JustForKnowHow
23.4K posts

JustForKnowHow
@JustForKnowHow1
(ɥʇɐǝp ʎddɐɥ ǝɥ┴) snɯɐƆ ʇɹǝql∀ – «˙ɟlǝsɹnoʎ llᴉʞ oʇ uɐɥʇ ǝʌᴉl oʇ ǝƃɐɹnoɔ ǝɹoɯ pǝǝu noʎ 'puǝ ǝɥʇ uI»
¿pǝʇɐɔol ʎllɐǝɹ ǝuo sᴉ ǝɹǝɥM Katılım Ocak 2021
668 Takip Edilen351 Takipçiler


meedia.de/news/beitrag/2…
Meedia: »Meta partially withdraws its AI image generator, Muse«.
English

docma.info/blog/ki-pflich…
Docma: »Mandatory AI labelling from August 2026: Between watermarks, C2PA and the quest for authenticity«.
English

@JustForKnowHow1 @QuoteJung Of course, constant vigilance is essential.
Here is the edition & page scan with full quote on archive:
archive.org/details/2-jung…


English

@ReginaAustralis @QuoteJung In my experience, one must be very critical of so-called quotations from various sources. Fiction and truth often become intertwined – and the internet is full of ‘contaminated sources’; the same applies to AI.
English

@JustForKnowHow1 @QuoteJung Interesting, I challenged Grok with what you said & it asserts the 2nd sentence does appear in the scholarly publications — then explains the confusion...
x.com/i/grok/share/e…

English

@ReginaAustralis @QuoteJung Reputable Jung scholars (including Sonu Shamdasani) do not cite it as an authentic quotation. The website carljungdepthpsychologysite.blog is not a scholarly or editorially verified source on Jung. It frequently reproduces unsubstantiated internet quotations.
English

@ReginaAustralis @QuoteJung The second sentence only began to appear on motivational websites/social media from around 2010 onwards. It does not appear in any scholarly edition of the Letters, neither in: the Princeton edition (Adler/Jaffé, 1975), the Routledge edition, nor in the German volumes.
English



















