Killroy🏳️‍🌈🏳️‍⚧️

CBA hören Liveticker: Der Titel vom Album ist eig gleich programm, cba mir das mehrmals anzuhören. Also, lets go

For years, I've used my Autism to further my career. Today, I'm using it to save League of Legends. It took me 4 hours to make this post. Please, take 10 minutes to read it in its entirety and voice support if you agree with any of it. It's not just for me, it's for all of us. In this post I detail the 3 main situations that Riot has presented as problems within the Ranked system, as well as their proposed solutions. I then offer what I believe to be the best solution for all parties involved, while giving supporting arguments to further all my claims. This post is structured with the detailing of 3 core situational problems, insight into smurfing, insight into the ladder reset, and then ending off with how everything could be fixed in the next 39 days and cement Season 16 as one of the greatest seasons for the ranked playerbase in the last decade. Let's begin. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ SITUATION #1: Masters being more achievable this Season & the best players getting stronger as the years go on is expanding the gap between the bottom of Master and the top of Challenger. Us making climbing at apex less daunting caused us to add Grandmaster several years ago and we’re nearing some of those feels now; the skill gaps in Apex are getting too big. Changes to systems like these [the Master+ system] are a natural part of League being a long-lived game and having growing player skills over time. Riot-Proposed Solution: In an effort to better differentiate between skill levels, allow LP numbers to become potentially unlimited so the higher-end skill levels among Master and Challenger players is more visible and better represented. Issues with Riot-Proposed Solution: - Grinding Master and Challenger now feels unrewarding and unattainable. Players who get into Masters on +/-20 LP gains will not want to make the grind all the way to 1500 LP just to hit Grandmaster (75 net wins, which is essentially the same as going from Iron 4 0 LP to Platinum 4 0 LP) and players who hit Challenger will not want to grind all the way to Rank 1 on even gains since, again, they will have to get upwards of 100 (or more) net wins. - Smurfing becomes worse. When confronted with a number as vast as what's going to be commonplace in terms of LP requirements, instead of playing on accounts with even gains; players will instead opt to smurf since there's the potential of getting an account with better gains playing in higher MMR lobbies to make the climbing process easier to process. To understand fully and properly, see the UNDERSTANDING SMURFING sidenote after Situation #3. Ideal solution #1: Add a new (4-tier) rank in between Diamond and Masters and (potentially) remove Grandmaster. This change properly addresses the situation without having the same issues as the proposed solution because; - Climbing at Apex will not feel daunting since LP cutoffs can even go as low as 1000 LP for Rank 1 and still maintain skill discrepancy since all the players that WOULD be Grandmaster are instead Masters and all the players that WOULD be Masters are instead in the new rank that's been introduced. - Players will not feel 'cheated' out of getting demoted out of Masters since the new Rank is essentially taking the place of Masters and Masters is now essentially Grandmaster. - The prestige of being Masters and viewing it as a true Apex tier due to lower player-count finally returns. Smurfing gets DEINCENTIVIZED rather than INCENTIVIZED because the climb for Masters and Challengers feels like it's truly attainable and the actual ranking process of getting into the higher elos takes longer. It's important to note, however, that this could have been done in the past by Riot when Emerald was introduced, but the execution was improperly handled and as a result didn't change anything. To elaborate, back in the day Apex players would start, at the highest, Platinum 1. When Emerald was introduced most people were led to believe that this would still be the case which would have resulted in significant elo DEFLATION among the Apex tiers since all the Diamond level players would now start in Platinum and would have to climb a LOT to make it back to Masters. By allowing everyone to start in Emerald 1, this elo deflation did not occur. For this solution to properly do its job, players MUST still maintain an Emerald 1 start [at the highest MMR end] so that the vetting process can properly occur. Ideal solution #2: Add promotional series BACK to Diamond+ SoloQueue. To preface, this does NOT NEED to happen; but one of the issues right now is that there is such an LP spread among Master+ players that adding promotional series BACK to Diamond (as well as the new rank) can add 9 net wins to promotion between tiers (assuming +/-20) while also making the ranks seem more competitive and exclusive since the rules become different. A popup can be given upon first time promotion into Diamond explaining the system changes while also being done in a way that EXCITES the player (e,g. Congratulations on promoting! Since you're now approaching TOP-LEVEL competition, we're making things even MORE competitive so you can really test yourself!) --------------- SITUATION #2: The addition of Challenger duos made it more challenging to balance some of these games. While we took pre-emptive mitigations to reduce the impact of things like Rank 1 & 2 duoing together, they weren’t powerful enough and resulted in the best players catapulting further ahead. Riot-Proposed Solution: In an effort to make things more competitive, potentially look into the limiting of duos between the highest ranked players while also uncapping the LP soft-cap so that players who did play Solo are still able to make progress. Issues with Riot-Proposed Solution: - Does not address the issue that already took place (i.e players ALREADY catapulting ahead) - Does not give an actual timeframe on when this limiting will take place, allowing for further abuse to take place. - Restricting RANKS from duoing with each other (i.e Rank 1 with Rank 10) does not prevent the Rank 10 player from playing on a Grandmaster account and duoing with the Rank 1. - Uncapping the LP cap leads to a whole other slew of problems which are detailed in Situation #1 Ideal solution: Resetting the ladder and making it so that upon reaching APEX ranks, duoing becomes limited to a percentage basis of games played. This change properly addresses the situation without having the same issues as the proposed solution because; - Players who were catapulted through duoing are now reset to 0, allowing for a fair playing field for everyone. - Players will NOT be able to catapult themselves in the future. This is a 2 part solution, and as a result I will give 2 different paragraphs explaining the necessity of both changes. SOLUTION #1: RESETTING THE LADDER - Explained further in depth later in this post SOLUTION #2: Duo Restrictions - The only way to properly allow for duoing in high elo is if it's limited. This is how the sliding scale should work; Masters: 75% GrandMaster: 50% Challenger: 30% Top 200: 20% Top 100: 10% To preface, the numbers can be adjusted. This would allow for duoing to STILL be possible in high elo and allow for players to have fun, while also making it so it cannot be abused. It's important to note, however, that restrictions should be made AT CUTOFFS rather than at RANKS or else people will use this to their advantage in an effort to camp 1 win below a certain threshold one day, then spend the entire next day abusing the lower threshold and duoing more than they should until the ladder updates. --------------- SITUATION #3: In the Live Ranked system, the max LP attainable has a soft cap to prevent LP gains from getting too high, which combined with the above issues has led to a less than ideal apex ladder experience. We might also reconsider the top end of how much LP you can gain per win, but need to be considerate of how much this incentivizes smurfing. Riot-Proposed Solution: Uncapping LP gain for high-end players in an effort to make the grind feel more rewarding for people in Challenger and top 10. Issues with Riot-Proposed Solution: - Delegitimizes an entire decade of 'lp quotas' and sends the entire ladder into disarray as to what's considered good and what's not (it's important to note that this has ALREADY been the case this season, but now it's tenfold worse) - Encourages smurfing since players at 1400 LP will only see an LP gain of +23 and as a result will go new account to hopefully get +30 in Challenger so they can compete with current Rank 1s who are already getting +30 at 2500 LP. - Doesn't actually make the grind feel more rewarding since now LP is just a number that is going up rather than a benchmark of success. To explain, in the past people used to view 1k LP players as insane and 2k LP players as god-level. Nowadays, 1k LP isn't even Challenger and 2k is becoming commonplace. This is actually REMOVING incentive from players to grind since previously respected and sought-after benchmarks aren't even present anymore. Ideal solution: Static gains across the board, with there being a bell curve amongst the top 10 players. In Apex tiers, MMR should cease to exist. Once you achieve Masters, the LP curve should look like this; Master: +20/-20 Grandmaster: +18/-20 Challenger: +16/-20 Top 100: +14/-20 Top 10: +12/-20 Rank 1: +10/-20 The real reason behind why high elo players have been smurfing this season is based upon 2 lines of reasoning, -30 feels awful, and people just want high MMR accounts (explained later in UNDERSTANDING SMURFING). By making gains static you not only deincentivize smurfing since people cannot get high MMR accounts anymore, but you also make it so that the losses don't feel AS bad since it's only -20. A baseline of -30 is just unsustainable for the game long-term because of how huge that number really is. This also fixes the issue of people complaining about matchmaking since now MMR won't even necessarily be a factor inside of it which makes it so that players end up feeling a lot better about game quality too (even though no changes actually happen to matchmaking). Needless to say, the only way to fix the third point is a ladder reset (explained later). New benchmarks will not present themselves because nobody even know what is or isn't good anymore and one year is not ample enough time to do so. In previous seasons boundaries and limits were pushed slightly every year to make it so that people could have generalized ideas of skill based upon LP. This season has completely unwound an entire decade of progression, the only fix is a reset. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Thank you for making it this far. Now, it's time for us to talk about two concepts. The first, smurfing. And the second, the Ladder Reset. Let's start with Smurfing. People do not enjoy smurfing. Contrary to popular belief, most people actually resent it. The idea of going on a new account and stomping 50 games in a row is just not something that people care about anymore. There's a reason why high winrate accounts don't get many impressions anymore on Twitter. The only reason why Master+ players do it typically falls into one of 4 categories; - Practicing new roles/champions - Getting banned - Master players trying to get high MMR to climb to GM - Challenger players trying to get high MMR to climb to Rank 1 The vast majority of smurfs that you will find in your games is apart of one of the last 2 points. Even among lower elos Diamond players will smurf to hit Masters, Emerald players will smurf to hit Diamond, and so on. By removing the concept of MMR while maintaining the ranking system you're able to actually reduce (I would assume) over 50% of smurfing cases if not even upwards of 75%. Players want to play in the highest elo they can, and the reason why they smurf is because they believe that getting an account with better LP gains is their ticket out of whatever rank they're stuck in. Removing this option removes all incentive. --- I saved this part for last because it's by far the most important. The Ladder Reset. As things are right now, it's only getting worse. 2500 LP players are gaining 30 per game, with players around the middle (700-1500 LP) gaining 22-23. If you're somebody who wants to grind for top 10 or Rank 1, which believe it or not is most of the high elo playerbase, you will not even want to try competing with players like GeneralSniper who are gaining more LP than you with double the amount that you have. Instead, you're going to smurf in the hopes that you can get an account with +30 to be on the same playing field. And this is why I wanted to structure my post in the way I did. There are many solutions that have been proposed, so let me just take a second to tell you what I would do if I were in your position, Riot. There are 39 days until 'Season 1' ends. With the exception of adding in an entirely new rank, every other change can be done within that timeframe. If there's one thing I've learned in my life as a content creator it's that it doesn't matter what you do, it's about how you present it. The same is true for everything. I know you're worried that some players will end up feeling demotivated at being reset, but I can promise you that the alternative is things will only get worse. Smurfing will become worse, player perception will become worse, communication lines will weaken, and overall trust among the playerbase towards you will completely fall. You have the opportunity right now to be heroes. Genuinely. Let me tell you how I would do it. Work together with the team in charge of the client and the overall seasonal progression. We're in the Demacia season, right? Demacia vs Noxus is a war. So play into that. Have popups appear over the course of the next few weeks talking about how something big is coming in the Apex tiers. Get people excited. Make Master+ players want to grind hard, and make lower elo players strive to also rankup so they can take part in whatever the event is. Then, when the new season starts, say (something along the lines of) the great battle is taking place. Master+ players can choose to be either Noxus or Demacia, and once they make their selection their ranks get reset. To prevent abuse of people just playing on new accounts and constantly smurfing once the season begins, make it so you can ONLY be a contender if you've reach Master+ in Split 1. In the client, you can view the players that are apart of both factions and see which ones are competing for which side, with a tab showing how the battle is faring (think similar to the pool party event you had years ago with the Mundo skin). And then, after 4 weeks, the event ends, with the side that gained more LP in Master+ taking the trophy. Players get some kind of in-game reward who participated based on if they were on the winning side and how far up in the ladder they made it and you can even have low elo players choose which side they want to support (even if they're not apart of the actual battle) with maybe an icon that can have a prestige edition for the winners. You would fix high elo. You would reinstill a sense of community. You would play into the seasonal hype and make everyone excited You would avoid (almost all) the backlash from the people who are getting reset. And you would save the game. Just remember that for many of us this isn't just a game. For me, it's my life. I had trouble sleeping last night, I didn't really feel like getting out of bed this morning, And I spent 4 hours this morning typing up this tweet. And it's not out of hate, or malice, or anything negative. It's out of love. So please, for not just me, but for all of us who love this game and just want to feel excited playing it daily, I'm begging you to hear me out. Thank you for reading.

