June

This is an interesting interview. Neither of them has a scientific background, yet both are rock-solid convinced they’re right. How is that possible? Well, you’ve got those who suffer from intellectual laziness and just blindly lean on big names, famous institutes or organisations, and data that looks convincing at first glance, like ´protection against severe disease’ -which, on closer inspection and over the longer term, turns out to be one of the most alarming ‘side effects’ of the C-19 mass vaccination as it got triggered by vaccine-induced immune refocusing. In contrast to the people who almost instinctively felt something was smelling fishy off from the start and, therefore, did their own research, the first group simply continues to repeat whatever mainstream brainwash is being served up that day. The emptier the brain, the more arrogant the argument tends to sound. The second group is a small minority. I feel lucky to have got to know many of them and even to count some as friends. They’re the real intellectual elite. These are the people who, despite having zero formal biological or scientific training, refused to settle for the naïve barking of the MSM. They did their own research, weighed the conflicting opinions, hit us with a steady stream of common-sense questions, joined the courses and seminars we ran, and wouldn’t rest until they’d acquired enough knowledge to puncture the MSM’s veil of mysterious, contradictory, or outright ridiculous claims. I have a lot of admiration for them. RFK Jr. is one of them. And when -just once in a while- an actual debate between the two groups does take place (something that has been systematically denied to us), it very quickly becomes obvious who knows what he’s talking about and who’s just the ape copying all the other apes. The most striking part is still that D. Bash is so breathtakingly stupid that she apparently thought she could checkmate someone as thoroughly trained and deeply steeped in the subject as RFK Jr. with a handful of arrogant cliché questions and copy-paste statements.

Wow! I don’t think the world will ever get beyond this humiliation. Shameful. Wonder if other world inhabitants had to wear them, or maybe orchestrated to find out the state of mankind’s intelligence:) We are not up to scale it seems.

Started watching his “Butterflies of the Week” from the git go. They were so valuable! Kept many of us from being indoctrinated. Maybe post them on X for those who didn’t get to watch them?

EXCLUSIVE: Anthony Fauci quietly joined a stealth mRNA vaccine startup in 2023. Then the Biden administration awarded it more than $28 million to develop vaccines for viruses with pandemic potential. Now Eli Lilly is buying it for up to $1.55 billion.

🚨 BREAKING NEWS: The first-in-the-world protocol using ivermectin, mebendazole, and fenbendazole for cancer has been peer-reviewed and published! I have been seeing our paper everywhere recently—the news is spreading! 😃 Big Pharma attacked our paper on fenbendazole involving three Stage 4 cancer patients who are now cancer-free, but it will be resubmitted and, hopefully, published soon. I have also been attacked recently by Canadian authorities because of my revolutionary cancer research and work, but... Thank you all for your ongoing support! 😃 God bless you all, and God bless those who are fighting cancer.

Wasn’t Fauci’s wife the one approving and releasing the grants?

REMEMBER WHEN the Media laughed and said ivermectin was ONLY for horses and cows? THEY KNEW it was made for people since 1987. Here’s what they didn’t tell you: 1 – It prevents the damage caused by drugs created using mRNA technology, blocks the entry of Spike Protein into cells and, if the person was vaccinated, they can treat themselves for damage already done through Ivermectin. 2 – It only has beneficial effects and no harmful effects in the treatment of the C virus. In fact, even before entering the cell, it has already destroyed the virus in the blood. 3 – It has a very powerful anti-inflammatory action against and has a powerful impact on traumatic and orthopedic injuries, it strengthens muscles and has no side effects like corticosteroids. 4 –It treats autoimmune ailments such as: rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, fibromyalgia, psoriasis, Crohn's disease, allergic rhinitis. 5 – It improves the immunity levels in cancer patients and treats Herpes Simplex and Herpes Zoster, plus reduces the frequency of sinusitis and diverticulitis. 6 – It protects the heart in cardiac overload. In an embolism for example, it prevents cardiac hypoxia because it stimulates the production of basic energy so that the tissue is not destroyed and thus improves cardiac function. 7 – It is anti-parasitic, anti-neoplastic (anti-cancer). Allegedly, it suppresses the proliferation and metastasis of cancer cells, preserving healthy cells and improving the effectiveness of chemotherapy treatment. 8 - It can kills cancer cells resistant to chemotherapy, defeating the resistance to multiple chemo-therapeutics that tumors develop, and combined with chemotherapy and/or anti-cancer agents, it provides an increase in the effectiveness of these treatments. 9 – It is antimicrobial (bacteria and viruses) and increases immunity. 10 – It reaches the Central Nervous System and regenerates the nerves. 11 – It helps to regulates glucose, insulin metabolism, cholesterol levels and reduces liver fat in steatose. 12 - It can be used as a prophylactic agent and has been associated with a significant reduction in infection, hospitalization and mortality rates due to C-19. #Ivermectin #Fenbendazole #Cancercure.

The federal government has a duty to protect the American people — not fund research that could put them at risk. Today, we are ending federal support for dangerous gain-of-function research and replacing weak oversight with clear, enforceable safeguards. This policy delivers on President Trump’s commitment to put safety first while ensuring America remains the global leader in ethical, responsible, and lifesaving biomedical research.

