Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Did you know if you use the panorama feature on your phone, you can get a pic of your whole family including yourself?
Firstperson takes the camera from the last person!
#myFamilyPano
Try it out!!
English
Justin Hubert 🇨🇦🏳️🌈
78.4K posts
Justin Hubert 🇨🇦🏳️🌈
@JustinHubert
husband 2 @mommyBert Psychology student, proud dad of 4, 4 business in 7 communities. Answer a question honestly, I’ll RT you! He/Him #ally #ADHD #YETIwakingUp
Red Deer, Alberta Canada Katılım Aralık 2010
5.1K Takip Edilen5.5K Takipçiler
How about the outfield gets no more water, until it cleans up its wells?
Or we (the people) put the price of water up, until real change happens.
No water, no oilfield.
I’m not against oil exploration, I’m against provincial exploitation.
English
Most keep looking for consciousness in the brain, when we should be looking for it in every cell?
15 trillion cells, all in a state of coherence.
Perhaps as elsewhere in nature (plant communication), consciousness is found in the communal coherence of biological subsystems?
Stuart Hameroff@StuartHameroff
Here’s what biological naturalism might actually look like, and probably does. It’s a segment of a single microtubule time crystal with 4 oscillating subsystems corresponding to hertz, kilohertz, megahertz, gigahertz and terahertz frequencies. @pgodfreysmith ingentaconnect.com/content/imp/jc…
English
@gator_gum @CAmiskusees Yup!!
Or…. Pierre, you can just wait….
lol
I love how the Guinness “settles” even during his crappy little video.
So he poured himself a Guinness first, then did a shitty pour of Carney…
English
So on brand for Pierre Poilievre.
He pours a shitty beer and blames Mark Carney.
Pierre Poilievre@PierrePoilievre
My St. Patrick’s Day beer with Mark Carney. We need less foam and more beer!
English
@ChrisLaBossiere @grok This is an X refinement I had that’s somewhat related…
Justin Hubert 🇨🇦🏳️🌈@JustinHubert
@elonmusk @grok @xai Simple tweak to Grok icon: add colors for vibe check. 🔴 Red=inauthentic poster/info 🟠 Orange=caution, still adjudicating 🟢 Green=authentic poster/info Cuts Grok is this real? Compute waste Still tap for full breakdown if needed Thoughts? #Grok #XFeatures
English
English
@elonmusk @grok @xai
Simple tweak to Grok icon: add colors for vibe check.
🔴 Red=inauthentic poster/info
🟠 Orange=caution, still adjudicating
🟢 Green=authentic poster/info
Cuts
Grok is this real?
Compute waste
Still tap for full breakdown if needed
Thoughts?
#Grok #XFeatures
English
So Trump is running war correspondents through truth social.
Ok.
Potty war it is!!
Collin Rugg@CollinRugg
JUST IN: President Trump responds after CBS News reported that Iran is "taking steps" to deploy mines through the shipping lane of the Strait of Hormuz. CBS reported that Iran has an estimated 2,000 to 6,000 naval mines. "If Iran has put out any mines in the Hormuz Strait, and we have no reports of them doing so, we want them removed, IMMEDIATELY!" Trump said on Truth Social. "If for any reason mines were placed, and they are not removed forthwith, the Military consequences to Iran will be at a level never seen before." "If, on the other hand, they remove what may have been placed, it will be a giant step in the right direction!"
English
Ok, you made the TRIANGLE version of the #cybertruck ….
Now make the SQUARE version.
Then make the OVAL version.
#tesla
Elon Musk@elonmusk
Tesla will be #1 in more states over time
English
@TheBlueGem3 @CJDwriter lol
Zebra!!
Do spots instead of stripes!!
English
@randallwcarlson In another post you asked a question regarding megalithic structures: WHY?
Well, maybe this is why.
If you want to survive, these types of galactic, seemingly random forces, that came in annual cycles, you stack huge stones.
Perhaps?
English
In 1908, a bolide exploded over a remote region of Siberia with enough force to flatten 2,000 square kilometres of forest. Had it arrived over any major city on Earth, that city would no longer exist.
To understand the scale, Randall Carlson offers a benchmark most people can work with. The largest bombs in the American Cold War arsenal peaked at around 15 to 20 megatons. The Soviet Union tested a device in 1962 estimated at 50 to 55 megatons - so large and so heavy that they had no reliable way to deliver it. It existed essentially as a demonstration of destructive potential rather than a deployable weapon.
The Tunguska event released energy in that same order of magnitude, and it was not a particularly large object by cosmic standards. When researchers attempt to quantify what ancient impact events may have released, nuclear yield is the only human-made reference point capable of framing the numbers. The comparison is not rhetorical. It is the closest gauge we have.
English
This is true.
However, how many of those human quadrillion synaptic operations are needed/necessary?
The power of ai, is hyper focus on a single challenge until it breaks it open.
Meanwhile in the middle of my thinking is Fred Flintstone yelling at Barney.
