millionaire wannabie 🔊 📈

2.3K posts

millionaire wannabie 🔊 📈 banner
millionaire wannabie 🔊 📈

millionaire wannabie 🔊 📈

@KumonSumon

multi market degen trader with style https://t.co/ZHTkVEsLcf all setups are for educational purpose, nfa

eastsideofamericathisisus Katılım Ekim 2017
665 Takip Edilen147 Takipçiler
Lambe Saham
Lambe Saham@LambeSahamjja·
Guys, ada pernyataan dari Menkeu Purbaya yang menurut gue adalah salah satu slip of tongue paling mahal yang pernah diucapkan pejabat Indonesia di forum publik dalam waktu lama. Dan dampaknya langsung terasa Malaysia dan Singapura bereaksi keras dalam hitungan jam. Apa yang Purbaya katakan: Di Simposium PT SMI 2026 sambil lalu Purbaya melontarkan ide: Kapal lewat Selat Malaka nggak kita charge ya. Sekarang Iran meng-charge kapal lewat Selat Hormuz. Kalau kita bagi tiga Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapura, lumayan kan. Kalimat itu terdengar santai. Tapi dampaknya tidak santai sama sekali. Dalam hitungan jam Menlu Singapura dan Menlu Malaysia sudah keluar dengan pernyataan keras. Purbaya terpaksa meralat sendiri. Reaksi Singapura langsung dan tegas: Menlu Singapura Vivian Balakrishnan: Hak akses transit dijamin untuk semua orang. Kami tidak akan berpartisipasi dalam upaya apa pun untuk menutup, melarang, atau mengenakan biaya tol di lingkungan kami. Ini bukan pernyataan diplomatik yang halus. Ini penolakan keras yang disampaikan secara publik yang artinya Singapura merasa perlu merespons secara resmi karena menganggap pernyataan Purbaya cukup serius untuk diklarifikasi. Reaksi Malaysia bahkan lebih keras: Menlu Malaysia Mohamad Hasan: Tidak ada negara yang dapat secara sepihak menentukan akses ke Selat Malaka. Apa pun yang akan dilakukan di Selat Malaka harus melibatkan kerja sama keempat negara. Tidak ada keputusan sepihak. Malaysia bahkan menyebut empat negara Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapura, dan Thailand yang punya pemahaman bersama tentang status selat ini. Dan menegaskan bahwa dasar kesepakatan yang sudah ada tidak bisa diubah secara sepihak oleh siapapun. Mengapa ini serius secara hukum internasional: Selat Malaka bukan milik Indonesia saja. Selat ini diatur oleh hukum laut internasional UNCLOS yang menjamin hak lintas transit bagi semua kapal dari semua negara tanpa diskriminasi dan tanpa pungutan. Ini bukan aturan yang bisa diubah dengan keputusan satu negara. Bahkan kalau tiga negara pantai sepakat sekalipun mereka tidak bisa begitu saja memberlakukan tarif karena melanggar prinsip kebebasan navigasi yang dijamin hukum internasional. Dan lebih dari 90.000 kapal per tahun melintas di sana sekitar seperempat dari seluruh perdagangan global. Ini bukan jalur domestik. Ini adalah arteri perdagangan dunia. Yang paling menggelitik dari seluruh situasi ini: Purbaya mengucapkan ini di konteks "mode survival" mencari sumber pendapatan baru untuk negara di tengah tekanan fiskal. Dan idenya adalah meniru Iran yang meng-charge kapal di Hormuz. Tapi ada perbedaan fundamental yang sepertinya tidak dipertimbangkan sebelum kalimat itu keluar: Iran mengklaim kedaulatan penuh atas Selat Hormuz. Dan dunia tidak setuju itulah kenapa ada konflik bersenjata yang sedang berlangsung sekarang. Indonesia tidak bisa dan tidak seharusnya menginspirasi diri dari tindakan Iran yang sedang memicu perang sebagai model kebijakan fiskal. Dan ini yang paling miris: Di saat yang sama Purbaya bicara soal mencari pendapatan baru dari Selat Malaka ada fakta-fakta berikut yang terjadi di dalam negeri: - Triliunan anggaran MBG tidak sampai ke makanan anak-anak. - Motor listrik Rp1,2 triliun gudangnya masih terkunci. - BPOM tidak punya anggaran untuk sampling keamanan pangan. - Portal SPPG tutup tapi dapur terus bertambah tanpa transparansi. - Manajer Kopdes direkrut 30.000 orang tapi tidak ada yang tahu siapa yang bayar gajinya termasuk Purbaya sendiri. Sumber kebocoran anggaran yang sudah ada di depan mata tidak ditutup. Tapi energi dipakai untuk memikirkan tarif di selat internasional yang secara hukum tidak bisa diberlakukan. Ide mencari pendapatan baru itu sah dan perlu. Indonesia memang butuh sumber fiskal baru. Tapi ide yang keluar tanpa kajian hukum internasional yang matang di forum publik yang langsung memicu reaksi diplomatik dari dua negara tetangga itu bukan tanda pemerintahan yang beroperasi dengan sistem yang rapi. Itu tanda bahwa bahkan di level pejabat tertinggi fiskal ada pernyataan yang keluar tanpa melalui proses review yang memadai. Dan dalam situasi "mode survival" yang Purbaya sendiri deklarasikan kegagapan seperti ini tidak bisa diabaikan. Selat Malaka tidak bisa ditarifkan secara sepihak. Itu fakta hukum internasional yang tidak bisa diubah dengan keinginan sepihak manapun. Tapi yang lebih penting dari itu: sumber kebocoran yang sudah ada dan terbukti di depan mata di program-program yang sudah berjalan itu yang seharusnya jadi prioritas untuk ditutup dulu sebelum mencari sumber pendapatan baru yang tidak realistis secara hukum. Perbaiki yang bocor di dalam rumah sendiri. Sebelum memikirkan tarif di jalan raya milik dunia.
