K

GROK HOW ABOUT SOME TRUTH; Here's a concise, ready-to-post summary for X. It focuses on the core truth without spin: --- **Oil Market Reality Check** (not the headlines): Futures Brent sits ~$108-109. But **Dated Brent physical spot** has spiked to **$141+** — real barrels for immediate delivery, screaming acute supply crunch from the Hormuz disruption. This gap isn't random: Futures = trader bets & sentiment. **Spot = actual supply/demand pain** hitting economies as a massive tax on growth. That's why the UK flipped fast — after saying "not our fight" — to lead a 40-nation coalition with military planning this week for escorts/demining. High physical prices force policy. It also quietly boosts **WTI demand**, pulling US companies back to Venezuela under licensing deals to rebuild infrastructure and ramp output. Pragmatic stabilization under the post-Maduro successor via business, not old-style regime change. Media hammering soft futures numbers while downplaying this basic macro 101 hides the forcing function linking economics to strategy. Result? Eroded trust, deeper division. Truth-seeking starts with seeing the real price signal. Supply & demand still rule — pride and narratives don't. What basic reality are we missing in the headlines? Thoughts?

@SkylineReport Paul the Democratic Party that passed the legislation you speak of in no way even resembles the Democratic Party of today!

Who built the America you benefit from every day? Social Security. Medicare. The Civil Rights Act. The Voting Rights Act. The 40-hour work week. Overtime protections. The last balanced federal budgets. Democrats did. A lot of Americans inherited the results so completely they forgot who fought for them in the first place. If you voted Democrat, you helped build this country. If you didn’t, you still live inside what they built. And it’s not too late to figure out who’s actually spent decades moving America forward while others screamed “socialism” every single step of the way. People will drive on public roads, collect Social Security, use Medicare, cash unemployment checks, send their kids to public schools, then turn around and ask what Democrats ever accomplished. Historical object permanence continues to beat this country’s ass.

Well we have had electricity for a century and likely when the electricity goes away anarchy will be the issue of true concern. But just like the aqueducts the technology will still be with us and with no electricity we will have likely have plenty of time and space to build aqueducts.

@KBearK99 @aakashgupta @MacriGenes And what happens when the electricity shuts off? How long will modern systems last without electricity? Romans engineering has lasted millenia. Ours will wither away in decades.

That water clarity is an engineering decision, and the math behind it is wilder than the video. Roman aqueducts ran on gravity alone. No pumps, no pressure systems. Engineers carved channels with a gradient so shallow it borders on absurd. The Pont du Gard in southern France drops 2.5 centimeters over 275 meters. That's roughly the thickness of a coin over the length of three football fields. They surveyed that accuracy with plumb lines and wooden leveling instruments. The clarity you're seeing is a direct product of flow velocity. Too steep and the water erodes the channel walls, picks up sediment, turns brown. Too flat and it stagnates. Roman engineers targeted a slope of about 20 centimeters per kilometer, which kept the water moving fast enough to stay fresh but slow enough to stay clear. Before the water reached the city, it passed through multi-chamber settling tanks where velocity dropped near zero. Suspended particles sank. Clean water flowed out the top into the next chamber. Repeat three or four times. Pliny specified the minimum slope in writing. Vitruvius published the exact mortar ratio for hydraulic cement: one part lime to two parts volcanic ash for underwater work. The pozzolana from Pozzuoli reacted with water to form a calcium-aluminum-silicate compound that actually gets stronger the longer it sits submerged. Modern concrete degrades in water. Roman concrete bonds with it. Scale the whole system and it gets harder to process. Eleven aqueducts fed Rome at its peak. Combined output: roughly 1 million cubic meters of water per day. That works out to about 250 gallons per person for a city of one million. Modern New York delivers about 125 gallons per person per day. Ancient Rome had access to double the per capita water supply of the largest city in the United States, running entirely on slope and stone. The Trevi Fountain in Rome is still fed by one of them. Two thousand years, same source, same gravity, same water.

@lsferguson @Terry1791BoR Same thing that happened when Obama was found not to be a naturalized citizen. Nothing!

What will happen when it's proved Biden was installed illegitimately?

