Charlotte Kuperwasser, PhD

324 posts

Charlotte Kuperwasser, PhD banner
Charlotte Kuperwasser, PhD

Charlotte Kuperwasser, PhD

@KUPERWASSERLAB

Professor @TuftsMedSchool, Co-Founder @Naveris_inc. Dedicated to understanding the biological, molecular, and genetic underpinnings of cancer & prevention.

Boston, MA Katılım Ağustos 2015
174 Takip Edilen1.1K Takipçiler
Charlotte Kuperwasser, PhD retweetledi
Prof. Akiko Iwasaki
Prof. Akiko Iwasaki@VirusesImmunity·
Vaccines save millions of lives. Unfortunately, a small fraction of people develop debilitating diseases after vaccination. Thank you @WSITYpod for having me on the show to discuss post-vaccination syndrome. Please listen and understand what the patients are going through and why many of them lost trust in the medical and scientific establishment. We must do better.
Why Should I Trust You?@WSITYpod

Dr. Kirk Milhoan (@KMilhoanMDPhD) reacts to a federal judge pausing ACIP’s work, and we examine real patient stories and how public health should respond to vaccine injuries with Dr. Craig Spencer (@Craig_A_Spencer) & Dr. Akiko Iwasaki (@VirusesImmunity): podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/aci…

English
215
90
371
68.2K
Jikkyleaks 🐭
Jikkyleaks 🐭@Jikkyleaks·
🚨Breaking #ACIPgate: someone didn't cover their tracks. There was one official leak. It went to @MaryanneDemasi to publish (hence the use of the word "exclusive" - which means the story was given to her and only her) because she is the only trusted journalist with the credentials and experience to handle the leak properly within US law. But this line in the copycat @nytimes article sticks out like a sore thumb: "members of the COVID work group may present data to show that the mRNA vaccines are contaminated with DNA" Is this why the meeting was shut down - because they were going to blow #plasmidgate open? And if so, who leaked that to the New York Times in order to derail the meeting and create a false story about Demasi's reporting? There is NO mention of plasmid contamination in the Demasi report. If this was a confidential part of the meeting agenda it should not have been leaked to the Times and as it doesn't appear in Demasi's article or the leaked document that means that someone else was leaking to the times. Who? @Kevin_McKernan @JesslovesMJK @RWMaloneMD @jeffreytucker @AGHuff @Fynnderella1 @docbiss Full NYT article here: https://archive.md/18YDV
Jikkyleaks 🐭 tweet media
Robert W Malone, MD@RWMaloneMD

Regarding the leaked confidential ACIP documents. There appears to be two separate leaks, because the metadata on the two versions of the leaked report have different creation dates. One Feb 14, the other Feb 15. We may have two separate leakers.

English
16
248
638
52.1K
Charlotte Kuperwasser, PhD
Charlotte Kuperwasser, PhD@KUPERWASSERLAB·
Yes- but it shouldn’t only be small groups at Yale and other places doing this research. And these places have no funds to do the research- they are literally scraping by with small studies using private donations from injured stakeholders. Studying PACVS should be a nationwide effort supported by the NIH given the scale and magnitude of the vaccine rollout and that they were mandated. Codes are needed for the CDC to track and quantify PAVCS - much like they are doing for Long Covid…
English
1
0
0
16
Elizabeth
Elizabeth@elizablue007·
@KUPERWASSERLAB @US_FDA @CDCgov @NIHDirector_Jay Yale plus others are doing research. There are codes being used while data is being collected. A new code can take a few years. Dealt w this after 9/11 conditions & codes. again you can easily find all the info
English
1
0
1
27
Charlotte Kuperwasser, PhD retweetledi
React19 - Official
React19 - Official@React19org·
A setback and a breakthrough. While this week brought unexpected challenges, progress continued. Today, March 18th, REACT19 advanced a proposal to the CDC’s National Center for Health Statistics for a dedicated ICD-10 code to identify adverse effects of COVID-19 vaccines. The proposal has now been approved to move forward in the formal review process. Submitted by Joel Wallskog, this marks an important step toward clinical recognition, accurate documentation, and future research. The proposal will now enter a 60-day public comment period, with the potential for inclusion in the U.S. system as early as 2027. Stay tuned for more information regarding comment submissions.
React19 - Official tweet media
English
10
121
328
40K
Charlotte Kuperwasser, PhD
Charlotte Kuperwasser, PhD@KUPERWASSERLAB·
The 2025 summary report from TGA Laboratories confirmed that 28 batches of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines contained DNA. Where is the data from the FDA describing the measurement and quantification of Spike DNA in vaccine products? Where is the data from the FDA showing the fate of residual DNA byproducts in mRNA vaccine products? Where are the FDA studies evaluating DNA persistence or integration potential? Why hasn't the FDA provided mRNA vaccine -specific safety DNA thresholds for LNP-encapsulated DNA? Six years after deployment, there is no data on the biological fate of DNA fragments delivered inside lipid nanoparticles, including whether they persist in tissues or how they interact with host cells. The FDA has failed to provide any information or guidance on this. tga.gov.au/resources/publ… pei.de/SharedDocs/Dow…
English
1
1
12
181
Kevin McKernan
Kevin McKernan@Kevin_McKernan·
“Regulators from around the world have examined and dismissed these claims”. No, they haven’t. Very few have run their own tests and those that did at the TGA, ran an assay that won’t find it and redacted all the methods and results.
Jikkyleaks 🐭@Jikkyleaks