Lambe Saham tweet media
Indonesia
48
52
185
32K
JA
JA@444zmt·
@ZenomTrader Welcome bro 🏄‍♂️
JA tweet media
English
1
0
12
612
ZenomTrader
ZenomTrader@ZenomTrader·
#1 Verified FTMO Prime Trader from Romania Huge milestone. I’ve been digging into it, and there appear to be only 3–4 verified FTMO Prime traders globally. Getting payouts is the easy part maintaining them consistently over a long period is much harder. That’s where the real difference shows: Systematic traders running robust, profitable strategies vs. account flippers gamifying prop firms. Probably top 0.0001%.
ZenomTrader tweet media
English
35
3
349
17.1K
Casper
Casper@casper_smc·
You wait patiently for your setup, only to get stopped out on every trade. When this happens, you don’t just lose money - you lose trust in yourself. The reason it keeps happening isn’t your psychology or your strategy, it’s your lack of conviction. You don’t actually know why your strategy works, or better yet if it even works at all. Conviction isn’t confidence. Confidence is just a feeling. Conviction comes from understanding the logic behind why you’re doing what you’re doing, and having data to back it. This is why I added order flow and volume profile into my system. They show you where real levels are in the market, and who is in control of the market. Once you understand this, you’re not guessing anymore. You have proof. Once you have proof, you have conviction, and your trading will change overnight.
English
8
7
52
5.4K
Kurnia Bijaksana
Kurnia Bijaksana@mkbijaksana·
KATA SIAPA AI BAKAL BIKIN TRADING CUAN? Kan AI belajar dan ngambil data dari internet Di internet, datanya 99% trader rungkad Mau cuan dari mana bjir
Indonesia
26
3
114
10.7K
AudaCity Capital
AudaCity Capital@Audacitycap·
GM Traders $240,000 Funded Account We are gifting EVERYONE with a $240k funded account today. No requirements. Just comment "I'm ready"!!!!!!
English
2.7K
220
1.2K
181.6K
W-Repel
W-Repel@Winmo18·
@LambeSahamjja Ini org cina , ( bodo amat kanada , gw sih list muka ya 😂 ) Jelas aja dia bias analisisnya Dia pengen china yg jadi superpower berikutnya
Indonesia
2
0
6
4.8K
Lambe Saham
Lambe Saham@LambeSahamjja·
Guys ada profesor China-Kanada bernama Chang yang baru saja ngomong sesuatu di interview Tucker Carlson yang gw rasa perlu lebih banyak orang dengar. Analisisnya sederhana tapi menghantam. Iran tidak akan berhenti. Polanya akan seperti Ukraina melebar dan berkepanjangan. Dan kalau itu terjadi harga minyak bisa tembus 200 dolar per barel. 200 dolar. Bukan 100. Bukan 120. Dua ratus. Dan kalau harga minyak 200 dolar kita tidak lagi bicara soal bensin mahal. Kita bicara soal krisis pangan global. Karena hampir semua rantai produksi dan distribusi makanan bergantung pada energi. Amerika terjebak. Ini yang paling menarik dari analisis Chang. Kalau Amerika berhenti sekarang Iran akan minta kompensasi atas kerugian yang diderita. Dan minta Amerika keluar dari Timur Tengah. Kalau Amerika keluar dari Teluk perjanjian petrodolar bisa runtuh. Petrodolar itu adalah kesepakatan yang sudah berjalan sejak 1974. Intinya minyak Arab dijual dalam dolar. Itu yang membuat dolar tetap jadi mata uang cadangan dunia. Itu yang membuat Amerika bisa cetak uang dan negara lain tetap mau pegang dolar. Kalau petrodolar runtuh tidak ada yang beli minyak Arab dalam dolar lagi. Permintaan dolar global turun drastis. Nilai dolar melemah. Dan Amerika yang ekonominya bergantung pada status dolar sebagai mata uang cadangan dunia langsung kena dampaknya. Jadi pilihan Amerika sekarang adalah dua yang sama-sama menyakitkan. Lanjutkan perang bayar 2 miliar dolar per hari dengan hasil yang tidak jelas. Atau hentikan perang — dan mungkin kehilangan petrodolar yang selama ini menopang dominasi ekonomi Amerika. Dan untuk Indonesia. Rupiah kita denominasi terhadap dolar. Utang luar negeri kita dalam dolar. Impor minyak kita dibayar dalam dolar. Kalau petrodolar goyah sistem keuangan global yang selama ini kita andalkan juga goyah. Dan kita tidak punya cadangan devisa yang cukup untuk menghadapi guncangan sebesar itu. Chang simpulkan dengan satu kalimat yang gw rasa paling jelas dari semua analisis yang beredar. Amerika masuk perang ini dengan asumsi Iran akan cepat menyerah. Iran tidak menyerah. Dan sekarang Amerika tidak punya jalan keluar yang murah.
Global Insight Journal@GlobalIJournal

