Sabitlenmiş Tweet
✝️Parsifal☦️
9.9K posts
✝️Parsifal☦️
@Julius_faber_
On a Synod with the Lord (but not cringe…), YEC, Theologian, I write stuff, seminarian (not allowed to say where lmao)🇻🇦
North West, England Katılım Ağustos 2023
396 Takip Edilen748 Takipçiler
✝️Parsifal☦️ retweetledi
📄An Open Letter to All
"Glory Be to God Alone."
- St. Bonaventure's motto as Cardinal
I would like to welcome my many new followers, and re-welcome all my friends and mutuals again. I plan here to outline my account, and what one may look forward to from my pen.
English
@gabriellf2181 "The very Bonnie Charlie left the Roman Church in 1750."
And was back by 1766, and all of his descendants were Romanists thereafter. But sure, his stint in Protestantism is enough cause for an anti-Catholic today to support placing a homosexual German Catholic on the throne!
English
There is nothing strange about being anti-Catholic and Jacobite; the greatest general in '45 was a Protestant, and the greatest propagandist of the old pretender's court was an Anglican pastor. The very Bonnie Charlie left the Roman Church in 1750.
Tristanxh@EvensongEnjoyer
>American Jacobite >"No Popery" Pick a LARP, buddy. (N.B., "Jacobites" are those who support the Roman Catholic descendants of King James II and their claim to the English monarchy)
English
@supercalifrag33 @martyrmade The idea of you attacking me an Englishman for somehow threatening the white Anglo Saxon race is hilarious.
English
@Julius_faber_ @martyrmade Don't threaten WASPs and this wouldn't be a conversation, but you did, now it is. Keep pressing.
English
@supercalifrag33 @martyrmade You people would do anything for the Jew it’s honestly sickening
English
@martyrmade The Know-Nothings were right.
WASPs - understand they mean war.
ploppity plop@supercalifrag33
First they came for the Jews, and I said a little, but not a lot, because I was also angry with the Jews for the censorship industrial complex and leftist organization that harmed my people. Then they came for the WASPs, and I said SHIELD WALL.
English
✝️Parsifal☦️ retweetledi
SSPX Update 34.0: Cardinal Jean-Marc Aveline, President of the Bishops Conference in France, in an interview with KTO called upon dialogue between the SSPX and Rome saying ,“I am convinced that only dialogue allows us to continue proclaiming the Gospel,” and that the announcement to go ahead with the July 1st Episcopal consecrations caused “mostly sadness,” to His Eminence.
English
@tranarchist1312 @cristian444999 So the democratic will of the majority of the population doesn’t count because a small island resulting has a small population?
English
@Julius_faber_ @cristian444999 There are less than 4000 people on the island, that’s a medium sized village in the UK; the village I lived in was 10,000 people. Could my village of 10,000 choose to vote to become part of Argentina?
English
Europeans are literally the native inhabitants of the Falklands lol
Marxist777 📕🇵🇸@Marxist777
“I’m a lefty anti-imperialist but Argentina is wrong on the Falklands”
English
@cristian444999 Yeah, but why does the UK care about keeping it? For post imperial power projection. Neither side here are good guys.
English
@just_me_1794 @DunsGloyp @FeelsGuy2003 Acceptance of the pope, that is what ratifies the universality of councils.
English
English
@just_me_1794 @DunsGloyp @FeelsGuy2003 Yes Met. Kallistos Ware’s argument here simply doesn’t work, as he recognises this idea of reception is a completely post hoc justification to reject Florence, it ultimately makes the councils beholden to the laity and is not reflected in any text of any council.
English
YouTube
English
English
@TradCatTaylor @CatholicHavoc Sure he’s new to the church but at least he’s not trying to crowdsource an ecumenical council consisting of four bishops
English
@CatholicHavoc Says bro who became a novus ordo catholic not even week ago. Take a seat kiddo.
English
“it begins” and its just 4 grandpas chopping it up in their basement
🗝️ Trad Cath Sermons@TradCathSermons
It begins...
English
@just_me_1794 @DunsGloyp @FeelsGuy2003 So then what is the point of the council? If the only method of recognising the council is how it’s received after the council is finished then how can you have any certainty in the council as it unfolds?
English
@Julius_faber_ @DunsGloyp @FeelsGuy2003 Straightaway acceptance is not the criteria. If that were the case, Florence would be Ecumenical.
The fact that, today, certain Councils are Ecumenical and certain are not is the evidence of them being Ecumenical.
The Church and the sensus fidelium are living.
English
@just_me_1794 @DunsGloyp @FeelsGuy2003 What is the time frame for this acceptance? Does it have to be an immediate acceptance? This would apply to Florence which established a union of the churches. If not an immediate acceptance then how can their ever be certainty in a council while it’s going on?
English
@Julius_faber_ @DunsGloyp @FeelsGuy2003 The worldwide Church recognizes it as such.
However, an issue with this definition could be the Council of Chalcedon due to the resulting schism. In those cases, the fidelity to Tradition would come into play. The decision of Chalcedon was simply correct.
English
@just_me_1794 @DunsGloyp @FeelsGuy2003 Yes of course they are, I’m not arguing against them, my point is that the logic of reception theory simply does not hold up when compared with these historical examples. If to have a valid council you need everyone to accept it straight away then neither could ever have validity
English
@Julius_faber_ @DunsGloyp @FeelsGuy2003 Bruh. Are Constantinople II and Nicaea II accepted Ecumenical Councils by the Roman Catholic Church?
English
English
@Julius_faber_ @DunsGloyp @FeelsGuy2003 Florence was not universally accepted, as evidenced by the fact that it was not universally accepted.
Constantinople II was.
English
@just_me_1794 @DunsGloyp @FeelsGuy2003 This is simply factually untrue, both Constantinople II and Nicaea II were rejected in the west when they happened, whereas with Florence every delegate, bishop and the emperor signed the acts, communed with the Latins and professed the union.
English
@Julius_faber_ @DunsGloyp @FeelsGuy2003 No. Councils clearly do have a point. Such as the 7 Ecumenical Councils (which were accepted everywhere, always, and by all). This is obviously not the case for Florence as the Orthodox Church rejects it to this day.
English
@just_me_1794 @DunsGloyp @FeelsGuy2003 How then is Constantinople II an ecumenical council? If Florence’s universal acceptance by the bishops isn’t enough for valid reception how can Constantinople II which wasn’t accepted as valid for over a century in the west an ecumenical council?
English
Română
@just_me_1794 @DunsGloyp @FeelsGuy2003 This is simply ridiculous, every delegate signed the acts of union, the emperor signed the acts of union, they were solemnly proclaimed in all the patriarchates of the east. To claim that Mark of Ephesus was the true locus of the entire church means councils have no point.
English
@Julius_faber_ @DunsGloyp @FeelsGuy2003 The fact that the Orthodox Church didn't accept it. The Orthodox Church being located in the individual of St. Mark of Ephesus, at the time.
We're going in circles.
English
@just_me_1794 @DunsGloyp @FeelsGuy2003 How? What is qualitatively different between the 7 first councils and Florence?
English
English