不要生气
81 posts
不要生气 retweetledi
@kkkk394680 @110uo 我之前也很担心这个问题，但自己用了之后大便正常，我买的是三档温度的，睡觉时开最低温一整夜没问题。高温（升温）档是40度往上，中温（保温）档大概是36度左右，低温（睡眠）档大概在25度左右，跟电热毯的温度、个人体质、环境等都有关系吧
中文
@jenniferzeng97 可以确定写这篇稿子的人没有听过他的视频内容，都不知道他讲的什么就出来澄清了，下次注意点，听完完整的视频内容再写稿子吧，太假了
中文
🙀 A Shocking Reversal! 🙀
After I posted the post below on my website, the person who claims to be the original proposer of the so-called “American Kill Line” left a comment on my site. He said that when he introduced the concept of the “kill line,” it was actually meant to satirize the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). However, because he is inside China, he had no choice but to replace the CCP with “the United States,” so that his content would not be censored by Chinese video platforms.
He also said that many Chinese netizens, in order to evade censorship, deliberately substitute other countries when they want to criticize China. Only in this way can their content pass censorship.
He further emphasized that the reason he chose to publish on Bilibili, rather than YouTube or X, is that he wants to inspire more young people inside China. After all, many young people still lack the means to bypass the Great Firewall—or simply do not dare to do so.
I went to Bilibili to verify this, and indeed found an account called “Squishy King” (斯奎奇大王), which posted a program titled “The Line Between Heaven and Hell” on December 21 (link: bilibili.com/video/BV1SbBnB… ) . In that video, he did mention the concept of the “American Kill Line.”
Below is the full English translation of the comment he left on my website:
Hello, I am Squishy King, the person who proposed the concept of the “kill line.”
In order to clarify the facts, I would like to say a few words here. I sincerely hope you can give me the opportunity to speak. Thank you!
1.
The concept of the “kill line” was actually proposed by me as a satire of the CCP. Due to censorship inside the Great Firewall, I had no choice but to replace the CCP with the United States, so that my videos could pass review on Bilibili. (Many people inside China use India, Vietnam, the Soviet Union, or the United States as stand-ins for the CCP regime—I simply followed the same approach. There was no alternative.)
However, the CCP has now begun to realize that my videos carry an element of “charging the towers” [i.e., pushing the limits of censorship], so I may have to suspend my uploads for a period of time.
For the misunderstandings and trouble my videos may have caused you and other netizens, I would like to say I’m sorry.
2.
You may be curious why I mainly make videos inside the Great Firewall instead of posting on YouTube or Twitter/X. What I want to say is that everyone has their own aspirations. People like “Teacher Li” and “Toronto Fanglian,” who work outside the Firewall, are of course admirable. But in my view, making videos inside the Firewall to inspire more and more young people is also extremely important.
After all, many young people currently lack the means to bypass the Firewall or are afraid to do so—let alone places like Xinjiang, where bypassing the Firewall is almost impossible.
I was inspired by a YouTuber named An Zhengming. She had every means to emigrate to Europe or the United States, but she chose not to, because she believed that staying inside the Firewall and persisting in enlightenment work was more meaningful than leaving.
I know this path is dangerous. But Mr. Tan Sitong once said:
“Reforms in all countries have been achieved through bloodshed. In China, we have yet to hear of reforms that involved bloodshed—this is why the nation has not prospered. If blood must be shed, let it begin with Tan Sitong.”
If I am truly forced to make sacrifices—and if such sacrifices can accelerate the destruction of the CCP, this demon—I will not retreat.
Finally, if it is convenient for you, I welcome you to share my message with more people.
Squishy King (斯奎奇大王)
Real name: Kong Xuanzhong
December 30, 2025
Image: A screenshot of Squishy King (斯奎奇大王)'s comment on my website.