🇮🇷🇺🇸 Iran will not stop the war immediately. The war will expand as it did in Ukraine and be prolonged, which will push global oil prices to $200. This could lead to a worldwide food shortage. The United States is stuck in this war. If it ends it, Iran will demand compensation for its losses and insist on the U.S. withdrawing from the Middle East. If the U.S. withdraws from the Gulf, the petrodollar deal, which the American economy depends on, could end, and then no one will buy oil from Arab countries in dollars. — Chinese-Canadian Professor Chang, in an interview with American journalist Tucker Carlson

Indonesia
70
1K
3.2K
165K
ISHAAN SAINI
ISHAAN SAINI@ishaansaini22·
Nobody talks about how weird it feels trading a $100k account while your bank account is empty. The mental gap is real. You're managing more money on a screen than you've ever had in your life… but rent is due. And you're sitting there trying to “stay disciplined.” This is the side of prop firm trading nobody posts about. There's more to trading than charts and strategies. The real battle is psychological.
English
37
6
312
13.8K
J
J@j_intradaytrade·
I’m doing 3-10R a day with the most simple strategy ever Comment ‘send’ and I’ll DM you a full video guide that I made about the strategy You get to see exactly how I trade (must be following me)
J tweet media
English
514
8
132
26.2K
Tanzeel Ahmed
Tanzeel Ahmed@TanzelAhmed·
I bought Funding Pips account just 30 minutes ago, and hit the daily loss limit by $24:)) Hurts:))
Tanzeel Ahmed tweet mediaTanzeel Ahmed tweet media
English
75
4
271
39.6K
Key Poems
Key Poems@key_poems·
I built an AI agent that trades NASDAQ ($NQ) futures during the London session. Not a signal bot. Not a back-tested indicator. A real conversational agent that reads market structure, builds conviction over time, and pulls the trigger itself. Here's how we did it 🧵
English
25
17
279
34.1K
Stoic Trader
Stoic Trader@StoicTA·
ICT has created the biggest cult in trading history and the proof is right in front of you. The man himself has blown live accounts on stream, failed his own challenges, and spent more time on Twitter rants than executing trades and somehow his followers still defend him like he's untouchable. This is cult brainwashing 101 Here's what ICT actually teaches you He teaches you to predict and analyze He teaches you to draw lines, label zones, memorize arrays, and wait for the "perfect" setup that never comes. What he doesn't teach you is how to press the button, take the loss, manage the trade, and move on. He's building an army of analysts who can annotate a chart after the fact but freeze the moment real money is on the line. You know who becomes profitable? The trader who takes 500 imperfect trades with sound risk management and learns from every single one. Not the analyst who spends 3 hours marking up a chart, posts it on Twitter with "called it" after the move already happened, and never risked a dollar. ICT can't trade and he's shown you that himself, multiple times, with his own money, on his own streams and instead of acknowledging it, his followers pretend it didn't happen. That's not a trading community, that's religion and the leader doesn't even practice what he preaches. The market doesn't reward analysis... it rewards execution and you can't learn execution from someone who doesn't execute.
English
94
6
201
32.1K
Alpha Capital Group
Alpha Capital Group@AlphaCapitalUK·
Alpha Prime’s 1st Grad Week 🎓🔥 Twelve traders from every background have come together in the City of London for an intensive two-week programme designed to fast-track their move into full-time professional trading. They’ll get hands-on education in technical analysis and market fundamentals, sit alongside peers with multi-million-dollar funding, and share ideas that only true traders understand. This is where solo ambition meets world-class opportunity. Over the next fortnight, they’ll build the skills needed to become a full-time professional trader and change their lives in the process.