🚨Breaking #ACIPgate: someone didn't cover their tracks. There was one official leak. It went to @MaryanneDemasi to publish (hence the use of the word "exclusive" - which means the story was given to her and only her) because she is the only trusted journalist with the credentials and experience to handle the leak properly within US law. But this line in the copycat @nytimes article sticks out like a sore thumb: "members of the COVID work group may present data to show that the mRNA vaccines are contaminated with DNA" Is this why the meeting was shut down - because they were going to blow #plasmidgate open? And if so, who leaked that to the New York Times in order to derail the meeting and create a false story about Demasi's reporting? There is NO mention of plasmid contamination in the Demasi report. If this was a confidential part of the meeting agenda it should not have been leaked to the Times and as it doesn't appear in Demasi's article or the leaked document that means that someone else was leaking to the times. Who? @Kevin_McKernan @JesslovesMJK @RWMaloneMD @jeffreytucker @AGHuff @Fynnderella1 @docbiss Full NYT article here: https://archive.md/18YDV

English
5
76
212
6.9K
Charlotte Kuperwasser, PhD retweetledi
Richard H. Ebright
Richard H. Ebright@R_H_Ebright·
Open letter to Nature Medicine, 07/26/23: "We, as STEM and STEM-policy professionals, call upon Nature Medicine to publish an expression of editorial concern for the paper and to begin a process of withdrawal or retraction of the paper."
Richard H. Ebright tweet media
English
2
31
112
5.8K
Charlotte Kuperwasser, PhD retweetledi
Joseph Marine
Joseph Marine@DrJMarine·
Interesting judicial ruling on ACIP. TL;DR- 1. The President does not have authority over HHS. 2. HHS does not have authority over its agencies. 3. The agencies do not have authority over their advisory committees. 4. "Experts" in the administrative state have ultimate sovereignty over us all. 5. One robed lawyer in Massachusetts gets to decide who the "experts" are. Everyone clear?
Jeffrey A Tucker@jeffreytucker

If I were to summarize this judge's opinion on ACIP, it would be: pharma, not the people and their representatives, should be in charge of government and its operations. static1.squarespace.com/static/61910a2…