Think about this; Your home isn’t worth more the value of money has been decreased by inflation! Inflation caused by deficit spending year after year and printing money with no tax income to support its value. Deficit spending being done by those devaluing your earned dollars all while demanding you give them even more! It’s Criminal!

Ron DeSantis: “[People] have their homes paid off and they bought it 30 years ago for a certain amount. Now they're being told it's worth so much more and they have to pony up more and more money. It's almost like they have to pay rent to the government, just to be able to enjoy their property. That's wrong.” Thoughts?

@BeingJWood @Archie19671984 Industry provides the means to build the infrastructure they need. Their business deepens on it! Government based laws claiming to build infrastructure often fail to come close to meeting their promises See CA new high speed rail system US Infrastructure and Jobs Act.

I can live without data centers. I can’t live without water.

@LauraLoomer @mhtrephan The exact same conclusion that Genghis Khan came to when offering terms to kingdoms he was about to concur. This knowledge has been around for a while now!

People are going to be jolted when they realize there’s no such thing as a peace deal with a Muslim country. Islamic countries, especially the Islamic Republic of Iran, don’t believe in peace, because Islam is inherently violent and focuses on conquering and killing all non Muslims. No peace deal with any Muslim country will ever be fruitful long term because Islam is inherently violent. Anyone who says otherwise has no concept of Islam. This is simply a fact.

@TheRealJamieKay These are people passing through on one of the most prolific trade routes of the time. They were not becoming citizens. At that time marriage with foreigners was frowned upon!

Funny how these ‘patriotic Christians’ never seem to follow this part of the Bible. Leviticus 19:33–34.

@aj_inapi Truth is because they have learned to be accountable for their actions and it developed thick skin. All while listening to their children complain about what they have or have not done for them. Which makes tuning out their 🐮💩 a lot easier!

I don't want to act like I know, only because I don't live in America. Why are boomers being vilified in America and more so in the West? I see a growing trend of this online.

@Rainmaker1973 America has an amazing ability to change its tune once it finds out a Nuclear plant is going to be built within 50 miles of them! Take New Mexico received Billions to dig a hole in the ground for nuclear waste. Then when the waste was ready to ship, it became illegal! Amazing!

A surprising shift in public opinion is underway: many Americans now say they would rather live near a nuclear power plant than a massive AI data center. As AI demand explodes, communities across the country are pushing back hard against the rapid construction of data centers. These enormous facilities consume enormous amounts of electricity and millions of gallons of water daily, while producing constant industrial noise that disrupts local life. Residents also worry that the huge power demands will drive up electricity bills for everyone in the area. In a striking reversal of decades-old attitudes, nuclear power plants are increasingly seen as the more acceptable neighbor. Modern nuclear facilities are viewed as quiet, stable, reliable, and far less disruptive to daily life than the power-hungry data centers. This growing preference reflects a broader change in priorities. While nuclear energy once carried heavy stigma, many communities now see it as a cleaner, more predictable solution compared to the relentless and resource-intensive demands of the AI boom. For an increasing number of people, the physical realities of the digital age have become more concerning than the atom. [Harris Poll (2026). Public Perception of Artificial Intelligence Infrastructure and Energy Sources. The Harris Poll]

Life Truth in America; When you print a form of money without any money to back it up that creates inflation! Annual deficit spending creates inflation. Ex. If you earn $100K after tax but spend 200K, the interest you owe on money borrowed + any principle reduction lowers your buying power of your next $100K earned. It is that simple! Yet the genius of our politicians cannot figure it out! Because they are to focused on stealing your $100K!

Everyone says rent went up because of inflation. That is backwards. Rent is not reacting to inflation. Rent is creating it. Landlords raising rent 10% a year on millions of units. No improvements. No justification. Just because they can. And because working people have nowhere else to go. Nobody in power has proposed a single meaningful solution. Because the people in power are the landlords.

@Ric_RTP @MimicoolBoomer Typical Social Media intelligence; AI will Replace all workers! AI is expensive for all things! AI is doomed, doomed I say! No learning curve, no balance of resources, no cost of integration! Just a go or no go gage by folks without a clue!