English
11
16
62
14.5K
Stoic Trader
Stoic Trader@StoicTA·
ok let me just say what everyone is thinking but nobody wants to admit the only reason sim prop firms worked for traders was hedging, that's it, that was the whole game you open multiple accounts, you hedge opposite directions, one wins one loses, you withdraw from the winner and reset the loser this is arbitrage against the prop firm's business model and guess what, it worked thousands of traders got paid doing exactly this the prop firms knew and some of them looked the other way because the 90% of people failing evaluations were funding the payouts now that metals are running 3-4% a day and hedgers are printing, suddenly it's "against the rules" they didn't ban hedging because it's wrong they banned it because it was working so here's the real question nobody wants to answer: if you remove hedging from prop firms, who is actually profitable? like genuinely, consistently, single-direction profitable on a prop firm account with their drawdown rules and their time limits and their restricted instruments almost nobody and if you ARE that trader, why are you giving away 10-20% of your profits to a prop firm when you could just trade your own $5-10K account and keep everything the whole prop firm model was built on two groups of people: losers who pay evaluation fees forever and hedgers who figured out the loophole remove both and what's left a subscription service selling hope when are you going to wake the f up?
English
88
14
208
48.2K
Tom
Tom@t0mbfx·
Hit these 2 trades last week for +7.15R Using the same trading system that I’ve been using the last 2 years to get $490k+ in prop firm payouts Comment ‘trade’ and I’ll DM you the video recordings of me breaking down these trades with my exact strategy (must be following)
Tom tweet mediaTom tweet media
English
338
18
405
29.9K
TonySnip3r
TonySnip3r@tonysnip3r·
MAX FUNDED ON FTMO !!
TonySnip3r tweet mediaTonySnip3r tweet media
English
233
80
1.8K
50.4K
Andrew NFX
Andrew NFX@andrew_nfx·
I make $40k/month+ from trading How? Because I made it super boring Here are the boring trading habits that made me $1.5M+ in prop firm payouts 👇
Andrew NFX tweet media
English
11
14
331
34.1K
Tom
Tom@t0mbfx·
The less you enjoy trading, the more you’ll make from it I think trading is BORING Because of that, I don’t take much trades I’ll only take a trade when it’s so super-obvious that I know that if I don’t trade it I’m most likely going to miss out on money Most newbies fail because they LOVE trading and always want to be in a trade no matter what because they love the feeling of it This is the complete opposite to how you should go about it and will lead to you losing a ton of money
English
50
42
631
18.3K
JadeCap
JadeCap@jadecap_·
They're trying to sabotage this man 🤣. Now.. in regards to the performance. I know people on here will love to say.. oh but he went through hundreds of accounts... The prop model is a skewed RR opportunity. Regardless of how many accounts were used to get to this point... 90% of you critics wouldn't have the balls or mental fortitude to trade at SIZE. And that's why only the top 1% will be able to generate a massive, massive payout. If you can't handle taking a $1K loss on the day, what makes you think it's so easy to manage $50K-$150K DAILY P&L swings. I also went through hundreds of accounts before going on a MASSIVE run. I don't trade my personal account, nor the firm in Chicago with reckless abandon. Different goals for different account types...
BrianStonk@thebrianstonk

