KipInItReal

@redpillb0t Maybe Epstien remembers the operator Eric forgot

Eric Weinstein: "Jeffrey Epstein was part of the Harvard Math Department" How do you know that? Eric Weinstein: "I'm not telling you. Stop digging."

@SethDavisHoops If this was literally anyone else maybe but he is a known psycho doing a psycho thing u have to assume ill intent

Just for context ... the referee is Roger Ayers, who has worked multiple Final Fours. Known for his toughness and also sense of humor. This struck me as Hurley messing with a buddy more than intimidating a ref. This is after Mullins' shot, so Hurley was obviously not mad at the refs.

@BrianEastwoodx @joerogan I wondered who these idiots are who fall for that and it looks like I found them

Neil, do you even watch @joerogan? I’d like to guess that you don’t. Joe Rogan starts discussions, and some of them are hard, some are easy, some are hilarious. But one thing Joe has always done is clearly state he’s no expert. Joe is as popular as he is because it’s real and it’s raw conversation. And he frequently says “I’m an idiot,” “I’m not an expert.” Maybe if you actually listened, you’d know that.

@ReemAmirIbrahim What is the expectation? The UK added 13 years to life expectancy with all those years requiring the largest medical costs. The population is 30% higher and the population is way older. Should people start dying 13 years earlier so your chart goes down?

“The NHS is under funded”. Right.

@pepel_klaasa Sounds like someone ruled by a king

With all respect to the protesters, what is next? Trump and team are not giving a damn about public opinion

@BadSocialisms I was told it would just be a "guided tour"

They could literally storm the white house and capitol if they want with that numbers

@hugewildfan @RussoHockey I'm not saying he is garbage but shouldn't the best defenseman in the league on a good team have a good plus minus. Every other top defenseman does.

@KipInItReal1 @RussoHockey Don’t be dumb

Brock Faber’s 50 points in 74 games is fastest in #mnwild history for a D (til Quinn Hughes shatters that by year’s end)

@mcuban Are u going to get rid of most the bench or are the stars playing 25 mins. Why stop at 40 let's make it 30 no subs. This whole thing is silly.

It’s not the stoppages. It’s actual game play. Is March Madness or any college game less enjoyable at 40 minutes ? What about the Olympics ? The NFL is about 15 minutes of actual play time and the rest talking heads and it’s the most watchable sport. That’s not an accident

@NoLimitsNBA @NoDunksInc The advantage was from the screen not the pass

Three dribble assists should not count as such, but thinking that a good handoff is not as valuable as chests pass is just telling on yourself and your basketball knowledge. The separation Murray gets on 90% of those "just handoffs" is much bigger advantage then majority of "regular" passes.

Jokic had 19 assists…or just a lot of handoffs?

@giveashitnature If I had to maintain a bunch of solar panels I wouldn't want them on the ground and spread out in line for hundreds of miles.

Switzerland is putting solar panels on their train tracks, turning their train system into a huge power plant. If the US did this, we'd generate enough clean, American-made energy to power about 8 million homes.

@AndreaB76995358 @ChrisMartzWX Uh but he saw a chart

@ChrisMartzWX That's literally the result of a constant decreasing share... And it literally is the result of a 15y long trend. You're just clearly terrible at math + you don't know anything about the subject

China isn't turning into a “green superpower.” Any renewable energy systems they're installing only add to existing energy sources; they are not replacing fossil fuels at all. China is increasing their use of ALL energy.

@Duderichy Oh no they might end up like the rest of us

remember when anyone says "tax the rich" the rich already pay most of the taxes

@trevortimm I would actually have an issue if they were specifically feeding different news algorithms to different users

I really hope the Trump admin does not grab hold of the logic in the Facebook case: “The NYT hooks users on addictive games to keep them on the app and then sends them a virtually infinite amount of bad news stories tailored to their interests, leaving them depressed.”

@cafreiman Look kids a bootlicker

They raised prices by one or two dollars per month—the typical American worker earns that in about five minutes on the job.