Microsoft just banned its own engineers from using AI. The tool was literally costing MORE than the humans it was supposed to replace. They lied to you about AI adoption and now the whole narrative is blowing up: Microsoft gave thousands of engineers access to Claude Code six months ago and encouraged them to use it. Engineers loved it and adoption exploded. But then the invoices arrived. Token-based pricing means every query, every code review, every debugging session costs money. At scale across 100,000 engineers, the numbers became so large that Microsoft issued an internal order to cancel nearly all Claude Code licenses by end of June and force everyone onto their own cheaper tool instead. The company that invested $5 billion in Anthropic just told its own people to stop using Anthropic's product because it costs too much. Uber's story is even worse... Their CTO Praveen Neppalli Naga told The Information that the budget he planned for the full year was "blown away already" by April. Uber had rolled out Claude Code in December 2025. By March, 84% of their 5,000 engineers were using it with 70% of all committed code coming from AI systems. Heavy users were burning $500 to $2,000 per month each. Naga himself spent $1,200 in a single two-hour demo session. The company had even built internal leaderboards ranking engineers by how much AI they used. They literally gamified the spending and then ran out of money. Now look at what Nvidia's own VP of applied deep learning Bryan Catanzaro said to Axios last month. Direct quote: "For my team, the cost of compute is far beyond the costs of the employees." This is a VP at the company that SELLS the chips saying that using AI is more expensive than paying humans. Think about what this means for the entire AI narrative. Every CEO on every earnings call for the past two years has said the same thing: AI will make us more efficient, reduce headcount, and cut costs. The stock market rewarded every company that said it. Fired workers, stock goes up. Announced AI adoption, stock goes up. But the actual companies deploying AI at scale are discovering the math doesn't work. The MORE employees use AI, the HIGHER the bill. Goldman Sachs forecasts a 24x increase in token consumption by 2030 as companies adopt AI agents. Gartner just published a report showing that even though individual token prices will drop 90% by 2030, total enterprise AI costs will go UP because agents consume exponentially more tokens per task than basic tools. Meta built an internal dashboard called "Claudeonomics" to track which employees use the most AI. Amazon started pushing engineers to "tokenmaxx," their internal term for consuming as many AI tokens as possible. Both companies are spending hundreds of billions on AI infrastructure this year alone. And Microsoft, the company that bet its entire future on AI, just told 100,000 engineers to stop using the tool they liked best because the per-token bills got out of control. The companies building AI are telling investors it saves money. The companies using AI are finding out it costs more than the humans it was supposed to replace. And even the company that makes the chips just admitted it through its own VP. This is the gap nobody on Wall Street is pricing in. $725 billion in AI infrastructure spending this year across Big Tech. And the first companies to actually deploy these tools at scale are already pulling back because the economics don't work. What do you think?

@KeriA1776again Is the water shortage lack of water or lack of infrastructure to provide the water needed? Industry builds and demands infrastructure and organizes the money to build it. Look to every area that industry moved out. The next thing to fail or fall short is the infrastructure.

Ohio has a water shortage and residents are restricted from watering lawns. There shouldn’t be a single data center in operation during this restriction season! I call bullshit on it all!

@ick_real So maybe folks should quit using weed & feed on their yards and lawns and let the clover grow. Think about how much food for bees can grow while having healthy industrial growth!

Honey Bees make our food, A.I. doesn't. Save the Honey Bees, not data centers

Maybe, maybe not! If Energy can change state and lay dormant or just travel somewhere else to change state but never be destroyed. Which planet is better off. The one that transfers its energy to another through a unique process or the other that figures out how to perform that process and allow the energy to stay home and be transferred to another state without galactic travel?

So obvious

So where does the decisions to sell your companies tech over seas, then chase after it looking for cheap labor, all while giving up on R&D because it does not produce immediate bottom line results fit in? The S&P Dream Team just happen to be the companies that are the newest fastest growing industry in the country that the executives are still the 1st or 2nd generation of management that is still hungry with vision and is being rewarded for it. The VP that remains at the same position for 15 years while the company stagnates really didn’t belong there in the first place. If he did in 15 years he would have more than likely been the president of a spin off company. A concept that no longer exists because quick bottom line fixes are through merger and cannibalism not leadership. I think there are multi levels to this problem and just about every one of them point to the same thing you speak of, incompetence of management! There is no new way of management! There is just new industry with Hungary management and old industry with Brown Nose management promoted to the level of incompetence over time. Nothing new and a problem that is not being solved!