Here's why they were so desperate to cover up the lab leak: The 2003 SARS outbreak exposed how outdated WHO's disease rules were, since the old International Health Regulations only covered a few named diseases. In response, the World Health Assembly launched a revision process. By 2004, avian flu drove CDC and global experts to draft the Manhattan Principles, which coined "One Health," a plan to unite human, animal, and environmental health to stop zoonotic outbreaks before they start. In 2005, WHO member states unanimously adopted the updated International Health Regulations (IHR 2005), legally binding all countries to detect, report, and respond to any event that might become a global health emergency. That framework began taking shape in practice with USAID's PREDICT program (2009), which hunted new zoonotic viruses worldwide and trained scientists in the One Health approach. One of its partners was EcoHealth Alliance, which later collaborated with the Wuhan Institute of Virology to study bat coronaviruses under a 2014 NIH grant. Meanwhile, WHO, FAO, and OIE formalized their Tripartite Concept Note in 2010, turning One Health into an institutional partnership. This tripartite later became a key partner in the Global Health Security Agenda (GHSA), launched in 2014 by the U.S. and allies to accelerate IHR 2005 compliance. EcoHealth Alliance and the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security both participated in GHSA networks. Hopkins would go on to stage the infamous Clade X (2018) and Event 201 (2019) pandemic simulations which happened just months before the COVID-19 outbreak. At the same time, the Sendai Framework (2015) wove biological threats into global disaster planning and introduced the "Build Back Better" language for post-crisis recovery, further cementing IHR 2005 principles in international policy. So by the mid-2010s, the global outbreak response framework and the virus discovery networks had fused into one system. In other words: the same institutions doing the gain-of-function COVID-19 research were also heavily involved in creating the response playbook and doing the scenario games. It was all happening in parallel. We likely would not have had COVID-19 in the first place if we had never adopted the IHR 2005 regulations in the first place. The pandemic created its response, but the response also created the pandemic. That's the cover-up.

FAUCI PARDON: NOT BULLETPROOF On the Pardon: Before the hearing @SenRandPaul a former senior Justice Department prosecutor told me there are three, viable legal strategies to challenge the preemptive Biden pardon. But there is no easy path. One strategy calls for charging Fauci with a crime, with the expectation he would file a motion with the court to dismiss based on the pardon. This could open the door to challenging the sweeping pardon’s viability and years of litigation. Another strategy involves Congress. Because Fauci has theoretically been preemptively pardoned against past and future criminal charges related to his NIH work, it can be argued that Fauci has no plausible claim to the 5th Amendment, the right against self-incrimination. If Fauci takes the Fifth at Senator Paul’s hearing (which he has) the committee could seek to compel Fauci's testimony. A finding of contempt could follow. Finally, one of Fauci’s closest associates has been criminally charged. With pressure and the right incentives he might be flipped and become a cooperating witness. Dr. David Morens, who was a senior advisor to Fauci at the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, was indicted on multiple charges including conspiracy and obstruction, including destruction, alteration or falsification of federal records. Along with allegations that personal email accounts were used to evade the Freedom of Information Act, this could be a powerful motivator. From media reports: Dr. David Morens has pleaded not guilty to all five federal criminal counts. NOTE: @SenRickScott has just raised the Morens case. Fauci continues to take the Fifth. Consider subscribing to@C__Herridge. Your support makes our independent reporting possible. **This has been reposted to correct TYPO fourth line

