Charlotte Kuperwasser, PhD

672 posts

Charlotte Kuperwasser, PhD banner
Charlotte Kuperwasser, PhD

Charlotte Kuperwasser, PhD

@KUPERWASSERLAB

Professor @TuftsMedSchool, Co-Founder @Naveris_inc. Dedicated to understanding the biological, molecular, and genetic underpinnings of cancer & prevention.

Boston, MA Katılım Ağustos 2015
202 Takip Edilen1.6K Takipçiler
John Beaudoin, Sr., The Real CdC, The Last Boomer
The scientific method was fine until EBM corrupted it. Yes. Burn it all do2n because the so-called scientists on both sides are still chanting "evidence-based" mantra. Jay B can't say a sentence without it. The IMA just put out a post in support of Saphier stating that "evidence-based" is what we need to get back to. But EBM is the cause of all that is wrong. Rhe fraud would not have been successful for EBM. Trials would not be as corrupt without EBM to foster the corruotion.
English
1
0
0
30
🇺🇸
🇺🇸@Amazing_GracieL·
But what about the dead and injured? Do we just forget about them? Try telling that to a grieving parent who lost their perfectly healthy child within hours or days of the vax. The truth is millions of Americans would have survived Covid without the mRNA injection and/or hospital interventions and if they had been treated early with steroids and antivirals. How many of your family members took the shots? The vast majority of mine did. I’m furious and disgusted.
English
1
0
0
13
Charlotte Kuperwasser, PhD
Charlotte Kuperwasser, PhD@KUPERWASSERLAB·
I have seen your evidence and it’s shocking and heartbreaking. What do you want to debate? I’m not disagreeing with you. There has been serious damage inflicted by these products. I’ve never said otherwise. All I’m trying to do is find a path forward. Your anger and the public’s anger, disillusionment, and calls to “burn it all down” are understandable, and in many ways, justified. All I’m trying to say is that the scientific method and rigorous inquiry, when conducted with integrity, remain among the most powerful tools we have to reduce human suffering. At some point we must rebuild a culture of truth, humility, and courage.
English
2
0
1
28
John Beaudoin, Sr., The Real CdC, The Last Boomer
Sure Im angry. But im rq4iknal and calm and you don't seem to have any idea of the level of evidence that I have and have pursued. You are not engaging in a substantive debate, but rather using common tropes to avoid debate. The passive aggressive turn toward emotion such as anger is an attempt to not acknowledge facts. Why are you not the least but curious about the evidence I have mentioned?
English
1
0
0
33
John Beaudoin, Sr., The Real CdC, The Last Boomer
The truth is rarely important between anythjng despite the colloquialism. That's a common divorce court trope, while one person is lying and the other is telling the truth. Facts are facts. Millions of nonredacted rwcirds show the massive lie that is "safe and effective." It is neither. When you have read a single chapter of my fully referenced book, then you will know that the trope that the truth is jn between is simply worthless in debate. The fraud is so rampant and massive that res ipsa loquitur applies to safe and effective. Government murdered a MILLION Americans and called it Covid. That's a fact. It is in the 12,000 page medical files of hundreds of thousands of Americans and in the death records of hundreds of thousands more.
English
2
0
1
77
Charlotte Kuperwasser, PhD
Charlotte Kuperwasser, PhD@KUPERWASSERLAB·
I never said they ended Covid, nor did I ever say they stopped transmission or prevented infection. I also never said that the term “vaccine” is an accurate term to describe what these products even do. But they do stimulate an IgG response against against their target- in this case spike. And this IgG response can help some people. But the hubris surrounding this technology also led to significant harmed (and even death) in some people. They also produce such an uncontrollable rampant inflammatory response, probably induce genotoxic stress as collateral damage, and depending on the fate of the DNA impurities - long term (and dare I say generational) consequences. So I think we can all agree that we are angry at those who lied and continue to cover up the truth about these products. Those of us talking about it and trying to right the wrongs done here should not be the targets of this justifiable rage.
English
0
0
1
59
Prof Jeffrey S Morris