@DavesAnalytics U kind of need to account for 5th pick and later.

Hey Phil, Judd, Declan, and Thor — huge fan of Purple Daily. As someone who’s worked in analytics in pro sports, I wanted to propose a new angle for discussion. First, I want to preface my research by saying that I bought a JJ McCarthy jersey after the draft. I really wanted him to be the guy. I am also a big fan of Thor's draft evaluations. So please don't take this as hate. Just wanted to add some data and talking points to your recent discussions on the matter. I built a table of every QB5 since 1980, and if you define a franchise QB as 3+ Pro Bowls, the data is pretty clear. Teams are 183% more likely to hit on a franchise QB with QB1 compared to QB2. Teams are 240% more likely to hit on a franchise QB with QB1 compared to QB3. Teams are 467% more likely to hit on a franchise QB with QB1 compared to QB4. The drop-off is incredibly steep. QB5's almost never pan out, and JJ McCarthy was drafted higher than any QB5 in history. Combining those odds with the expectations of a top 10 overall pick is a massive organizational failure by the Vikings front office. I don't want to say the kid never had a chance, but the historical odds of his draft position show that he only had an 8% chance of becoming a franchise QB, a 4% chance of becoming a star QB, and a 2% chance of winning a Super Bowl as a starting QB. I've heard so much about patience, sample size, development, and age when it comes to this McCarthy conundrum. Not nearly enough is being said about his draft position. Even if Kevin O'Connell was a miracle worker and the greatest QB developer of all-time, the odds of him developing a star QB from the QB5 slot is less than 5%. Only 2 QB's drafted 5th at their position in the last 45 years turned out to be stars (Lamar Jackson and Jalen Hurts). Only one (Hurts) won a Super Bowl as a starting QB. Beyond those two outliers, the best QB5 outcomes like Marc Bulger, Andy Dalton, and Matt Schaub were borderline franchise QB's at best. The Vikings made the exact same mistake with Christian Ponder (QB4 at #12). If you're not in position to take QB1, the worst thing you can do is get desperate and talk yourself into QB4 or QB5. History says that has an astronomically low probability of turning into a franchise quarterback. If the Vikings want to find their franchise QB in the draft, they need to make sure he’s the consensus QB1. Trade up or don’t draft one at all. Funny side note: Kevin O'Connell was also the 5th QB taken in his draft, and he didn't pan out either. * Also for those asking, why 3+ Pro Bowls for franchise designation? With the recent trend of star QB's opting out of the Pro Bowl and borderline / mid QB's replacing them, you can't just go by 1 or 2 Pro Bowls. That would include players like Jacoby Brissett, Mac Jones, Geno Smith, and Tua Tagovailoa. I don't think anybody would classify those guys as true franchise QB's. @PhilMackey @jzulgad @DexsTweets @thorku @SKORNorth

@Huncho_Jman Is there a metric for shots being nowhere fucking close

It is no secret that Julius Randle's jumper has been in a slump. However, his non-rim paint efficiency has taken the biggest fall since the All-Star break. Dropping from 49.3% to 38.7%.

@Fullcourtpass @joevardon @APH00PS Why do they have to change anything to do this.

If a team, under the new rules, was still found by Adam Silver’s office to be tanking, he would be able to take away that team’s draft pick, move it to the end of the lottery or first round and also increase fines into the millions of dollars, per @joevardon (h/t @APH00PS)

@PaulMSherman I realize there is a piece of this is have failed to articulate. The algorithm alone is not the issue, intent and reasonable awareness of harm play a huge factor.

@PaulMSherman This is to me the fundamental issue. There is a difference in an algorithm that presents content globally vs presenting different content to different users. There is no carve out in any standards or guidelines as I am aware to apply them differently to different users.

Without having read the briefing, it's not at all clear to me how a claim premised on "They presented information to me in a way that made me want to consume much more information" can be squared with the First Amendment.