While you wait for Fauci’s hearing to start, a reminder that when the U.S. government purchased Covid-19 vaccines from Pfizer and Moderna, it contractually agreed to keep the PREP Act immunity in place for as long as their vaccines are administered in the United States. What that means is that the U.S. government promised Pfizer and Moderna that it could not be sued for harms from its Covid-19 vaccines, irrespective of whether an emergency continued to exist. But not only did our government contractually agree that Pfizer and Moderna can harm and kill Americans with impunity, it also guaranteed Pfizer and Moderna billions of dollars for this privilege. Even worse, the U.S. government guaranteed this immunity in July 2020, months before it first authorized Covid-19 vaccines in December 2020. Meaning, the U.S. government pre-guaranteed these companies immunity from any harm caused by their products, thus, knowingly undermining any incentive for them to create a safe product. And how much were Pfizer and Moderna guaranteed to be paid by the U.S. government to develop a product that could harm its own citizens with impunity? A total of over $21 billion just in the initial rollout -- $8.63 billion for Moderna and $13.15 billion for Pfizer. Sound unreal? See the actual contracts for yourself linked in my most recent restack. The Fallout The implications are incredible. To start, Pfizer and Moderna could sue the U.S. government for breach of contract and potentially other relief if PREP Act immunity is terminated before the United States’ use of their COVID-19 vaccines ceases. Only in an upside-down world would the U.S. government siphon over $21 billion of its citizen’s taxpayer dollars to Pfizer and Moderna and pre-guarantee a profit-motivated company sweeping immunity for harms its product causes to its own citizens. Summing it up: The U.S. government guaranteed Pfizer and Moderna immunity for injuries from their products before they were even developed, thereby eliminating the incentive for these companies to make their product safe. Worse, it gave these companies billions of dollars of its citizens’ money to develop these products, and even more incredible, it then spent billions more of its citizen’s money to promote Pfizer’s product as “safe and effective.” And in an ultimate slap to its citizens, then it required them to be injected with this product under the threat of grave consequences, including expulsion from school, losing their job, discharge from the military, etc. Who is Being Protected? Who exactly is the U.S. government working for? Whose interests is it protecting? Government agencies have a well-documented history of being captured by industry. It is known in political science as regulatory capture. In this case, the capture is by pharma and the degree of capture is unprecedented. You, the collective citizens of the United States, have paid Pfizer and Moderna billions of dollars. You have paid with your taxes. You have paid with your bodies when you were injured without recourse against Pfizer or Moderna. You have paid with your right to freedom when you were forced to be injected with their products under penalty of losing basic civil rights, employment, or more. And what have Pfizer and Moderna paid? Nothing. They instead raked in billions of dollars of your money as long as they developed a Covid-19 vaccine and were shielded from liability irrespective of how unsafe of a product they developed or how much harm it would cause the public that paid them. The Solution The above again brings into focus why no medical product should ever be mandated. This assures you can say “no” if you don’t want a product developed with pre-guaranteed immunity for harms. “No” where its clinical trial had more deaths in the vaccinated group than the placebo group. “No” where it generates over $55 billion in revenue but its morally-bankrupt manufacturers won’t spend a dollar to compensate those injured. Even if you support all current vaccines, masks, etc., there may come a day when you may not want to take a mandated medical product or procedure. When that day comes, it may be too late to recapture the rights you have surrendered. Rights lost are rarely retrieved. This is why, while everyone should be free to take any medical product, everyone should also be free to decline any medical product without penalty. It should be that simple. Take Action To that end, I encourage you to send the following proposed legislation to your legislative representatives: “No law may require or coerce a person to receive or use a medical product, or impose a penalty or deprive a benefit for refusing a medical product or refusing to disclose whether a person has received a medical product.” Medical freedom is freedom. If you cannot get a job, go to school, play sports, sit in a restaurant, or otherwise participate in civil society because you refuse a medical product, then what good are your rights if you can exercise them only at home by yourself? That is why medical freedom is a fundamental right that must be permanently fixed into the law of every civilized nation. Thank you to all the warriors, veteran and new, who join arms in the battle to secure this fundamental right. As aptly stated in the Declaration of Independence, we “are endowed by [our] Creator with certain unalienable Rights” and to safeguard those rights “we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes, and our sacred Honor.” We must never yield to the tyranny of permitting others to dictate what can or must be placed, administered, or injected onto or into our bodies. For once that right is ceded, none truly remains.

BREAKING: Financial disclosure records reveal Dr. Anthony Fauci was an investor in Nancy and Paul Pelosi's favorite restaurant in San Francisco --Jackson Fillmore Trattoria--which SBA records reveal received at least $307,000 in COVID-tied PPP funds benefiting Fauci and his stake

I would be happy with a huge financial penalty…these guys have assets probably from questionable sources. Make them sell and live on social security. Money donated to vaccine injured. Old, yes, some claim early dementia? Hit where it hurts $

@FiveTimesAugust @POTUS @SecKennedy I would be happy with a huge financial penalty…these guys have assets probably from questionable sources. Make them sell and live on social security. Money donated to vaccine injured. Old, yes, some claim early dementia? Hit where it hurts $

Fauci isn’t actually going to jail for anything. He’s 85 years old. His life’s work and the damage and death caused by it is done. And nobody rushed to get him for any of it. Not @POTUS. Not @SecKennedy. Certainly nobody in the last administration. And much of the current admin has been about sweeping the entire Covid era under the rug and moving along. They just don’t talk about it. Which tells you all you need to know about tomorrow. We’re going to get some solid bread and circus from Fauci’s testimony, but don’t be shocked when he and everyone else involved in his crimes shuffles along without any real penalty under law.

Oh this is so much better than the film ‘Disclosure Day.’ Will make you rethink everything you thought you knew or believed.

CONTEXT: The ghost writer tapes were recorded seven years before Special Counsel Robert Hur concluded a jury would not convict President Biden because of his age and failing memory. Hur found Biden wilfully retained and disclosed highly classified materials after his vice presidency, including government documents and personal notes/notebooks/notecards containing classified information about the Obama administration’s Afghanistan policy. Some of these sensitive records were found by investigators in Biden’s garage, offices, and basement den. As a senator, Biden apparently removed some classified materials from a secure facility known as a SCIF. Unlawful retention of classified information is a potential federal crime, in additional to mishandling national defense information.

🇺🇸As her popularity grows with the mildly retarded population, let share this with the rest of America.🇺🇸

Teens dancing to one of the biggest dance crazes out of the late-1950's called The Stroll, which originated from American Bandstand, Idaho, 1958.

A good time to hear it from one of the chief investigators. bit.ly/goingrogue-ep55