Well it wasn’t “sterilizing” but greatly reduced risk of infection in RCT and validated in dozens of observational studies in 2021 (before antibody waning and Omicron decreased magnitude of protection) and numerous secondary transmission studies consistently showed ~50% reduced risk of transmission in the infections that broke through. I’m glad to send you a slew of references for these but that is not the point of this post — they are blatantly misrepresenting this data in fundamental ways — can you not see that here? These are raw counts comparing vaccinated to unvaccinated after 93.2% crossed over without adjusting for massively different denominators — base rate fallacy to the extreme. If you look at all the literature at that time you see their claim of 0% effectiveness is ridiculously false
English
6
1
8
1.3K
Neil Stone
Neil Stone@DrNeilStone·
After 8 billion doses (yes 8 BILLION, not a typo) Covid vaccines are at this point one of the most tested medical interventions in history and one of the safest ever
English
805
1.6K
8.6K
114.2K
Charlotte Kuperwasser, PhD
Charlotte Kuperwasser, PhD@KUPERWASSERLAB·
Again- agree. A lot of harm (including death) was caused by these products. The level of dishonesty and corruption surrounding these products is infuriating. I understand your anger and it is justified. There needs to be a reckoning in order to move forward from this. But the statement “There is no way these products helped anyone” is just as one sided as the statement “safe and effective”. The truth is somewhere in between. And from lived experience by millions, both these perspectives can be true.
English
2
0
0
70
John Beaudoin, Sr., The Real CdC, The Last Boomer
There is no way these products helped anyone. Even Redfield said his vaxed elderly patients were getting and giving Covid like Typhoid Mary as early as April May 2020. But none of the anecdotes and none of the trial data are needed to understand what happened. Records that government refuses to acknowledge (and they are their own records) conclusively show massive numbers of known vax deaths with no recorded Y59.0 attributed to them and often vax deaths within hours of injection with no mention of the vax on the death record and many of them labeled as covid deaths. The level of fraud in both certifying deaths as covid when it wasn't covid and not mentioning vax when they knew the vax killed the person is so great that after you see the evidence, you realize that discussion of biased scientific studies of data is mere statistical masturbation. Look at this thread. People are making assertions they cannot back up. Conclusive evidence of massive fraud with regard to data destroys reliance on data The truth based facts that I deliver to people using official records precludes any usefulness from discussion like the one here; and all the doctors and professors either ignore me and the evidence or they try to turn the conversation back to statistics using credentialism. I'm not in their academic club. Their academic club isn't looking too bright right now.
English
10
39
100
1.7K
Charlotte Kuperwasser, PhD
Charlotte Kuperwasser, PhD@KUPERWASSERLAB·
No it’s not. It is modified RNA. It contains pseudouridines that increase its stability unlike any natural form of mRNA. And this modification is intentional- specifically designed so the RNA would NOT breakdown quickly in the cell. That is the entire function of this technology. But the real issue at large for which we still have no data, is what is the fate of the LNP encapsulated Spike DNA and other DNA byproducts that are present in the mRNA vaccine products? Where does this go? What happens to it? And we agree that certain viruses increase the risk of cancer. And we agree that SARS-CoV-2 is a virus. And the spike protein has been reported to interact with and inhibit p53…. And the vaccine instructs cells to make spike…And that this hasn’t been studied for genotoxicity or carcinogenicity.
English
0
0
2
47
Dr Zeus
Dr Zeus@Dr_Z_Media·
It’s messenger RNA. It simply gets translated in the cytoplasm. It doesn’t go into the nucleus and breaks down pretty quickly. The spike protein lasts a few days in most people and it gets cleared. Humans don’t have reverse transcriptase to magically turn mRNA into DNA. Millions of people have been studied for all those conditions across the world and there is no evidence of increases in any of those conditions. Decades of studies have actually shown viruses to increase many types of cancers, not vaccines.
English
1
0
2
203
Charlotte Kuperwasser, PhD
Charlotte Kuperwasser, PhD@KUPERWASSERLAB·
No. According to the package inserts from the FDA- the mRNA vaccines have not been tested for genotoxicity, carcinogenicity or effects on fertility. Comirnaty, t. P.-B. C.-m. v. fda.gov/media/151707/d…. Spikevax, t. M. C.-m. v. fda.gov/media/155675/d….
Charlotte Kuperwasser, PhD tweet mediaCharlotte Kuperwasser, PhD tweet media
Neil Stone@DrNeilStone

