

点进去一看疯狂转发新西兰蝻同张俊杰以及谣棍今月,感觉大哥你这辈子有了
Inevitable Indian
16.1K posts



点进去一看疯狂转发新西兰蝻同张俊杰以及谣棍今月,感觉大哥你这辈子有了

Jensen Huang pays his top executives the exact same dollar amount. Same number for 55 people. He opens Excel, types one figure, and drags it down. Nvidia crossed $5 trillion on Friday. Performance reviews go unwritten. The standing one-on-one cadence that anchors most CEO calendars simply doesn't exist, and information flows to all 55 directs at once or not at all. The man running the world's most valuable company threw out the entire CEO operating manual. The conventional read is eccentricity. 55 directs blows past Dunbar. The identical pay surrenders talent retention as a lever, and zero scheduled 1:1s skips the most basic CEO ritual in the management playbook. A board reviewing this on paper would fire the CEO. What reads as three quirks is one architecture. Each rule removes a specific class of executive politics that traditional companies spend 40% of CEO time managing. Identical pay removes compensation negotiation as a variable. There's no "I should make more than Ajay" conversation, because the conversation has no surface area. Nvidia's most recent proxy shows Colette Kress, Ajay Puri, Debora Shoquist, and Timothy Teter all receiving the same $1.5M cash bonus this year. Identical to the dollar. Skipping one-on-ones removes information asymmetry across the entire executive layer. Every exec operates on identical intel, because Jensen never says anything to one of them that the other 54 don't also hear. Status games inside executive teams need private information to function. Jensen made every piece of information public. 55 directs forces a flat structure. A Fortune 500 with 5-7 directs per manager typically runs 9-10 layers deep. Nvidia runs roughly 3-4 layers from Jensen to a senior individual contributor. Information that takes a quarter to move at Microsoft moves in a single meeting at Nvidia. The deeper trade is what most people miss. The traditional CEO spends 30-40% of their week on executive management overhead: 1:1s, comp reviews, conflict mediation between directs, performance plans. Jensen runs the same headcount with effectively zero of that. His management system IS the engineering meeting. Every exec is a co-designer in real time. Management happens as a byproduct of the work. The Excel drag-down is the most surgical move in the system. Differentiated executive comp creates permanent political machinery. Every cycle, every exec compares their number to their peers, recalibrates relative status, and adjusts behavior accordingly. Jensen looked at that entire machinery and unplugged it. The whole architecture was designed for the moment money stops working. Once a senior Nvidia exec clears $50M+ in vested stock, comp differentiation stops functioning as a motivational lever. It becomes noise. Jensen built the system as if money was already off the table from day one. $5 trillion is the validation. The most heretical management architecture in the Fortune 500 sits on top of the most valuable company in the world. Nobody else will copy it. The system requires a CEO with no executive favorites.

@xixiong78951197 所以這就是很多人在乎他, 而沒有人在乎你的原因☺️


@anblk984 我个人认为,媒体当然是希望各方都站出来发言,最好是吸烟的男生也出来自述,受案的警察也出来自述 并不是我们选择性只报道了女生的自述,而是目前只有女生的自述。


很正常,当我们发男性新闻的时候会被女权骂男拳 当我们发女性新闻的时候会被男的骂女拳 但是实际上对我们来说,新闻就是新闻。 被各方喜欢的代价就是也会被各方骂 在世界已经被割裂成碎片的时代,习惯就好






很正常,当我们发男性新闻的时候会被女权骂男拳 当我们发女性新闻的时候会被男的骂女拳 但是实际上对我们来说,新闻就是新闻。 被各方喜欢的代价就是也会被各方骂 在世界已经被割裂成碎片的时代,习惯就好

@anblk984 我个人认为,媒体当然是希望各方都站出来发言,最好是吸烟的男生也出来自述,受案的警察也出来自述 并不是我们选择性只报道了女生的自述,而是目前只有女生的自述。



