kateliu

🚨 🇩🇪 CHOC : Un demandeur d’asile irakien de 31 ans, Muhammad A., a poussé une jeune Ukrainienne de 16 ans, Liana K., devant un train de marchandises en gare de Friedland La jeune fille est morte sur le coup, sous les yeux de son grand-père avec qui elle était au téléphone. Le tribunal vient de décider : pas de prison. En raison d’une « grave schizophrénie paranoïde », Muhammad A. est déclaré pénalement irresponsable et envoyé dans un établissement psychiatrique. Un demandeur d’asile débouté, qui n’aurait jamais dû rester en Allemagne, tue une réfugiée ukrainienne de 16 ans… et le système le protège. La justice allemande préfère soigner le bourreau plutôt que de protéger les innocents. Triste symbole d’une Europe qui a perdu le sens des priorités. 💔

This week was tough. I had dinner with my intelligent friends from European countries, people who have spent half their lives working within the United Nations. We were having a good time until the conversation turned to Donald Trump and Iran. Everyone, without exception, spoke badly of Trump: that he causes problems for everyone, that war is terrible, that it is illegal, and so on. I stayed silent. When everyone finally became quiet, I asked only one question: who is actually going to collect and remove those more than 400 kilograms of uranium? My French friend said: Trump is no better than the regime. On top of that, he has started an illegal war, and many countries have nuclear power plants why shouldn’t Iran have them too? I exploded inside, but I remained silent at first. When I finally broke my silence, I said: was it illegal when the United States helped the French during the Second World War? Was it unnecessary? Then silence returned. I kept thinking about how to express everything happening inside me; how to explain the regime to a European-someone surrounded by left-wing ideology, enclosed within indirect forms of censorship, and always ready to say that war is terrible, yet surprised when I say many Iranians wanted it. How do you explain to people who live in safety that some nations sometimes see outside pressure as the only remaining path when every internal path has been closed? How do you explain that they do not even speak in geopolitical terms, but judge only from a position of moral comfort, while others are speaking about survival? Europeans who, despite democracy and free internet, still do not know what happened in Iran on January 8–9. Europeans who believe every conflict can be understood through the same moral template. Europeans who condemn all violence in theory, but have never had to live under a Islamic system where violence is part of everyday life. And I sat there with the feeling that the distance between our realities was greater than the table around which we were sitting…