Kadir Kaderoğlu

This happened to me two days ago and I am still not over it. Absolute bollocks

OMG KENTUCKY THIS IS MARCH 🤯🤯🤯

doi.org/10.1111/ijal.7… More evidence that we should not use written-receptive (read) vocabulary tests in listening or viewing without subtitles research (still taking place in 2024 & 2026 in the top journals), and instead, we should use spoken-receptive (heard) vocabulary tests.

🚨🇪🇸 ARDA GULER SCORES FROM HIS OWN HALF TO MAKE IT FOUR FOR REAL MADRID! 🤯 Real Madrid 4-1 Elche. x.com/vjedgyfox/stat…

@JaronBgame He can’t finish shite, even around the rim

I never understood all the Yurtseven hate.. he’s a really good player

Optimizing the Effectiveness of Captioned Viewing for Incidental Second Language Vocabulary Learning: The Effects of Repeated Viewing and Reading Fluency - Kurokawa - TESOL Quarterly - Wiley Online Library onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/te…

🚨 Fifty-one schoolgirls were killed and 60 were injured when a strike destroyed a girls’ elementary school in Minab, southern Iran, Iranian media has reported Follow the latest ⬇️ telegraph.co.uk/world-news/202…

Watching full blown wars on Twitter is the most surreal experience of modern life. War, war, NBA post, F1, relationship advice, Epstein, war, Champions League draw, missiles.

now imagine this on a brain where the prefrontal cortex has barely started developing, where dopamine sensitivity is an order of magnitude higher than adults, and every neural pathway is being wired from scratch in real time thats a toddler with an ipad giving a 2 year old short-form video is for all intents and purposes indistinguishable from giving them cocaine. same reward pathway, same dopamine hijack, zero executive function to regulate it, and a brain that won't even finish developing before being irreparably compromised ipad kids are brain damaged and the parents who did it to them for a "quiet dinner" (read: lazy) should be treated exactly the way we would treat anyone who gives cocaine to toddlers

Addiction to short-form videos reduces brain activity in the frontal lobe weakening the ability to focus.

He's not just defending AI energy use. He is smuggling in a whole anthropology where humans are basically inefficient meat computers that you have to pour food and years into before they become useful. And once you accept that, the next move is obvious. If people are just costly biological training runs, then burning mountains of electricity to build synthetic intelligence starts to feel not only equal, but superior, even if it negatively impacts actual humans. That is the dystopian. It makes human development sound like a bug in the system, and it makes sacrificing human and creational flourishing for more computational power sound logical. To him, the grid gets strained, prices go up, ecosystems get hit, but hey, humans eat too, so what's the difference? The difference is that humans aren't an inefficient line item. They're the point. If your worldview can look at a child growing into an adult and describe it as energy spent to train intelligence, you haven't said something profound. You've revealed a horrifically rotten worldview.

@AusensiJ @davidsancho1973 @SomXlaPublica Hola @AusensiJ la meva pregunta es tractava dels professors amb títols doctors treballant als instituts que deia @davidsancho1973 . Perdó per la confusió

@KaderogluK1035 @davidsancho1973 @SomXlaPublica A qualsevol de les pàgines webs de recursos humans de les unis catalanes hi apareix. Amb una cerca ràpida a Google "retribucions PDI + nom uni" ho trobes.

Posats a jugar, juguem-hi: Un professor lector d'universitat (el que diríem "escala bàsica") cobra 2700€ bruts en 14 pagues, després de fer un grau, un màster universitari, i un doctorat.

@davidsancho1973 @AusensiJ @SomXlaPublica N’hi ha alguna data o pàgina on es pot veure aquesta data? Pregunto per curiositat

@AusensiJ @SomXlaPublica Ja, és que la vergonya de l’accés a la docència universitària és de traca. Per això secundària està plena de doctors, al final s’ha de menjar.

Language teachers - here is a question for you this week! Which type of captions/subtitles - interlingual (i.e paraphrasing) or intralingual (translate from one language to another) do you provide along videos to improve Ss’ vocab acquisition?

@inanozdemir Wemby ve Antman’a teşekkürlerimizi iletiyoruz. Amerikan gururu işi olmuş bence. Bu oyun amerikalıların oyunu. Diğerlerine kaybedemeyiz tutumu dikte ediyor oyunculara. Dünya oyuncuları da (Wemby hariç) pek oralı değil gibi

Ne diyorsunuz formata şimdiye kadar?

The percentage of Harvard students receiving disability accommodations has risen from about 3% in 2014 to 21% in 2024. The Harvard Crimson published this graphic showing the rise at Harvard and several other elite schools. Watch Brown and Stanford too!