Pascal Bornet@pascal_bornet
Every time someone tells me AI will soon surpass the human brain, I pause. An NVIDIA H100 can perform around 200 trillion operations per second. It requires massive power, cooling systems, and heavy infrastructure. Your brain? Roughly one quadrillion synaptic operations per second. Running on about 20 watts. Less than a dim light bulb. We celebrate AI for its scale and speed. But it depends on predefined architectures, labeled data, and external power. The brain learns continuously. Adapts without instructions. Integrates emotion into decisions. Generates original thought under uncertainty. This gap is not just about intelligence. It is about efficiency and adaptability shaped by millions of years of evolution. AI will dominate narrow domains. But the human brain remains the most energy-efficient, flexible computing system we know. Are we underestimating biology while overestimating silicon? #AI #ArtificialIntelligence #Neuroscience #DeepTech #Innovation #FutureOfTechnology
English
He is showing the world what it taken to get a call when playing against @cmcdavid97
Because in the game previously it wasn’t:
-Hooking x2
-Tripping x2
-Roughing
mr charisma@weiirwoods
like what the hell is this maniac doing
English
@GailVazOxlade @BelowZeroGames One common factor with separatist, a very limited worldview. Usually they start in with perceived personal grievances against the Crown.
English
Imagine living in a country like Canada -- peaceful, free, gentle, polite??? -- and wanting to "separate?" WTF is up with that? Maybe it's a sign that life has been too easy; if you've travelled and you've seen how many others live, you'd kiss the ground and say Thank You.
English
Not a bad idea.
Also, bring your own guns and ammo, you only get gov supply when your own cache is spent.
Alan MacLeod@AlanRMacLeod
The US should have a system where we can only go to war through a popular vote, but everyone voting "yes" is automatically drafted into the military.
English
Some days are better than other days….
Need to get back out to the mountains!!
English
@KristinRaworth I’m simply bewildered by the party that “stands for freedom” always being the one taking away freedoms.
English
I genuinely do not know exactly how to express my feelings on this. MAiD has been consistently demonized on the right and cases of those who are not terminally ill get the focus when that is incredibly rare. Our government has better things to do than attack MAiD.
timescolonist.com/the-mix/immigr…
English
Justin Hubert 🇨🇦🏳️🌈 retweetledi
You are absolutely allowed to leave Canada. You just can’t take a chunk of it with you.
As for the constitution, it’s true: it’s very hard to change. Too hard. That needs to change — for everybody’s sake. The country needs a better amending formula — one that is based on the consent of the people, not the consent of the premiers.
But whatever formula is chosen, it can never be the case that one part of the country can impose constitutional changes on the rest of the country merely by voting on it — or legislating it. It’s wrong, and unconstitutional, when the government of Quebec does it, or purports to. And it’s just as wrong when the government of Alberta does it. Or purports to. Constitutional change, of any kind, can only be the result of a broad consensus across the country. That’s especially true of the kind of constitutional change that would be required to break up the country.
A final point, which has been made a thousand times, but it seems needs to be made a thousand more: equalization is not unfair to Alberta. It’s a screwed-up, dysfunctional, politicized program that doesn’t actually equalize. But it’s not paid for by Alberta, and it’s not an interprovincial revenue-sharing program. It’s a federal spending program paid for by federal taxpayers. Even as federal taxpayers, Albertan’s don’t pay into it disproportionately. They face exactly the same schedule of tax rates as taxpayers in the rest of the country. The people who pay disproportionately for it are richer people. They’re supposed to: that’s how a progressive income tax works. All these feverish calculations of how much more Albertans pay into the federal treasury than other Canadians are only a statement of how much richer Albertans are, on average, than other Canadians — a blessing, and a burden, they have in common with Canadians in, for example, midtown Toronto, who also pay “disproportionately” for equalization and other federal programs, only without the same vast industry devoted to showing how hard done by they are.
The only way in which you could say that equalization treats Alberta “differently” than other provinces is that its government does not qualify, and has never qualified, for equalization payments. But that’s not discrimination either — there’s no law that says “Alberta shall not be eligible for equalization payments.” The reason it does not receive equalization is because it is, by far, the richest province in the country, with by far the highest per capita revenues — even without a provincial sales tax. Equalization is messed up enough, but an equalization program that paid out to the richest province in the federation would be completely insane.
Maybe we shouldn’t have a progressive income tax. Maybe we shouldn’t have an equalization program. I happen to think we need both, albeit in substantially modified form, but those are legitimate questions for debate. What’s not legitimate is pretending that equalization is some kind of scam against Alberta. What’s even less legitimate is pretending you can abolish or reform a federal program by a referendum in one province. And what’s least legitimate of all is invoking the failure of that non-solution to a non-problem as justification for the constitutional nonsense of secession — which, to repeat, is the proposition that you can not only leave Canada, but take a piece of it with you.
Derek Fildebrandt@Dfildebrandt
Clear admission from an Eastern federalist: Albertans should not even bother to reform Canada. The constitution is set in stone in the East’s favour. It will never change. And you are never allowed to leave.
English
The difference, I actually WANTED to watch a @MarkJCarney video.
I WANTED to hear his voice.
I WANTED to hear his words.
I WANTED to hear his ideas.
And I haven’t had that feeling for any Canadian politician in a long long time.
Jason Pugh 🇨🇦 🏳️🌈@TheJasonPugh
🚨WATCH: "With our economy under threat from abroad, Canadians have made a choice. To focus on what we can control." - Prime Minister @MarkJCarney @PierrePoilievre is copying PMMC word-for-word. Just goes to show that #Canada doesn't need Pierre. #cdnpoli
English