Tradovate is down. Not risking my accounts on a day where platform issues could jeopardize everything. I’ll continue posting my wins and losses throughout the entire journey to $5M. #1 highest balance so far. No rush. Slow, controlled growth from here.

English
17
34
436
62.2K
L2WTrades
L2WTrades@L2WTrades·
Prop firms accidentally created a $200k cheat code and they're praying retail traders don't figure it out… Think about their business model for a second They charge you $500 for a challenge They give you $100k in "capital" They're betting you'll fail 90%+ of traders fail the challenge. That's $500 in their pocket for nothing. The ones who pass? They're betting you'll blow the funded account eventually. Then you pay another $500 to try again. Their entire business model is built on you losing. But here's what they didn't account for… What happens when someone actually knows what they're doing? The exploit: You take the same proven methodology and run it across multiple firms simultaneously Firm 1: $100k challenge - $500 Firm 2: $100k challenge - $500 Firm 3: $100k challenge - $500 Firm 4: $100k challenge - $500 Total investment: $2,000 Total capital if all pass: $400,000 "But what if I fail some?" That's the beautiful part You only need a 50% pass rate to print Pass 2 out of 4? You're controlling $200k for $2,000 investment Make 4% monthly on $200k = $8,000 gross Your cut after profit split: $6,400/month On $2,000 risk. With zero of your own capital in the market. The math gets even stupider when you scale: 10 challenges × $500 = $5,000 investment Pass 5 (50% rate) = $500,000 in funded capital 4% monthly = $20,000 gross Your cut: $16,000/month You're risking $5,000 to potentially make $16k/month Find me another "business" with that risk/reward. I'll wait. The methodology that makes this work: You can't just gamble and hope You need high timeframe alignment. Daily/4H bias pointing one direction. Then you wait for price to sweep a significant level (previous day high/low, swing point) and enter when it reverses into a fair value gap on the lower timeframe. 3-4 setups per week maximum. 3:1 minimum reward to risk. Pass rate jumps to 60-70% when you're not forcing garbage trades The prop firms are literally handing you other people's money and praying you're too emotional to use it properly Most traders will blow the challenge in week 1 because they can't sit out for 2 days Meanwhile the guys who figured this out are stacking 5-10 funded accounts and withdrawing $20k+/month The system is rigged. Just not against you. Against the 90% who can't control themselves. Don't be the 90%. (I teach trading methods that made over $3m total. Anyone can get a free 7 day trial to my trading GC with the link in my bio)
English
30
37
395
51.8K