Cornelius VanTil

1.8K posts

Cornelius VanTil banner
Cornelius VanTil

Cornelius VanTil

@KeesVanTil

Apologist extraordinaire

Westminster Katılım Ocak 2011
246 Takip Edilen4.2K Takipçiler
Cornelius VanTil retweetledi
Mark A. Garcia
Mark A. Garcia@Garcia_Mark_A·
This is an annual reminder that is apparently needed more than annually: justification and salvation are not synonyms.
English
5
7
61
2.9K
Cornelius VanTil retweetledi
James Baird
James Baird@james_d_baird·
Richard Gaffin is the greatest living theologian
English
13
4
44
8.4K
Cornelius VanTil
Cornelius VanTil@KeesVanTil·
@Protestia The article needs to be re titled to “More copies of the New Testament we all read today discovered with marginal from the scribes.”
English
1
0
2
180
Cornelius VanTil retweetledi
Pierce Taylor Hibbs
Pierce Taylor Hibbs@HibbsPierce·
What's a Christian response to the mental health crisis? I wrote this Point of Contact from @WestminsterTS to get into the details, mining the wisdom of David Powlison and applying it to contemporary culture: Sigmund Freud, Carl Rogers, B.F. Skinner, and even @AbigailShrier. God is at the center of our mental health, and he always will be. You can get this delivered to your physical mailbox by signing up here: wm.wts.edu/point-of-conta…
Pierce Taylor Hibbs tweet media
English
1
1
9
581
Cornelius VanTil
Cornelius VanTil@KeesVanTil·
True Jew = Circumcision of the Heart.
English
1
0
1
127
Cornelius VanTil retweetledi
Reformed1563
Reformed1563@Heidel_bro1563·
“The Church is the true Israel, not by replacing it, but by being the organic continuation of God's covenant people." -Herman Bavinck
Reformed1563 tweet media
English
39
158
812
17.4K
Cornelius VanTil
Cornelius VanTil@KeesVanTil·
Well done.
Melissa the Hopeful🏠Homemaker@BiblicalBeauty

Great balance of showing compassion while sharing truth as Wes Huff responds to the question of why a good God would allow evil: "Well, that is arguably the hardest and most pressing apologetic question there is, because ultimately, the very tidy philosophical and theological answer isn't the right answer sometimes. You know, sometimes the right answer to the wrong question is the wrong answer, because I've encountered situations where someone has brought up a variation of the problem of evil to me, and I've just felt uneasy about maybe the tenor that they're coming at with the question...and asking them, 'You know, that's a great question. Why are you asking that question in particular?' and finding out once again (like the previous question related to it), they're personally hurting. And so, in that sense, I could give a tidy answer about if you're positing that something is good, you're positing that there's an objective good and evil, and if there's an objective good and evil, then you're positing an objective law, and objective law needs an objective lawgiver. So where do we find the groundwork for an objective lawgiver to begin with? Otherwise, you may not like certain things, but to say they ought not to happen is actually an ethical leap to an objective reality that you may or may not have groundwork for. But if that person is struggling because a family member of theirs has cancer, then that particular, maybe tidy, tied-up-in-a-nice-bow answer is not going to speak to them whatsoever. And so that's why that's the hardest question because there are actually very good answers to it, but often it doesn't speak to the person in front of you, because questions have questioners that sit behind them. And one of the pitfalls of my chosen field of ministry apologetics is that sometimes we give answers where we talk at people rather than with people. And there's a danger to that because the Christian faith isn't just an intellectual assent, right? It's a personal relationship. And that should also be played out in the answers that we give..."

English
0
0
1
244
Cornelius VanTil retweetledi
Melissa the Hopeful🏠Homemaker
Melissa the Hopeful🏠Homemaker@BiblicalBeauty·
Great balance of showing compassion while sharing truth as Wes Huff responds to the question of why a good God would allow evil: "Well, that is arguably the hardest and most pressing apologetic question there is, because ultimately, the very tidy philosophical and theological answer isn't the right answer sometimes. You know, sometimes the right answer to the wrong question is the wrong answer, because I've encountered situations where someone has brought up a variation of the problem of evil to me, and I've just felt uneasy about maybe the tenor that they're coming at with the question...and asking them, 'You know, that's a great question. Why are you asking that question in particular?' and finding out once again (like the previous question related to it), they're personally hurting. And so, in that sense, I could give a tidy answer about if you're positing that something is good, you're positing that there's an objective good and evil, and if there's an objective good and evil, then you're positing an objective law, and objective law needs an objective lawgiver. So where do we find the groundwork for an objective lawgiver to begin with? Otherwise, you may not like certain things, but to say they ought not to happen is actually an ethical leap to an objective reality that you may or may not have groundwork for. But if that person is struggling because a family member of theirs has cancer, then that particular, maybe tidy, tied-up-in-a-nice-bow answer is not going to speak to them whatsoever. And so that's why that's the hardest question because there are actually very good answers to it, but often it doesn't speak to the person in front of you, because questions have questioners that sit behind them. And one of the pitfalls of my chosen field of ministry apologetics is that sometimes we give answers where we talk at people rather than with people. And there's a danger to that because the Christian faith isn't just an intellectual assent, right? It's a personal relationship. And that should also be played out in the answers that we give..."
English
44
243
2K
114.6K
Cornelius VanTil retweetledi
Westminster Seminary
Westminster Seminary@WestminsterTS·
Solid. This is how you preach Luke 19:1-10. Alumnus and pastor of Meadowcroft PCA, Max Benfer shows us how to understand the scene with Zacchaeus. Listen.
English
0
14
70
7.8K
Cornelius VanTil retweetledi
Rusty Dawson
Rusty Dawson@806_reformer·
“God continues to reveal himself in the facts of the created world, but the sinner needs to interpret every one of them in the clearer light of Scripture.” - Van Til, Cornelius. The Reformed Pastor and Modern Thought
English
0
3
11
383
Cornelius VanTil retweetledi
Rusty Dawson
Rusty Dawson@806_reformer·
"God’s nature is, as it were, the stamp; our nature is the impression made by this stamp. Both fit together." - Geerhardus Vos
English
0
1
3
159
Cornelius VanTil retweetledi
Rusty Dawson
Rusty Dawson@806_reformer·
“If one does not make human knowledge wholly dependent upon the original self-knowledge and consequent revelation of God to man, then man will have to seek knowledge within himself as the final reference point.” - Van Til, Cornelius
English
0
2
3
190
Cornelius VanTil retweetledi
Josh Howerton
Josh Howerton@howertonjosh·
@KeesVanTil @WestminsterTS Yes, I was immensely blessed by many Westminster lectures online when I was learning to preach and the Keller / Clowney "Preaching Christ in a Postmodern World" lectures series I still go back to every now and then. Grateful.
English
1
2
3
285