Sepinare

1K posts

Sepinare banner
Sepinare

Sepinare

@Keynes_re

you know who I am.

MSU Katılım Ocak 2012
59 Takip Edilen44 Takipçiler
Seberekane Papi
Seberekane Papi@SeberekaneQ·
This just humbled me. And Here I was thinking we did the bare minimum. 🙏🏾.
Seberekane Papi tweet media
English
6
6
75
3.1K
Sepinare
Sepinare@Keynes_re·
@koko_matshela Hana joale esale u faa li Gupta Eskom funds you have reckoned you can launder your reputation via ANC bashing, bathong boo Koko motho😅😅😅
English
0
0
0
387
Rapelang Radebe
Rapelang Radebe@ntateRaps·
#Lesotho #PAC chair‘Machabana Letsie, reacting to @LEC’s court petition says, the Parliamentary independence must be protected, hence the need to oppose LEC’s case: Public institutions resort to courts to avoid accountability. ⁦@Sophie_Mokoena#sabcnews
Rapelang Radebe tweet media
English
5
6
35
1.9K
Official LCA
Official LCA@official_lca·
Are you a Vodacom Lesotho subscriber who has been affected by the recent changes on airtime usage? Kindly contact us...
Official LCA tweet media
English
1
1
7
353
Sepinare
Sepinare@Keynes_re·
@KbzFire They managed to string us along nicely with the constant communication, how are you gonna call the community to a march when the latest feedback was they are still investigating the issue? But separately we need to explore smart network for critical infrastructure else this is it
English
2
0
0
71
Kbz
Kbz@KbzFire·
@Keynes_re Haai, but at least we'd have had an outlet for this pent up rage. Also says alot about those entrusted to deliver services, that they knew we wouldn't riot...
English
1
0
0
388
Kbz
Kbz@KbzFire·
Basotho are the calmest (or most passive) people alive. How has there been no water for 4 days straight and no riots? I am incandescent with rage, but don't know where to direct it.
English
15
7
68
7.7K
Sepinare
Sepinare@Keynes_re·
@YourKayBol Semantics from my point, a country that doesn’t have a sufficient tax base coming up with more welfare programs under the pretext of advocacy is really irresponsible radicalism, but I digress
English
1
0
0
10
Kananelo Boloetse
Kananelo Boloetse@YourKayBol·
@Keynes_re Yes, if we mandate internet as a right, we must also have a serious conversation about sustainable funding. That’s not radicalism for its own sake, it’s responsible advocacy for inclusive progress.
English
1
0
0
12
Sepinare
Sepinare@Keynes_re·
@YourKayBol Many consumers buy down I don’t think anecdotes suffice when there is a whole body of knowledge on consumer behavior and psychology, but ke this is a premises thing more than logic of how the thing works
English
0
0
0
10
Kananelo Boloetse
Kananelo Boloetse@YourKayBol·
@Keynes_re Many people don’t buy down, not because they don’t feel ripped off, but because small bundles are often uneconomical in the long run. People are being cornered into a system that penalises thoughtful or moderate use. That’s not just psychology, it’s structural.
English
1
0
0
8
Sepinare
Sepinare@Keynes_re·
@YourKayBol Your ask is akin to what airtime usage offers and remember that bundles are an innovation to make usage cheaper so you want to regress but keep the benefits and call it radical?
English
0
0
0
9
Kananelo Boloetse
Kananelo Boloetse@YourKayBol·
@Keynes_re With respect, that’s a convenient justification, but it misses the core issue. Yes, using regular airtime gives unrestricted access, but at a significantly higher cost per megabyte. Bundles were introduced not as a luxury, but as a necessity for affordability.
English
2
0
0
22
Sepinare
Sepinare@Keynes_re·
@YourKayBol You can ask the regulator to do this but most MNO’s aren’t making a bet on this, basic consumer psychology will tell you people will buy down if they feel like it’s a rip off and their usage is less, so it’s a classic red herring
English
1
0
0
10
Kananelo Boloetse
Kananelo Boloetse@YourKayBol·
