Ebube Francis 💙❤️

2.2K posts

Ebube Francis 💙❤️ banner
Ebube Francis 💙❤️

Ebube Francis 💙❤️

@Justdeywiime

Just having fun 😁 Barcelona fan 🇪🇸 Més qué un club 💙❤️

Katılım Mart 2026
563 Takip Edilen79 Takipçiler
Ebube Francis 💙❤️ retweetledi
ESPN UK
ESPN UK@ESPNUK·
France squad are having too much fun with the Rayan Cherki meme 😭
ESPN UK tweet media
English
265
1.4K
25.5K
267.5K
Ebube Francis 💙❤️ retweetledi
Yehgha
Yehgha@yaygha·
This, btw, is partly why friendships exist. Friends are, typically people we have filtered for shared interests, and physical and temperamental similarity. This is why short people have short friends, tall people, tall friends, and idiots, idiot friends And thus, where we have gist or 'interesting' stories to share, the ideal audience are those we have chosen because of resonance; our friends. Not our wife or husband that we chose not for similarity, but for complementarity. But we now have all adopted a distorted conception of love by asking one person to satisfy needs that were once distributed across friends, family, community, mentors, and companions. Read the bible, for example, and you will see how people like David for example, had a bossom friend who he was very close to despite having wives and numerous side bitches. "the soul of Jonathan was knit with the soul of David, and Jonathan loved him as his own soul." 1 samuel 18:1 But we positively dehumanise our spouses by expecting them to be superman simply because of the existence of an emotion and the pronouncement of vows that ultimately mean nothing Then, when the relationship or marriage inevitably breaks down under the overload, we blame the individuals involved rather than evaluate the impossible standard to which we have subjected love itself. Tough, then for those who have allowed themselves to be ruled by this dysfunction
Nsikan@CkanJohnson

And before anyone says ‘but couples should be interested in each other’s lives.’ Yes. Broadly. But there’s a difference between being interested in someone’s life and being expected to perform enthusiasm for every piece of trivia that crosses their mind.

English
5
22
63
5.6K
Ebube Francis 💙❤️ retweetledi
Yehgha
Yehgha@yaygha·
About 4 days ago, I watched a YT video that talked about how we came about the term 'colour temperature' and by extension, why warmer-coloured lights (2800 to 3000K) is more relaxing and comfortable, while cooler light (white-ish light) is more stimulating, and suited to work, play and activity, broadly speaking. Found it particular interesting as I've always prefered incandescent lighting indoors, especially at night because its more conducive to rest, signals sleep time and creates a more intimate ambience for when I have female guests That video gave scientific backing to my night time preference for warm light (the science always meets me in front, eh?) Now, maybe because of how excited I was about that discovery, I felt a strong urge to share it with my girl who had just walked into the living room as the video was ending - but caught myself mid-thought, self-reminded she would not share my enthusiasm because I know from experience, such things do not interest her. So rather than expend my exuberence on an audience that would not share my fascination, I relocated to my desk and rerouted that energy into a deeply rewarding epistemic exercise on the subject. Moral of the story: While we all have impulses to share stories, interests or random bits of knowledge with those we love, and expect them to share our interests, it is socially unintelligent to forget that they are separate individuals with minds of their own. They have different interests, different curiosities, different levels of intelligence, different mental landscapes and basically, different things that capture their attention. To expect that whatever interests us must interest them, or that whatever excites us must excite them, is a textbook case of self-absorption and a consequent inability to map their psychology. It evinces an inability to fully appreciate separateness and the 'other-ness' of others. Affection, love, marriage and whatever, does not undo individuality. So the reason he 'doesn't receive the information in the first place' may very well be that the subject matter does not interest him. But because he is your husband, rather than communicate that lack of interest, he pretends to listen so as not to hurt your feelings. Which then begs the question: how long will he continue to pretend? And at what point does it become unfair to expect that he shows interest in whatever story you have to share at whatever time - irrespective of his state of mind or individuality? Okay... I guess that's two questions but you get the point A better response, then (one which I use and have found to be remarkably effective) would be to (nonverbally) communicate his disinterest in such, as I like to call them, low level gists so that you gradually learn to stop bringing them to him Or at least, consider whether the subject matter is one that is likely to interest him before sharing. Rather than sharing simply because it interests you. So the problem is not inattention on his part. The problem is an inability on yours to recognise him as an independent center of exprerience, rather than an extension of yourself. The issue, in simple terms, is your solipsism
Ada@adanonso_

Having a husband is great because you always have someone to talk to. The problem is, halfway through your story, you start noticing the signs. The occasional "hmm." The random nodding. The delayed "wow" that has absolutely nothing to do with what you just said. One day I spent almost twenty minutes telling my husband about something that happened at work. I was fully invested. I gave background information, side characters, plot twists, and even explained why I was upset. When I finally finished, he blinked a couple of times, looked up at me, and said, "Sorry, I think I drifted off for a second. What happened after that?" That was when I realized this man had been physically present but spiritually unavailable. The funny part is that I wasn't even angry. I just started laughing because now I understand why all my secrets are safe with him. It's not loyalty. It's because he never received the information in the first place.

English
14
69
247
18.6K
Coconut head 🙂‍↔️😍
“i miss you” “i miss you too” na the national anthem for long distance relationships be that “i wish you were here” na the chorus.
English
350
2.4K
12.5K
152.9K
Ebube Francis 💙❤️ retweetledi
Tamale
Tamale@256Rootyherman·
Drug Sniffer dog doing it's intern on airports in Mexico
Tamale tweet media
English
222
2.3K
17.9K
230.4K
Ebube Francis 💙❤️ retweetledi
Sir Dickson
Sir Dickson@Wizarab10·
You might want to rethink your favourite for the World Cup. Most of them are playing shit. This World Cup will pull up a surprise.
English
406
325
2.6K
46.1K
Ebube Francis 💙❤️ retweetledi
Sir Dickson
Sir Dickson@Wizarab10·
If your perception of relationship is what you're going to be getting and how much you would take, you should be embarrassed. I don't know how people are comfortable being in a relationship where all they do is take. Dont you feel ashamed? You clearly don't love your partner, but that is not even my concern. I'm worried you don't feel shame.
Leo Dasilva@SirLeoBDasilva

Many of you want great relationships but all you want to do is take. There’s nothing great that comes out of always taking. Even friendships but you want life long partners while being a leach. If you like stay online and let people deceive you that you are some sort of prize that no one can get tired of.

English
67
344
972
35.4K
𐌔†ac𐌊z
𐌔†ac𐌊z@_STACKZINC·
my blessings are custom made, they won’t fit you
English
26
69
127
2.7K
Astra 🪖
Astra 🪖@Astra_szn·
🙍🏻‍♀️: "What's your body count" If I wash my hands with gloves on, did I really wash my hands???
Astra 🪖 tweet media
English
53
64
100
818