Kudzu Jungle

Doc. 1: Civil Action against Community Health Systems, Inc. ("CHSI") et al. File: drive.google.com/file/d/1NUPm42… We are seeking to pierce the corporate veil and are alleging CHSI is not just a holding company with hospitals as its portfolio. Exhibit 1: Statutory challenge - drive.google.com/file/d/1dev7x7… The certificate of good faith allows non-lawyers to do the work of lawyers, while another law makes it illegal for non-lawyers to do the work of lawyers.

Pro Se goofball reporting for duty...it's not a sur-reply we're waiting for. Defendant files...plaintiffs object...defendant replies...plaintiffs file a sur-reply. (I think). So, hospital can still respond up to 14 days (I think again).

No sur-reply from the hospital yet. C'mon guys, bring it! We raised the argument of judicial admission. You admitted to malpractice for tolling date for a doc never entered in evidence. Let's hear your response. The day is still young. Maybe later.

They forgot one question. How many on the panel asking questions get PAC money from the ones raising their hands? youtube.com/shorts/y87wJl1…

The hospital has one day left to file a sur-reply to our opposition to their motion to stay discovery. Super Lawyer always waits until the last moment to pounce. I see way cases go on for years and years. We don't wait until the last day, on purpose.

After an extensive search, I'm pretty sure our approach to challenging Cleland v. Bronson has not been argued yet. I'm looking forward to filing our brief, and sending it the person who argued for the US amicus brief, Seth Waxman. He opened the door for our arguments.

Our Writ of Mandamus status has moved to "awaiting decision" You can see Crawford for the appeal (currently at nr) and again for the writ. opn.ca6.uscourts.gov/case_reports/r…

Here is our opposition to the hospital's motion to stay discovery (and raising their judicial admission of misdiagnosis). Scroll below for the email we sent to Super Lawyer with the attached opposition. drive.google.com/file/d/17nv2fd… Ms. [Super Lawyer's name removed], Please find attached our Opposition to the Motion to Stay, filed today. We draw your particular attention to paragraphs 35 and 36 regarding the judicial admission of "misdiagnosis" previously entered by your client in 3:24-cv-00382, Doc. 51. As this deliberate statement is now a matter of record and binding under MacDonald v. Gen. Motors Corp., it stands in direct conflict with your current assertions of "adequate care." A judicial admission is not an alternative hypothesis or a mere piece of evidence to be weighed; it is a 'deliberate, clear, and unambiguous' statement of fact that conclusively binds your client, who made it. Having successfully used the fact of 'misdiagnosis' to obtain a dismissal in the prior case, the Defendants are legally barred from now treating that admission as a disposable argument. See MacDonald v. Gen. Motors Corp., 110 F.3d 337, 340 (6th Cir. 1997) Given this contradiction, we believe any further attempt to stay discovery while withholding the records central to that admission constitutes "playing fast and loose with the courts" as defined in Edwards v. Aetna Life Ins. Co. We have highlighted these issues for the Court to ensure the integrity of the discovery process and your mandatory certification duties under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(g). We have also preserved potential sanctions against you and Tennova North. Sincerely, Colleen Crawford Disclaimer: I am a pro se litigant representing myself in matters with the cases below, collaborating solely with my co-plaintiff, Wesley Crawford, with his explicit consent. I am not a licensed attorney and do not provide legal advice or representation to others. All communications are made in my capacity as a pro se litigant for the purpose of these cases, in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5(b) and E.D. Tenn. L.R. 83.4, and are limited to permissible pro se activities. District Court: 3:24-cv-00382 | Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals: 25-5868 | Knox County Circuit Court: 2-304-25 | District Court: 3:25-cv-00516 cc: WWesley E. Crawford Pro Se Co-Plaintiff

Defendant has less than 2 weeks to comply with discovery. The hospital's motion to stay discovery can be read here: drive.google.com/file/d/12n2R4R… They attached our discovery requests, but not sure why. All this did was show the court our requests are narrowed to the case. Here they are: 1. Production: drive.google.com/file/d/19hvYii… 2. Admissions: drive.google.com/file/d/1D98VLJ… 3. Interrogatories: drive.google.com/file/d/14gp29s…

Tennova North's Super Lawyer put on public record our first requests for admissions, interrogatories and production, as exhibits to their motion for a stay in discovery.

Appellant brief now 2,299 words over the limit. Discovered Tennova made a judicial admission. 😱😮 Had to add it to brief. Will delete words elsewhere. Too important to not add the admission. I can't believe they put this writing. #appellatetwitter

Super Lawyer is friends with the judge's wife, however, one of the documents we filed had to be sealed, and yet Super Lawyer revealed some of the sealed information to the public, then tried telling the court she filed her response before the court sealed. We replied and showed the true timeline of events. She knew 10 days for filing the information was sealed.

Super Lawyer withheld documents pre-suit after requesting a list from me. So, Wesley and I put her email (with the 45 records she withheld) as one of the requests for production. They have been playing games. Our chess move played. Check mate yet? ♟️

Wesley and I served the Tennova hospital with our first set of requests for production, admissions and interrogatories on March 4. Maybe concealment will end?

I don't know why this amuses me so much. Maybe it's the introvert me that writes too much, and proud I found 40 more words to delete from the appellant brief. We are at 12,940 words. 🧐

Our appellant brief is ready. We are at 12,980 words. Wesley is going to go through it one more time and see if we crunch a bit more, but we are ahead now. I think we get 40 days once the 6th Circuit sets the schedule. We finished before scheduling. 😎

How nitpicking can I get now, with 65 more words to cut? I'm literally changing "emergency department" entries to just "ED" 🤣 13,000 words is not very many words for a complex case. I can't imagine what lawyers go through having multiple cases.

213 words need to be trimmed from our appellant brief. Not bad considering nearly 3,000 words had to be trimmed. Almost ready to file, but we don't have a response from the court yet. However, our writ was applied to both cases, so not sure what the lower court will do.

@skillz17q They will just make it illegal to drive an older vehicle.

Everything is done by design. If you're going to share one video today, let it be this one. How many of you still have an automobile that is older than 2005?

While not related to a birth, what happened to me does relate to ignoring consent. My husband and I are in three courts over this. I took him to a Tennova Healthcare emergency dept for food poisoning testing. They refused. Unknown to me, they were testing a variety of drugs on him, then recorded renal failure to near death. He has kidney injury now. I found out the pressure comes from the holding company and its executives who are billions of dollars in debt. The hospital's revenue is siphoned upstream every day. The physicians and nurses concealed their errors. Consent means nothing.

When did we stop demanding consent from the medical industry?