Nearly 40% of Stanford undergraduates claim they’re disabled. I’m one of them | Elsa Johnson, The Times In 2023, one month into my freshman year at Stanford University, an upperclassman was showing me her dorm room — a prized single in one of the nicest buildings on campus. As she took me around her space, which included a private bathroom, a walk-in shower and a great view of Hoover Tower, she casually mentioned that she had lived in a single all four years she had attended Stanford. I was surprised. Most people don’t get the privilege of a single room until they reach their senior year. That’s when my friend gave me a tip: Stanford had granted her “a disability accommodation”. She, of course, didn’t have a disability. She knew it. I knew it. But she had figured out early what most Stanford students eventually learn: the Office of Accessible Education will give students a single room, extra time on tests and even exemptions from academic requirements if they qualify as “disabled”. Everyone was doing it. I could do it, too, if I just knew how to ask. A recent article in The Atlantic reported that an increasing number of students at elite universities were claiming they had disabilities to get benefits or exemptions, which can also include copies of lecture notes, excused absences and access to private testing rooms. Those who suffer from “social anxiety” can even get out of participating in class discussions. But the most common disability accommodation students ask for — and receive — is the best housing on campus. At Stanford University in Palo Alto, California, where competition for the best dorm rooms is fierce, this practice is particularly rife. The Atlantic reported that 38 percent of undergraduates at my college were registered as having a disability — that’s 2,850 students out of a class of 7,500 — and 24 per cent of undergrads received academic or housing accommodations in the fall quarter. At the Ivy League colleges Brown and Harvard, more than 20 per cent of undergrads are registered as disabled. Contrast these numbers with America’s community colleges, where only 3 to 4 per cent of students receive disability accommodations. Bizarrely, the schools that boast the most academically successful students are the ones with the largest number who claim disabilities — disabilities that you’d think would deter academic success. The truth is, the system is there to be gamed, and most students feel that if you’re not gaming it, you’re putting yourself at a disadvantage. That’s why I decided to claim my legitimate illness — endometriosis — as a disability at Stanford. When I arrived on campus two and a half years ago, I would have assumed that special allowances were made for a small number of students who genuinely needed them. But I quickly discovered that wasn’t true. Some diagnoses are real and serious, of course, such as epilepsy, anaphylactic allergies, sleep apnea or severe physical disabilities. But most students, in my experience, claim less severe ailments, such as ADHD or anxiety. And some “disabilities” are just downright silly. Students claim “night terrors”; others say they “get easily distracted” or they “can’t live with others”. I know a guy who was granted a single room because he needs to wear contacts at night. I’ve heard of a girl who got a single because she was gluten intolerant. That’s why I felt justified in claiming endometriosis as a disability. It is a painful condition in which cells from the uterus grow outside the womb. I’m often doubled over in agony from the problem, for which there is no known cure, so I decided to ask for a single room in a campus dorm where I could endure those moments in private. The application process was very easy. I registered my condition on the Stanford Office of Accessible Education website and made an appointment to meet an adviser later that week. The system is staffed largely by empathetic women who want to help students. As I explained my diagnosis and symptoms over Zoom to one woman, she listened, nodded sympathetically, related my problems to her own life and asked a few basic questions. Within 30 minutes, I was registered as a student with a disability, entitled to more accommodations than I asked for. In addition to a single housing assignment, I was granted extra absences from class, some late days on assignments and a 15-minute tardiness allowance for all of my classes. I was met with so little scepticism or questioning, I probably didn’t even need a doctor’s note to get these exemptions. Had I been pushier, I am sure I could have received almost any accommodation I asked for. While I feel entitled to my single room, I would feel guilty about some of the perks I have — except that so many of my fellow students have gamed the system. Take Callie, a recent Stanford grad with ADHD and Asperger’s who agreed to be quoted under a pseudonym. Callie was diagnosed with her conditions in elementary school; in return, Stanford granted her a single room for all four years, plus extra time on tests — and a few more perks. “In college, I haven’t had that many ‘in real life’ tests as opposed to take-home essays,” Callie told me. “When I did use the extra time, I felt guilty, because I probably didn’t deserve the accommodations, given the fact I got into Stanford and could compete at a high academic level. Extra time on tests — some students even get double time — seems unfair to me.” But at Stanford, almost no one talks about the system with shame. Rather, we openly discuss, strategise and even joke about it. At a university of savvy optimisers, the feeling is that if you aren’t getting accommodations, you haven’t tried hard enough. Another student told me that special “accommodations are so prevalent that they effectively only punish the honest”. Academic accommodations, they added, help “students get ahead … which puts a huge proportion of the class on an unfair playing ground”. The gaming even extends to our meals. Stanford requires most undergraduates living on campus to purchase a meal plan, which costs $7,944 for the 2025-26 academic year. But students can get exempted if they claim a religious dietary restriction that the college kitchens cannot accommodate. And so, some students I know claim to be devout members of the Jain faith, which rejects any food that may cause harm to all living creatures — including small insects and root vegetables. The students I know who claim to be Jain (but aren’t) spend their meal money at Whole Foods instead and enjoy freshly made salads and other yummy dishes, while the rest of us are stuck with college meals, like burgers made partly from “mushroom mix”. Administrators seem powerless to reform the system and frankly don’t seem to care. How do you prove someone doesn’t have anxiety? How do you verify they don’t need extra time on a test? How do you challenge a religious dietary claim without risking a discrimination lawsuit? I often think back to that conversation with my upperclassman friend. She wasn’t proud of gaming the system and she wasn’t ashamed either. She was simply rational. The university had created a set of incentives and she had simply responded to them. That’s what strikes me most about the accommodation explosion at Stanford and similar schools. The students aren’t exactly cheating and if they are, can you blame them? Stanford has made gaming the system the logical choice. When accommodations mean the difference between a cramped triple and your own room, when extra test time can boost your grade point average, opting out feels like self-sabotage. Who would make their lives harder when the easiest option is just a 30-minute Zoom call away? thetimes.com/us/news-today/…