@Keynes_re Saying that unrestricted usage is available through airtime is like offering an expensive alternative and calling it choice. If bundles truly depend on expiry to remain feasible, then let’s have full transparency, how much data do MNOs collect from expiry alone each year?
English
2
0
0
39
Sepinare
Sepinare@Keynes_re·
@YourKayBol Rights go with responsibilities in civics class, you can mandate that and then you have to find a funding mechanism that will sustain the right, else it’s radicalism for the sake of it
English
1
0
0
11
Kananelo Boloetse
Kananelo Boloetse@YourKayBol·
@Keynes_re Let people see what they’re losing in the name of "innovation." Truly, calling for bundles not to expire is a modest demand. Real demand should be more radical, we must declare access to the internet a fundamental right, and demand that people have a say in setting data tariffs.
English
2
0
0
34
Sepinare
Sepinare@Keynes_re·
@YourKayBol I think the underlying premises need to be more informed, but it’s not something easily done within the tweet limits
English
0
0
0
4
Kananelo Boloetse
Kananelo Boloetse@YourKayBol·
@Keynes_re That varying price of a gigabyte based on validity is exactly the issue. The data itself doesn’t change. A gig is a gig. So, consumers are being charged more not for more data or better service, but simply for the right to use their data over a longer period.
English
2
0
0
40
Sepinare
Sepinare@Keynes_re·
@YourKayBol No, the assumptions are misplaced, airtime usage is unrestricted, the innovation of bundles is only ever feasible with validity, what you want is already there, it’s using normal airtime for your data consumption it has no restrictions, bundled pricing is something else
English
1
0
0
19
Kananelo Boloetse
Kananelo Boloetse@YourKayBol·
@Keynes_re They charge less for short-validity bundles to encourage quick, extravagant, consumption. The goal is to get us to burn through our data fast so we go back to buy more. It’s about accelerating turnover. Giving us time to use our data responsibly isn’t as profitable.
English
2
0
0
47
Sepinare
Sepinare@Keynes_re·
@YourKayBol I do remember and the difference was the economics back then, you see you have to spread overheads and when connections were low they even had to charge for receiving calls, your comparison of timed bundles to airtime window is misplaced, why does a gig cost differ by validity?
English
1
0
0
21
Kananelo Boloetse
Kananelo Boloetse@YourKayBol·
@Keynes_re Remember the days when airtime came with a window period? Buying M10 voucher gave you 10 days of access, and the more you recharged, the longer your window stayed open. If that was possible with airtime back then, it can’t be complicated to apply the same logic to data bundles.
English
1
0
0
24
Sepinare
Sepinare@Keynes_re·
@YourKayBol And if they buy 52, then the bundle window extend to a year? And you now have to design with that in mind, I think most of these suggestions are devoid of the complexity of provisioning at an MNO level and the complexity that have to be accommodated for an effective lesser price
English
1
0
0
22
Kananelo Boloetse
Kananelo Boloetse@YourKayBol·
@Keynes_re We had also said that if someone buys a weekly bundle and uses it up in a day, and buys another weekly bundle, the new one should extend the original expiry by seven days, not start a new cycle. Now, explain how these consumer-friendly measures would make data more expensive.
English
2
0
0
76
Sepinare
Sepinare@Keynes_re·
@YourKayBol needs to be priced in , and the assumption that client behavior would be static when history shows that clients aim to exploit value and even such needs to be modeled in
English
0
0
0
14
Sepinare
Sepinare@Keynes_re·
@YourKayBol I haven’t but the logic stands, now the suggestions even bring complexity in having client history in perpetuity but also the problem being solved is very insignificant bundle expiry is insignificant to bundle depletion and what more the complexity of your product design still
English
2
0
1
35
Sepinare
Sepinare@Keynes_re·
@Its_Lira And your passcode while we at it🫠🫠🫠
English
0
0
0
110