knowledge, & a single human civilization, bound together by what in Il Convivio he called the ‘universal religion of the human species’. It could even be argued, on the basis of Matthew 28, 18—‘all power is given unto me in heaven and in earth’, & Corinthians 15, 27: ‘for He hath put all things under his feet’—that, as Aquinas among others concluded, it was Christ himself who had been the true ‘dominus totius orbis’ & Augustus merely his regent. Such a political ordo could, therefore, only be, to reverse Voltaire’s famous dictum, Holy, Roman and an Empire. The origin of this unique political order in Jupiter’s donation, as recorded by Virgil, also had extensive significance for later generations eager to sustain that, otherwise fragile, continuity between the pagan & Christian empires. For, it was argued, the empire Jupiter had founded & Augustus had re-created had then passed through a succession of political translations to Constantine the Great, and Constantine—at least in the fertile political imagination of the 8th century Papacy—had bequeathed imperium (now conceived as a quasi-hereditary property) to the Papacy and the Papacy had bestowed it upon a succession of Germanic rulers. The realities were of little theoretical significance. What mattered, for the other princes of Christendom & for later generations of European rulers, was the historical pedigree of the claims of both the Emperor & the Pope to hold Imperium over the whole of the Christian world.’ Anthony Pagden (1995). Lords of all the worlds: ideologies of empire in Spain, Britain and France c.1500-c.1850

English
3
1
5
282