Kelvin

@faithapologia @NBrasing @FreedomHasWon Such a sad tired argument. The moral law giver who lays out rules for the owning of other people couldn't lay out the moral laws for life from the beginning . The religious need to twist themselves into knots constantly to reconcile the absurdities.

Exactly, you keep proving my point. God is eternal and unchanging, objective moral values (grounded in His holy nature) exist eternally and are unchanging. But that doesn't mean humans don't need to discover or grow in moral knowledge. Just as scientific truths existed long before we discovered them, moral truths exist independently of our awareness.

This guy, an atheist and attorney set out to prove no Resurrection happened. The evidence is overwhelming.

@SteveDeaceShow Jesus lied, died and remains dead.

We are headed into a prolonged era of systemic epistemological retardation. The sad but inevitable next step in the post post-modernism/moral subjectivism zeitgeist, coinciding with an era of The Church not taking discipleship seriously. Neither side will be immune. The Left in total will believe every official narrative uncritically since they control the institutions, and seek to impose those narratives by any means necessary. Significant segments of the Right will reject them all, regardless of any objective evidence presented, as a reaction to that — and seek out increasingly radicalized gnostics grifters to feed their overall suspicions. The only vaccine to the contagion will be a Biblical worldview, because without it you will think either you are the truth, or truth is nowhere to be found. We are gonna painfully learn the definition of a narrow road.

@LarryTaunton You've always been a no class grifter

The time when I announced, in good fun, atheist Richard Dawkins’s conversion to Christianity.

@JeremyFragrance Jesus lied, died and remains dead.

Happy To Be Christian:

@JesseHughesNC Jesus lied, died and dead he remains.

There is no neutrality with Jesus Christ. He is either the Son of God who was crucified and rose from the dead, or He’s not. He’s not just a prophet. He’s not just a good moral figure. He is either God or He is not. What you believe will define your eternity.

@122360FU Jesus lied, died and dead he remains.

“Never in history did a person of significance die for saying a lie.” “They tried to assassinate President Trump and they Assassinated Charlie Kirk and Jesus for speaking the truth!” 👊🏻✅

@MitchellAskew Jesus lied, died and dead he remains.

“Jesus was a great teacher but…” “I like the principles of Christianity but…” This mentality is nothing new The New Testament frequently refers to witnesses “marveling” at the miracles & teachings of God But if you listen to Jesus closely, it’s clear that he’s not “just” a good teacher He is so much more than that He is LORD of Heaven & Earth

@GoodShepherd316 Jesus lied, died and dead he remains.

JESUS CHRIST said : “Before Abraham was; I AM.” John 8:58 “I AM the First and the Last” Rev. 1:17-18 JESUS is the Messiah; “I AM he” John 4:25-26 “I AM with you always” Matt. 28:20 “I AM the Bread of Life” John 6:35 “I AM the Light of the world” John 8:12 I AM the Son of Man; “I AM he” John 8:28 “I AM the Gate/Door” John 10:9 “I AM the Good Shepherd” John 10:11 “I AM the Resurrection and the Life” John 11:25 “I AM the Way” John 14:6 I AM the Truth” John 14:6 “I AM the Vine” John 15:5 I AM the same yesterday, today and forever Hebrews 13:8

@w_bitterman Jesus lied, died and dead he remains.

The infinite Son of God carried an infinite punishment in His infinite person. So there is nothing left to charge to my account. Jesus paid it all.

@AmericaFirsa Jesus lied, died and remains dead.

Do you sincerely believe that Jesus Christ died on the cross and rose again on the third day? A. Absolutely Yes B. No

@WynMad There is nothing believers won't believe.

The Bible is completely true, 63000 cross reference connections and it was written by 40 different men over 1500 years in 3 different continents in 3 languages and the entire book have a united story

@CSLewisDaily Jesus lied, died and dead he remains.

Scientists note that “Jesus” wasn’t the name our Savior would have been called during His time on Earth. Here’s what He was actually known as. beliefnet.com/columnists/chr…

@Tanyaelisabeth 2000 years later and Christians in the US used the bible to validate the owning of others as property you dweeb.

Christians ended slavery you dweeb

@MrDavX More pandering to the credulous.

Elon Musk Makes Shocking Declaration: “Take God with you wherever you go. If you cannot take God, do not go!” – Has the Atheist Billionaire Changed?

@KR3Wmatic Apologists need to reconcile lots of things in the bible and it comes down to interpretation. The god of the bible decides to inspire in a bunch of books his rules for living but leaves it all up to interpretation. Oh and he couldn't eradicate slavery.

So far, I've received a variety of perspectives on this. Some suggest the "Us" refers to the Trinity, while others point to archangels or a divine council. Some argue it is the "Royal We," and others even imply a connection to the Canaanite pantheon. Given these conflicting views, who is actually right?

@KatKanada_TM Lmao believers will believe anything.

This is evidence that Scripture did not come from the mind of man. 63,000 connections 1500 years 40 authors 3 continents ONE cohesive story full of prophecies. God wrote this through men.

@faithapologia @NBrasing @FreedomHasWon If your god is eternal that would mean that morals have been objectively moral for eternity and that people wouldn't need to discover them. You're stuck with that and the reality that you can't prove any god exists let alone the one you believe in.

@Klobe222 @NBrasing @FreedomHasWon Child sacrifice stopped (in cultures influenced by Judeo-Christian ethics especially) because people came to recognize it as objectively wrong, not because morals evolved into truth. God is the foundation for objective moral values, and duties, not evolution.

@faithapologia @NBrasing @FreedomHasWon I've refuted everything you asserted.

@Klobe222 @NBrasing @FreedomHasWon So, you can't refute anything I responded with, got it. Objective moral values do exist regardless of what anyone thinks or feels about it.

@InterstellarUAP How many times does this disngenuous hack need to be refuted for the religious to believe it?

Dr. Jeremiah Johnston: "The Shroud of Turin is fading" "I believe the shroud is the greatest scientific evidence that we have for the resurrection and the public needs to see it." It's not in the Vatican, it's in a reliquary in Turin, Italy. But the image is fading. "I met with Enrio who changes the gas twice a year in the shroud and even the blood is fading." The Catholic Church has never officially said they believe it was Jesus' burial cloth. It's been publicly displayed fewer than 30 days over the last several hundred years. Why not bring it out with today's technology? What do you think? is this proof of the resurrection?

@faithapologia @NBrasing @FreedomHasWon Why aren't people still sacrificing children to imaginary gods? Then to assert there is a moral lawgiver who is the basis for morality you need to prove it exists.

But I thought you said there were no objective morals? So, you are leaning on evolution here it seems. Evolution doesn't why they are true, or objectively binding. Calling our evolved feelings 'objective' is arbitrary speciesism with no foundation in naturalism. "Two problems" First problem: The moral argument doesn't require a standalone proof of God upfront, and the burden isn't on me alone; you still need to explain objective binding duties without a transcendent foundation. Calling our current evolved feelings "objectively right" for everyone forever is arbitrary. Naturalism has no foundation for that.