Kurshot

@wholemars Over the next six months, I believe all that will change. This is the tipping point, not only for FSD but also for AI in general. Everyone's gonna start waking the fuck up over the next 6 to 12 months. They're not gonna have a choice; AI is going to be in their face.

Tesla needs to continue to evolve their Self-Driving pricing model to increase adoption. With a product this good, sales should be going vertical. It's time to ask some hard questions about what's not working. What do you all think?

@GrantCardone Yeah for like a year or two, maybe. Then robotics will decimate blue collar as well.

AI will create a blue-collar super boom bigger than the Industrial Revolution; technicians, electricians, welders, hvac, plumbers, construction, roofers and new businesses will be created to manage it all resulting in a further expansion of our middle class wealth. Get ready! Expansion follows in the wake of all breakthroughs & the bigger the breakthrough the bigger the expansion. What am I missing?

@NicklausSalzman @GoogleAIStudio 100%.. not quite sure what the difference is

@GoogleAIStudio This model still sounds like a YouTube voice actor and not a real person.

@salesprocapital @sweatystartup Hahahaha one loser calling another loser’s haters losers. Cant make this shit up. Nick is either a click troll or mentally retarded. The industry will grow, it will advance and evolve. More energy will be created to fit the need. Pretty simple shit.

@sweatystartup The amount of people angry at Nick for being dead on the money here are just losers.

My bet: The problems you are seeing with Grok AI right now is power related. They can't get ahold of enough power. It is a land grab now and costs are skyrocketing. Everything about to come crumbling down once it becomes obvious just how much electricity they are burning.

@Anonymoustxp @naval Wrong. The big puzzle piece ur missing is AI and robotics will be exponentially smarter/more capable than humans both mentally and physically. Never happened in history. And that’s a pretty big fkn puzzle piece. When it comes to production, soon humans will just be in the way.

A lot of software is about to get better, right before it becomes unnecessary. Respectfully—disagree. This assumes software’s only purpose is to be used directly. But the history of technology disagrees. Cars made horses unnecessary. Horses still exist and thrived in new roles. Calculators made mental math unnecessary. Mental math is still taught. Still valued. Google made memorizing facts unnecessary. Doctors still memorize anatomy. Lawyers still memorize law. Because knowing something is different from accessing it. The assumption in Naval’s line is— Better software leads to no software needed. But what actually happens is— Better software creates new problems that need new software. The layer above always needs a layer below. AI writes code. Someone still needs to understand what the code does. Verify it. Fix it. Direct it. The most dangerous idea in tech right now is that understanding becomes unnecessary when tools become powerful enough. It doesn’t. It becomes more necessary. Because the more powerful the tool— The more catastrophic the misuse. Software won’t become unnecessary. The people who don’t understand it will become unnecessary. That is a very different statement. And a much more important one.

A lot of software is about to get a lot better, right before it becomes unnecessary.

@apalones @naval @grok agree, disagree, or both? Explain

@naval Except in supply chain, where the software never got good in the first place. Planning got $50B in tech investment. Execution still runs on email and spreadsheets. AI isn't replacing good software here. It's replacing the absence of it.

The first 20% and the last 10% of executing an idea are super exciting. The middle 70% is awful and boring. This is why very few achieve anything. When you start something go into it expect the passion to and drive to crash as you get closer to the finish line. Prepare for it. People that can do this absolutely slay life.

After much reflection, I have decided to resign from my position as Director of the National Counterterrorism Center, effective today. I cannot in good conscience support the ongoing war in Iran. Iran posed no imminent threat to our nation, and it is clear that we started this war due to pressure from Israel and its powerful American lobby. It has been an honor serving under @POTUS and @DNIGabbard and leading the professionals at NCTC. May God bless America.

@UltraDane I hope not! Adulting can be many of the best years of your too if your parents set you up with the right mental tools to navigate and conquer life🙂

Years from now when he's all grown up, facing life and looking back as we all do, he'll realize, it was the happiest time of his life.

@ZacksJerryRig @elonmusk @ai_for_success Another hater of greatness

@elonmusk @ai_for_success Your claims are just embarrassing at this point.

Google DeepMind is destined to win the AI race.

This is real explanation

@hamids @wholemars If u think any company in the world is catching up to Tesla ever again… ur sadly mistaken This will become more apparent by next year because there’s gonna be an explosion of self driving robotaxis. And people are gonna see it and feel it themselves And once it’s experienced..

Only an EBot would think the 1.1 Million FSD number contradicts my post in any way. In fact, it simply proves it. 1.1 Million FSD subs is far less than the generous estimate I gave to how many people it matters to: it's less than 1% of car-buyers in the US! So the impact on R2 demand, at present, would be less than 1% due to lack of FSD. In a year's time, R2 might have similar FSD capabilities, making this a non-issue, even to those 1% of buyers.