La plupart des grandes boîtes sont des organisations zombies. Voici pourquoi. Dans League of Legends, ton rang n'est pas un titre. C'est une mesure continue. Tu es Master parce que tu joues comme un Master cette semaine. Si tu arrêtes de bosser, tu redescends. Diamond. Platine. Gold. Le système ne te doit rien : ton rang reflète ta compétence à l'instant T, pas celle d'il y a trois ans. Maintenant regarde une entreprise classique du S&P 500. Un type devient VP parce qu'il a été excellent à 35 ans. À 50 ans, il est toujours VP. Entre-temps, il a peut-être arrêté de produire, arrêté d'apprendre, arrêté de challenger ses modèles mentaux. Aucune importance : le titre est acquis. La hiérarchie pyramidale fonctionne comme un cliquet — tu montes, tu ne redescends pas. Ton elo organisationnel est gelé au pic de ta carrière. C'est une aberration darwinienne. Ces structures distribuent l'autorité selon la compétence passée, et la compétence passée est un très mauvais prédicteur de la compétence présente — surtout dans un monde qui change vite. Les jeux compétitifs ont résolu ce problème il y a vingt ans. Le elo se recalcule à chaque partie. La hiérarchie reflète la performance réelle, pas le souvenir d'une performance. C'est brutal, et c'est précisément pour ça que ça marche : les meilleurs joueurs sont vraiment les meilleurs joueurs, pas ceux qui ont été bons en 2008. L'IA rend cette aberration létale. Quand une équipe de 12 personnes avec les bons outils peut produire ce que produisait un département de 200, le coût d'un VP qui ne produit plus n'est plus seulement son salaire — c'est le delta entre ce qu'il bloque et ce qu'une organisation méritocratique débloquerait. Ce delta explose chaque mois. Regardez le marché. Le S&P 500 n'existe plus vraiment. Il y a le S&P 7 (Nvidia, Microsoft, Apple, Google, Amazon, Meta, Tesla) qui capte la quasi-totalité de la création de valeur, et 493 zombies qui maintiennent leur cap par inertie comptable. Les zombies partagent une caractéristique : la compétence n'y circule pas. Elle s'y cristallise en titres, en territoires, en process de protection. Les boîtes qui vont émerger dans les dix prochaines années auront une propriété structurelle nouvelle : l'autorité y sera révocable en continu. La compétence présente sera la seule monnaie. Plus de rentes de titre. Plus de comités. Plus de "j'ai mérité ma position en 2015". Tu produis maintenant ou tu sors du ladder. C'est pas une question d'idéologie. C'est juste que dans un environnement où l'IA divise par 50 le coût d'exécution, les organisations qui protègent l'incompétence acquise se font oblitérer par celles qui ne la protègent pas. Tout est à réinventer. Et c'est exactement ce qui rend le moment fascinant.

@elonmusk Was that picture we seen differential expansion yesterday? It seemed to differentiate one piece into many.

The Starship V3 heat shield held well

@HotmerRobin @TeachAllAmerica @anyonewantchips Pardons by President Bush sr 74/4yrs Bush jr 200/4yrs Obama 212/8yrs Trump 143/4yrs All convicted non political imprisonments.

@KBearK99 @TeachAllAmerica @anyonewantchips how many people IN JAIL FOR DEFRAUDING the govt for BILLIONS were pardoned by other presidents? list them. how many drug kingpins were pardoned by other presidents. name them.

If Raul Castro can be indicted for ordering the downing of 2 unarmed civilian planes - Pete Hegseth can be indicted for ordering the bombing of at least 58 unarmed civilian boats.

@D162Michele We sold our manufacturing technology & capability overseas then called it thievery in the name of staying competitive. You are likely too young to see what really happened. Text books generally don’t write about how foolish you are as a nation!

China didn’t ‘destroy’ your industries, you destroyed it by yourself by being uncompetitive. Why is it always China’s fault?

@saylordocs “Form of inflation” borrowing money because of deficit spending. The quiet part said out loud. They say true inflation is from printing to much money. But they never say why they are printing to much money!

Milton Friedman: “Keep your eye on one thing and one thing only: how much government is spending, because that’s the true tax.” “If you’re not paying for it in the form of explicit taxes, you’re paying for it indirectly in the form of inflation or borrowing.”