@inanozdemir Hocam özür diliyorum. Doğrusu birleşikmiş :)) Kafa bulandırdığım için kusura bakmayın. Severek takip ediyorum sizleri. Sevgiler 😌

@KaderogluK1035 Ah be kaçırmışım, nazar boncuğu olsun, edit yaparak timeline'ın önüne elli kere düşürmeyeyim tweeti :)

2021-2022 Cavs en sevdiğim takımlardan biriydi, MSG'deki NY Knicks maçını unutamıyorum. Rubio'nun 37 sayısı beni 2000'lerde okuduğum altyapı forumlarına götürmüştü. Çaylak Mobley, ışıldayan Garland, Rubio ile kenardan gelen Cedi, Markkanen'in üç numara oynadığı beşler... 44 galibiyetli o sezonu takip etmek müthişti. O Knicks maçında Sexton sakatlanmıştı, bu da Garland'ı direksiyona geçirmişti. Yeni Cavs'in temelleri atıldı. Yazın Donovan Mitchell geldi. Takım daha çok normal sezon maçı kazandı, ciddi playoff hüsranları yaşadı ve ben hep o 2021-2022 sezonunu aradım. 64 galibiyetlik, Ty Jerome'lu geçen sezonda bile... Garland'ı James Harden karşılığında LA Clippers'a yollayan takas mühim bir değişime işaret ediyor. Hâlâ Mitchell-Mobley-Allen burada, yanlarında daha büyük ama idaresi de zor bir oyun kurucu olacak. 26 yaşındaki Garland'ın 36 yaşındaki Harden'dan sağlıksız olması, ayak sakatlığından bir türlü kurtulamaması bu hamlenin sebepleri arasında. Uzun vadede Mitchell ile Mobley'yi tutmak isteyen yönetim (Hoş, Giannis için de pazardalar) zaten Garland'ı bir noktada bırakacaktı. Onun yerine 1,5 sezonluk (belki daha uzun) Harden deneyine girmek belki kısa vadede mantıklıdır. Uzun vadede bu yapının ömrü kısaldı mı? Kısaldı. Lakin bu sezon da başarı gelmeseydi muhtemelen zaten büyük zarlar atılacaktı. Koby Altman beklemeden şimdi attı. Jaylon Tyson'ın yükselişi rotasyonu değiştirmiş ve De'Andre Hunter'ı gereksiz kılmıştı; nitekim karşılığında Keon Ellis ve Dennis Schröder'i aldılar. Garland'ın serüveni de karşılığında Harden alarak bitti. İki sezondur Harden öve öve ilişkimizi toparlamıştım, şimdi Cavs'te buluşuyoruz. Garland'ı özlerken yeni hayaller kuracağız.

@HandersMarc 😆 ‘Saras marxa sense tècnica’. Tothom demanaven un tècnic pel Saras però com era al teu equip segurament feies ulls grossos. Com és provar teva pròpia medecina ara? xD i això de ‘és impossible jugar contra un equip turc’? Fener portava anys sense guanyar al Palau. Quin amargat😆

Saras marxa sense tècnica i havent frenat el partit per la cara en el millor moment del Barça No podem agafar un rebot clau. De 24 a 16 van 8 segons. El Barça hauria d'haver tingut el tir per empatar i una vegada és impossible jugar contra un equip turc.