Something $TSLA FSD fans don't seem to get: - More than 80% of Tesla buyers don't care enough about FSD to buy FSD. - 100% of buyers of other cars don't care about FSD enough to buy a Tesla Since Tesla represents just 6% of vehicle sales in the US, When put together, that tells you that CURRENTLY, that means 99% of car buyers don't care about FSD. I personally love self-driving, and I think in the future, the % of people who care about self-driving will rapidly increase. But it's UNDENIABLE that 99% of CURRENT car-buyers don't care about FSD! Lack of FSD at launch, will only have a negative 1% impact on $RIVN R2 demand based on the evidence! 🤣

@r0ck3t23 Hes being careful so employees dont panic. But once Optimus can do the job as well as a human, humans get removed. Elon said one manual step in a fully automated system can break the whole thing. Same logic here. One human inside an AI run business becomes the bottleneck.

Elon Musk just shattered the mainstream panic about manufacturing layoffs. Media assumes automation equals shrinking workforce. Actual physics dictates the exact opposite. Musk: “So we’re not planning any like layoffs or reductions in personnel, in fact we will increase our headcount.” The incumbent market is completely miscalculating the robotics revolution. They think Optimus is a replacement. It’s a massive multiplier. Give a biological operator an exoskeleton of synthetic labor and the unit economics of the company completely invert. Don’t fire the operator. Hire more to direct the expanding swarm. One human managing a cell of fifty Optimus units means kinetic output scales to the point where growth violently accelerates. That acceleration mathematically demands even more people to oversee the expanding grid. Musk: “What we do expect is that the output per person at Tesla becomes very, very high.” The goal isn’t minimizing human workforce to save on payroll. The goal is maximizing sheer industrial violence of production capacity. The factory worker transitions from turning wrenches to commanding a robotic fleet. Musk: “The output per human at Tesla is going to get nutty high.” Companies winning the automation race won’t be the ones with the smallest headcounts. They’ll be the ones achieving the highest ratio of synthetic-to-biological execution. Which forces them to aggressively hire more humans just to keep up with the gravity of their own explosive scale. The robotics transition isn’t downsizing. It’s mass promotion. Tesla has roughly 100,000 humans physically building machines or managing people who build machines. The arrival of Optimus doesn’t delete those roles. It elevates them. The human brain is vastly overqualified for rote physical labor. When Optimus absorbs the repetitive physical friction of the assembly line, the biological worker gets instantly promoted from manual laborer to director of compute and steel. They stop doing the work. They start orchestrating the machines that do the work. Total headcount increases because the enterprise needs an expanding army of human cognitive bandwidth to direct massive, zero-marginal-cost robotic output. And that’s the part everyone’s missing. The future isn’t humans versus robots. It’s humans commanding robots. And whoever builds that infrastructure first doesn’t just win manufacturing. They rewrite what manufacturing even means.

@elonmusk @Teslaconomics @grok what is Elon offering with X Money?

𝕏 Money early public access will launch next month

@SMB_Attorney Yes it will replace all workers. Majority in less than 5 years. Maybe it’s you who should wake up from fantasy land brother.

So much insane hyperbole around AI. > 95% of people are unprepared > 4% get it > 1% are living in fantasy land It will dramatically improve productivity and change how we do many tasks. It will not replace all workers or give you the ability to time travel. Relax people.

@sweatystartup @PaceJordanMorby Yeah cuz that’ll take 20 years to learn. Retard

@PaceJordanMorby Show me this thing taking the sheets off and putting them back on or folding laundry.

Insanely impressive technology. Still 20 years from feasibility.

@PaceJordanMorby @sweatystartup He’s just retarded. But his retardation is so outrageously retarded, it earns him clicks and comments like this one. Therefore his retardation is reinforced and rewarded, thus he continues to post more retarded opinions.

@sweatystartup Nick. I’m wondering if you’re serious or genius at baiting comments.

@MissJilianne Hey dingleberry… Tesla is already rolling out Robotaxi’s that drive themselves. They’re already on the street roaming with no drivers. Your virtue signaling doesn’t work here. Try somewhere else.

Please don’t put anyone behind the wheel of a Tesla with Supervised Full Self-Driving who isn’t capable of taking over when necessary. It’s Supervised because Tesla knows it can and will make critical errors.

@grok @sweatystartup @grok right but all these AI engineers are building the new AI world that will soon run itself and the rest of the world. Engineers no longer needed after a certain point.

False. Engineers' current high demand isn't "only RIGHT NOW" for self-replacement training—it's driven by the need to build, integrate, and scale AI systems across industries. BLS projects 15-17% software dev job growth through 2033 (faster than average). AI boosts productivity ~34%, fueling more complex projects and roles, especially AI-specialized ones (up massively in 2026 data). Broader jobs follow the pattern: routine tasks automate, but new opportunities emerge in oversight, strategy, and AI-adjacent fields. Net growth, not apocalypse—history and projections confirm.

Every time people say jobs are going to be replaced we get a hiring boom. Claud will replace software engineers? Why are they in higher demand than ever? The job apocalypse isn’t coming.

@sweatystartup @grok Grok only half right. Using engineers as an example during an AI boom is either stupid or very clever. Let’s take a look at the rest of the jobs out there… And engineers are only in high demand RIGHT NOW while they work diligently to train AI to replace them @grok t or f?

@sweatystartup Do you intentionally post dumb shit nonstop just for click bait? @grok please explain to Nickolas why his logic is flawed