@LucylnTheSkyy @rexyRLD Naja der größte vorteil wäre ja die einfache strafverfolgung, was durch backend gesichert werden kann, da muss keine öffentliche klarnamenpflicht bestehen.

@Killroy2004 @rexyRLD Wie denn zum Beispiel?

Klarnamenpflicht rr der größte Bullshit, den keiner braucht, außer irgendwelche Internetpolizisten die schon für ein "Halt's Maul" 'ne Anzeige schreiben und trotzdem schwurbeln sich rechte beim Ulmen-Thema wieder was zusammen, statt Verständnis für ihren Gedankengang zu zeigen.

@emotikha @MidPeng Well no, riot currently considers anything above diamond apex tiers, thats why they have a different way of promoting

@Killroy2004 @MidPeng What counts as 'apex' is only what people say (it's subjective), not what name the division has. Right now you can say low master isn't apex compared to 5 years ago, in any case what's important is the rank (just like top 300 is chall we need a value that represents apex tier).

3000-4000 peak LP so your telling me Iron 4 - master is around 2800 lp while master 0 lp to Rank 1 is 3000-4000 Lp whaaaat it’s not April 1 yet

@ZombHarris It is, but I have only really engaged with star wars in my late teens, bc I was down to watch clone wars Before that the lego games and trading cards were my biggest memory of it

@Killroy2004 2004 is your birth year right? This makes sense to say if so

Remove yourself from nostalgia and contrarianism and admit it’s a dogshit movie that you like because you watched it as a kid

@LucylnTheSkyy @rexyRLD Finde kontra überwiegt deutlich, weil alle "Vorteile" auch anderweitig erreicht werden können

@rexyRLD Ich sag's wie's ist Klarnamenpflicht hat Pro und Contra, aber man kann nur schwer abschätzen, was überwiegt

@xaviersonline_ Fromsofts whole thing is experimentation, I really dont worry about that

They might be falling off

Fromsoft releasing 2 multiplayer games in a row makes me want to die

@rexyRLD Konsequenzen für verhalten im internet gibt es auch ohne dass dein namen überall hingepflastert wurde Allein die struggles die (vorallem frauen) stalking opfer und trans personen damit haben werden sind halt so nen outsized problem an so ner scheiße

Wer sich auch nur zu 1% in ihre Situation hineinversetzt, würde verstehen, warum sie überhaupt erst diesen Gedankengang vertritt, selbst wenn man, wie ich, komplett dagegen ist. Aber klar, das dient jetzt alles nur dazu, die Klarnamenpflicht einzuführen um paar rechte zu mobben.

