



I want to find his birth mother and have a TALK with her for abandoning him 😭
ᏗᏰᏬ ᎷᏗᏒᎩᏗᎷ
5.7K posts

@Knightameir
Islam first | Father | Old school | Iron will mindset | Am not your friend & neither am I your enemy | Brutal Facts | History | Conspiracy |




I want to find his birth mother and have a TALK with her for abandoning him 😭

A predator pastor




In Islam, God doesn’t die because He’s God.


I urgently need muslim friends. If you're Muslims, plz report here 🙂

In the end, Islam will win.

The Loneliest Prisoner: When Saddam Hussein Became Human to His Guards Thread 🧵





I didn’t wake up trying to challenge anyone’s faith, it started small just a random read, perhaps a footnote in history. Then came something I almost scrolled past, then I paused and became inquisitive of course I should am a student of comparative religion studies. Letters. Old ones. Written by a king. Not sermons. Not laws. Personal words. Soft. Attached. Emotional in a way that made me reread twice and whisper, wait… what? This was King James. The same name printed boldly on millions of Bibles. The same Bible people swear by. Fight over. Kill for. Condemn others with. They hope you don’t ask too many questions. But I’m a Muslim. So I was already taught something uncomfortable That truth doesn’t fear scrutiny. And falsehood hates light. I wasn’t shocked that a king had desires. I was shocked that a king’s name sits on a book claimed to be divine perfection. A book: Authorized by power Translated by committee Defended by pretending history doesn’t exist And then used as a moral weapon. That’s when it hit me. This isn’t about Jesus (pbuh) Islam honors Jesus. This is about what happens after prophets, when men take over, when rulers interfere, when politics enters scripture and people fabricate lies and call it the words of God. Incase you are lost let me help you A king writing to another man with longing. Soft words. Private desire. The kind of language some pastors today would call a sin and unnatural. In other words king James was probably a G@y. Yet the same king’s name sits boldly on the cover of the King James Bible. King James didn’t receive revelation. He didn’t walk with Jesus. He didn’t hear God speak. He authorized a translation. Commissioned by power. Filtered by scholars. Stamped by a throne. And the man himself? Obsessed with male favorites. Emotionally dependent. Jealous when they left him. Writing things historians still twist themselves to excuse. Christianity was not and can never be the religion founded by Jesus (pbuh) and the modern bible was a fabrication of different authors and liars. Jesus (pbuh) is a Muslim, a sarvant and a messenger of the almighty Allah (swt) So his massage was simple worship the one true almighty God alone. If your holy book needs you to ignore history, silence questions, and protect reputations are you following revelation… or just defending a tradition that can’t survive the truth? Lastly incase you dare call this a lie Out of ignorance or emotional blindness. King James letters are not hidden. They’re just not talked about loudly. King James’ letters are well preserved in official British archives, not rumors. Main places: The British Library (London) Holds original correspondence between King James and George Villiers (Duke of Buckingham). The National Archives (UK) State papers and royal letters from James I’s reign. Bodleian Library, Oxford Manuscripts and personal correspondence from the Stuart period. You can also read them published by historians, not bloggers: Quoted in academic biographies of King James I Referenced in peer-reviewed history books Used in university courses on early modern England This isn’t WhatsApp history. This is archived material studied by scholars. The debate is not whether the letters exist. The debate is how far people are willing to interpret them. If the letters are real, preserved, and taught in elite institutions why are ordinary believers told they’re irrelevant the moment they become uncomfortable? Abu-Maryam -@Knightameir