After 8 billion doses (yes 8 BILLION, not a typo) Covid vaccines are at this point one of the most tested medical interventions in history and one of the safest ever

English
4
4
19
2.1K
Charlotte Kuperwasser, PhD
Charlotte Kuperwasser, PhD@KUPERWASSERLAB·
Agree that there are misrepresentations. But this is coming from both sides in large part because of the inability to acknowledge that there can be more than one truth. These products helped a lot of people and these products were also not effective for a lot of people. Both are true. But more importantly, these products also harmed a lot of people- this latter point continues to be dismissed- and dismissal of this is a misrepresentation of the truth. These products still have not been properly tested for some basic safety profiles …. Why do we still not have this data six years later? You must also be asking yourself this. The politicization of the pandemic, the response to it and the mRNA vaccines has led to a tragic breakdown in scientific and medical discourse— It has also led to profound damage in public trust in science- not by “misinformation” or “misrepresentation” but by the lived experience of millions who saw policies diverge from reason, saw experts contradict themselves, witnessed dissent punished rather than debated, and experienced suffering that was ignored or erased. The scientific and medical community must find the courage to publicly acknowledge its role in these failures. Until that happens, the future of public support for biomedical research and public health stands on perilous ground.
Prof Jeffrey S Morris@jsm2334

Well it wasn’t “sterilizing” but greatly reduced risk of infection in RCT and validated in dozens of observational studies in 2021 (before antibody waning and Omicron decreased magnitude of protection) and numerous secondary transmission studies consistently showed ~50% reduced risk of transmission in the infections that broke through. I’m glad to send you a slew of references for these but that is not the point of this post — they are blatantly misrepresenting this data in fundamental ways — can you not see that here? These are raw counts comparing vaccinated to unvaccinated after 93.2% crossed over without adjusting for massively different denominators — base rate fallacy to the extreme. If you look at all the literature at that time you see their claim of 0% effectiveness is ridiculously false

English
3
2
11
532
Charlotte Kuperwasser, PhD
Charlotte Kuperwasser, PhD@KUPERWASSERLAB·
@jsm2334 @KenCaptn20114 Can you provide me the references that showed it was a sterilizing? Pfizer stated themselves they never tested/studied its ability to stop transmission so maybe I missed it. The only data I saw showed it could induce an IgG response. Can you show me the data you’re referring to?
English
1
0
5
363
Charlotte Kuperwasser, PhD
Charlotte Kuperwasser, PhD@KUPERWASSERLAB·
yes 💯- There is an expectation that findings of such importance (even if negative) will be replicated and rigorous… and if/when that happens and there are no safety issues - I will indeed breathe a collective sigh of relief. But until then, I will continue to be EXTREMELY worried and uncomfortable about this technology deployed so rapidly at such scale with no real safety data or testing by regulators.
English
0
0
0
18
Mudblood 🐺
Mudblood 🐺@thewhitewolf51·
@KUPERWASSERLAB @DrNeilStone If and when you find said data, are you prepared to be content with the findings if they don’t find the DNA byproducts/impurities pose any meaningful risk?
English
1
0
0
23
Charlotte Kuperwasser, PhD
Charlotte Kuperwasser, PhD@KUPERWASSERLAB·
And to parrot the line from @DrNeilStone post….So bored of having to keep saying this SIX YEARS ON but where are the data on the fate of the DNA byproducts/impurities in the Covid mRNA vaccines? Clearly we deserve transparency from the FDA and evidence based guidance on manufacturing and DNA limits for mRNA vaccine products, but apparently we have to keep asking for this kind of thing… It’s not difficult. Just show us the results.
Neil Stone@DrNeilStone

So bored of having to keep saying this SIX YEARS ON but the Covid vaccines clearly worked very well but apparently I have to keep sharing this kind of thing It's not difficult. They worked England for example 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 👇

English
2
0
3
231