@emotikha @MidPeng The apex tier should not be over half the ladder grind removed from the actual top. The way to fix this would be to introduce several more non apex full lp based tiers (aka divisions in master and gm, where only gm 1 or higher counts as apex) or give us more lower tier divisions

@MidPeng So you guys complain it's too easy to achieve apex tier then you say there shouldn't be a huge difference between a low master and Chall ?

13岁开始hrt然后长这样，要么说明hrt没用或者效果可逆，要么说明在撒谎完全胡编乱造，无论哪种情况都和这人表述的内容是自相矛盾的

@stitchedspider So itd make sense that he doesnt want others to deal with him, because in miles story he wouldnt have been a relevant villain then. He needs to fight miles and he needs miles to acknowledge his threat.

@stitchedspider What makes spot a compelling antagonist is that he from the get go wanted to be treated as a serious villain, but didnt. Upon attaining knowledge of the multiverse it makes sense that he wants to become a multiversal threat, just to be treated serious. He is however miles villain

obviously im biased cause im the spot guy but i think a lot of the spiderverse fandoms predictions for the next movie are a little lame because they see the spot as an obstacle rather than a character

@delmoi @paolini Check out the costs of 100% renewable coverage. The last bit takes an egregious amount of effort even when 99% are already covered by renewables, and covering this last bit with fission/fusion is going to be a very reasonable future path to earthly energy productions.

@Killroy2004 @paolini Nuclear is a waste of money compared to wind and solar. For the same amount of money you can build like 4x-5x as much wind and solar and they will have paid for themselves in electricity production years before a nuke plant would even come online.

Looking at the world and our dependence on fossil fuels reminds me of when I was doing all my research for To Sleep in a Sea of Stars. Digging into the math of energy production completely and utterly convinced me that the only path forward for humanity is to just bite the bullet and build a ton of nuclear power plants. Nuclear is the only power source that's dense enough for humanity to keep advancing, both on this planet and throughout the solar system. Plus, it's nowhere near as dangerous as folks think. No one died from radiation at Fukushima, for example. And while nuclear isn't totally safe (nothing is), oil and coal kill a huge amount of people through pollution and knock-on political effects (see current events). There's no such thing as a free lunch. Energy is what allows for EVERYTHING in our modern world, and the more we can produce, the better life gets. But to do that, and cleanly, nuclear is the only real option at the scales we need.

@morallawwithin Lying in a game of truth or dare is in the same vein as breaking a pinky promise to me in that it seems trivial and childish and yet I will forever think of it as tarnishing your character

@ImJacksRage @paolini I know its hard to understand throughout all the warcrimes you committed that haunt your brain, but studies are not hidden. You can read them. They're actually all about proving their own reasoning.

@Killroy2004 @paolini "Studies" 😂 Go ahead and keep thinking the thoughts others want you to

@ImJacksRage @paolini You are not a reliable source, for either knowledge on renewables or maths, so I am taking my chances with the studies that show the exact opposite being the case :)

@Killroy2004 @paolini You're welcome to see it the math works out but I'm telling you it doesn't

@ImJacksRage @paolini Loud incorrect buzzer

@Killroy2004 @paolini Maybe a few small, undeveloped regions. Most "renewable" sources of energy are insufficient for larger populated/developed areas

@rexyRLD Überlege die JMA aus langeweile zu rewatchen, so schlimm isses schon

--> Ziehe mir aus langeweile die Ultimative Chartshow - die erfolgreichsten Mitsinghits rein --> Platz 1: Zartmann - tau mich auf 😂🔫

@coolwarrior32 😭😭😭

@Killroy2004 ive done more legally dubious things during that time like i straight up scammed some guy promising him nudes for money idk why this is where i drew the line haha

One time i had given a blowjob to a guy and i was like full femboy mode and when we were done he pulls out his wallet and tries to hand me £100 but i was scared he was a fed trying to get people done for prostitution on grindr so i declined