Inconvenient Truths — Jennifer Zeng Reports@jenniferzeng97
t.co/E3Penx2o7a 🙀 The Minnesota fraud case exposed by @nickshirleyy is truly shocking. Yet while Americans are rightly stunned by how fake daycare centers and bogus learning centers were used to defraud government welfare funds, I couldn’t help but think of the Chinese Communist Party’s recent hype around the so-called U.S. “kill line.” The term “kill line” originally comes from gaming. It refers to a critical threshold: once a character’s health (blood level) drops below that point, they can be eliminated instantly by a single combo attack. The CCP has borrowed this gaming term in its propaganda against the United States, claiming that Americans can go from a normal life to homelessness in as little as six months. It then piles on so-called “tragic” examples. Some articles go even further, directly attacking the U.S. system, arguing that the existence of an “American kill line” has its “roots in inherent flaws in the design of the American system.” They claim that “‘the American kill line’ is, in essence, an extreme manifestation of social Darwinism under the dominance of capital logic: when an individual’s economic output falls below the social cost required to sustain their existence, they are labeled a ‘negative asset’ and subjected to implicit systemic elimination. In games, the ‘kill line’ is a transparent and avoidable rule, but America’s ‘kill line’ is vague and unjust.” At this point, the CCP’s intentions become clear. Its obsessive promotion of the “American kill line” serves two purposes. First, it attacks the U.S. system and tries to convince the Chinese people that the CCP’s system is superior. Second, it diverts attention and obscures the reality that, as China’s economy collapses, hundreds of millions of people are about to face a genuine survival crisis (👇Watch my video below if you haven't). When you are fully absorbed in the misery of the American people, your own situation may suddenly seem less dire. But is that really the case? From @nickshirleyy’s videos, it doesn’t look like the United States is short of money at all. On the contrary, money seems to be everywhere—so abundant that people can easily scam hundreds of millions of dollars year after year without being stopped. At the same time, however, the CCP has been feverishly promoting the narrative of an “American kill line,” portraying the U.S. as a terrifying society where one misstep leads to total ruin.
English
不要生气 retweetledi
🇺🇸 A phrase is going viral in China right now: “the US kill line” and it isn’t propaganda, it’s a metaphor that finally names a reality Americans have lived with for years.
In gaming, a kill line is the point where defence no longer matters. Cross it and one hit ends you. Applied to the US economy, it describes a society where millions are just one shock away from irreversible collapse.
Illness, job loss, a missed paycheck or a medical bill are just some examples.
Below that line, the system doesn’t help you recover, it accelerates your fall.
This isn’t a theory, by late 2025:
• Over 770,000 people are homeless
• Only 30% can access temporary shelters
• 40+ million rely on food assistance
• 30 million have no health insurance
• 37% of adults can’t raise $400 in an emergency
That’s not poverty in the traditional sense, that’s fragility engineered into the system.
The “kill line” matters because once you fall below it in the United States, recovery becomes structurally difficult.
Lose your job, then lose your address
Lose your address, then you can’t receive welfare
No address, then you can’t get hired
No car, then you can’t commute
No credit, then you can’t rent
This is a closed loop, not a safety net.
Americans even have a formal term for it: Asset Limited, Income Constrained, Employed (ALICE).
You’re above the official poverty line, but below the real cost of living.
Believe it or not, in 2023, 42% of US households were already there.
This is where the so called K-shaped economy kicks in.
Not sure what the K-shaped economy is? Read on…
At the top: exploding asset prices, tax optimisation, political access.
At the bottom: inflation, debt, layoffs, shrinking welfare.
The richest 1% now hold more wealth than the bottom 90% combined, yet often pay lower effective tax rates than ordinary workers. Everyone knows this, but are either in denial or ignorant to it.
This isn’t an accident. It’s the result of money and policy being tightly fused.
I’ve said this before and I’ll say it again: The US system doesn’t just tolerate inequality, it relies on it. Very much the same way that it relies on war.
You can see the social consequences everywhere:
• Mass protests
• Criminalisation and alienation of homelessness
• Benches designed to repel homeless people
• Cities debating “drug rooms” instead of housing
• People dying quietly out of sight
That’s what “social Darwinism” looks like when it’s fused into institutions.
The Western media hates to discuss this. as if this topic is taboo. But it needs to be discussed.
Let me make this crystal clear: this will never happen in China. Not because people are magically richer, but because the system is designed differently.
The Chinese Government actually works for the people.
Here in China:
• Extreme poverty was systematically eradicated (800+ million raised out of poverty)
• Universal medical insurance exists in multiple tiers
• Housing support is embedded in local governance
• Income redistribution isn’t left to charity
• Local officials are evaluated on social stability, not donor satisfaction
People can fall, but they don’t disappear and there is no institutionalised kill line. That’s the difference.
You can hate on China all you like, but you cannot change the fact that one system treats human beings as inputs, while the other treats social survival as a governance responsibility.
No system ever fixes itself by pretending the damage is normal. Until the kill line is acknowledged as a design flaw, not a personal failure, the problem will continue.
English
不要生气 retweetledi
不要生气 retweetledi
不要生气 retweetledi
不要生气 retweetledi