English
93
941
2.5K
85.2K
Charlotte Kuperwasser, PhD
Charlotte Kuperwasser, PhD@KUPERWASSERLAB·
Agree…infection is associated with heart conditions- and this is well established (also speaking from personal experience with Long Covid). The figure should indeed be updated to reflect this. That said, why are we dismissing the striking overlap between the two conditions? One has to wonder how much of the overlap is due to the magnitude or persistence of the common antigen - Spike. Why are we not talking about the omission of this connection in the conversation?
English
3
0
3
87
Sheryl Gay Stolberg
Sheryl Gay Stolberg@SherylNYT·
BREAKING: A federal judge has blocked all Kennedy vaccine decisions and all ACIP decisions from going into effect. The panel cannot meet this week as planned. @apoorva_nyc "A rare bit of good news," said the American Academy of Pediatrics lawyer. nytimes.com/2026/03/16/hea…
English
29
91
350
14.8K
Sheryl Gay Stolberg
Sheryl Gay Stolberg@SherylNYT·
SCOOP: Confidential report to ACIP calls for sweeping changes in how Covid vaccine injuries are tracked and treated. ACIP expected to consider it this week. The authors cite a survey from a GOP-leaning pollster headlined "Killer Jab?" w/@apoorva_nyc nytimes.com/2026/03/15/hea…
English
10
26
124
18K
Charlotte Kuperwasser, PhD retweetledi
Paloma Franceschi
Paloma Franceschi@DocpalFrancesc2·
Exactly at this moment, as we are intensively researching the adverse effects of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines, it is deeply regrettable, and frankly concerning, that the vaccination status of the patients in the cohort was not mentioned or analyzed in the Cell paper. This omission is significant: the authors, reviewers, and editors apparently overlooked (or chose not to include) crucial information that could directly influence the interpretation of the results, especially when the discussion explicitly touches on “the indirect benefits of cancer prevention from vaccination” and claims that vaccination mitigated tumor promotion in their experimental models. Without stratification or even basic reporting of vaccination status among those who developed severe pneumonia/COVID requiring hospitalization, any conclusions linking prior viral pneumonia to lung tumorigenesis… and particularly any recommendations about vaccination reducing cancer risk remain incomplete and potentially misleading. This has real implications for clinical recommendations and public health messaging. We cannot afford such gaps in high-impact papers when lives and trust are at stake. This debate urgently needs to be opened, expanded, and rigorously discussed by the scientific community, clinicians, and regulators. Transparency on vaccination status in post-COVID outcome studies should be non-negotiable. @CellCellPress @Cancer_Cell @CellPressNews
Wafik S. El-Deiry, MD, PhD, FACP@weldeiry

There is no information in a @CellCellPress paper (cell.com/cell/abstract/…) just published about the vaccination status of a clinical cohort that developed severe respiratory symptoms/pneumonia requiring hospitalization after SARS-CoV-2. This is unexpected for a paper published in Cell that concludes in the abstract: “Together, these findings establish a causal link between prior viral pneu- monia and lung tumorigenesis, underscoring the need for enhanced surveillance and targeted interventions to reduce post-COVID cancer risk.” Or states in the discussion: “these findings carry significant implications for clinical care, including enhanced lung cancer surveillance in high-risk survivors and the indirect cancer-preventive benefits of vaccination, consistent with our experimental data showing that vaccination mitigated tumor promotion.” I don’t understand how the authors, editors and reviewers at Cell would not have thought that was important to include, know about, comment on and discuss as part of the rigor of the study or even as a requirement for including the human clinical data in the manuscript.  @RetsefL @RWMaloneMD @KUPERWASSERLAB @Kevin_McKernan @NicHulscher @danaparish @MaryanneDemasi @NIHDirector_Jay @DrMakaryFDA @theNCI @AmericanCancer @ASCO @ASCOPost @TracyBethHoeg @LocasaleLab

English
3
15
38
2.5K
Charlotte Kuperwasser, PhD retweetledi
U.S. Surgeon General
U.S. Surgeon General@Surgeon_General·
New from HHS: hhs.gov/longcovid is now live. Your hub for Long COVID research, diagnostics, clinical resources, and more. Because 18 million Americans deserve answers.
English
61
124
433
65.1K
Dr Terry Simpson
Dr Terry Simpson@drterrysimpson·
That’s not how molecular biology works. Turning off RLRs or TLRs affects innate immune sensing, not the mechanics of DNA integration. Integration requires a reverse transcriptase to make DNA and an integrase or recombination machinery to insert it into the genome. The mRNA vaccines contain none of those enzymes. They deliver modified RNA that stays in the cytoplasm and is degraded. No reverse transcriptase + no integrase = no genomic integration pathway. Hand-waving about innate immune receptors doesn’t change basic cell biology.
Hector Madonar@Interferon_G

@drterrysimpson @KUPERWASSERLAB @pastheliopause Genomic integration is extremely much more likely if RLRs and TLRs are switched off. You can thank me later.

English
11
5
36
2K

Keşfet

@WSITYpod @ChristinaDelPre @Jikkyleaks @MaryanneDemasi @nytimes @Kevin_McKernan @JesslovesMJK @RWMaloneMD